Advertisement

A comparison of numerical and Lu modeling of water flow and heat transport with laboratory experiments

  • Jie RenEmail author
  • Wenbing Zhang
  • Jie Yang
  • Zhenzhong Shen
  • Jian Zhao
  • Yinjun Zhou
  • Zhenhua Wang
Original Article
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

Reservoirs are considered to result in significant changes to river water temperature. Discharge of deep water has a large impact on aquatic ecosystems downstream of dam and on both river banks. A laboratory sand tank test investigation was conducted to simulate water flow and thermal dynamics in the riparian zone. The sand temperature (ST) data generated were used to validate and compare HYDRUS-2D, a physically based numerical model, with Lu et al.’s (Soil Sci Soc Am J 71(1):8–14, 2007) soil thermal conductivity model under different water temperature, hydraulic head and radiation temperature conditions. The Richards model and the heat conduction model were coupled through the Horton thermal conductivity model and the Lu et al. (Soil Sci Soc Am J 71(1):8–14, 2007) model, respectively. The results demonstrated the success of model coupling and its application for investigating water flow and thermal dynamics in the riparian zone. The Lu et al. (Soil Sci Soc Am J 71(1):8–14, 2007) model based on COMSOL and the Horton thermal conductivity model based on HYDRUS each had their own advantages. Global analysis showed that the Lu et al. (Soil Sci Soc Am J 71(1):8–14, 2007) model was better able to simulate the riparian zone temperature field under the investigated experimental conditions. The sensitivity analysis results showed that the parameters nv, T and H had a considerable influence on the temperature field in the model, of which nv was the most sensitive, whereas the parameters ks, α, θs, and θr were relatively less sensitive to the temperature field.

Keywords

Water temperature Riparian zone HYDRUS-2D Lu et al. (2007) model Sensitivity analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by CRSRI Open Research Program (Grant No. CKWV2017500/KY), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51679194).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of the interest are declared.

References

  1. Alekseevich AN (2017) Numerical modelling of tailings dam thermal-seepage regime considering phase transitions. Model Simul Eng 4:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arntzen EV, Geist DR, Dresel PE (2006) Effects of fluctuating river flow on groundwater/surface water mixing in the hyporheic zone of a regulated, large cobble bed river. River Res Appl 22(8):937–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boutt DF, Fleming BJ (2009) Implications of anthropogenic river stage fluctuations on mass transport in a valley fill aquifer. Water Resour Res 45(4):546–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brunetti G, Saito H, Saito T, Šimůnek J (2017) A computationally efficient pseudo-3D model for the numerical analysis of borehole heat exchangers. Appl Energy 208:1113–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brunetti G, Porti M, Patrizia P (2018) Multi-level numerical and statistical analysis of the hygrothermal behavior of a non-vegetated green roof in a mediterranean climate. Appl Energy 221:204–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Casado A, Hannah DM, Peiry JL, Ferreras AMC (2013) Influence of dam-induced hydrological regulation on summer water temperature: Sauce Grande River, Argentina. Ecohydrology 6(4):523–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chui TFM, Freyberg DL (2007) The use of COMSOL for integrated hydrological modeling. In: COMSOL conference, Boston, pp 217–23Google Scholar
  8. Chung SO, Horton R (1987) Soil heat and water flow with a partial surface mulch. Water Resour Res 23(12):2175–2186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Curry RA, Gehrels J, Noakes DLG, Swainson R (1994) Effects of river flow fluctuations on groundwater discharge through brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis, spawning and incubation habitats. Hydrobiologia 277(2):121–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fritz B, Arntzen EV (2007) Effect of rapidly changing river stage on uranium flux through the hyporheic zone. Groundwater 45(6):753–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gardner WR, Hillel D, Benyamini Y (1970) Post-irrigation movement of soil water: 1. Redistribution. Water Resour Res 6(3):851–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerecht KE, Cardenas MB, Guswa AJ, Sawyer AH, Nowinski JD, Swanson TE (2011) Dynamics of hyporheic flow and heat transport across a bed-to-bank continuum in a large regulated river. Water Resour Res 47(47):104–121Google Scholar
  13. Giraldo NM, Bayer P, Blum P, Cirpka O (2011) Propagation of seasonal temperature signals into an aquifer upon bank infiltration. Groundwater 49(4):491–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harleman DRF (1982) Hydrothermal analysis of lakes and reservoirs. J Hydraul Div 108(3):301–325Google Scholar
  15. Healy RW, Ronan AD (1996) Documentation of computer program VS2DH for simulation of energy transport in variably saturated porous media; modification of the US geological survey’s computer program VS2DT. U.S. Geological Survey. Water-Resource Investigation Report 96-4230Google Scholar
  16. Ho IH, Dickson M (2017) Numerical modeling of heat production using geothermal energy for a snow-melting system. Geomech Energy Environ 10:42–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kipp KL (1987) A computer code for simulation of heat and solution transport in three-dimensional groundwater flow systems. USGS Water Resources Investigations Report, Denver, pp 86–4095Google Scholar
  18. Laganière J, Paré D, Bergeron Y, Chen HYH (2012) The effect of boreal forest composition on soil respiration is mediated through variations in soil temperature and C quality. Soil Biol Biochem 53:18–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu Z, Yu X (2011) Coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical model for porous materials under frost action: theory and implementation. Acta Geotech 6(2):51–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lu S, Ren TS, Gong YS, Horton R (2007) An improved model for predicting soil thermal conductivity from water content at room temperature. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71(1):8–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mark O, Tony DA, Andrew JD (2012) Projected soil temperature increase and seed dormancy response along an altitudinal gradient: implications for seed bank persistence under climate change. Plant Soil 353(1–2):289–303Google Scholar
  22. Milly PCD (1987) Estimation of the Brooks Corey parameters from water retention data. Water Resour Res 23:1085–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nowinski JD, Cardenas MB, Lightbody AF, Sawyer A (2012) Hydraulic and thermal response of groundwater–surface water exchange to flooding in an experimental aquifer. J Hydrol 472–473(23):184–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oosterbaan H, Janiszewski M, Uotinen L, Siren T, Rinne M (2016) Numerical thermal back-calculation of the Kerava Solar Village underground thermal energy storage. Procedia Eng 191:352–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ren J, Wang XP, Shen ZZ, Zhao J, Yang J, Ye M, Zhou YJ, Wang ZH (2018) Heat tracer test in a riparian zone: laboratory experiments and numerical modelling. J Hydrol 563:560–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Saito H, Šimůnek J, Mohanty BP (2006) Numerical analysis of coupled water, vapor, and heat transport in the vadose zone. Vadose Zone J 5(2):784–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shao W, Bogaard T, Bakker M (2014) How to use comsol multiphysics for coupled dual-permeability hydrological and slope stability modeling. Procedia Earth Planet Sci 9:83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Šimůnek J, Sejna M, van Genuchten MT (1999) HYDRUS-2D simulating water flow, heat, and solute transport in two-dimensional variably saturated media. International Ground Water Modeling Center, RiversideGoogle Scholar
  29. van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vogt T, Schirmer M, Cirpka O (2012) Investigating riparian groundwater flow close to a losing river using diurnal temperature oscillations at high vertical resolution. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16(2):473–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang JD, Gong SH, Xu D, Juan S, Mu JX (2013) Numerical simulations and validation of water flow and heat transport in a subsurface drip irrigation system using HYDRUS-2D. Irrig Drain 62(1):97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wu ZW, Song HZ (2015) Numerical simulation of embankment dam seepage monitoring with temperature based on thermal-hydro coupling model. Rock Soil Mech 36:584–590 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  33. Xu C, Dowd PA, Tian ZF (2015) A simplified coupled hydro-thermal model for enhanced geothermal systems. Appl Energy 140:135–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yosef TY, Song CR, Chang KT (2017) Hydro-thermal coupled analysis for health monitoring of embankment dams. Acta Geotech 4:1–9Google Scholar
  35. Zhao Y, Zhai XF, Wang ZH, Li HJ, Jiang R, Hill RL, Si B, Hao F (2018) Simulation of soil water and heat flow in ridge cultivation with plastic film mulching system on the Chinese Loess Plateau. Agric Water Manag 202:99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jie Ren
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Wenbing Zhang
    • 1
  • Jie Yang
    • 1
  • Zhenzhong Shen
    • 2
  • Jian Zhao
    • 2
  • Yinjun Zhou
    • 3
  • Zhenhua Wang
    • 4
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region of ChinaXi’an University of TechnologyXi’anChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic EngineeringHohai UniversityNanjingChina
  3. 3.Changjiang River Scientific Research InstituteWuhanChina
  4. 4.College of Water & Architectural EngineeringShihezi UniversityShiheziChina

Personalised recommendations