Spatial and temporal variability in hydrochemistry of a small-scale dolomite karst environment

  • Tahoora Sheikhy NaranyEmail author
  • Daniel Bittner
  • Markus Disse
  • Gabriele Chiogna
Thematic Issue
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Groundwater resources in a changing environment


Dolomite karst systems are less common and less exploited than limestone systems, but still they can significantly contribute to drinking water supply in many countries. The knowledge about spatial and temporal variations of hydrochemical parameters of such systems is much more limited than for limestone karst aquifers. In the present research, 40-year-long observations of hydrochemical parameters gathered from five springs and a pumping well in Waidhofen an der Ybbs (Austria) were used to show the variability of chemical water composition in a small-scale ( ~ 10 km2) dolomite karst system. Integration of classic geochemical methods and multivariate statistical analysis revealed that the hydrofacies correlate directly with the lithofacies (dolomite) in the study area. At the same time, measured concentrations of Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, Cl, and HCO3 allow for a classification of the springs in three groups based on their ionic ratios. This classification highlights the spatial and temporal variability that can be encountered in dolomite karst systems, even on small spatial scales, that are relevant for water suppliers. Moreover, temporal observations of hydrochemical parameters show increasing trends of nitrate concentrations in all sampling points, though with different rates. The analysis of the stable isotopes δ15N–NO3 and δ18O–NO3 revealed that nitrification processes in forest floors and mineral soils are the main source of nitrate in most locations investigated. The findings of the present study highlight the necessity of a detailed temporal and spatial distributed monitoring to support water resources management in dolomitic karst aquifers.


Dolomite karst systems Hydrochemistry Small-scale Drinking water Austria 



The authors refer to the ERDF-funded Interreg Central Europe project PROLINE-CE. The authors would also like to thank the water works in Waidhofen a.d. Ybbs for providing long-term groundwater chemistry information from springs and pumping well. The first author is grateful to the Gender & Diversity Incentive Fund (GDIF) of Technical University of Munich for supporting the researches. In addition, Prof. Chiogna acknowledges the support of the Stiftungsfonds für Umweltökonomie und Nachhaltigkeit GmbH (SUN).


  1. Albertin AR, Sickman JO, Pinowska A, Stevenson RJ (2012) Identification of nitrogen sources and transformations within karst springs using isotope tracers of nitrogen. Biogeochemistry 108(1–3):219–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreo B, Gil-Márquez JM, Mudarra M, Linares L, Carrasco F (2016) Hypothesis on the hydrogeological context of wetland areas and springs related to evaporitic karst aquifers (Málaga, Córdoba and Jaén provinces, Southern Spain). Env Earth Sci 75(9):759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benson RC, Yuhr LB (2016) Areas affected by karst and pseudokarst. In site characterization in Karst and Pseudokarst Terraines. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 41–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bicalho CC, Batiot-Guilhe C, Taupin JD, Patris N, Van Exter S, Jourde H (2017) A conceptual model for groundwater circulation using isotopes and geochemical tracers coupled with hydrodynamics: a case study of the Lez karst system, France. Chem Geol.
  5. Bittner D, Narany TS, Kohl B, Disse M, Chiogna G (2018) Modeling the hydrological impact of land use change in a dolomite-dominated karst system. J Hydrol 567:267–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charizopoulos N, Zagana E, Psilovikos A (2018) Assessment of natural and anthropogenic impacts in groundwater, utilizing multivariate statistical analysis and inverse distance weighted interpolation modeling: the case of a Scopia basin (Central Greece). Env Earth Sci 77(10):380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chovanec A (1994) Water quality monitoring in Austria. IWRB Publication no 40, pp 137–150Google Scholar
  8. Cloutier V, Lefebvre R, Therrien R, Savard MM (2008) Multivariate statistical analysis of geochemical data as indicative of the hydrogeochemical evolution of groundwater in a sedimentary rock aquifer system. J Hydrol 353(3–4):294–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Di Lorenzo T, Brilli M, Del Tosto D, Galassi DM, Petitta M (2012) Nitrate source and fate at the catchment scale of the Vibrata River and aquifer (central Italy): an analysis by integrating component approaches and nitrogen isotopes. Env Earth Sci 67(8):2383–2398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dossi C, Ciceri E, Giussani B, Pozzi A, Galgaro A, Viero A, Viganò A (2007) Water and snow chemistry of main ions and trace elements in the karst system of Monte Pelmo massif (Dolomites, Eastern Alps, Italy). Mar Freshw Res 58(7):649–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Einsiedl F, Mayer B (2006) Hydrodynamic and microbial processes controlling nitrate in a fissured-porous karst aquifer of the Franconian Alb, Southern Germany. Env Sci Technol 40(21):6697–6702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Einsiedl F, Maloszewski P, Stichler W (2005) Estimation of denitrification potential in a karst aquifer using the 15N and 18O isotopes of NO3 . Biogeochemistry 72(1):67–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fiorillo F, Guadagno FM (2010) Karst spring discharges analysis in relation to drought periods, using the SPI. Water Resour Manag 24(9):1867–1884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldscheider N (2005) Karst groundwater vulnerability mapping: application of a new method in the Swabian Alb, Germany. Hydrogeol J 13(4):555–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hacker P (2003) Hydrologisch-hydrogeologische Untersuchungen im Bereich des Glashüttenberges zur Frage des engeren Schutzgebietes für die Kerschbaumer-Quelle. ARC Seibersdorf research GmbHGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamed KH, Rao AR (1998) A modified Mann-Kendall trend test for autocorrelated data. J Hydrol 204(1–4):182–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hartmann A, Mudarra M, Andreo B, Marín A, Wagener T, Lange J (2014) Modeling spatiotemporal impacts of hydroclimatic extremes on groundwater recharge at a Mediterranean karst aquifer. Water Resour Res 50(8):6507–6521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hilberg S (2016) Natural tracers in fractured hard-rock aquifers in the Austrian part of the Eastern Alps—previous approaches and future perspectives for hydrogeology in mountain regions Revue. Hydrogeol J 24(5):1091–1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hilberg S, Schneider JF (2011) The aquifer characteristics of the dolomite formation a new approach for providing drinking water in the northern calcareous Alps region in Germany and Austria. Water Resour Manag 25(11):2705–2729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hillebrand O, Nödler K, Sauter M, Licha T (2015) Multitracer experiment to evaluate the attenuation of selected organic micropollutants in a karst aquifer. Sci Total Env 506:338–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jebreen H, Wohnlich S, Banning A, Wisotzky F, Niedermayr A, Ghanem M (2018) Recharge, geochemical processes and water quality in karst aquifers: Central West Bank, Palestine. Env Earth Sci 77(6):261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kanduč T, Mori N, Kocman D, Stibilj V, Grassa F (2012) Hydrogeochemistry of Alpine springs from North Slovenia: insights from stable isotopes. Chem Geol 300:40–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kendall MG (1975) Rank correlation methods, 4th edn. Charles Griffin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Koeck R (2012) Climate change and impacts on water supply “CC-WaterS”. South-East-Europe project monograph.
  25. Koeck R (2017) PROLINE-CE, workpackage t2, activity t2.1. In: Pilot action 1.2: Waidhofen/YBBS. Lead Institutions Municipality of Waidhofen/Ybbs. D.T2.1.4 descriptive documentation of pilot actions and related issuesGoogle Scholar
  26. Krawczyk WE, Ford DC (2006) Correlating specific conductivity with total hardness in limestone and dolomite karst waters. Earth Surf Process Landf 31(2):221–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kruskal WH, Wallis WA (1952) Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 47(260):583–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mahler BJ, Valdes D, Musgrove M, Massei N (2008) Nutrient dynamics as indicators of karst processes: comparison of the Chalk aquifer (Normandy, France) and the Edwards aquifer (Texas, USA). J Contam Hydrol 98(1–2):36–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mann HB (1945) Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometr J Econometr Soc 1945:245–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Markart G, Perzl F, Klebinder K, Kohl B, Adams M, Sotier B, Stary U, Strasser M, Suntinger K (2012). Evaluation and quantification of possible impacts of climate change on hydrological characteristics of forests in the Waidhofen ad Ybbs region. In: Final Report: CC-WaterS-Climate Change and Impacts on Water Supply. Bundesforschungszentrum für Wald, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  31. Matiatos I (2016) Nitrate source identification in groundwater of multiple land-use areas by combining isotopes and multivariate statistical analysis: a case study of Asopos basin (Central Greece). Sci Total Env 541:802–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mayo AL, Loucks MD (1995) Solute and isotopic geochemistry and ground water flow in the central Wasatch Range, Utah. J Hydrol 172(1–4):31–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miorandi R, Borsato A, Frisia S, Fairchild IJ, Richter DK (2010) Epikarst hydrology and implications for stalagmite capture of climate changes at Grotta di Ernesto (NE Italy): results from long-term monitoring. Hydrol Proces 24(21):3101–3114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mudarra M, Andreo B (2011) Relative importance of the saturated and the unsaturated zones in the hydrogeological functioning of karst aquifers: the case of Alta Cadena (Southern Spain). J Hydrol 397(3–4):263–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mudarra M, Andreo B, Mudry J (2012) Monitoring groundwater in the discharge area of a complex karst aquifer to assess the role of the saturated and unsaturated zones. Env Earth Sci 65(8):2321–2336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Musgrove M, Opsahl SP, Mahler BJ, Herrington C, Sample TL, Banta JR (2016) Source, variability, and transformation of nitrate in a regional karst aquifer: Edwards aquifer, central Texas. Sci Total Env 568:457–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Narany TS, Aris AZ, Sefie A, Keesstra S (2017) Detecting and predicting the impact of land use changes on groundwater quality, a case study in Northern Kelantan, Malaysia. Sci Total Env 599:844–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nosrati K, Van Den Eeckhaut M (2012) Assessment of groundwater quality using multivariate statistical techniques in Hashtgerd Plain, Iran. Env Earth Sci 65(1):331–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Perrin J, Jeannin PY, Zwahlen F (2003) Implications of the spatial variability of infiltration-water chemistry for the investigation of a karst aquifer: a field study at Milandre test site, Swiss Jura. Hydrogeol J 11(6):673–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pettitt AN (1979) A non-parametric approach to the change-point problem. Appl Statist 28:126–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pfleiderer S, Klein P, Reitner H, Heinrich M (2006) The hydrogeology of the Northern Calcareous Alps between the Rivers Enns and Ybbs. Austrian J Earth Sci 99:4–10Google Scholar
  42. Piper AM (1944) A graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water-analyses. EOS Trans AGU 25(6):914–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Promper C, Puissant A, Malet JP, Glade T (2014) Analysis of land cover changes in the past and the future as contribution to landslide risk scenarios. Appl Geogr 53:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schmidt S, Geyer T, Marei A, Guttman J, Sauter M (2013) Quantification of long-term wastewater impacts on karst groundwater resources in a semi-arid environment by chloride mass balance methods. J Hydrol 502:177–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Spoelstra J, Schiff SL, Hazlett PW, Jeffries DS, Semkin RG (2007) The isotopic composition of nitrate produced from nitrification in a hardwood forest floor. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 71(15):3757–3771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Szramek K, McIntosh JC, Williams EL, Kanduc T, Ogrinc N, Walter LM (2007) Relative weathering intensity of calcite versus dolomite in carbonate‐bearing temperate zone watersheds: carbonate geochemistry and fluxes from catchments within the St. Lawrence and Danube river basins. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 8:4Google Scholar
  47. Wang SJ, Li RL, Sun CX, Zhang DF, Li FQ, Zhou DQ, Xiong KN, Zhou ZF (2004) How types of carbonate rock assemblages constrain the distribution of karst rocky desertified land in Guizhou Province, PR China: phenomena and mechanisms. Land Degrad Dev 15(2):123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ward JH Jr (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 58(301):236–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wassenaar LI (1995) Evaluation of the origin and fate of nitrate in the Abbotsford aquifer using the isotopes of 15N and 18O in NO3 . Appl Geochem 10(4):391–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yue S, Wang C (2004) The Mann–Kendall test modified by effective sample size to detect trend in serially correlated hydrological series. Water Resour Manag 18(3):201–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tahoora Sheikhy Narany
    • 1
    Email author
  • Daniel Bittner
    • 1
  • Markus Disse
    • 1
  • Gabriele Chiogna
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Civil, Geo and Environmental EngineeringTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany
  2. 2.Institute of GeographyUniversity of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria

Personalised recommendations