Advertisement

Microinclusion Evaluation Using Various Standards

  • P. Pavan KumarEmail author
  • G. Balachandran
Technical Paper
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

A comparison has been made on inclusion rating of steels using various inclusion standards including ASTM E45, DIN 50602, JIS G0555, ISO 4967:2013 (E), IS4163:2004, GOST 1778-70 and ASTM E2283 Murakami’s extreme value analysis. Eight different steels were prepared and subjected to investigation as per the standards chosen. The study brings out the relative rating measure in the various standards. The extreme value analysis could be effectively used to find the largest macro-oxide inclusion within a given size range, which had potential for initiation of fatigue failure in the steel. The inclusions found using extreme value analysis were characterized by SEM–EDS to understand the type of inclusions.

Keywords

Nonmetallic inclusions Extreme value statistics Gumbel distribution Murakami model Scanning electron microscope 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work is carried out as a part of Master degree program assigned by the Andhra University College of Engineering, Visakhapatnam. The support given by Mr C Rajagopal, Mrs Deepa Rajan, Ms V Madhuri and B Gobinath in characterization in optical and SEM is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would like to thank the Senior Management of JSW steel Salem Works for the support and encouragement to complete this work.

References

  1. 1.
    ASTM E45 (American standard), Standard test methods for determining the inclusion content of steel. ASTM International, (EDT 2009).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    JIS G0555 (Japan standard), Microscopic testing method for the nonmetallic inclusions in steel, (EDT 2015).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ISO 4967:2013 (International standard), Steel- Determination of content of nonmetallic Inclusions-Micrographic method using standard diagrams, (EDT 2013).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    IS 4163:2004 (Indian standard), Determination of content of nonmetallic Inclusions-Micrographic method using standard diagrams, (EDT 2004).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    DIN 50602 (German standard), Microscopic examinations of special steels using standard diagrams to assess the content of nonmetallic inclusions, (EDT 1985).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    GOST 1778-70 Metallographic methods of determination of nonmetallic inclusions, (EDT 1971).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gumbel E J, Statistics of Extremes, Columbia University press, New York (1957).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Murakami Y, J Res Natl Standard 99 (1994) 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Murakami Y, Kodama S, and Konuma S, J Fatigue II 5 (1989) 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miller K J, Fatigue Fract. Eng Mater Struct 16 (1993) 931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Murakami Y, Metal Fatigue, Inclusions, YokendoLtd, Tokyo (1993).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Murakami Y, Eng Fract Mech 22 (1985) 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beretta S, and Murakami Y, Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 21 (1998) 1049.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    ASTM E 2283(American standard), Standard practice for extreme value analysis of nonmetallic inclusions in steel and other micro structural features, (EDT 2008).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shi G, Atkinson H V, Sellars C M, and Anderson C W, Acta Mater 47 (1999) 1455.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    ASTM E178-08(American standard), Standard practice for dealing with outlying observations, (EDT 2008).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang J M, Influence of inclusion size on fatigue behavior of high strength steels in the giga cycle fatigue regime, (2006).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Murakami Y, Quantitative evaluation of effects of nonmetallic inclusions on fatigue strength of high strength steels. II: Fatigue limits evaluation based on statistics for extreme values of inclusion size, (1989).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lambrighs K, Influence of non-metallic inclusions on the fatigue properties of heavily cold drawn steel wires, (2010).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Indian Institute of Metals - IIM 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Andhra University College of EngineeringVisakhapatnamIndia
  2. 2.JSW Steel LimitedSalemIndia

Personalised recommendations