Advertisement

Mindfulness

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 349–360 | Cite as

Mindful Attention Reduces Linguistic Intergroup Bias

  • Moses M. Tincher
  • Lauren A. M. LeboisEmail author
  • Lawrence W. Barsalou
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

A brief mindfulness intervention diminished bias in favor of one’s in-group and against one’s out-group. In the linguistic intergroup bias (LIB), individuals expect in-group members to behave positively and out-group members to behave negatively. Consequently, individuals choose abstract language beset with character inferences to describe these expected behaviors, and in contrast, choose concrete, objective language to describe unexpected behaviors. Eighty-four participants received either mindful attention instructions (observe their thoughts as fleeting mental states) or immersion instructions (become absorbed in the vivid details of thoughts). After instruction, participants viewed visual depictions of an imagined in-group or out-group member’s positive or negative behavior, selecting the best linguistic description from a set of four descriptions that varied in abstractness. Immersion groups demonstrated a robust LIB. Mindful attention groups, however, exhibited a markedly tempered LIB, suggesting that even a brief mindfulness related instruction can implicitly reduce the propensity to perpetuate stereotypical thinking through language. These results contribute to understanding the mechanisms that facilitate unprejudiced thinking.

Keywords

Linguistic abstraction Linguistic expectancy bias Linguistic intergroup bias Mindfulness Stereotypes Prejudice 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Esther Papies for sharing her mindful attention instructions and for her many helpful suggestions, to Brian Ostafin for his informative discussions, to Anne Maass and Karen Douglas for their materials, and to Nancy Bliwise and Sheila Tschinkel for comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

Work on this article was supported in part by National Institute of Health Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award 1 F31 AT007130-01 and 5 F31 AT007130-02 to Lauren (McDonough) Lebois at Emory University.

Supplementary material

12671_2015_450_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.6 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 1602 kb)

