Advertisement

Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals

, Volume 71, Issue 12, pp 3111–3116 | Cite as

Numerical Analysis of Effect of Temperature on Ball Indentation Behaviour of Armox500T and IN718

  • Ambuj Saxena
  • A. Kumaraswamy
Technical Paper
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Temperature dependence of ball indentation behaviour of Armox500T and IN718 in terms of Meyer’s hardness, constraint factor (CF) and pile-up around indentation as a function of average strain at ambient temperature and elevated temperature (673 K) has been analysed using FEA. Subsequently, FE model has been validated by experimental data for IN718 and Armox500T. The value of CF for Armox500T and IN718 at RT is found to be 2.80 and 2.75, respectively. The CF value is increased to 3.66 and 3.41, respectively, at 673 K indicating the dependence of temperature. It is also observed that pile-up at a given strain for Armox500T is higher (low strain hardening) compared to IN718 (high strain hardening) under static indentation conditions. The FEA results are in good agreement with expansion cavity model and fully plastic model.

Keywords

Constraint factor FEA Spherical indentation Elasto-plastic deformation Pile-up 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Vice Chancellor, DIAT (DU), Pune for permitting him to publish this paper in the journal. The authors are also thankful to Director, DMRL, Hyderabad for extending the facilities for conducting a number of experiments. Acknowledgements are also due to the scientists and technical staff from Armor division, DMRL, Hyderabad.

References

  1. 1.
    Johnson K L, Contact Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee C H, Masaki S, and Kobayashi S, Int J Mech Sci 14 (1972) 417IN1421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tabor D, The Hardness of Metals, Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Francis H A, J Eng Mater Technol Trans ASME 98 (1976) 272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tirupataiah Y, and Sundararajan G, Process Mater Sci Eng 91 (1987) 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tirupataiah Y, and Sundararajan G, Metall Trans A 22 (1991) 2375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moteff J, Bhargava R K, and Mccullough W L, Metall Trans A 6 (1975) 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Patnaik M N M, Narasimhan R, and Ramamurty U, Acta Mater 52 (2004) 3335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tirupataiah Y, and Sundararajan G, J Mech Phys Solids 39 (1991) 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xu Z, and Huang F, Acta Mech Solida Sin 25 (2012) 598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kumaraswamy A, and Rao V V, Mater Sci Eng A 527 (2010) 6230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saxena A, Kumaraswamy A, Sethi S, Reddy G M, and Madhu V, J Mater Eng Perform.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3487-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Johnson K L, J Mech Phys Solids 18 (1970) 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Richmond O, Int J Mech Sci 16 (1974) 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Barényi I, Híreš O, and Lipták P, Problemy Mechatroniki: uzbrojenie, lotnictwo, inżynieriabezpieczeństwa 4 (2013) 7.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kumaraswamy A, and Venkataraman B, Scr Mater 54 (2006) 493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li W, Zeng F, Chen G, Deng Y, Liu G, Zhang X, Bezold A, and Broeckmann C, Int J Press Vessels Pip 162 (2018) 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Saxena A, Rai A, and Kumaraswamy A, Trans Indian Inst Met 70 (2017) 1549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sundararajan G, and Tirupataiah Y, Bull Mater Sci 17 (1994) 747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Indian Institute of Metals - IIM 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringDefence Institute of Advanced Technology (DU)PuneIndia

Personalised recommendations