Advertisement

Mindfulness

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 27–37 | Cite as

Remembrance of things to come: a conversation between Zen and neuroscience on the predictive nature of the mind

  • Giuseppe Pagnoni
  • Fausto Taiten Guareschi
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

The notion of the brain as a predictive organ following Bayesian principles has been steadily gaining favor in neuroscience. This perspective, which has broad theoretical and applicative consequences, suggests also a novel way to look at the mind-body processes mobilized by meditative practices. In this article, the topic is introduced and subsequently explored as a conversation between a neuroscientist (GP) and the abbot of a Zen Sōtō monastery (FTG). We believe that such ‘mutual perturbations’ between the third-person descriptions provided by scientific research and the phenomenological depth of Buddhist lore have a great potential for advancing our understanding of both brain function and meditation.

Keywords

Predictive coding Meditation Bayes Free energy Autopoiesis Neurophenomenology Zen Zazen 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Tiziana Verde and Omar T. Khachouf for joining the original conversations from which the present article was produced, and for providing their insightful feedback on the early draft of the manuscript. GP would also like to thank Wendy Hasenkamp for her collaboration on an editorial piece for the Mind & Life Institute, where some of these ideas presented here were first discussed.

References

  1. Banich, M. T. (2009). Executive function: the search for an integrated account. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences, 18(2), 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bene, C., & Deleuze, G. (2002). Sovrapposizioni: “Riccardo III” Di Carmelo Bene, “Un Manifesto Di Meno” Di Gilles Deleuze. Macerata: Quodlibet.Google Scholar
  3. Bowker, R. M., & Morrison, A. R. (1976). The startle reflex and PGO spikes. Brain Research, 102(1), 185–190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Braver, T. S. (2012). The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 106–113.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Cabral, J., Kringelbach, M. L., & Deco, G. (2014). Exploring the network dynamics underlying brain activity during rest. Progress in Neurobiology, 114, 102--131.Google Scholar
  6. Cahn, B. R., & Polich, J. (2006). Meditation states and traits: EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies. Psychological Bullettin, 132(2), 180–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Colzato, L. S., Ozturk, A., & Hommel, B. (2012). Meditate to create: the impact of focused-attention and open-monitoring training on convergent and divergent thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 116.Google Scholar
  8. Dietrich, A. (2003). Functional neuroanatomy of altered states of consciousness: the transient hypofrontality hypothesis. Consciousness and Cognition, 12(2), 231–256.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Friston, K., Thornton, C., & Clark, A. (2012). Free-energy minimization and the dark-room problem. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 130.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. German, T. P., & Defeyter, M. A. (2000). Immunity to functional fixedness in young children. Psychonomic Bullettin and Review, 7(4), 707–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guareschi, T. (2013). Fatti Di Nebbia. Padova, Italy: Casadeilibri.Google Scholar
  13. Hobson, J. A., & Friston, K. J. (2012). Waking and dreaming consciousness: neurobiological and functional considerations. Progress in Neurobiology, 98(1), 82–98.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Khachouf, O. T., Poletti, S., & Pagnoni, G. (2013). The embodied transcendental: a Kantian perspective on neurophenomenology. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 611. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00611.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim, H. J. (2004). Eihei Dogen: mystical realist. London: Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar
  17. Kim, H. J. (2007). Dōgen on meditation and thinking: a reflection on his view of Zen. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Limb, C. J., & Braun, A. R. (2008). Neural substrates of spontaneous musical performance: an FMRI study of jazz improvisation. PLoS ONE, 3(2), e1679. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001679.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Lutz, A., & Thompson, E. (2003). Neurophenomenology integrating subjective experience and brain dynamics in the neuroscience of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10(9-10), 31–52.Google Scholar
  21. Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: the realization of the living. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Power, J. D., Schlaggar, B. L., & Petersen, S. E. (2014). Studying brain organization via spontaneous fMRI signal. Neuron, 84, 681--696.Google Scholar
  24. Rodriguez, E., George, N., Lachaux, J. P., Martinerie, J., Renault, B., & Varela, F. J. (1999). Perception’s shadow: long-distance synchronization of human brain activity. Nature, 397(6718), 430–433.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Sadaghiani, S., Hesselmann, G., Friston, K. J., & Kleinschmidt, A. (2010). The relation of ongoing brain activity, evoked neural responses, and cognition. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 4. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2010.00020.
  26. Slingerland, E. (2003). Effortless action: Wu-Wei as conceptual metaphor and spiritual idea in early China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Slingerland, E. (2014). Trying not to try: the art and science of spontaneity. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Stout, D. (2010). The evolution of cognitive control. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(4), 614–630.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Thompson-Schill, S. L., Ramscar, M., & Chrysikou, E. G. (2009). Cognition without control: when a little frontal lobe goes a long way. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 259–263.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Varela, F. J. (1996). Neurophenomenology: a methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3(4), 330–349.Google Scholar
  31. Varela, F. J. (1999). The specious present: a neurophenomenology of time consciousness. In B. Pachoud, J. Petitot, & F. J. Varela (Eds.), Naturalizing phenomenology: issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science (pp. 266–314). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural SciencesUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
  2. 2.Istituto Italiano Zen Sōtō Shōbōzan FudenjiSalsomaggiore TermeItaly

Personalised recommendations