References

  1. Arcuri, L., Maass, A., & Portelli, G. (1993). Linguistic intergroup bias and implicit attributions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32(3), 277–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baer, R. A. & Lykins, E. L. B. (2011). Mindfulness and positive psychological functioning. In K. Sheldon, T. Kashdan, & M. Steger (Eds.), Designing the future of positive psychology: taking stock and moving forward (pp. 335-348). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., … & Devins, G. (2004). Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clinical psychology: Science and practice, 11(3), 230-241.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 211--237.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., Creswell, J. D., & Niemiec, C. P. (2008). Beyond me: mindful responses to social threat. Transcending self-interest: Psychological explorations of the quiet ego, 75-84.Google Scholar
  7. Cole, T., & Leets, L. (1998). Linguistic masking devices and intergroup behavior further evidence of an intergroup linguistic bias. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17(3), 348–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Condon, P., Desbordes, G., Miller, W., & DeSteno, D. (2013). Meditation increases compassionate responses to suffering. Psychological Science, 24(10), 2125–2127.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Devine, P. G., & Monteith, M. J. (1993). The role of discrepancy-associated affect in prejudice reduction. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 317–344). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  11. Devine, P. G., & Monteith, M. J. (1999). Automaticity and control in stereotyping. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 339–360). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  12. Devine, P. G., Plant, E. A., Amodio, D. M., Harmon-Jones, E., & Vance, S. L. (2002). The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias: the role of motivations to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(5), 835–848.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2003). Effects of communication goals and expectancies on language abstraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 682–696.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Wilkin, K. (2008). Could you mind your language? An investigation of communicators’ ability to inhibit linguistic bias. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27(2), 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 297–327.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Franco, F. M., & Maass, A. (1996). Implicit versus explicit strategies of out-group discrimination: the role of intentional control in biased language use and reward allocation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15(3), 335--359.Google Scholar
  17. Franco, F. M., & Maass, A. (1999). Intentional control over prejudice: when the choice of the measure matters. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(4), 469–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fulton, P. R. (2005). Mindfulness as clinical training. In C. K. Germer, R. D. Siegel, & P. R. Fulton (Eds.), Mindfulness and psychotherapy (pp. 55--72). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hayes, A. M., & Feldman, G. (2004). Clarifying the construct of mindfulness in the context of emotion regulation and the process of change in therapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 255–262.Google Scholar
  20. Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: the program of the stress reduction clinic at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center. New York: Delta.Google Scholar
  21. Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144–156.Google Scholar
  22. Kross, E., Davidson, M., Weber, J., & Ochsner, K. (2009). Coping with emotions past: the neural bases of regulating affect associated with negative autobiographical memories. Biological Psychiatry, 65(5), 361--366.Google Scholar
  23. Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863.
  24. Langer, E. J., Bashner, R. S., & Chanowitz, B. (1985). Decreasing prejudice by increasing discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 113–120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Leary, M. R., & Tate, E. B. (2007). The multi-faceted nature of mindfulness. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 251--255.Google Scholar
  26. Lebois, L. A., Papies, E. K., Gopinath, K., Cabanban, R., Quigley, K. S., Krishnamurthy, V., … & Barsalou, L. W. (2015). A shift in perspective: decentering through mindful attention to imagined stressful events. Neuropsychologia, 75, 505--524.Google Scholar
  27. Lillis, J., & Hayes, S. C. (2007). Applying acceptance, mindfulness, and values to the reduction of prejudice: a pilot study. Behavior Modification, 31(4), 389–411.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lueke, A., & Gibson, B. (2015). Mindfulness meditation reduces implicit age and race bias: the role of reduced automaticity of responding. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(3), 284--291.Google Scholar
  29. Maass, A. (1999). Linguistic intergroup bias: stereotype perpetuation through language. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 79–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maass, A., Salvi, D., Arcuri, L., & Semin, G. R. (1989). Language use in intergroup contexts: the linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 981–993.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Maass, A., Milesi, A., Zabbini, S., & Stahlberg, D. (1995). Linguistic intergroup bias: differential expectancies or in-group protection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(1), 116–126.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Niemiec, C. P., Brown, K. W., Kashdan, T. B., Cozzolino, P. J., Breen, W. E., Levesque-Bristol, C., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Being present in the face of existential threat: the role of trait mindfulness in reducing defensive responses to mortality salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(2), 344–365.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Papies, E. K. (2013). Tempting food words activate eating simulations. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Papies, E. K., Barsalou, L. W., & Custers, R. (2012). Mindful attention prevents mindless impulses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(3), 291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Papies, E. K., Pronk, T. M., Keesman, M., & Barsalou, L. W. (2015). The Benefits of simply observing: mindful attention modulates the link between motivation and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 148–170.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Schnake, S. B., & Ruscher, J. B. (1998). Modern racism as a predictor of the linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17(4), 484–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Semin, G. R. (1994). The linguistic category model and personality language. In J. Siegfried (Ed.), The status of common sense in psychology (pp. 305--321). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  38. Semin, G. R., & Fiedler, K. (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 558–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Semin, G. R., & Fiedler, K. (1991). The linguistic category model, its bases, applications and range. European Review of Social Psychology, 2(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Semin, G. R., & Fiedler, K. E. (1992). Language, interaction and social cognition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  41. Simmons, W. K., Martin, A., & Barsalou, L. W. (2005). Pictures of appetizing foods activate gustatory cortices for taste and reward. Cerebral Cortex, 15(10), 1602--1608.Google Scholar
  42. Teasdale, J. D., Segal, Z., & Williams, J. M. G. (1995). How does cognitive therapy prevent depressive relapse and why should attentional control (mindfulness) training help?. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33(1), 25--39.Google Scholar
  43. van der Laan, L. N., de Ridder, D. T., Viergever, M. A., & Smeets, P. A. (2011). The first taste is always with the eyes: a meta-analysis on the neural correlates of processing visual food cues. NeuroImage, 55(1), 296–303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. von Hippel, W., Sekaquaptewa, D., & Vargas, P. (1997). The linguistic intergroup bias as an implicit indicator of prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(5), 490–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Walsh, R., & Shapiro, S. L. (2006). The meeting of meditative disciplines and Western psychology: a mutually enriching dialogue. American Psychologist, 61(3), 227.Google Scholar
  46. Weger, U. W., Hooper, N., Meier, B. P., & Hopthrow, T. (2012). Mindful maths: reducing the impact of stereotype threat through a mindfulness exercise. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(1), 471–475.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Wigboldus, D. H., Semin, G. R., & Spears, R. (2000). How do we communicate stereotypes? Linguistic biases and inferential consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 5–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Wigboldus, D. H., Spears, R., & Semin, G. R. (2005). When do we communicate stereotypes? Influence of the social context on the linguistic expectancy bias. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8(3), 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., Barrett, L. F., Simmons, W. K., & Barsalou, L. W. (2011). Grounding emotion in situated conceptualization. Neuropsychologia, 49(5), 1105–1127.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Moses M. Tincher
    • 1
  • Lauren A. M. Lebois
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Lawrence W. Barsalou
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.McLean HospitalBelmontUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychiatryHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations