Characterization of High Strength Stainless Steel/Al/Brass Composite Tri-layered Clad
- 205 Downloads
Abstract
Delamination is a major limitation of lamellar composite structures in general, wherein interface/interphase control is a major factor. Studying/investigating the mitigation of cracks as well as toughening mechanisms is paramount to establish the control of interface/interphase kinetics. Stainless steel 316, Al 6082, CU–Zn sandwich laminate composite-sheets, in a foil–foil processing technique, were fabricated by means of hot uniaxial pressing. A parametric study was introduced using temperature and pressure effects on the composite specimens. The composite-sheet interface and its bond strength were investigated using scanning electron microscopy and tensile test. Microstructural as well as mechanical characterization, were established via optical and scanning electron microscopy; energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and mechanical testing. Mechanical characterization of the interfacial shear strength is investigated using hardness testing. The interphase kinetic behavior is observed through localized micro plasticity, metal flow and delocalized Al oxide and Mg oxide. Results showed that low temperature heat treatment can improve the morphology of stainless steel 316, Al 6082, CU–Zn interface and increase its bond strength. Alloying element segregation with diffusion mechanisms induced the formation of localized metal flow along with the interface. Alloy segregation during solidification in a semisolid state processing induces directional solidification with fibrous entities and oxides on structural interphase. For the stainless steel 316, Al 6082, Cu–Zn composite, the reasonable heat treatment is approximately 823 K for 1 and 3 h.
Keywords
Metal-matrix composites (MMCs) Interface Sandwich structures Laminate Isostatic pressingReferences
- 1.He P, Yue X, and Zhang J H, Mater Sci Eng A 486 (2008) 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Yang X W, Lai Z H, Zhu J C, Liu Y, and He D, Mater Sci Eng B 177 (2012) 1721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Guo X, Tao J, Wang W, Li H, and Wang C, Mater Des 49 (2013) 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Ouyang J, Yarrapareddy E, and Kovacevic R, J Mater Process Technol 172 (2006) 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Mileiko S T, Compos Sci Technol 64 (2005) 2500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Lee W-B, Bang K-S, and Jung S-B, J Alloys Compd 390 (2005) 212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Yan H, and Lenard J G, Mater Sci Eng A 385 (2004) 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Lee M H, Kim J J, Kim KH, Kim N J, Lee S, and Lee E W, Mater Sci Eng A 340 (2003) 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Yang C, Hu D, Wu X, Huang A, and Dixon M, Mater Sci Eng A 534 (2012) 268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Eizadjou M, Kazemi Talachi A, Danesh Manesh H, Shakur Shahabi H, and Janghorban K, Compos Sci Technol 68 (2008) 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Ferreira R A S, Arvieu C, and Quenisset J M, Scripta Mater 53 (2005) 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Luo J-G, and Acoff V L, Mater Sci Eng A 379 (2004) 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Yamanoğlu R, Karakulak E, Zeren A, and Zeren M, Mater Des 49 (2013) 820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Che H Q, and Fan Q C, J Alloys Compd 475 (2009) 184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Lee K S, Kim J S, Jo Y M, Lee, Heo J, Chang Y W, and Lee Y S, Mater Charact 75 (2013) 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Liang Y, Han Z, Zhang Z, Li X, and Ren L, Mater Des 40 (2012) 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.ASTM E8/E8M-11 Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials, ASTM volume metals—mechanical testing; Elevated and Low-Temperature Tests; Metallography (2010).Google Scholar