Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, 78:665 | Cite as

Modeling of geochemical processes and multivariate statistical analysis for hydrochemical assessment of spring water of the Outer Himalaya, India

  • Md. Arzoo Ansari
  • Archana DeodharEmail author
  • U. Saravana Kumar
Original Article
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

Water resources in the Himalayan region are under stress because of the changes in land use and land cover pattern and climate. In the recent past, the region has encountered extreme events such as cloud burst and widespread flooding. In this reference, this study was conducted on the spring water resources in the outer Himalayan region to assess their quality and quantity. The main geochemical processes and the impact of anthropogenic forcing on water chemistry were deciphered using geochemical modeling tools, multivariate statistical analysis and graphic plots. The hierarchical cluster analyses were used to categorize the springs in two clusters based on their chemical characteristics. The principal component analysis was used to evaluate the effective loading of spring water. Hydrochemical data, ionic ratios and geochemical modeling using PHREEQC were used to confirm the processes that govern the chemistry of the spring water. The results indicate that silicate weathering and anthropogenic activities are the dominant processes controlling the chemical evolution of spring water in the region. This study will provide a better insight for understanding the spring water resources and their sustainable management in the Himalayan region.

Keywords

Groundwater Geochemical evolution Multivariate statistical analysis Modeling The Himalayas India 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Dr. P.K. Pujari, Associate Director, RC&IG, BARC for his encouragement and support. We thank Shri. V.S. Khati, HESCO, Dehradun; Dr. Gursharan Singh, Former Associate Director, RC&IG, BARC; Dr. K. Shivanna, Former Head, IHS; Dr. Noble Jacob, Shri G.N. Mendhekar and Shri S.N. Kamble, IRAD, BARC for their support given during the investigation. The cooperation and assistance extended by all the scientists and staffs of Himalayan Environmental Studies and Conservation Organisation (HESCO), Dehradun and Yuva Mahamandal Dhartidhar (YUMDHA), Nahan, Himachal Pradesh, during the field sampling program are thankfully acknowledged.

Supplementary material

12665_2019_8682_MOESM1_ESM.docx (283 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 282 kb)

References

  1. Acero P, Auque LF, Galve JP, Gutierrez F et al (2015) Evaluation of geochemical and hydrogeological processes by geochemical modeling in an area affected by evaporite karstification. J Hydrol 529:1874–1889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams S, Titus R, Pietersen K, Tredoux G, Harris C (2001) Hydrochemical characteristics of aquifers near Sutherland in the Western Karoo, South Africa. J Hydrol 241:91–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed A, Clark I (2016) Groundwater flow and geochemical evolution in the Central Flinders Ranges. South Australia. Sci Total Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andre L, Franceschi M, Pouchan P, Atteia O (2005) Using geochemical data and modelling to enhance the understanding of groundwater flow in a regional deep aquifer, Aquitaine Basin, south-west of France. J Hydrol 305:40–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ansari MA, Deodhar A, Kumar US, Khatti VS (2015) Water quality of few springs in outer Himalayas—a study on the groundwater–bedrock interactions and hydrochemical evolution. Groundw Sustain Dev 1:59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. APHA (2005) Standard Method for Examination of Water and Wastewater. American Public Health Association(APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), Water Pollution Control Federation (WPCF), Washington, 21st ednGoogle Scholar
  7. Belkhiri L, Mouni L, Tiri A (2012) Water-rock interaction and geochemistry of groundwater from the Ain Azel aquifer, Algeria. Environ Geochem Health 34:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bertolo R, Hirata R, Sracek O (2006) Geochemistry and geochemical modeling of unsaturated zone in a tropical region in Urania, Sao Paulo State, Brazil. J Hydrol 329:49–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhatia SB, Bhargava ON, Bagi H, Singh BP (2017) Carbonate microfacies from a paleocene-eocene succession of an attached platform—a case study from the Sub-Himalaya. J Palaeotol Soc India 62(1):1–16Google Scholar
  10. BIS (2012) Indian Standard Drinking water specification, BIS 10500:2012. New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  11. Bodrud-Doza M, Bhuiyan MAH, Islam SMD, Rahman MS, Haque MM, Fatema KJ, Ahmed N, Rakib MA, Rahman MA (2019) Hydrogeochemical investigation of groundwater in Dhaka City of Bangladesh using GIS and multivariate statistical techniques. Groundw Sustain Devl 8:226–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bosnjak MU, Capak K, Jazbec A, Casiot C, Sipos L, Poljak V, Dadic Z (2012) Hydrochemical characterization of arsenic contaminated alluvial aquifers in Eastern Croatia using multivariate statistical techniques and arsenic risk assessment. Sci Total Environ 420:100–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cartwright I, Weaver T, Cendon DI, Swane I (2010) Environmental isotopes as indicators of inter-aquifer mixing, Wimmera Region, Murray Basin, Southeast Australia. Chem Geol 277:214–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. CGWB (2013) Groundwater information booklet Sirmaur district, Himachal Pradesh, Central Ground Water Board, Northern Himalayan Region, Government of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  15. Chabukdhara M, Gupta SK, Kotecha Y, Nema AK (2017) Groundwater quality in Ghaziabad district, Uttar Pradesh, India: multivariate and health risk assessment. Chemosphere 179:167–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cloutier V, Lefebvre R, Therrien R, Savard MM (2008) Multivariate statistical analysis of geochemical data as indicative of the hydrogeochemical evolution of groundwater in a sedimentary rock aquifer system. J Hydrol 353:294–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davis JC, Sampson RJ (2002) Statistics and data analysis in geology, vol 3. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Dunteman GH (1989) Principal Component Analysis. Sage, Thousand OaksCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Edmunds WM, Ma JZ, Aeschbach-Hertig W, Kipfer R, Darbyshire DPF (2006) Groundwater recharge history and hydrogeochemical evolution in the Minqin Basin, North West China. Appl Geochem 21:2148–2170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fishman MJ and Friedman LC (1985) Methods for determination of inorganic substances in water and fluvial sediments. In: U.S. Geol. Surv. Book Vol. 5 Chapter A1, Open File Report 85e495, Denver, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  21. Gaillardet J, Dupre B, Louvat P, Allegre CJ (1999) Global silicate weathering and CO2 consumption rates deduced from the chemistry of large rivers. Chem Geol 159:3–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goldscheider N, Drew D (2007) Methods in karst hydrogeology. Taylor and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Güler C, Thyne GD, McCray JE, Turner AK (2002) Evaluation of graphical and multivariate statistical methods for classification of water chemistry data. Hydrogeol J 10:455–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hotelling H (1933) Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal com-ponents. J Educ Psychol 24(6):417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ibrahim RGM, Korany EA, Tempel RN, Gomaa MA (2019) Processes of water–rock interactions and their impacts upon the groundwater composition in Assiut area, Egypt: applications of hydrogeochemical and multivariate analysis. J Afr Earth Sci 149:72–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jackson JE (1991) A User’s guide to principal components. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jampani M, Huelsmann S, Liedl R, Sonkamble S, Ahmed S, Amerasinghe P (2018) Spatio-temporal distribution and chemical characterization of groundwater quality of a wastewater irrigated systems: a case study. Sci Total Environ 636:1089–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jankowski J, Acworth RI, Shekarforoush S (1998) Reverse ion exchange in deeply weathered porphyritic dacite fractured aquifer system, Yass, New South Wales, Australia. In: Arehart GB, Hulston JR (eds) Ninth International Symposium on Water-Rock Interaction. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 243–246Google Scholar
  29. Kaiser HF (1958) The varimax criteria for analytical rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika 23:187–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kelly WP (1946) Permissible composition and concentration of irrigation waters. In: Proc. Ameri. Soci., Civil Engg., pp 607Google Scholar
  31. Ledesma-Ruiz R, Pasten-Zapata E, Parra R, Harter T, Mahlknecht J (2015) Investigation of the geochemical evolution of groundwater under agricultural land: a case study in northeastern Mexico. J Hydrol 521:410–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lin CY, Abdullah MH, Praveena SM, Yahaya AHB, Musta B (2012) Delineation of temporal variability and governing factors influencing the spatial variability of shallow groundwater chemistry in a tropical sedimentary island. J Hydrol 432–433:26–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lin CY, Musta B, Abdullah MH (2013) Geochemical process, evidence and thermodynamic behavior of dissolved and precipitated carbonate minerals in a modern seawater/freshwater mixing zone of a small tropical island. Appl Geochem 29:13–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Magu MM, Govender PP, Ngila JC (2016) Geochemical modelling and speciation studies of metal pollutants present in selected water systems in South Africa. Phys Chem Earth 92:44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meredith K, Cendon DI, Pigois JP, Hollins S, Jacobsen G (2012) Using 14C and 3H to delineate a recharge ‘window’ into the Perth Basin aquifers, North Gnangara groundwater system, Western Australia. Sci Total Environ 414:456–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mohammed N, Celle-Jeanton H, Huneau F, Coustumer PL et al (2014) Isotopic and geochemical identification of main groundwater supply sources to an alluvial aquifer, the Allier River valley (France). J Hydrol 508:181–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moran-Ramirez J, Ruiz-Ledesma R, Mahlknecht J, Leal-Ramos JA (2016) Rockewater interactions and pollution processes in the volcanic aquifer system of Guadalajara, Mexico, using inverse geochemical modeling. Appl Geochem 68:79–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mosaad S, Abd ESE (2019) Geochemical characterization and evolution of the groundwater along the flow path, Gharandal watershed, South Sinai, Egypt. J Afr Ear Sci 150:299–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mukherjee A, Bhattacharya P, Fei S, Fryar AE, Mukherjee AB, Zheng M, Jacks G, Bundschuh J (2009) Chemical evolution in the high arsenic groundwater of the Huhhot basin (Inner Mongolia, PR China) and its difference from the western Bengal basin (India). Appl Geochem 24:1835–1851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Narany TS, Ramli MF, Aris AZ, Sulaiman WNA, Juahir H, Fakharian K (2014) Identification of the hydrogeochemical processes in groundwater using classic integrated geochemical methods and geostatistical techniques, in amol-babol plain. Iran. Sci World J.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/419058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Noble J, Ansari MA (2019) Isotope hydrology and geophysical techniques for reviving a part of the drought prone areas of Vidarbha, Maharashtra, India. J Hydrol 570:495–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parizi HS, Samani N (2013) Geochemical evolution and quality assessment of water resources in the Sarcheshmeh copper mine area (Iran) using multivariate statistical techniques. Environ Earth Sci 69:1699–1718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parkash B, Kumar S (1991) The Indogangetic basin. In: Sedimentary basin of India: tectonic context. Gyanodaya Prakashan, Nainital, pp 147–170Google Scholar
  44. Parkhurst DL, Appelo CAJ (2013) Description of input and examples for PHREEQC version 3—a computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, Book 6, Chap. A43, pp 497Google Scholar
  45. Pina A, Donado LD, Blake S, Cramer T (2018) Compositional multivariate statistical analysis of the hydrogeochemical processes in a fractured massif: La Línea tunnel project, Colombia. App Geochem 95:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Piper AMA (1944) Graphical procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water analysis. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 25:914–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Praveena SM, Lin CY, Aris AZ et al (2010) Groundwater assessment at Manukan Island, Sabah: multidisciplinary approach. Nat Resour Res 19:279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rajesh R, Brindha K, Murugan R, Elango L (2011) Influence of hydrogeochemical processes on temporal changes in groundwater quality in a part of Nalgonda district. Environ Earth Sci, Andhra Pradesh.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1368-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Saravana Kumar U, Ansari MA, Deodhar A, Khatti VS (2012) Isotope hydrogeological investigation on a few drying springs in Surla valley, Sirmaur District, Himachal Pradesh. Curr Sci 103(1):87–90Google Scholar
  50. Saravana Kumar U, Ansari MA, Deodhar A (2014) Isotopic, Hydrogeologic and geomorphologic investigation on rejuvenation of few drying springs in Dhouli Rao and Kandela valley, Sirmaur District, Himachal Pradesh. Arab J Geosci 7(7):2667–2677.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-0965-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Singh CK, Kumar A, Shashtri S, Kumar A, Kumar P, Mallick J (2017) Multivariate statistical analysis and geochemical modeling for geochemical assessment of groundwater of Delhi, India. J Geochem Explor 175:59–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Srikantia SV, Bhargava ON (1998) Geology of Himachal Pradesh. Geological Society of India, Bengaluru, pp 1–435Google Scholar
  53. Stetzenbach KJ, Farnham IM, Hodge VF, Johannesson KH (1999) Using multivariate statistical analysis of groundwater major cation and trace element concentrations to evaluate groundwater flow in a regional aquifer. Hydrol Process 13:2655–2697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stetzenbach KJ, Hodge VF, Guo C, Farnham IM, Johannesson KH (2001) Geochemical and statistical evidence of deep carbonate groundwater within overlying volcanic rock aquifers/aquitards of southern Nevada, USA. J Hydrol 243:254–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ward JH (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 58:236–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. WHO (2011) WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality, 4th edn. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  57. Yidana SM, Yidana A (2010) Assessingwater quality using water quality index and multivariate analysis. Environ Earth Sci 59(7):1461–1473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yidana SM, Bawoyobie P, Sakyi P, Fynn OF (2018) Evolutionary analysis of groundwater flow: application of multivariate statistical analysis to hydrochemical data in the Densu Basin, Ghana. J Afr Earth Sci 138:167–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhang Y, Xu M, Li X, Jihong Q, Zhang Q, Guo J, Leilei Y, Zhao R (2018) Hydrochemical characteristics and multivariate statistical analysis of natural water system: a case study in Kangding county, Southwestern China. Water 10:80.  https://doi.org/10.3390/w10010080 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zumlot T, Batayneh A, Nazal Y, Ghrefat H, Mogren S, Zaman H et al (2013) Using multivariate statistical analyses to evaluate groundwater contamination in the northwestern part of Saudi Arabia. Environ Earth Sci 70:3277–3287CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Md. Arzoo Ansari
    • 1
  • Archana Deodhar
    • 1
    Email author
  • U. Saravana Kumar
    • 2
  1. 1.Isotope and Radiation Application DivisionBhabha Atomic Research CentreMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Isotope Hydrology Section, Division of Physical and Chemical SciencesInternational Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)ViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations