Friction Stir Welding of Copper: Numerical Modeling and Validation

  • Pankaj Sahlot
  • Amit Kumar Singh
  • Vishvesh J. Badheka
  • Amit AroraEmail author
Technical Paper


High thermal and electrical conductivities, corrosion resistance and relatively good strength lead to use of copper and its alloys for several engineering applications. Copper alloys also find application in the nuclear industry for manufacturing storage canisters for spent nuclear fuel. Conventional fusion welding of copper and its alloys is difficult due to high-energy input requirement and various weld defects such as porosity, solidification cracks and distortion. Friction stir welding (FSW) has been proposed as an alternative way of joining copper as it is a solid-state joining process avoiding most of the fusion welding defects. Numerical models are very useful in understanding a welding process, and various models have been developed for FSW of steels, aluminum and titanium alloys. However, such models are not available for copper and its alloys. Here we present a three-dimensional heat transfer numerical model for FSW of copper. The model uses finite element method to calculate the three-dimensional distribution of temperature due to frictional heat generation at the tool and workpiece interface. The computed results are validated with the measured temperatures using a thermocouple near the tool shoulder. The experimentally welded samples are found to be defect free and acceptable based on radiographic testing. The tensile strength of these samples is measured and compared with strength of the base material. The variation in the peak temperature and weld joint strength is studied as a function of the rotation speed. This validated numerical model can be developed further by including material flow calculation for joining of copper.


Copper Friction stir welding Heat transfer Numerical modeling Tensile strength 



The authors would like to acknowledge the support from the administration and staff at PDPU, Gandhinagar, and IIT Gandhinagar for this collaborative research work. One of the authors would also like to thank Board for Research in Fusion Science and Technology (BRFST), Institute for Plasma Research (IPR), Gandhinagar, for sponsoring the research project via Project No. NFP/MAT/A10/04. Authors would also like to show gratitude to the Board for Research in Nuclear Sciences (BRNS), (Project No. 36(2)/20/02/2014-BRNS/). Authors are also grateful to Mr. Gaurang Joshi, Ph.D. scholar at SoT, PDPU, for his help and support in conducting FSW experiments.


  1. 1.
    Davis J R, Copper and Copper Alloys, ASM International (2001).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lin J -W, Chang H -C, and Wu M -H, J Manuf Process 16 (2014) 296–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee W -B, and Jung S -B, Mater Lett 58 (2004) 1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chao Y J, Qi X, Tang W, J Manuf Sci Eng 125 (2003) 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mishra R S, and Mahoney M W, Friction stir welding and processing, ASM International (2007).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aydin H, Tutar M, Durmuş A, Bayram A, and Sayaca T, Trans Indian Inst Met 65 (2012) 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mastanaiah P, Sharma A, and Reddy GM, Trans Indian Inst Met 69 (2016) 1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cavaliere P, Squillace A, and Panella F, J Mater Process Technol 200 (2008) 364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barenji R V, Trans Indian Inst Met 69 (2015) 1.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumar K, and Kailas S V, Mater Des 29 (2008) 791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang Z, and Zhang H W, J Mater Process Technol 209 (2009) 241–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mishra R S, and Ma Z Y, Mater Sci Eng R Rep 50 (2005) 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shiraly M, Shamanian M, Toroghinejad M R, Jazani M A, and Sadreddini S, Trans Indian Inst Met 70 (2017) 2205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Babajanzade Roshan S, Behboodi Jooibari M, Teimouri R, Asgharzadeh-Ahmadi G, Falahati-Naghibi M, and Sohrabpoor H, Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69 (2013) 1803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ghetiya N D, Patel K M, and Kavar A J, Trans Indian Inst Met 69 (2016) 917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Arora A, De A, and DebRoy T, Scr Mater 64 (2011) 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tutum C, Schmidt H, and Hattel J, TCN CAE 2008 (2008) 6.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang V, and Zhang H W, Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37 (2007) 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jacquin D, de Meester B, Simar A, Deloison D, Montheillet F, and Desrayaud C, J Mater Process Technol 211 (2011) 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nandan R, Roy G G, Lienert T J, and Debroy T, Acta Mater 55 (2007) 883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhu X K, and Chao Y J, J Mater Process Technol 146 (2004) 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Arora A, Zhang Z, De A, and DebRoy T, Scr Mater 61 (2009) 863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yang C, Int J Heat Mass Transf 76 (2014) 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Al-Badour F, Merah N, Shuaib A, and Bazoune A, J Mater Process Technol 213 (2013) 1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lorrain O, Favier V, Zahrouni H, and Lawrjaniec D, J Mater Process Technol 210 (2010) 603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Xiao Y, Zhan H, Gu Y, and Li Q, Int J Heat Mass Transf 104 (2017) 288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Song M, and Kovacevic R, Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43 (2003) 605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Indian Institute of Metals - IIM 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pankaj Sahlot
    • 1
    • 2
  • Amit Kumar Singh
    • 1
  • Vishvesh J. Badheka
    • 2
  • Amit Arora
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Advanced Materials Processing Research Group, Materials Science and EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology GandhinagarGandhinagarIndia
  2. 2.School of TechnologyPandit Deendayal Petroleum UniversityGandhinagarIndia

Personalised recommendations