The influence of water saturation and confining pressure to gas porosity and permeability of sandstone

  • Shiqi Liu
  • Huanling WangEmail author
  • Weiya Xu
  • Zhipeng Xiang
Original Article


Understanding of gas porosity and permeability is important in gas storage, recovery and nuclear waste disposal. In this paper, we focus on the gas porosity and permeability variation of sandstone at different water saturation in loading–unloading cycle. Through an improved method, we prepared the samples with water saturation level from 0 to 81%. The test results suggest that gas effective permeability and porosity are sensitive to confining pressure. This is particularly true in low pressure from 1 to 10 MPa. There is a significant difference between loading and unloading process. This is caused by irreversible deformation of pores and microcracks. The existence of water inside samples leads to a change of permeability on the order of magnitudes from 10−13 to 10−15 m2. Water saturation also influences the sandstone porosity significantly. We observed that the gas relative porosity almost decreases linearly with the increase of water saturation. A simple power law is modified to describe the relationship between gas effective permeability and porosity.


Gas effective permeability Porosity Sandstone Water saturation Confining pressure Power law 



This study is financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC1501100), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 11771116, 11572110), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant no. 2016B05314).


  1. Brace WF (1980) Permeability of crystalline and argillaceous rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 17:241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brace WF, Walsh JB, Frangos WT (1968) Permeability of granite under high pressure. J Geophys Res 73:2225–2236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Celia MA, Reeves PC, Lin AF (1995) Recent advances in pore scale models for multiphase flow in porous media. Rev Geophys 33:1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen W, Liu J, Brue F, Skoczylas F, Davy CA, Bourbon X, Talandier J (2012) Water retention and gas relative permeability of two industrial concretes. Cem Concr Res 42:1001–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dana E, Skoczylas F (1999) Gas relative permeability and pore structure of sandstones. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36:613–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dana E, Skoczylas F (2002) Experimental study of two-phase flow in three sandstones. I. Measuring relative permeabilities during two-phase steady-state experiments. Int J Multiphase Flow 28:1719–1736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. David C, Wong TF, Zhu WL, Zhang JX (1994) Laboratory measurement of compaction-induced permeability change in porous rocks: implications for the generation and maintenance of pore pressure excess in the crust. Pure Appl Geophys 143:425–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dong JJ, Hsu JY, Wu WJ et al (2010) Stress-dependence of the permeability and porosity of sandstone and shale from TCDP Hole-A. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47:1141–1157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dullien FAL (1991) Characterization of porous media—pore level. Transp Porous Media 6:581–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Evans B, Wong TF (1992) Fault mechanics and transport properties of rocks, vol 51. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Fu X, Agostini F, Skoczylas F, Jeannin L (2015) Experimental study of the stress dependence of the absolute and relative permeabilities of some tight gas sandstones. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 77:36–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gavrilenko P, Gueguen Y (2010) Pressure dependence of permeability: a model for cracked rocks. Geophys J Int 98:159–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghabezloo S, Sulem J, Guédon S, Martineau F (2009) Effective stress law for the permeability of a limestone. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46:297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoholick JD, Metarko T, Potter PE (1984) Regional variations of porosity and cement: St. Peter and Mount Simon sandstones in Illinois Basin. AAPG Bull 68:753–764Google Scholar
  15. Jia CJ, Xu WY, Wang HL, Wang RB, Yu J, Yan L (2017) Stress dependent permeability and porosity of low-permeability rock. J Central South Univ 24:2396–2405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jia CJ, Xu WY, Wang HL, Wang W, Yu J, Lin ZN (2018) Laboratory investigations of inert gas flow behaviors in compact sandstone. Environ Earth Sci 77:245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaviany M (2012) Principles of heat transfer in porous media. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  18. Klinkenberg LJ (1941) The permeability of porous media to liquids and gases. In: Drilling and production practice. American Petroleum InstituteGoogle Scholar
  19. Lion M, Skoczylas F, Ledésert B (2004) Determination of the main hydraulic and poro-elastic properties of a limestone from Bourgogne, France. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:915–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu JF, Skoczylas F, Talandier J (2015) Gas permeability of a compacted bentonite–sand mixture: coupled effects of water content, dry density, and confining pressure. Can Geotech J 52:1159–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Morrow CA, Shi LQ, Byerlee JD (1984) Permeability of fault gouge under confining pressure and shear stress. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 89:3193–3200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ramakrishnan TS, Cappiello A (1991) A new technique to measure static and dynamic properties of a partially saturated porous medium. Chem Eng Sci 46:1157–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schmoker JW, Halley RB (1982) Carbonate porosity versus depth: a predictable relation for south Florida. AAPG Bull 66:2561–2570Google Scholar
  24. Shanley KW, Cluff RM, Robinson JW (2004) Factors controlling prolific gas production from low-permeability sandstone reservoirs: implications for resource assessment, prospect development, and risk analysis. AAPG Bull 88:1083–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shi Y, Wang CY (1986) Pore pressure generation in sedimentary basins: overloading versus aquathermal. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 91:2153–2162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Song Y, Davy CA, Bertier P, Skoczylas F, Talandier J (2017) On the porosity of COx claystone by gas injection. Micropor Mesopor Mater 239:272–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ulusay R, Hudson JA (2007) The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 1974–2006. International Society for Rock Mechanics, Commission on Testing MethodsGoogle Scholar
  28. Verdier J, Carcasses M, Ollivier JP (2002) Modelling of a gas flow measurement: application to nuclear containment vessels. Cement Concret Res 32:1331–1340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang HL, Xu WY, Shao JF, Skoczylas F (2014) The gas permeability properties of low-permeability rock in the process of triaxial compression test. Mater Lett 116:386–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang HL, Xu WY, Cai M, Zuo J (2016) an experimental study on the slippage effect of gas flow in a compact rock. Transp Porous Media 112:117–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang HL, Xu WY, Cai M, Xiang ZP, Kong Q (2017a) Gas permeability and porosity evolution of a porous sandstone under repeated loading and unloading conditions. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang Y, Agostini F, Skoczylas F, Jeannin L, Portier É (2017b) Experimental study of the gas permeability and bulk modulus of tight sandstone and changes in its pore structure. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 91:203–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yıldırım H, Erşan H (2007) Settlements under consecutive series of cyclic loading. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27:577–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhang F, Xie SY, Hu DW, Shao JF, Gatmiri B (2012) Effect of water content and structural anisotropy on mechanical property of claystone. Appl Clay Sci 69:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zoback MD, Byerlee J (1975) Permeability and effective stress: geologic notes. AAPG Bull 59:154–158Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shiqi Liu
    • 1
  • Huanling Wang
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Weiya Xu
    • 1
  • Zhipeng Xiang
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Institute of Geotechnical EngineeringHohai UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Coastal Disaster and Defense, Ministry of EducationHohai UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations