Advertisement

Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals

, Volume 72, Issue 1, pp 123–132 | Cite as

Effect of Grain Refinement on Corrosion Rate, Mechanical and Machining Behavior of Friction Stir Processed ZE41 Mg Alloy

  • M. Venkataiah
  • T. Anup KumarEmail author
  • K. Venkata Rao
  • S. Anand Kumar
  • I. Siva
  • B. Ratna SunilEmail author
Technical Paper
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of the present work is to modify the microstructure of ZE41 Mg alloy by friction stir processing (FSP) and to study the influence of microstructure on the corrosion, mechanical and machining behavior. Microstructural observations revealed the prevalence of grain refinement from ≈ 100 to 3.5 µm. The compound present at the grain boundary was observed to have decreased to a great extent after FSP suggesting the formation of supersaturated grains. Hardness measurements indicated increased hardness after FSP which was attributed to grain refinement effect. Tensile tests showed increased yield strength after FSP without altering the percentage of elongation which was due to the grain boundary strengthening. Corrosion performance of FSPed ZE41 was found to be similar compared with ZE41 due to the synergy of grain refinement, decreased amount of secondary phase and development of supersaturated grains. Grain size was observed as significant factor on machining characteristics as observed from improved machinability for FSPed ZE41 during drilling experiments. It was learnt from the current work that the grain-refined supersaturated ZE41 Mg alloy could be produced through FSP with better mechanical and machining behavior without deteriorating the corrosion performance.

Keywords

Mg alloy FSP Fine grains Tensile strength Corrosion resistance Machining 

References

  1. 1.
    Friedrich H E, and Mordike B L, Magnesium Technology, vol 788, Springer, Berlin (2006).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mordike B L, and Ebert T, Mater Sci Eng A, 302 (2001) 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Valiev R, Nat Mater 3 (2004) 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mishra R S, and Ma Z, Mater Sci Eng R 50 (2005) 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bobby Kannan M, Dietzel W, and Zettler R, J Mater Sci Mater Med 22 (2011) 2397.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ratna Sunil B, Sampath Kumar T S, and Chakkingal U, Mater Sci Forum 710 (2012) 264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mishra R S, De P, and Kumar N, Friction Stir Welding and Processing: Science and Engineering, Springer (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saikrishna N, Pradeep Kumar Reddy G, Munirathinam B, and Ratna Sunil B, J Magnes Alloys 4 (2016) 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krook M, Recina V, and Karlsson B, in Superalloys 718, 625, 437 706 and Derivatives, (eds) Loria E A, TMS, The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society (2005) 613.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu Q, Zhang Q, Zhang M, and Zhang J, Proc Imeche Part B J Eng Manuf (2015) 1.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lapovok R, Molotnikov A, Levin Y, Bandaranayake A, and Estrin Y, J Mater Sci 47 (2012) 4589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Surya Kiran G, Hari Krishna K, Sameer S K, Bhargavi M, Santosh Kumar B, Mohana Rao G, Naidubabu Y, Dumpala R, and Ratna Sunil B, Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 27 (2017) 804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hemendra P, Ravikumar D, and Ratna Sunil B, Trans Indian Inst Met 71 (2018) 951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Polmear I, Light Alloys: From Traditional Alloys to Nanocrystals, Elsevier (2006).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    ASTM Standard E8/E8M-11, Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken (2009).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mansfeld F, in Advances in Corrosion Science and Engineering, (eds) Fontana M G, and Staehle R W, New York, Plenum Press (1976).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Neil W, Forsyth M, Howlett P, Hutchinson C, and Hinton R, Corros Sci 51 (2009) 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Clark J B, Zabdyr L, and Moser Z, in Phase Diagrams of Binary Magneisium Alloys, 2nd edn, (eds) Massalski T B, Okamoto H, Subramanian P R, Kacprzak L, ASM International, Ohio, USA, (1990).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Park S H, Sato Y S, and Kokawa H, Metal Mater Trans A 34 (2003) 987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Han J, Chen J, Peng L, Zheng F, Rong W, Wu Y, and Ding W, Mater Des 94 (2016) 186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ratna Sunil B, Sampath Kumar T S, Chakkingal U, Nandakumar V, and Doble M, J Mater Sci Mater Med 25 (2014) 975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Saikrishna N, Pradeep Kumar Reddy G, Munirathinam B, Dumpala R, Jagannatham M, and Ratna Sunil B, J Magnes Alloys 6 (2018) 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhao M, Liu, M, Song G, and Atrens A, Adv Eng Mater 10 (2008) 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Indian Institute of Metals - IIM 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringVignan’s Foundation for Science, Technology and ResearchVadlamudiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringKoneru Lakshmaiah Education FoundationVaddeswaramIndia
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology JammuJammuIndia
  4. 4.Center for Composite MaterialsKalasalingam UniversityKrishnankoilIndia
  5. 5.Department of Mechanical EngineeringBapatla Engineering CollegeBapatlaIndia

Personalised recommendations