Study on seismic isolation measures for cross-fault embankment
- 21 Downloads
Under the movement of fault, embankment can produce uneven displacement, deformation and even destruction. Consequently, it is necessary to adopt appropriate seismic measures to reduce the deformation or damage of embankment with the fault displacement. In view of this, the dynamic response of a cross-fault embankment with raft foundation as a seismic isolation measure was simulated by ABAQUS in this paper. Based on the reverse fault and normal fault, three kinds of setting positions of the raft foundation were set and then the displacement of subgrade surface and bending moments of raft foundation in all kinds of working conditions were calculated and compared. The results show that when s/b = 0.75, the fracture zone is shifted to the right compared with no foundation, indirectly reducing the dip angle of fault (“s” is the distance that from left endpoint of the foundation to the surface outer point of fault without foundation, “b” is the width of foundation). In addition, it is found that the vertical displacement curve of subgrade surface when s/b = 0.75 is gentler than other working conditions, furthermore, the curve’s largest inclination value and bending moment of raft foundation are the minimum. Therefore, the best condition for raft foundation as a seismic measure to cross-fault embankment is s/b = 0.75.
KeywordsCross-fault embankment ABAQUS Dynamic response Seismic measures
This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant no. 41602332, and the Youth Scientific and Technological Innovation Team of Southwest Petroleum University under Grant no. 2018CXTD02.
- Dong JC (1999) Brief introduction of safe distance regulations of Earthquake rupture‘Building Seismic Design’ Code Revised profile (Five). Eng Seism 2:14–16 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Guo ED, Shao GB, Bo GS, Ji SZ (2002) A method for earthquake rupture analysis of overlying soil site. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 22(5):122–126 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Lubkowski ZA, Duan X (2001) Eurocode 8—design of structures for earthquake resistance. Civ Eng 144(6):55–60Google Scholar
- Solhmirzaei R, Soroush A, Zanjani MM (2012) Numerical analysis of effects of fault rupture on overlying soil structures. In: International conference on dams and hydropowerGoogle Scholar
- Zanjani MM, Soroush A (2013) Numerical modeling of reverse fault rupture propagation through clayey embankment. Int J Civ Eng 11(2):122–132Google Scholar
- Zhang BK (2014) Several key influencing factors in the numerical simulation of fault. Sichuan Archit 2:124–125 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Zhang JY (2016) Active fault setback research on engineering sites. Recent Dev World Seismol 4:47–48 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Zhu JF, Huang ZL (2003) City active fault explore and seismic risk evaluation in Fujian province. Fujian Earthq 2:3–11 (in Chinese)Google Scholar