Mindfulness

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 202–207 | Cite as

Dispositional Mindfulness and Bias in Self-theories

  • Adam Hanley
  • Eric Garland
  • Angela Canto
  • Alia Warner
  • Robert Hanley
  • Vincent Dehili
  • Andrew Proctor
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

Mindfulness is theorized to encourage a dispositional quality of nonjudgmental awareness that is incongruent with emotional and cognitive bias. Recent empirical investigations offer evidence supporting the putative negative association between dispositional mindfulness and bias. The present study aimed to test the hypothesized negative relationship between dispositional mindfulness and extreme or biased self-theories with respect to implicit beliefs about the variability of personality and intelligence. One hundred sixty-three young adults completed a measure of dispositional mindfulness followed by a self-theories implicit association test. Results indicate that respondents with less biased self-theories reported higher levels of dispositional mindfulness relative to respondents with more biased beliefs about the variability of intelligence and personality. These findings suggest that mindful individuals may adopt less biased characterizations of the self and maintain self-concepts that are less influenced by past associations or preconceived notions.

Keywords

Mindfulness Bias Self-theories Implicit beliefs Intelligence Personality 

References

  1. Aristotle, & Woods, M. (2005). Eudemian ethics (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association (text revision).Google Scholar
  3. Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Lykins, E., Button, D., Krietemeyer, J., Sauer, S., et al. (2008). Construct validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment, 15(3), 329–342.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrash, J., Asp, E., Markon, K., Manzel, K., Anderson, S. W., & Tranel, D. (2011). Dimensions of personality disturbance after focal brain damage: investigation with the Iowa Scales of Personality Change. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33(8), 833–852.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brinch, C. N., & Galloway, T. A. (2012). Schooling in adolescence raises IQ scores. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(2), 425–430.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 211–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carmody, J., & Baer, R. A. (2008). Relationships between mindfulness practice and levels of mindfulness, medical and psychological symptoms and well-being in a mindfulness-based stress reduction program. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 31, 23–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cleary, T. (1991). An initiation into the heart of Taoism through the authentic Tao Te Ching and the inner teachings of Chuang-tzu. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  9. Djikic, M., Langer, E. J., & Stepleton, S. F. (2008). Reducing stereotyping through mindfulness: effects on automatic stereotype-activated behaviors. Journal of Adult Development, 15, 106–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: their role in motivation, personality, and development. Lillington, NC: Edwards Brothers.Google Scholar
  11. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: the new psychology of success. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  12. Garfield, J. L. (1995). The fundamental wisdom of the middle way: Nagarjuna’s Mulamadhyamakakarika. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Garland, E. L. (2007). The meaning of mindfulness: a second-order cybernetics of stress, metacognition, and coping. Complementary Health Practice Review, 12(1), 15–30.Google Scholar
  14. Garland, E. L., & Howard, M. O. (2013). Mindfulness-oriented recovery enhancement reduces pain attentional bias in chronic pain patients. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 82, 311–318.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Garland, E.L., Boettiger, C.A., Gaylord, S., Chanon, V.W., & Howard, M.O. (2011). Mindfulness is inversely associated with alcohol attentional bias among recovering alcohol-dependent adults. Cognitive Therapy and Research. doi: 10.1007/s10608-011-9378-7
  16. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 17–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gunarantana, H. (1992). Mindfulness in plain English. Boston: Wisdom.Google Scholar
  19. Haimovitz, K., Wormington, S. V., & Corpus, J. H. (2011). Dangerous mindsets: how beliefs about intelligence predict motivational change. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(6), 747–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hanh, T. N. (1998). The heart of the Buddha’s teaching: transforming suffering into peace, joy, and liberation. Berkeley, CA: Parallax.Google Scholar
  21. Holzel, B. K., Lazar, S. W., Gard, T., Schuman-Olivier, Z., Vago, D., & Ott, U. (2011). How does mindfulness meditation work? Proposing mechanisms of action from a conceptual and neural perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(6), 537–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hopwood, C. J., Donnellan, M. B., Blonigen, D. M., Krueger, R. F., McGue, M., Iacono, W. G., et al. (2011). Genetic and environmental influences on personality trait stability and growth during the transition to adulthood: a three-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 545–556.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain and illness. New York: Delacorte.Google Scholar
  24. Kiken, L. G., & Shook, N. J. (2011). Looking up: mindfulness increases positive judgments and reduces negativity bias. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 425–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maier, S. F., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1976). Learned helplessness: theory and evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 105, 3–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McFarlane, T. J. (1995). The meaning of sunyata in Nagarjuna’s philosophy. Available from http://www.integralscience.org/sacredscience/SSsunyata.html. Accessed 5 May 2013
  27. Merton, T. (1955). No man is an island. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
  28. Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). Understanding and using the implicit association test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 166–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., MacCallum, R. C., & Nicewander, W. A. (2005). Use of the extreme groups approach: a critical reexamination and new recommendations. Psychological Methods, 10, 178–192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: a meta- analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 3–27.Google Scholar
  31. Suzuki, S. (1970). Zen mind. Weatherhill, NY: Beginner Mind’s.Google Scholar
  32. Tse, L (2008). Tao Te Ching: of the Tao and its characteristics (James Legge, Trans.). The Floating Press, AucklandGoogle Scholar
  33. Vago, D. R., & Silbersweig, D. A. (2012). Self-awareness, self-regulation, and self-transcendence (S-ART): a framework for understanding the neurobiological mechanisms of mindfulness. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(296), 1–30.Google Scholar
  34. Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam Hanley
    • 1
  • Eric Garland
    • 2
  • Angela Canto
    • 1
  • Alia Warner
    • 1
  • Robert Hanley
    • 3
  • Vincent Dehili
    • 1
  • Andrew Proctor
    • 4
  1. 1.Educational Psychology and Learning SystemsFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  2. 2.Huntsman Cancer InstituteUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  3. 3.AustinTexas
  4. 4.AlpineUtah

Personalised recommendations