Advertisement

BioNanoScience

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 742–751 | Cite as

Effect of Nano-Fertilizer on Seed Germination and First Stages of Bitter Almond Seedlings’ Growth Under Saline Conditions

  • Antar BadranEmail author
  • Igor Savin
Article

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of nano-fertilizer on seed germination and the first stages of bitter almond growth compared to other chemical fertilizers under saline conditions. In this regard, nuts were soaked in salt solutions of NaCl as 1, 3, and 5 ds m−1 for 48 h prior to stratification. Subsequently, the seeds were sown in perlite and treated by different concentrations of urea, ammonium sulfate, and nano-fertilizer at 0, 25, 50, and 100% for each fertilizer under different saline concentrations then stratified at 6 °C for 8 weeks. The treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design in factorial experiment with three replicates and 25 seeds for each. Germination and first stages of growth measurements were estimated. Our results revealed that pre-treating seeds of bitter almond rootstock with 50% of nano-fertilizer under saline conditions markedly increased germination measurements, stem length and diameter, elongation of secondary and primary roots/plant, and number of secondary roots/plant relative to urea and ammonium sulfate fertilizers, thus throughout its vital role in increasing the moisture content of seed which in turn increased germination percentage and rate. Additionally, all the amount of nano-fertilizer was covered by plants via slow and continuous release of fertilizer, therefore producing stronger seedlings. Hence, we can conclude to use the nano-fertilizer nanourea modified with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles as a source for N, P, and Ca nutrients under saline conditions.

Keywords

Nitrogen utilization efficiency Hydroxyapatite Slow release fertilizers Salinity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the cultural affairs and missions’ sector of Ministry of Higher Education (Egypt) for post graduate scholarship of the People’s Friendship University (RUDN University), as well as by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (the Agreement No 02.A30.21.0008).

References

  1. 1.
    Munns, R. (2002). Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant, Cell & Environment, 25, 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gupta, I. C. (1979). Use of saline water in agriculture in arid and semi-arid zones of India (210 pp.). New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zheng, T., Liang, Y. H., Ye, S. H., & He, Z. Y. (2009). Superabsorbent hydrogels as carriers for the controlled-release of urea: experiments and a mathematical model describing the release rate. Biosystems Engineering, 102, 44–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hu, X., Su, F., Ju, X., Gao, B., Oenema, O., Christie, P., Huang, B., Jiang, R., & Zhang, F. (2013). Greenhouse gas emissions from a wheat–maize double cropping system with different nitrogen fertilization regimes. Environmental Pollution, 176, 198–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Al-Zahrani, S. M. (1999). Controlled-release of fertilizers: modelling and simulation. International Journal of Engineering Science, 37, 1299–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hassan, M. M., & El- Azayem, A. I. A. (1990). Differences in salt tolerance of some fruit species. Egyptian Journal of Horticulture, 17, 1–8.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Monreal, C. M., McGill, W. B., & Nyborg, M. (1986). Spatial heterogeneity of substrates: effects of hydrolysis, immobilization and nitrification of urea. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 66(4), 499–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kottegoda, N., Munaweera, I., Madusanka, N., & Karunaratne, Y. (2011). A green slow-release fertilizer composition based on urea-modified hydroxyapatite nanoparticles encapsulated wood. Current Science, 101(1), 73–78.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cabrera, R. I. (1997). Comparative evaluation of nitrogen release patterns controlled-release fertilizers by nitrogen leaching analysis. Horticultural Science, 10(2), 232–234.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heinen, R. B., Ye, Q., & Chaumont, F. (2009). Role of aquaporins in leaf physiology. Journal of Experimental Botany, 11, 2971–2985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khot, L. R., Sankaran, S., Maja, J. M., Ehsani, R., & Schuster, E. W. (2012). Applications of nanomaterials in agricultural production and crop protection: a review. Crop Protection, 35, 64–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Venkatachalam, P., Priyanka, N., Manikandan, K., Ganeshbabu, I., Indiraarulselvi, P., Geetha, N., Muralikrishna, K., Bhattacharya, R. C., Tiwari, M., Sharma, N., & Sahi, S. V. (2017). Enhanced plant growth promoting role of phycomolecules coated zinc oxide nanoparticles with P supplementation in cotton (Gossypiumhirsutum L.). Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 110, 118–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schroeder, J. I., & Hagiwara, S. (1989). Cytosolic calcium regulates ion channels in the plasma membrane of Vicia faba guard cells. Nature, 338, 427–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lahaye, P. A., & Epstien, B. (1971). Calcium and salt tolerance by bean plants. Physiologia Plantarum, 25, 213–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Colmer, T. D., Fan, T. W., RM, H. I., & Lauchli, A. (1996). Interactive effects of Ca2+ and NaCl salinity on the ionic relations and proline accumulation in the primary root-tip of Sorghum bicolor. Physiologia Plantarum, 97, 421–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Subbaiya, R., Priyanka, M., & Masilamani, S. M. (2012). Formulation of green nano-fertilizer to enhance the plant growth through slow and sustained release of nitrogen. Journal of Pharmacy Research, 5(11), 5178–5183.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ayers, R. S., & Westcot, D. W. (1985). Water quality for agriculture (Vol. 29, 107 pp.). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Neilsen, D., Parchomchuk, P., & Hogue, E. J. (1993). Soil and peach seedling responses to soluble phosphorus applied in single or multiple doses. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 24, 881–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yücedağ, C., & CemalGültekin, H. (2011). Effects of cold stratification and sowing time on germination of almond (Amygdaluscommunis L.) and wild almond (Amygdalusorientalis L.) seeds. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(15), 3522–3525.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Miryam, O., Moulay, B., & Narimane, Z. (2015). Effect of salinity on seed germination of Abelmoschusesculentus. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 10, 2014–2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Copeland, L. O., & Mc Donald, M. B. (2001). Principles of seed science and technology (4th ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers 488pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Copeland, L. O., & Mc Donald, M. B. (1995). Principals of seed science and technology (3nd ed.). New York: Chapman and Hall 236 pp.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vashisth, A., & Nagarajan, S. (2010). Effect on germination and early growth characteristics in sunflower (Helianthus annuus) seeds exposed to static magnetic field. Journal of Plant Physiology, 167(2), 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Khodakovskaya, M., Dervishi, E., Mahmood, M., Xu, Y., Li, Z., Watanabe, F., & Biris, A. (2009). Carbon nanotubes are able to penetrate plant seed coat and dramatically affect seed germination and plant growth. ACS Nano, 3(10), 3221–3227.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Panuccio, M. R., Jacobsen, S. E., Akhtar, S. S., & Muscolo, A. (2014). Effect of saline water on seed germination and early seedling growth of the halophyte quinoa. AoB Plants, 6, plu047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lahiani, M. H., Dervishi, E., Chen, J., Nima, Z., Gaume, A., Biris, A. S., & Khodakovskaya, M. V. (2013). Impact of carbon nanotube exposure to seeds of valuable crops. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 5, 7965–7973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zheng, L., Hong, F., Lu, S., & Liu, C. (2005). Effect of nano-TiO2 on strength of naturally aged seeds and growth of spinach. Biological Trace Element Research, 105, 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jianrong, W., Lei, W., Ting, H., Wenchao, L., & Shaowu, X. (2014). Effects of lanthanum on abscisic acid regulation of root growth in Arabidopsis. Journal of Rare Earths, 32, 78–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rains, D. W. (1972). Salt transport by plants in relation to salinity. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 23, 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Flowers, T. J. (2004). Improving crop salt tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55, 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Abd El-Hady, A. M., Aly, M. A., & El-Mogy, M. M. (2003). Effect of some soil conditioners on counteracting the adverse effects of salinity on growth and fruiting of flame seedless vines. Minia Journal of Agricultural Research and Development, 23(4), 699–726.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Almutairi, Z. M. (2016). Effect of nano-silicon application on the expression of salt tolerance genes in germinating tomato (Solanumlycopersicum L.) seedlings under salt stress. Plant Omics, 9, 106–114.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cano, E. A., Bolarin, M. C., Perez-Alfocea, F., & Caro, M. (1991). Effect of NaCl priming on increased salt tolerance in tomato. Journal of Horticultural Science, 66, 621–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Syu, Y. Y., Hung, J. H., Chen, J. C., & Chuang, H. W. (2014). Impact of size and shape of silver nanoparticles on Arabidopsis plant growth and gene expression. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 83, 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mahdiyeh, G., Majid, R., & Bahman, K. (2010). Effect of drought stress induced by polyethylene glycol on seed germination of four wild almond species. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 4(5), 785–791.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Prasad, T. N. V. K. V., Sudhakar, P., Sreenivasulu, Y., Latha, P., Munaswamy, V., Reddy, K. R., Sreeprasad, T. S., Sajanlal, P. R., & Pradeep, T. (2012). Effect of nanoscale zinc oxide particles on the germination, growth and yield of peanut. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 35, 905–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Soliman, A. S. H., El-feky, S. A., & Darwish, E. (2015). Alleviation of salt stress on Moringa peregrina using foliar application of nanofertilizers. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry, 7, 36–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhang, M., Gao, B., Chen, J., & Li, Y. (2015). Effects of graphene on seed germination and seedling growth. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 17, 78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Desert Res. CenterCairoEgypt
  2. 2.Agrarian-Technological InstituteRUDN UniversityMoscowRussia
  3. 3.V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science InstituteMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations