Advertisement

Influence of Cross-linking Agents on Drug Delivery Behavior of Magnetic Nanohydrogels Made of Polyvinyl Alcohol and Chitosan

  • Hamidreza ShagholaniEmail author
  • Sayed Mehdi Ghoreishi
  • Reza Rahmatolahzadeh
Article
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

With the purpose of examining cross-linking agents, we used glutaraldehyde and ammonium persulfate to synthesize nanohydrogels based on poly(vinyl alcohol), chitosan, and magnetite nanoparticles. Fe3O4 nanoparticles were produced by coprecipitation in alkaline solution under sonication followed by coating with chitosan. Then, poly(vinyl alcohol) was combined with chitosan in the presence of glutaraldehyde and ammonium persulfate as cross-linking agents. The Fe3O4 nanoparticles had nanoscale size that was confirmed by XRD, SEM, and TEM. VSM measurements showed that all samples were superparamagnetic. Physicochemical properties of nanohydrogels were measured by DLS and zeta potential. The unspecific adsorption and interaction of nanohydrogels with bovine serum albumin and immunoglobulin G were investigated systematically by UV-Vis spectroscopy method. The release profile of nanohydrogels showed that nanohydrogels cross-linked with glutaraldehyde represent more sensitivity to pH. These nanohydrogels had more and faster release in acidic release medium.

Keywords

Fe3O4 nanoparticles Chitosan Poly(vinyl alcohol) Drug delivery Cross-linking agent 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Humans and Animals Statement

None.

Informed Consent

None.

Funding Information

There are no sources of financial funding and support.

References

  1. 1.
    Fu, Y., & Kao, W. J. (2010). Drug release kinetics and transport mechanisms of non-degradable and degradable polymeric delivery systems. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, 7(4), 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blanco, E., Shen, H., & Ferrari, M. (2015). Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery. Nature Biotechnology, 33, 941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kai, M. P., et al. (2015). Evaluation of drug loading, pharmacokinetic behavior, and toxicity of a cisplatin-containing hydrogel nanoparticle. Journal of Controlled Release, 204, 70–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vall, M., et al. (2017). Effects of amine modification of mesoporous magnesium carbonate on controlled drug release. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 524(1), 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Veiseh, O., Gunn, J. W., & Zhang, M. (2010). Design and fabrication of magnetic nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery and imaging. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 62(3), 284–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kamaly, N., et al. (2016). Degradable controlled-release polymers and polymeric nanoparticles: Mechanisms of controlling drug release. Chemical Reviews, 116(4), 2602–2663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alexis, F. (2005). Factors affecting the degradation and drug-release mechanism of poly(lactic acid) and poly[(lactic acid)-co-(glycolic acid)]. Polymer International, 54(1), 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bowers, D. T., Botchwey, E. A., & Brayman, K. L. (2015). Advances in local drug release and scaffolding design to enhance cell Therapy for diabetes. Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews, 21(6), 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Craciun, A. M., et al. (2019). Nitrosalicyl-imine-chitosan hydrogels based drug delivery systems for long term sustained release in local therapy. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 536, 196–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rutkowski, S., et al. (2019). Magnetically-propelled hydrogel particle motors produced by ultrasound assisted hydrodynamic electrospray ionization jetting. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 175, 44–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prabaharan, M. (2015). Chitosan-based nanoparticles for tumor-targeted drug delivery. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 72, 1313–1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shu, X. Z., & Zhu, K. J. (2002). Controlled drug release properties of ionically cross-linked chitosan beads: the influence of anion structure. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 233(1), 217–225.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kamoun, E. A., et al. (2015). Crosslinked poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels for wound dressing applications: A review of remarkably blended polymers. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 8(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang, D., et al. (2015). Carboxyl-modified poly(vinyl alcohol)-crosslinked chitosan hydrogel films for potential wound dressing. Carbohydrate Polymers, 125, 189–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rutkowski, S., et al. (2019). Magnetically-guided hydrogel capsule motors produced via ultrasound assisted hydrodynamic electrospray ionization jetting. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 541, 407–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hu, N., et al. (2017). Forecastable and guidable bubble-propelled microplate motors for cell transport. Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 38(11), 1600795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shagholani, H., Ghoreishi, S. M., & Mousazadeh, M. (2015). Improvement of interaction between PVA and chitosan via magnetite nanoparticles for drug delivery application. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 78, 130–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kayal, S., & Ramanujan, R. V. (2010). Doxorubicin loaded PVA coated iron oxide nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 30(3), 484–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guyomard-Lack, A., et al. (2015). Ion segregation in an ionic liquid confined within chitosan based chemical ionogels. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 17(37), 23947–23951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Farris, S., et al. (2009). Development of polyion-complex hydrogels as an alternative approach for the production of bio-based polymers for food packaging applications: a review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 20(8), 316–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gonçalves, V. L., et al. (2005). Effect of crosslinking agents on chitosan microspheres in controlled release of diclofenac sodium %J. Polímeros., 15, 6–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kumar, P., et al. (2012). Novel high-viscosity polyacrylamidated chitosan for neural tissue engineering: Fabrication of anisotropic neurodurable caffold via molecular disposition of persulfate-mediated polymer slicing and complexation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 13(11), 13966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li, J., et al. (2015). Cross-linking of poly(vinyl alcohol) with N,N′-methylene bisacrylamide via a radical reaction to prepare pervaporation membranes. RSC Advances, 5(26), 19859–19864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shagholani, H., & Ghoreishi, S. M. (2017). Investigation of tannic acid cross-linked onto magnetite nanoparticles for applying in drug delivery systems. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, 39, 88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Khoee, S., Shagholani, H., & Abedini, N. (2015). Synthesis of quasi-spherical and square shaped oligoamino-ester graft-from magnetite nanoparticles: Effect of morphology and chemical structure on protein interactions. Polymer, 56, 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lee, N., et al. (2015). Iron oxide based nanoparticles for multimodal imaging and magnetoresponsive therapy. Chemical Reviews, 115(19), 10637–10689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Laurent, S., et al. (2014). Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for delivery of therapeutic agents: opportunities and challenges. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, 11(9), 1449–1470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kratz, F., & Elsadek, B. (2012). Clinical impact of serum proteins on drug delivery. Journal of Controlled Release, 161(2), 429–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Li, X., et al. (2012). Interaction of bovine serum albumin with self-assembled nanoparticles of 6-O-cholesterol modified chitosan. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 92, 136–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Boyer, C., et al. (2010). The design and utility of polymer-stabilized iron-oxide nanoparticles for nanomedicine applications. Npg Asia Materials, 2, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wu, Y., et al. (2006). Preparation and characterization of chitosan–poly(acrylic acid) polymer magnetic microspheres. Polymer, 47(15), 5287–5294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zou, X., et al. (2015). Preparation and drug release behavior of pH-responsive bovine serum albumin-loaded chitosan microspheres. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 21, 1389–1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hamidreza Shagholani
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sayed Mehdi Ghoreishi
    • 2
  • Reza Rahmatolahzadeh
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Nanoscience and NanotechnologyUniversity of KashanKashanIran
  2. 2.Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of ChemistryUniversity of KashanKashanIran
  3. 3.Tehran Firefighting Center of Applied Science and TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations