Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, 78:653 | Cite as

Effects of restoration age on water conservation function and soil fertility quality of restored woodlands in phosphate mined-out areas

  • Yong Yuan
  • Xiaoying Li
  • Donghong XiongEmail author
  • Han Wu
  • Su Zhang
  • Lin Liu
  • Wanxin Li
Original Article
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

The age of vegetation restoration has significant influences on near-surface hydrological function and soil quality in mining areas. This study analyzed the effects of restoration age and tree species on water conservation function (reflected by the water-holding characteristics of litter and soil) and soil fertility quality [reflected by soil bulk density (BD), soil organic carbon (SOC), total N (TN), available N (AN), available P (AP), and available K (AK)] of restored woodlands in phosphate mined-out areas. A primary forest (the control) and six woodlands restored for 4–25 years were selected as test sites. The results showed that total litter storage capacity, litter water-holding capacity, soil effective water-holding capacity, SOC, TN, AN, AP, and the comprehensive soil fertility index (SFI) increased with the restoration age, while small changes were also observed in soil total water-holding capacity, BD, and AK with restoration age. Compared to the control, the litter-modified interception amount, soil total water-holding capacity, and SFI in woodlands restored for 25 years were restored on average by 78%, 77%, and 92%, respectively. Furthermore, the litter water-holding capacities, soil capillary water-holding capacity, and AN in the Eucalyptus robusta woodlands restored for 10 years were significantly lower than those in woodlands of Alnus nepalensis restored for < 10 years. Our findings highlight that the restoration age has positive impacts on improving the water conservation function and soil fertility quality of restored woodlands, and the influence of tree species on the water conservation function should be specifically considered while carrying out vegetation restoration in phosphate mined-out areas.

Keywords

Vegetation restoration Leaf litter Water-holding capacity Soil fertility index Mined-out area 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Dahal Nirmal Mani for his help with editing. This study was supported by projects XDA20020401 (the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences), S2012FZ0557 (the Applied Basic Research Program of Yunnan), and 2017YFC0505102 (the National Key Research and Development Program of China). This support is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Alday JG, Marrs RH, Martinez-Ruiz C (2012) Soil and vegetation development during early succession on restored coal wastes: a six-year permanent plot study. Plant Soil 353:305–320Google Scholar
  2. Baddeley JA, Edwards AC, Watson CA (2017) Changes in soil C and N stocks and C:N stoichiometry 21 years after land use change on an arable mineral topsoil. Geoderma 303:19–26Google Scholar
  3. Bienes R, Marques MJ, Sastre B, Garcia-Diaz A, Ruiz-Colmenero M (2016) Eleven years after shrub revegetation in semiarid eroded soils. Influence in soil properties. Geoderma 273:106–114Google Scholar
  4. Blouin M, Hodson ME, Delgado EA, Baker G, Brussaard L, Butt KR, Dai J, Dendooven L, Peres G, Tondoh JE, Cluzeau D, Brun JJ (2013) A review of earthworm impact on soil function and ecosystem services. Eur J Soil Sci 64:161–182Google Scholar
  5. Brantley S, Ford CR, Vose JM (2013) Future species composition will affect forest water use after loss of eastern hemlock from southern Appalachian forests. Ecol Appl 23:777–790Google Scholar
  6. Bremner JM (1996) Nitrogen-total. In: Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH (eds) Methods of soil analysis, Part 3—chemical methods, vol 5. SSSA Book Series. Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 1085–1121Google Scholar
  7. Bruijnzeel LA (2004) Hydrological functions of tropical forests: not seeing the soil for the trees? Agr Ecosyst Environ 104:185–228Google Scholar
  8. Chodak M, Niklinska M (2010) The effect of different tree species on the chemical and microbial properties of reclaimed mine soils. Biol Fert Soils 46:555–566Google Scholar
  9. Deng Q, Cheng X, Hui D, Zhang Q, Li M, Zhang Q (2016) Soil microbial community and its interaction with soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics following afforestation in central China. Sci Total Environ 541:230–237Google Scholar
  10. Doerr SH, Shakesby RA, Walsh RPD (2000) Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance. Earth Sci Rev 51:33–65Google Scholar
  11. Du J, Niu J, Gao Z, Chen X, Zhang L, Li X, Van Doorn NS, Luo Z, Zhu Z (2019) Effects of rainfall intensity and slope on interception and precipitation partitioning by forest litter layer. CATENA 172:711–718Google Scholar
  12. Edwards DP, Tobias JA, Sheil D, Meijaard E, Laurance WF (2014) Maintaining ecosystem function and services in logged tropical forests. Trends Ecol Evol 29:511–520Google Scholar
  13. Fu X, Shao M, Wei X, Horton R (2010) Soil organic carbon and total nitrogen as affected by vegetation types in Northern Loess Plateau of China. Geoderma 155:31–35Google Scholar
  14. Garay M, Amiotti N, Zalba P (2018) Response of phosphorus pools in Mollisols to afforestation with Pinus radiata D. Don in the Argentinean Pampa. For Ecol Manag 422:33–40Google Scholar
  15. Ghidey F, Alberts EE (1997) Plant root effects on soil erodibility, splash detachment, soil strength, and aggregate stability. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 40:129–135Google Scholar
  16. Girona-Garcia A, Badia-Villas D, Jimenez-Morillo NT, de la Rosa JM, Gonzalez-Perez JA (2018) Soil C and N isotope composition after a centennial Scots pine afforestation in podzols of native European beech forests in NE-Spain. CATENA 165:434–441Google Scholar
  17. Guo W, Yang F, Li Y, Wang S (2017) New insights into the source of decadal increase in chemical oxygen demand associated with dissolved organic carbon in Dianchi Lake. Sci Total Environ 603:699–708Google Scholar
  18. Guo S, Han X, Li H, Wang T, Tong X, Ren G, Feng Y, Yang G (2018) Evaluation of soil quality along two revegetation chronosequences on the Loess Hilly Region of China. Sci Total Environ 633:808–815Google Scholar
  19. Guo A, Zhao Z, Zhang P, Yang Q, Li Y, Wang G (2019) Linkage between soil nutrient and microbial characteristic in an opencast mine, China. Sci Total Environ 671:905–913Google Scholar
  20. Han X, Zhao F, Tong X, Deng J, Yang G, Chen L, Kang D (2017) Understanding soil carbon sequestration following the afforestation of former arable land by physical fractionation. CATENA 150:317–327Google Scholar
  21. He L, Fang X, Meng G, Li G, Shao J, Chai Y, Kong J (2013) Effect of Alnus nepalensis cultivation on soil biological and physicochemical properties during restoration near a phosphate smelter in Kunyang, Yunnan Province, SW China. J Soil Sci Plant Nut 13:355–366Google Scholar
  22. Horodecki P, Jagodzinski AM (2017) Tree species effects on litter decomposition in pure stands on afforested post-mining sites. For Ecol Manag 406:1–11Google Scholar
  23. Hossain MF, Chen W, Zhang Y (2015) Bulk density of mineral and organic soils in the Canada’s arctic and sub-arctic. Inf Process Agric 2:183–190Google Scholar
  24. Hou X, Han H, Tigabu M, Cai L, Meng F, Liu A, Ma X (2019) Changes in soil physico-chemical properties following vegetation restoration mediate bacterial community composition and diversity in Changting, China. Ecol Eng 138:171–179Google Scholar
  25. Jiang L, Han X, Dong N, Wang Y, Kardol P (2011) Plant species effects on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics in a temperate steppe of northern China. Plant Soil 346:331–347Google Scholar
  26. Karlen DL, Ditzler CA, Andrews SS (2003) Soil quality: why and how? Geoderma 114:145–156Google Scholar
  27. Li MS (2006) Ecological restoration of mineland with particular reference to the metalliferous mine wasteland in China: a review of research and practice. Sci Total Environ 357:38–53Google Scholar
  28. Li G-X, Zhang J, Shao J-P, Zhou B, Bi B, Xie K-M, Fang X-J, Wang Y-Z (2015) Chemical properties of soil layers of restoration sites in phosphate mining area, China. Environ Earth Sci 73:2027–2030Google Scholar
  29. Liu S, Hou X, Yang M, Cheng F, Coxixo A, Wu X, Zhang Y (2018) Factors driving the relationships between vegetation and soil properties in the Yellow River Delta, China. CATENA 165:279–285Google Scholar
  30. Moreno-de las Heras M (2009) Development of soil physical structure and biological functionality in mining spoils affected by soil erosion in a Mediterranean–Continental environment. Geoderma 149:249–256Google Scholar
  31. Mueller KE, Eissenstat DM, Hobbie SE, Oleksyn J, Jagodzinski AM, Reich PB, Chadwick OA, Chorover J (2012) Tree species effects on coupled cycles of carbon, nitrogen, and acidity in mineral soils at a common garden experiment. Biogeochemistry 111:601–614Google Scholar
  32. Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1996) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH (eds) Methods of soil analysis, Part 3—chemical methods, vol 5.3. SSSA Book Series. Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 961–1010Google Scholar
  33. Nikolic N, Kostic L, Djordjevic A, Nikolic M (2011) Phosphorus deficiency is the major limiting factor for wheat on alluvium polluted by the copper mine pyrite tailings: a black box approach. Plant Soil 339:485–498Google Scholar
  34. Olsen SR, Sommers LE (1982) Phosphorus. In: Page AL (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. Agronomy monograph, vol 9.2. American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 403–430Google Scholar
  35. Phan Minh S, Lamb D, Bonner M, Schmidt S (2013) Carbon sequestration and soil fertility of tropical tree plantations and secondary forest established on degraded land. Plant Soil 362:187–200Google Scholar
  36. Putuhena WM, Cordery I (2000) Some hydrological effects of changing forest cover from eucalypts to Pinus radiata. Agr For Meteorol 100:59–72Google Scholar
  37. Raiesi F (2017) A minimum data set and soil quality index to quantify the effect of land use conversion on soil quality and degradation in native rangelands of upland arid and semiarid regions. Ecol Indic 75:307–320Google Scholar
  38. Rowland SM, Prescott CE, Grayston SJ, Quideau SA, Bradfield GE (2009) Recreating a functioning forest soil in reclaimed oil sands in Northern Alberta: an approach for measuring success in ecological restoration. J Environ Qual 38:1580–1590Google Scholar
  39. Ruthrof KX, Steel E, Misra S, McComb J, O’Hara G, Hardy GESJ, Howieson J (2018) Transitioning from phosphate mining to agriculture: responses to urea and slow release fertilizers for Sorghum bicolor. Sci Total Environ 625:1–7Google Scholar
  40. Ruwanza S, Gaertner M, Richardson DM, Esler KJ (2013) Soil water repellency in riparian systems invaded by Eucalyptus camaldulensis: a restoration perspective from the Western Cape Province, South Africa. Geoderma 200:9–17Google Scholar
  41. Shackelford N, Miller BP, Erickson TE (2018) Restoration of open-cut mining in semi-arid systems: a synthesis of long-term monitoring data and implications for management. Land Degrad Dev 29:994–1004Google Scholar
  42. Shrestha RK, Lal R (2008) Land use impacts on physical properties of 28 years old reclaimed mine soils in Ohio. Plant Soil 306:249–260Google Scholar
  43. Singh A, Singh JS (2001) Comparative growth behaviour and leaf nutrient status of native trees planted on mine spoil with and without nutrient amendment. Ann Bot-London 87:777–787Google Scholar
  44. Sun B, Zhou S, Zhao Q (2003) Evaluation of spatial and temporal changes of soil quality based on geostatistical analysis in the hill region of subtropical China. Geoderma 115:85–99Google Scholar
  45. Sun L, Zhang G-h, Luan L-l, Liu F (2016) Temporal variation in soil resistance to flowing water erosion for soil incorporated with plant litters in the Loess Plateau of China. CATENA 145:239–245Google Scholar
  46. Sun D, Zhang W, Lin Y, Liu Z, Shen W, Zhou L, Rao X, Liu S, Cai X, He D, Fu S (2018a) Soil erosion and water retention varies with plantation type and age. For Ecol Manag 422:1–10Google Scholar
  47. Sun J, Yu X, Wang H, Jia G, Zhao Y, Tu Z, Deng W, Jia J, Chen J (2018b) Effects of forest structure on hydrological processes in China. J Hydrol 561:187–199Google Scholar
  48. Tonks AJ, Aplin P, Beriro DJ, Cooper H, Evers S, Vane CH, Sjogersten S (2017) Impacts of conversion of tropical peat swamp forest to oil palm plantation on peat organic chemistry, physical properties and carbon stocks. Geoderma 289:36–45Google Scholar
  49. Upton A, Vane CH, Girkin N, Turner BL, Sjogersten S (2018) Does litter input determine carbon storage and peat organic chemistry in tropical peatlands? Geoderma 326:76–87Google Scholar
  50. Urbanova M, Snajdr J, Brabcova V, Merhautova V, Dobiasova P, Cajthaml T, Vanek D, Frouz J, Santruckova H, Baldrian P (2014) Litter decomposition along a primary post-mining chronosequence. Biol Fertil Soils 50:827–837Google Scholar
  51. Wang D, Zhang B, Zhu L, Yang Y, Li M (2018a) Soil and vegetation development along a 10-year restoration chronosequence in tailing dams in the Xiaoqinling gold region of Central China. CATENA 167:250–256Google Scholar
  52. Wang J, Luo X, Zhang Y, Huang Y, Rajendran M, Xue S (2018b) Plant species diversity for vegetation restoration in manganese tailing wasteland. Environ Sci Pollut R 25:24101–24110Google Scholar
  53. Wang Y, Shen Z, Zhang Z (2018c) Phosphorus speciation and nutrient stoichiometry in the soil-plant system during primary ecological restoration of copper mine tailings. Pedosphere 28:530–541Google Scholar
  54. Wong MH (2003) Ecological restoration of mine degraded soils, with emphasis on metal contaminated soils. Chemosphere 50:775–780Google Scholar
  55. Wu D, Xin X-b, Zhao M-y, Pei S-x, Kong Y (2014) Hydrological effects of litters and soil under different forests in Jiulongshan of Beijing. For Res 27:417–422 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  56. Xia L, Song X, Fu N, Cui S, Li L, Li H, Li Y (2019) Effects of forest litter cover on hydrological response of hillslopes in the Loess Plateau of China. CATENA 181:104076Google Scholar
  57. Xu S, Liu LL, Sayer EJ (2013) Variability of above-ground litter inputs alters soil physicochemical and biological processes: a meta-analysis of litterfall-manipulation experiments. Biogeosciences 10:7537Google Scholar
  58. Yan D, Zhao F, Sun OJ (2013) Assessment of Vegetation Establishment on Tailings Dam at an Iron Ore Mining Site of Suburban Beijing, China, 7 Years After Reclamation with Contrasting Site Treatment Methods. Environ Manag 52:748–757Google Scholar
  59. Yang B, Zhang W, Xu H, Wang S, Xu X, Fan H, Chen HYH, Ruan H (2018) Effects of soil fauna on leaf litter decomposition under different land uses in eastern coast of China. J For Res 29:973–982Google Scholar
  60. Ye M, Li JT, Tian SN, Hu M, Yi S, Liao B (2009) Biogeochemical studies of metallophytes from four copper-enriched sites along the Yangtze River, China. Environ Geol 56:1313–1322Google Scholar
  61. Zagyvai-Kiss KA, Kalicz P, Szilágyi J, Gribovszki Z (2019) On the specific water holding capacity of litter for three forest ecosystems in the eastern foothills of the Alps. Agr For Meteorol 278:107656Google Scholar
  62. Zhang C, Xue S, Liu G-B, Song Z-L (2011) A comparison of soil qualities of different revegetation types in the Loess Plateau, China. Plant Soil 347:163–178Google Scholar
  63. Zhang X, Liu Z, Zhu B, Bing Y, Nhu Trung L, Du L, Zhu Z (2016) Impacts of mixed litter decomposition from Robinia pseudoacacia and other tree species on C loss and nutrient release in the Loess Plateau of China. J For Res 27:525–532Google Scholar
  64. Zhang W, Gao D, Chen Z, Li H, Deng J, Qiao W, Han X, Yang G, Feng Y, Huang J (2018) Substrate quality and soil environmental conditions predict litter decomposition and drive soil nutrient dynamics following afforestation on the Loess Plateau of China. Geoderma 325:152–161Google Scholar
  65. Zhang B, Xu Q, Gao D, Jiang C, Liu F, Jiang J, Ma Y (2019) Higher soil capacity of intercepting heavy rainfall in mixed stands than in pure stands in riparian forests. Sci Total Environ 658:1514–1522Google Scholar
  66. Zhao F, Kang D, Han X, Yang G, Yang G, Feng Y, Ren G (2015) Soil stoichiometry and carbon storage in long-term afforestation soil affected by understory vegetation diversity. Ecol Eng 74:415–422Google Scholar
  67. Zhong Y, Yan W, Wang R, Shangguan Z (2017) Differential responses of litter decomposition to nutrient addition and soil water availability with long-term vegetation recovery. Biol Fertil Soils 53:939–949Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Mountain Hazards and EnvironmentChinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water ResourcesChengduChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Earth Surface ProcessesChinese Academy of SciencesChengduChina
  3. 3.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.College of Ecology and Soil and Water ConservationSouthwest Forestry UniversityKunmingChina

Personalised recommendations