, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 86–94 | Cite as

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for the Treatment of Adolescent Depression: A Pilot Study in a Psychiatric Outpatient Setting

  • Louise HayesEmail author
  • Candice P. Boyd
  • Jessica Sewell
Original Paper


Based on promising results with adults, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) presents as a treatment opportunity for depressed adolescents. We present a pilot study that compares ACT with treatment as usual (TAU), using random allocation of participants who were clinically referred to a psychiatric outpatient service. Participants were 30 adolescents, aged M = 14.9 (SD = 2.55), with 73.6% in the clinical range for depression. At posttreatment on measures of depression participants in the ACT condition showed significantly greater improvement statistically (d = 0.38), and 58% showed clinically reliable change with a response ratio of 1.59 in favor of ACT. Outcomes from 3-month follow-up data are tentative due to small numbers but suggest that improvement increased in magnitude. Measures of global functioning showed statistically significant improvement for both conditions, although clinical change measures favored only the ACT condition. The results support conducting a larger trial of ACT for the treatment of adolescent depression.


Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Adolescent psychopathology Adolescent depression 



This research project was funded by beyondblue: the national depression initiative. We would also like to acknowledge Joy Nichols and the staff at Ballarat Health Services Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service (CAMHS) for accommodating the system change required to implement this project.


  1. Agostinis, A., Morley, S. J., & Dowzer, C. N. (2008). The Leeds Reliable Change Index Calculator. Retrieved from (v. 1).
  2. Aldea, M. A., Rice, K. G., Gormley, B., & Rojas, A. (2010). Telling perfectionists about their perfectionism: effects of providing feedback on emotional reactivity and psychological symptoms. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48(12), 1194–1203. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.09.003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beunckensa, C., Molenberghsa, G., & Kenward, M. G. (2005). Direct likelihood analysis versus simple forms of imputation for missing data in randomized clinical trials. Clinical Trials, 2, 379–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(11), 1337–1345.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goodman, R., Ford, T., Richards, H., Gatward, R., & Meltzer, H. (2000). The development and well-being assessment: description and initial validation of an integrated assessment of child and adolescent psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 645–655.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goodman, R., Ford, T., Simmons, H., Gatward, R., & Meltzer, H. (2003a). Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample (Reprinted from The British Journal of Psychiatry, vol 177, pp 534–539, 2000). International Review of Psychiatry, 15(1–2), 166–172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goodman, R., Meltzer, H., & Bailey, V. (2003b). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a pilot study on the validity of the self-report version (Reprinted from European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, vol 7, pp 125–130, 1998). International Review of Psychiatry, 15(1–2), 173–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Greco, L. A. (2006). The ACT for teens program. St Louis: University of Missouri.Google Scholar
  10. Harris, R. (2007). The happiness trap: Stop struggling and start living. Wollombi, NSW: Exisle.Google Scholar
  11. Hawes, D. J., & Dadds, M. R. (2004). Australian data and psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 38(8), 644–651.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hayes, L. L. (2007). Problem behaviours in early primary school children: Australian normative data using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Teacher Reports. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 41, 231–238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hayes, L. L., Bach, P. A., & Boyd, C. P. (2010). Psychological Treatment for Adolescent Depression: Perspectives on the Past, Present, and Future, Behaviour Change, 27(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1375/bech.27.1.1
  14. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hayes, S. C., Bissett, R., Roget, N., Padilla, M., Kohlenberg, B. S., & Fisher, G. (2004a). The impact of acceptance and commitment training on stigmatizing attitudes and professional burnout of substance abuse counselors. Behavior Therapy, 35, 821–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hayes, S. C., Masuda, A., Bissett, R., Luoma, J., & Guerrero, L. F. (2004b). DBT, FAP, and ACT: how empirically oriented are the new behavior therapy technologies? Behavior Therapy, 35, 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(1), 1–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Klasen, H., Woerner, W., Rothenberger, A., & Goodman, R. (2003). The German version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Deu)—Overview over first validation and normative studies. Praxis Der Kinderpsychologie Und Kinderpsychiatrie, 52(7), 491–502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lappalainen, R., Lehtonen, T., Skarp, E., Taubert, E., Ojanen, M., & Hayes, S. C. (2007). The impact of CBT and ACT models using psychology trainee therapists: a preliminary controlled effectiveness trial. Behavior Modification, 31(4), 488–511.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Livheim, F. (2004). Acceptance and commitment therapy in schools to cope with stress and promote health: A randomized controlled trial. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
  22. Malmberg, M., Rydell, A. M., & Smedje, H. (2003). Validity of the Swedish version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Swe). Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 57(5), 357–363.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mellor, D. (2004). Furthering the use of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: Reliability with younger child respondents. Psychological Assessment, 16(4), 396–401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mellor, D. (2005). Normative data for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Australian Psychologist, 40(3), 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Neacsiu, A. D., Rizvi, S. L., & Linehan, M. M. (2010). Dialectical behavior therapy skills use as a mediator and outcome of treatment for borderline personality disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48(9), 832–839. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.05.017.
  26. Reynolds, W. M. (2002). Reynold’s adolescent depression scale—2nd edition: Professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
  27. van Widenfelt, B. M., Goedhart, A. W., Treffers, P. D. A., & Goodman, R. (2003). Dutch version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 12(6), 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Watanabe, N., Hunot, V., Omori, I. M., Churchill, R., & Furukawa, T. A. (2007). Psychotherapy for depression among children and adolescents: A systematic review. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 116(2), 84–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Webb, M. S., de Ybarra, D. R., Baker, E. A., Reis, I. M., & Carey, M. P. (2010). Cognitive behavioral therapy to promote smoking cessation among African American smokers: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(1), 24–33. doi: 10.1037/a0017669 Google Scholar
  30. Weisz, J. R., McCarty, C. A., & Valeri, S. M. (2006). Effects of psychotherapy for depression in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 132–149.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wicksell, R., Melin, L., & Olsson, G. (2007). Exposure and acceptance in the rehabilitation of adolescents with idiopathic chronic pain: A pilot study. European Journal of Pain, 11(3), 267–274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wicksell, R., Melin, L., Lekander, M., & Olsson, G. (2009). Evaluating the effectiveness of exposure and acceptance strategies to improve functioning and quality of life in longstanding pediatric pain: A randomized controlled trial. Pain, 141, 248–257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zettle, R. D. (2007). ACT for depression: A clinician’s guide to using acceptance and commitment therapy in treating depression. Oakland: New Harbinger.Google Scholar
  34. Zettle, R. D., & Hayes, S. C. (1986). Dysfunctional control by client verbal behaviour: The context of reason giving. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 4, 30–38.Google Scholar
  35. Zettle, R. D., & Rains, J. C. (1989). Group cognitive and contextual therapies in treatment of depression. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45(3), 436–445.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louise Hayes
    • 1
    Email author
  • Candice P. Boyd
    • 2
  • Jessica Sewell
    • 1
  1. 1.PsychologyUniversity of Ballarat & Ballarat Health Services CAMHSMount HelenAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Youth Mental Health, Orygen Youth Health Research CentreUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations