Blast Furnace Performance Under Varying Pellet Proportion
- 34 Downloads
As a promising method to strengthen the blast furnace smelting and to realize reduced fuel operation, high-proportion pellet charging has become the practice of BF ironmaking. Use of pellet gives rise to uniform bed permeability in comparison with iron ore or sinter. This leads to better gas–solid contact resulting in higher productivity at reduced coke and fuel rate. To achieve the desired gas flow distribution, the burden distribution is changed so that the rollability of pellets is encountered and furnace is maintained in stable condition. This paper discusses the effect of pellet charging proportion on working indices, gas utilization, permeability, fuel rate and production rate of blast furnace. The present work is made to understand the effect of replacing the iron ore proportionately by pellets. An attempt is made to understand the effect of increasing the pellet per cent of the burden charge on the blast furnace process parameters. The results are based on the effect observed in the blast furnace operation.
KeywordsBlast furnace Burden Pellet Burden distribution Gas permeability Gas efficiency Above burden probe Working index
We would like to acknowledge the entire BF operation and technology group of Tata Steel Jamshedpur for extending their operational knowledge. We are also grateful to Automation Division Jamshedpur for providing us the opportunity to carry out the above work.
- 1.Biswas A K, Principles of Blast Furnace Ironmaking: Theory and Practice, 1981.Google Scholar
- 3.Agrawal A, Agarwal M K, Kothari A K, and Mallick S, Ironmak Steelmak (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/03019233.2017.1353765.
- 5.Agrawal A, Vishwakarma R K, Tripathi V R, Kothari A K , Prasad B, Kumar J, Ghosh U, Tiwari M, Kundu S, Agarwal M K, and Murthy G S R, Ironmak Steelmak (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/03019233.2017.1400732.
- 7.Mitra T, Mondal D N, Petterson F, and Saxen H, Comput Methods Mater Sci 13 (2013) 99.Google Scholar
- 10.Kurunov I F, Ermolaev V V, Pleshkov V I, Isteev A I, and Dobroskok V A, Mosc Inst Steel Alloys Trans Metallurg 3 (1978) 12.Google Scholar
- 11.Tarakanov A K, Bochka V V, Nemchenko S Z, Taranets A I, Neskorodev A S, Grinshtein N S, Taranovkii V V, and Marder B F, Dnepropetrovsk Metall Institute Trans Metallurg 7 (1979) 21.Google Scholar
- 14.Tarakanov A K, Bochka V V, Nemchenko S Z, Grinshtein N S, Taranets A I, Dyshlevich I I, Taranovkii V V, and Marder B F, Dnepropetrovsk Metallurg Inst Trans Metallurg 9 (1985) 9.Google Scholar
- 15.Eklund N, Lindblom B, Wikstrom J O, and Bjorkman B, Steel Res Int Process Metall 80 (2009) 379.Google Scholar
- 20.Trans ISIJ 26 (1986) 841.Google Scholar
- 22.Fukushima T, Furukawa T, Yamada Y, et al. Trans ISIJ 22 (1982) 807.Google Scholar
- 23.Fu D, Chen Y, Rahman M T, and Zhou C Q, in AISTech 2011 Proceedings 1 (2011) 695.Google Scholar
- 24.Guha M, Rai S, Agarwal M K, and Ramna R V, in AISTech 2013 Proceedings 1 (2013) 657.Google Scholar
- 25.Guha M, Ironmak Steelmak (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/03019233.2017.1338385.
- 26.Martín R D, Mochón J, Verdeja L F, Barea R, Rusek P, and Jiménez J, Steel Res Int 80 (2009) 185.Google Scholar
- 27.Martín R D, Mochón J, Verdeja L F, Barea R, Rusek P, and Jiménez J, Steel Res Int 80 (2009) 194.Google Scholar
- 31.Sibagatullin S K, Kharchenko A S, Devyatchenko L D, and Steblyanko V L, J Chem Technol Metall 52 (2017) 694.Google Scholar