Hydrochemistry and geothermometry of geothermal water in the central Guanzhong Basin, China: a case study in Xi’an
- 47 Downloads
The Xi’an geothermal field is a typical medium–low-temperature group of geothermal reservoirs in the Guanzhong Basin. Three distinct groundwater systems occur in this field: the cold groundwater (CG) system (quaternary cold-water reservoir with a depth of less than 300 m); the shallow geothermal water (SGW) system (the Quaternary, Zhangjiapo Group, and Lantian-Bahe Group thermal reservoirs with depths ranging between 300 and 2000 m); the deep geothermal water (DGW) system (the Gaoling Group, Bailuyuan Group, and Proterozoic crystalline rock fissure thermal reservoirs, with depths of more than 2000 m). The chemical composition of the CG system consists of HCO3–Ca and HCO3–Ca–Mg water types with a low Total Dissolved Solids’ (TDS) content. The chemical composition of the SGW system consists of SO4–Na and SO4–HCO3–Na water types that have resulted from the partial mixing with water from the CG system through fault structures. Calculations suggest that about 39.4–42.7% of the water in the SGW system was derived from the CG system. The chemical composition of the DGW system consists of SO4–Na and SO4–Cl–Na water types with elevated TDS, F−, SiO2, and high ion concentrations due to the long residence time of water in this largely closed system. The use of geothermometers, multiple mineral equilibrium calculations, and the silica-enthalpy mixing model suggests that temperatures in the SGW and DGW systems lie in the range of 40–85 °C and 94.7–135 °C, respectively. The chalcedony geothermometer is considered to provide the most reliable temperature estimates of the shallow reservoir, whereas the quartzb (maximum steam loss 100 °C) and Na–K geothermometers are considered to provide the most reliable estimates for the deep thermal reservoir. The results of a Q-cluster classification of the water agree well with the field classification of the sampled waters, and the associations of the principal variables obtained by the R-cluster method are consistent with the results obtained by the conventional hydrogeochemical assessment of the samples.
KeywordsGeothermometry Hydrogeochemistry Mixing processes Xi’an geothermal water Guanzhong Basin
This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41572236). And the completion of this article was inseparable from the contributions of all authors. Their support is gratefully acknowledged.
- Fournier RO, Potter RWI (1982) Revised and expanded silica (quartz) geothermometer. Geotherm Resour Counc Bull 11:3–12Google Scholar
- Jiang GM, Wu QC (2009) Study on the sustainable development and utilization of geothermal water resources in Xi’an city. Geol Resour 18(03):210–213 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
- Lu LH, Pang ZH, Kong YL, Guo Q, Wang YC, Xu CH, Gu W, Zhou LL, Yu DD (2018) Geochemical and isotopic evidence on the recharge and circulation of geothermal water in the Tangshan geothermal system near Nanjing, China: implications for sustainable development. Hydrogeol J 26(5):1705–1719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Qin DJ, Pang ZH, Turner JV, Wen XR, Zhao YD, Xu XL, Liu T (2005a) Isotopes of geothermal water in Xi’an area and implication on its relation to karstic groundwater in North Mountains. Acta Petrol Sin(05): 1489–1500 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
- Xu GF (2014) Isotope and hydrochemical evidence of Genetic about deep geothermal water, as the central of guanzhong basin for an example. M.S. Thesis, Chang’an University, Xi’an, China (in Chinese) Google Scholar