Advertisement

BioNanoScience

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 251–262 | Cite as

Bioactivation of Plane and Patterned PDMS Thin Films by Wettability Engineering

  • M. ScharinEmail author
  • M. Rommel
  • T. Dirnecker
  • J. Marhenke
  • B. Herrmann
  • M. Rumler
  • R. Fader
  • L. Frey
  • M. Herrmann
Article

Abstract

This study shows how surface properties of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) thin films, such as wettability and cellular adhesive behavior, can be influenced by surface modification and patterning, to improve the suitability of such modified PDMS for biomedical applications. For that purpose, different types of PDMS (i.e., soft (S-) and hard (H-) PDMS) and differently patterned surfaces were prepared by a commercially available tool which is originally used to produce patterned PDMS stamps for substrate conformal imprint lithography. To increase surface wettability and cellular adhesive behavior, PDMS surfaces were modified by O2, Ar/O2, Ar, and forming gas (N2/H2) plasma treatment. It is shown that, especially, plasma treatment using N2/H2 is a promising method to modify PDMS surfaces towards enhanced wettability. Such modified PDMS surfaces exhibit water contact angle values (WCA) of nearly 0° and demonstrate enhanced attachment of melanoma cells. Differences between as-prepared and plasma-treated S- and H-PDMS can be observed, where H-PDMS shows smaller WCA than S-PDMS. Even plasma-treated PDMS surfaces, however, exhibit only temporary hydrophilicity, due to hydrophobic recovery. To overcome this problem, plasma-treated PDMS films were stored in ethanol and water, where low and constant WCAs for several months could be achieved. Finally, the influence of surface topography of different patterned PDMS thin films on the adhesion behavior of melanoma cells was investigated. It can be concluded that chemical as well as structural modifications of PDMS enable to gradually control the adhesive properties of cells on their surfaces. This has a high technological impact since regulated and topologically stable adhesion and repulsion of cells by their scaffolds has high potency for in vitro as well as in vivo applications.

Keywords

PDMS Hydrophilicity modification Surface patterning Biocompatibility Cell adhesion 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Aaron Häring for preparing and analyzing of PDMS surfaces, Christian Matthus and Florian Stumpf for AFM analysis, and Philipp Singer for the SEM images. We are also grateful to Christian Maueröder for preparing and culturing of C57BL/6 mouse-derived B16F10 melanoma cells on PDMS. Additionally, we would like to point out the importance of the collaboration with Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Systems and Device Technology (IISB), Germany, and the Department for Internal Medicine 3 and Institute of Clinical Immunology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.

Supplementary material

12668_2014_145_MOESM1_ESM.docx (841 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 841 kb)
12668_2014_145_MOESM2_ESM.docx (130 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 130 kb)
12668_2014_145_MOESM3_ESM.docx (21 kb)
ESM 3 (DOCX 21 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Yim, E., Reano, R., Pang, S., Yee, A., Chen, C., Leong, K. (2005). Nanopattern-induced changes in morphology and motility of smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials, 26, 5405–5413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Choi, H. G., Choi, D. S., Kim, E. W., Jung, G. Y., Choi, J. W., Oh, B. K. (2009). Fabrication of nanopattern by nanoimprint lithography for the application to protein chip. BioChip Journal, 3, 76–811.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yao, J., Le, A. P., Gray, S. K., Moore, J. S., Rogers, J. A., Nuzzo, R. G. (2010). Functional nanostructured plasmonic materials. Advanced Materials, 22, 1102–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Curtis, A. G. S., & Varde, M. (1964). Control of cell behavior: topological factors. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 33, 15–26.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Flemming, R., Murphy, C., Abrams, G., Goodman, S., Nealey, P. (1999). Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. Biomaterials, 20, 573–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Truskett, V. N., & Watts, M. P. (2006). Trends in imprint lithography for biological applications. Trends in Biotechnology, 24, 312–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tan, H. M., Fukuda, H., Akagi, T., Ichiki, T. (2007). Surface modification of poly(dimethylsiloxane) for controlling biological cells’ adhesion using a scanning radical microjet. Thin Solid Films, 515, 5172–5178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li, X., Wu, N., Rojanasakul, Y., Liu, Y. (2013). Selective stamp bonding of PDMS microfluidic devices to polymer substrates for biological applications. Sensors and Actuators A, 193, 186–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    El Rassi, Z., Zhou, J., Ellis, A. V., Voelcker, N. H. (2010). Recent developments in PDMS surface modification for microfluidic devices. Electrophoresis, 31, 2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rosenman, G., & Aronov, D. (2006). Wettability engineering and bioactivation of hydroxyapatite nanoceramics. 2006 NSTI Nanotechnology Conference and Trade Show - NSTI Nanotech 2006 Technical Proceedings, 2, 91–94.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Israelachvili, J. N. (2011). Intermolecular & surface forces (3rd ed.). San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tantra, R., & Cooper, J. (2002). Imaging of protein arrays and gradients using softlithography and biochip technology. Sensors and Actuators B, 82, 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guo, L., Guvanasen, G. S., Liu, X., Tuthill, C., Nichols, T. R., DeWeerth, S. P. (2013). A PDMS-based integrated stretchable microelectrode array (isMEA) for neural and muscular surface interfacing. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, 7, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tu, Q., Wang, J. C., Zhang, Y., Liu, R., Liu, W., Ren, L., et al. (2012). Surface modification of poly(dimethylsiloxane) and its applications in microfluidics-based biological analysis. Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 31, 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhou, J., Khodakov, D. A., Ellis, A. V., Voelcker, N. H. (2012). Surface modification for PDMS-based microfluidic devices. Electrophoresis, 33, 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bodas, D., Rauch, J. Y., Khan-Malek, C. (2008). Surface modification and aging studies of addition-curing silicone rubbers by oxygen plasma. European Polymer Journal, 44, 2130–2139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gomathi, N., Sureshkumar, A., Neogi, S. (2008). RF plasma-treated polymers for biomedical applications. Current Science, 94, 1478.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fritz, J. L., & Owen, M. J. (1995). Hydrophobic recovery of plasma-treated polydimethylsiloxane. Journal of Adhesion, 54, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Owen, M. J., & Smith, P. J. (1994). Plasma treatment of polydimethylsiloxane. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 8, 1063–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hino, T., Igarashi, Y., Ymauchi, Y., Nishikawa, M. (2008). Surface wettability of silicon rubber after irradiation with a glow discharge plasma. Vacuum, 83, 506–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Verschuuren, M. A. (2010). Substrate conformal imprint lithography for nanophotonics. Dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fader, R., Schmitt, H., Rommel, M., Bauer, A. J., Frey, L., Ji, R., et al. (2012). Novel organic polymer for UV-enhanced substrate conformal imprint lithography. Microelectronic Engineering, 98, 238–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schmid, H., & Michel, B. (2000). Siloxane polymers for high-resolution, high-accuracy soft lithography. Macromolecules, 33, 3042–3049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Esteves, A., Brokken-Zijp, J., Laven, J., Huinink, H., Reuvers, N., Van, M., et al. (2009). Influence of cross-linker concentration on the cross-linking of PDMS and the network structures formed. Polymer, 50, 3955–3966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Choi, K. M., & Rogers, J. A. (2003). A photocurable poly(dimethylsiloxane) chemistry designed for soft lithographic molding and printing in the nanometer regime. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 125, 4060–4061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mittal, K. L. (2009). Contact angle, wettability and adhesion (Vol. 6). Leiden: VSP/Brill.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kaelble, D. H. (1970). Dispersion-polar surface tension properties of organic solids. Journal of Adhesion, 2, 66–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Owens, D. K. (1969). Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 13, 1741–1747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pinto, S., Alves, P., Matos, C. M., Santos, A. C., Rodrigues, L. R., Teixeira, J. A., et al. (2010). Poly(dimethyl siloxane) surface modification by low pressure plasma to improve its characteristics towards biomedical applications. Colloids and Surfaces, B: Biointerfaces, 81, 20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Quéré, D. (2008). Wetting and roughness. Annual Review of Materials Research, 38, 71–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sia, S. K., & Whitesides, G. M. (2003). Microfluidic devices fabricated in poly(dimethylsiloxane) for biological studies. Electrophoresis, 24, 3563–3576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wenzel, R. N. (1936). Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 28, 988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cassie, A. B. D., & Baxter, S. (1944). Wettability of porous surfaces. Transactions of the Faraday Society, 40, 546–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bushan, B., & Jung, Y. C. (2006). Micro- and nanoscale characterization of hydrophobic and hydrophilic leaf surfaces. Nanotechnology, 17, 2758–2772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lundgren, M., Allan, N. L., Cosgrove, T. (2003). A molecular dynamics study of wetting of a pillar-surface. Langmuir, 19, 7127–7129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lundgren, M., Allan, N. L., Cosgrove, T. (2007). Modeling of wetting: a study of nanowetting at rough and heterogeneous surfaces. Langmuir, 23, 1187–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Extrand, C. W. (2004). Criteria for ultralyophobic surfaces. Langmuir, 20, 5013–5018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Scharin
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  • M. Rommel
    • 2
  • T. Dirnecker
    • 1
  • J. Marhenke
    • 1
  • B. Herrmann
    • 2
  • M. Rumler
    • 2
    • 4
  • R. Fader
    • 2
    • 4
  • L. Frey
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  • M. Herrmann
    • 3
  1. 1.Chair of Electron DevicesUniversity of Erlangen-NurembergErlangenGermany
  2. 2.Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Systems and Device Technology (IISB)ErlangenGermany
  3. 3.Department for Internal Medicine 3 and Institute of Clinical ImmunologyUniversity of Erlangen-NurembergErlangenGermany
  4. 4.Erlangen Graduate School in Advanced Optical Technologies (SAOT)ErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations