Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, 78:644 | Cite as

Evaluation of the hydrochemical evolution characteristics and renewable capacity of deep fresh groundwater in the Hangzhou Bay New Zone, China

  • Yu ZhaoEmail author
  • Chaolin Wang
  • Wei Xiang
  • Shuijun Zhang
Original Article
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

The deep fresh groundwater in the Hangzhou Bay New Zone lies in a confined aquifer. The roof of the freshwater layer is 80–110-m deep, and its average thickness is 22 m. Freshwater occupies the downstream portion of the aquifer structure, while saline water occupies the upstream portion of the aquifer structure; this rare freshwater distribution characteristic causes widespread concern. Based on the hydrogeological conditions of the study area, the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of groundwater in the Hangzhou Bay New Zone are researched by analyzing the hydrochemical characteristics and isotope tracing results of water samples. Furthermore, the formation mechanism of the fresh groundwater and its renewal capacity are evaluated. The results show that (1) the groundwater chemical type is influenced by the total dissolved solids (TDS). With an increase in the TDS of the groundwater, the main anions in the groundwater evolve from HCO3 to Cl, and the major cations evolve from Ca2+ and Mg2+ to Na+. (2) The hydrogeological conditions, the hydrochemistry evolution characteristics, and the 2H, 18O, and 3H characteristics of the groundwater indicate that the freshwater does not receive a supplement of modern water and that no hydraulic connection exists between different layers. (3) According to 3H and 14C dating, the formation period of deep fresh groundwater and saline water in the study area was 13.0–17.9 Ka.B.P, and, 10.6–15.6 ka.B.P (the late Pleistocene), respectively. It is predicted that the fresh groundwater is the continental sedimentary water buried in the Pleistocene, as a result of sealing the well-isolated original sedimentary fresh water because of direct upstream infiltration and downstream salinization in the late transgression (mainly ice transgression in the later stage). (4) The fresh groundwater has little renewable capacity due to the absence of recharge sources.

Keywords

Hydrochemistry Stable isotopes Groundwater age Groundwater evolution Isotopic tracer method 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the project of the China National Science Foundation (Grant Nos. 51374257 and 50804060) and the project of Evaluation of emergency groundwater sources in Ningbo coastal zone.

References

  1. Abd El Samie SG, Sadek MA (2001) Groundwater recharge and flow in the Lower Cretaceous Nubian Sandstone aquifer in the Sinai Peninsula, using isotopic techniques and hydrochemistry. Hydrogeol J 9:378–389Google Scholar
  2. Bakari SS, Aagaard P, Vogt RD, Ruden F, Brennwald MS, Johansen I, Gulliksen S (2012a) Groundwater residence time and paleorecharge conditions in the deep confined aquifers of the coastal watershed South–East Tanzania. J Hydrol 466(21):127–140Google Scholar
  3. Bakari SS, Aagaard P, Vogt RD, Ruden F, Johansen I, Vuai SA (2012b) Delineation of groundwater provenance in a coastal aquifer using statistical and isotopic methods, Southeast Tanzania. Environ Earth Sci 66:889–902Google Scholar
  4. Bi J, Zhou XP, Qian QH (2016) The 3D numerical simulation for the propagation process of multiple pre-existing flaws in rock-like materials subjected to biaxial compressive loads. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(5):1611–1627Google Scholar
  5. Bi J, Zhou XP, Xu XM (2017) Numerical simulation of failure process of rock-like materials subjected to impact loads. Int J Geomech 17(3):04016073Google Scholar
  6. Burbey TJ (2003) Use of time-subsidence data during pumping to characterize specific storage and hydraulic conductivity of semi-confining units. J Hydrol 281:3–22Google Scholar
  7. Cartwright I (2010) Using groundwater geochemistry and environmental isotopes to assess the correction of 14C ages in a silicate-dominated aquifer system. J Hydrol 382:174–187Google Scholar
  8. Deverel S, Rojstaczer S (1996) Subsidence of agricultural lands in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California. Role of aqueous and gaseous carbon fluxes. Water Resour Res 32(8):2359–2367Google Scholar
  9. Dindane K, Bouchaou L, Hsissou Y, Krimissa M (2003) Hydrochemical and isotopic characteristics of groundwater in the Souss Upstream Basin, southwestern Morocco. J Afr Earth Sci 36:315–327Google Scholar
  10. Eastoe CJ, Olivas AG, Hibbs BJ (2016) Tracers of groundwater mixing in the Hueco Bolson aquifer, Ciudad Juarez, Mexico. Environ Eng Geosci 22:195–207Google Scholar
  11. Edmunds WM, Guendouz AH, Mamou A, Moulla A, Shand P, Zouari K (2003) Groundwater evolution in the Continental Intercalaire aquifer of southern Algeria and Tunisia. Trace element and isotopic indicators. Appl Geochem 18(6):805–822Google Scholar
  12. Giambastiani BMS, Colombani N, Mastrocicco M, Fidelibus MD (2013) Characterization of the lowland coastal aquifer of Comacchio (Ferrara, Italy). Hydrology, hydrochemistry and evolution of the system. J Hydrol 501:35–44Google Scholar
  13. Guendouz A, Moulla AS, Remini B, Michelot JL (2006) Hydrochemical and isotopic behaviour of a Saharan phreatic aquifer suffering severe natural and anthropic constraints (case of Oued-Souf region, Algeria). Hydrogeol J 14:955–968Google Scholar
  14. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) (2011) Global network of isotopes in pre-Ian Clark, Peter Fritz. 1997 Environmental isotopes in hydrogeology. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  15. Ibe KM, Agbamu PU (1999) Impacts of human activities on groundwater quality of an alluvial aquifer: a case study of the Warri River, Delta State, SW, Nigeria. Int J Environ Health Res 9(4):329–334Google Scholar
  16. Ingerson E, Person F J Jr (1964) Estimation of age and rate of motion of the groundwater by the 14C method. In: Proceedings of sugawara festival on recent researches in the fields of atmosphere, Hydrosphere, and nuclear geochemisrtry. Maruzen, Tokyo, pp 237–266Google Scholar
  17. Islam SMDU, Bhuiyan MAH, Rume T, Azam G (2017) Hydrogeochemical investigation of groundwater in shallow coastal aquifer of Khulna District, Bangladesh. Appl Water Sci 7:219–4236Google Scholar
  18. Jasechko S (2016) Partitioning young and old groundwater with geochemical tracers. Chem Geol 427:35–42Google Scholar
  19. Jia XM, Sun JC, Chen X, Huang GX, Yu DM (2009) Distribution characteristics of hydrogen and oxygen isotopic compositions and (14)C ages in confined water of Yinchuan plain. Geoscience 23(1):15–22Google Scholar
  20. Kang B (2017) The study of groundwater evolution and rational exploitation and utilizing in Jiangsu coastal area. Jilin University, ChaoyangGoogle Scholar
  21. Kundzewicz ZW, Döll P (2009) Will groundwater ease freshwater stress under climate change? Hydrol Sci J 54(4):665–675Google Scholar
  22. Lee S, Kayane I (1999) Stable isotopes in precipitation in the volcanic island of Cheju, Korea. Hydrol Process 13:113–121Google Scholar
  23. Li Q, Zhou JL, Zhou YZ, Bai CY, Tao HF, Jia RL, Ji YY, Yang GY (2014) Variation of groundwater hydrochemical characteristics in the plain area of the Tarim Basin, Xinjiang Region, China. Environ Earth Sci 72:4249–4263Google Scholar
  24. Li PY, Wu JH, Qian H, Zhang YT, Yang NA, Jing LJ, Yu PY (2016) Hydrogeochemical characterization of groundwater in and around a wastewater irrigated forest in the southeastern edge of the Tengger desert, northwest China. Expo Health 8:331–348Google Scholar
  25. Mahmoudpour M, Khamehchiyan M, Nikudel MR, Ghassemi MR (2016) Numerical simulation and prediction of regional land subsidence caused by groundwater exploitation in the southwest plain of Tehran. Iran. Eng Geol 201:6–28Google Scholar
  26. Mazeika J, Guobyte R, Kibirkstis G, Petrosius R, Skuratovic Z, Taminskas J (2009) The use of carbon-14 and tritium for peat and water dynamics characterization: case of Čepkeliai Peatland, Southeastern Lithuania. Geochronometria 34:41–48Google Scholar
  27. Meredith K, Cendon DI, Pigois JP, Hollins S, Jacobsen G (2012) Using C-14 and H-3 to delineate a recharge ‘window’ into the Perth Basin aquifers, North Gnangara groundwater system, Western Australia. Sci Total Environ 414:456–469Google Scholar
  28. Monjerezi M, Vogt RD, Aagaard P, Gebru AG, Saka JDK (2011) Using 87Sr/86Sr, δ18O and δ2H isotopes along with major chemical composition to assess groundwater salinization in lower Shire valley, Malawi. Appl Geochem 26:2201–2214Google Scholar
  29. Nazzal Y, Howari FM, Al-Arifi NSN (2018) Investigating hydrochemistry and the groundwater quality to Tabuk, Jauf and Hail Regions, Saudi Arabia from the prospects of its suitability for agricultural, using descriptive statistics. Int J Appl Math Stat 57:218–228Google Scholar
  30. Qi H, Ma C, He Z, Hu X, Gao L (2019) Lithiumand its isotopes as tracers of groundwater salinization: a study in the southern coastal plain of Laizhou Bay, China. Sci Total Environ 650:878–890Google Scholar
  31. Samborska K, Rozkowski A, Maloszewski P (2013) Estimation of groundwater residence time using environmental radioisotopes (14C, T) in carbonate aquifers, southern Poland. Isot Environ Health Stud 49:73–97Google Scholar
  32. Shi X, Wang Y, Jiao J et al (2018) Assessing major factors affecting shallow groundwater geochemical evolution in a highly urbanized coastal area of Shenzhen City, China. J Geochem Explor 184:17–27Google Scholar
  33. Srinivas Y, Aghil TB, Oliver DH, Nair CN, Chandrasekar N (2017) Hydrochemical characteristics and quality assessment of groundwater along the Manavalakurichi coast, Tamil Nadu, India. Appl Water Sci 7:1429–1438Google Scholar
  34. Su X, Cui G, Du S (2016) Estimation of groundwater discharge in an arid lake based on multiple environmental methods. Hydrogeol J 24:1707–1722Google Scholar
  35. Tarmers MA (1967) Radiocarbon ages of groundwater in an arid zone unconfined aquifer. Stout G E. Isostope techniques in the hydrologic cycle, geophysics. AGU, Washington, DC, pp 143–152Google Scholar
  36. Uribe J, Munoz JF, Gironas J, Oyarzun R, Aguirre E, Aravena R (2015) Assessing groundwater recharge in an Andean closed basin using isotopic characterization and a rainfall-runoff model: salar del Huasco basin, Chile. Hydrogeol J 23:1535–1551Google Scholar
  37. Vandenbohede A, Van Houtte E, Lebbe L (2009) Sustainable groundwater extraction in coastal areas: a Belgian example. Environ Geol 57(4):735–747Google Scholar
  38. Vogel JC (1970) Carbon-14 dating of groundwater. In: Isotope hydrology. IAEA, Vienna, pp 225–239Google Scholar
  39. Wang LH, Dong YH, Xu ZF, Qiao XJ (2017) Hydrochemical and isotopic characteristics of groundwater in the northeastern Tennger Desert, northern China. Hydrogeol J 25:2363–2375Google Scholar
  40. Wang CL, Pan L, Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Shen W (2019) Analysis of the pressure-pulse propagation in rock: a new approach to simultaneously determine permeability, porosity, and adsorption capacity. Rock Mech Rock Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01874-w CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wu Y, Wang NA, Zhao LQ, Zhang ZY, Chen L, Lu Y, Lu XN, Chang JL (2014) Hydrochemical characteristics and recharge sources of Lake Nuoertu in the Badain Jaran Desert. Chin Sci Bull 59:886–895Google Scholar
  42. Xiao C, Liu J, Liang X, Du S (2016) Hydrogeochemistry characteristics of groundwater and its suitability for water supply and irrigation in Jilin City China. Arab J Geosci 9:434Google Scholar
  43. Xing LN, Guo HM, Zhan YH (2013) Groundwater hydrochemical characteristics and processes along flow paths in the North China Plain. J Asian Earth Sci 70:250–264Google Scholar
  44. Xu N, Gong J, Yang G (2018) Using environmental isotopes along with major hydro-geochemical compositions to assess deep groundwater formation and evolution in eastern coastal China. J Contam Hydrol 208:1–9Google Scholar
  45. Yang J, Zhang YH, Ye SJ, Wu JC (2010) Characteristics of tritium distribution in precipitation in Nanjing. J Nanjing Univ Nat Sci 46:432–439 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  46. Yechieli Y, Sivan O, Lazar B, Vengosh A, Ronen D, Herut B (2001) Radiocarbon in seawater intruding into the Israeli Mediterranean coastal aquifer. Radiocarbon 4:773–781Google Scholar
  47. Zhang YH, Ye SJ, Wu JC (2011) A global model of recovering the annual mean tritium concentration in atmospheric precipitation. Geol Rev 57(3):409–418 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  48. Zhao Y, Wang CL, Zhang YF, Liu Q (2019) Experimental study of adsorption effects on shale permeability. Nat Resour Res 28(4):1575–1586Google Scholar
  49. Zhou XP, Bi J, Deng RS, Li B (2019) Effects of brittleness on crack behaviors in rock-like materials. J Test Eval.  https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20170595 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu Zhao
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chaolin Wang
    • 1
  • Wei Xiang
    • 2
    • 3
  • Shuijun Zhang
    • 4
  1. 1.College of Civil EngineeringGuizhou UniversityGuiyangChina
  2. 2.School of Civil EngineeringChongqing UniversityChongqingChina
  3. 3.Chongqing Construction Science Research InstituteChongqingChina
  4. 4.Zhejiang Institute of Hydrogeology and Engineering GeologyNingboChina

Personalised recommendations