Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, 78:110 | Cite as

Delineation of fracture zone for groundwater using combined inversion technique

  • K. K. K. SinghEmail author
  • Abhay Kumar Bharti
  • S. K. Pal
  • Amar Prakash
  • Saurabh
  • Rajwardhan Kumar
  • P. K. Singh
Original Article
  • 38 Downloads

Abstract

This paper deals with severe issue of groundwater crisis over a part of hard rock terrain in the premises of Central Institute of Mining and Fuel Research (CIMFR), Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India. The goal of this study is delineation and mapping of fractured rock mass for groundwater exploration. Generally, fractured rock formation is the only source of groundwater in hard rock terrain. Electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) survey was conducted along three profiles over different parts of CIMFR premises using Wenner–Schlumberger and dipole–dipole arrays. Combined inversion of both arrays has been carried out during data analysis for better delineation of fracture rock masses in the complex geological environment. Two water-saturated fracture zones have been identified for the availability of groundwater, which has been confirmed by direct borehole drilling. This proves the effectiveness of ERT survey by combined inversion of both arrays for delineation of fracture zones.

Keywords

Groundwater Hard rock terrain Fracture zone mapping Wenner–Schlumberger Dipole–dipole Combined inversion 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to SERB, DST, Govt. of India, for funding the project (PDF/2016/004034). The authors wish to thank to Director, CSIR-CIMFR, and IIT (ISM), Dhanbad, for all support to this study.

References

  1. Abu-Shariah MII (2009) Determination of cave geometry by using a geoelectrical resistivity inverse model. Eng Geol 105:239–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acworth RI (1987) The development of crystalline basement aquifers in a tropical environment. Quart J Eng Geol 20:265–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adetoyinbo AA, Adelegan FT, Bello AK (2015) Environmental impact assessment of the potability of water from bore-hole, hand dug well and stream at Itagunmodi gold deposits Southwestern, Nigeria using FORTRAN algorithm for monitoring leachates and interpreting physicochemical data of contaminants in groundwater. Int J Water Res Environ Eng 7(1):1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Athanasiou E (2004) Combined inversion of geoelectrical data by the use of contact electrodes. M.Sc. Thesis, Aristotle University of ThessalonikiGoogle Scholar
  5. Athanasiou EN, Tsourlos PI, Papazachos CB, Tsokas GN (2007) Combined weighted inversion of electrical resistivity data arising from different array types. J Appl Geophys 62:124–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atzemoglou A, Tsourlos P, Pavlides S (2003) Investigation of the tectonic structure of the NW Part of the Amynteon Basin (NW Greece) by means of a Vertical Electrical Sounding (VES) survey. J Balkan Geophys Soc 4:188–201Google Scholar
  7. Banerjee KS, Sharma SP, Sarangi AK, Sengupta D (2011) Delineation of subsurface structures using resistivity, VLF and radiometric measurement around a U-tailings pond and its hydrogeological implication. Phys Chem Earth 36:1345–1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barker RD (1978) The offset system of electrical resistivity sounding and its use with a multi-core cable. Geophys Prospect 29:128–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barker RD (1992) A simple algorithm for electrical imaging of the subsurface. First Break 10:53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bharti AK, Pal SK, Vaish J (2014) Application of self-potential method for coal fire detection over Jharia Coal field. 51st annual convention of Indian Geophysical Union, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, 19–21 November, pp 59–62Google Scholar
  11. Bharti AK, Pal SK, Priyam P, Narayan S, Pathak VK, Sahoo SD (2015) Detection of illegal mining over Raniganj coalfield using electrical resistivity tomography. Engineering Geology in New Millennium, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  12. Bharti AK, Pal SK, Priam P, Kumar S, Shalivahan, Yadav PK (2016a) Subsurface cavity detection over Patherdih colliery, Jharia Coalfield, India using electrical resistivity tomography. Environ Earth Sci 75(5):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bharti AK, Pal SK, Priam P, Pathak VK, Kumar R, Ranjan SK (2016b) Detection of illegal mine voids using electrical resistivity tomography: the case-study of Raniganj coalfield (India). Eng Geol 213:120–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bharti AK, Pal SK, Ranjan SK, Priyam P, Pathak VK (2016c) Coal mine cavity detection using electrical resistivity tomography: a joint inversion of multi array data. 22nd European meeting of environmental and engineering geophysics, EAGE, held in Barcelona, Spain.  https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201602084
  15. Bharti AK, Pal SK, Singh KKK, Prakash A, Verma A, Singh PK (2018a) Mapping of cavity using electrical resistivity tomography, near surface geoscience conference and exhibition, 9–12 September 2018, Porto, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  16. Bharti AK, Pal SK, Saurabh, Singh KKK, Singh PK, Prakash A, Tiwary RK (2018b) Groundwater prospecting by inversion of cumulative data of Wenner–Schlumberger and dipole–dipole arrays: a case study at Turamdih, Jharkhand, India. J Earth Syst Sci (in press) Google Scholar
  17. Bhattacharya BB, Shalivahan S (2016) Geoelectric methods: theory and application. McGraw Hill Education, Oxford, p 735Google Scholar
  18. Cardarelli E, Cercato M, Cerreto A, DiFilippo G (2010) Electrical resistivity and seismic refraction tomography to detect buried cavities. Geophys Prospect 58:685–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chandra S, Rao VA, Krishnamurthy NS, Dutta S, Ahmed S (2006) Integrated studies for characterization of lineaments used to locate groundwater potential zones in a hard rock region of Karnataka, India. Hydrogeol J 14:1042–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chandra S, Shakeel A, Avadh R, Benoit D (2008) Estimation of hard rock aquifers hydraulic conductivity from geoelectrical measurements: a theoretical development with field application. J Hydrol 357:218–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dahlin T, Owen R (1998) Geophysical investigations of alluvial aquifers in Zimbabwe. In: Proceedings of the IV meeting of the environmental and engineering geophysical society, Barcelona, Spain, pp 151–154Google Scholar
  22. Das P, Mohanty PR (2016) Resistivity imaging technique to delineate shallow subsurface cavities associated with old coal working: a numerical study. Environ Earth Sci 75(8):661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dawson CB, Lane JW Jr, White EA, Belaval M (2002) Integrated geophysical characterization of the Winthrop landfill southern flow path, Winthrop, Maine. In: Proceedings of the symposium on the application of geophysics to engineering and environmental problems, Las Vegas, Nevada, Environ and Eng Geophys Soc 22Google Scholar
  24. De la Vega M, Osella A, Lascano E (2003) Joint inversion of Wenner and dipole–dipole data to study a gasoline-contaminated soil. J Appl Geophys 54:97–109DCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Giao PH, Chung SG, Kim DY, Tanaka H (2003) Electric imaging and laboratory resistivity testing for geotechnical investigation of Pusan clay deposits. J Appl Geophys 52:157–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Griffiths DH, Barker RD (1993) Two-dimensional resistivity imaging and modeling in areas of complex geology. J Appl Geophys 29:211–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Griffiths DH, Turnbull J (1985) A multi-electrode array for resistivity surveying. First Break 3(7):16–20Google Scholar
  28. Griffiths DH, Turnbull J, Olayinka AI (1990) Two-dimensional resistivity mapping with a computer-controlled array. First Break 8:121–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Karlik G, Kaya MA (2001) Investigation of groundwater contamination using electric and electromagnetic methods at an open waste disposal site: a case study from Isparta, Turkey. Environ Geol 40:725–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Krishnamurthy NS, Kumar D, Rao AV, Jain SC, Ahmed S (2003) Comparison of surface and sub-surface geophysical investigations in delineating fracture zones. Curr Sci 84(9):1242–1246Google Scholar
  31. Kumar D, Ahmed S, Krishnamurthy NS, Dewandel B (2007) Reducing ambiguities in vertical electrical sounding interpretations: a geostatistical application. J Appl Geophys 62(1):16–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kumar D, Rao VA, Sarma VS (2014) Hydrogeological and geophysical study for deeper groundwater resource in quartzitic hard rock ridge region from 2D resistivity data. J Earth Syst Sci 123(3):531–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kumar D, Mondal S, Nandan MJ, Harini P, Sekhar SBMV, Sen MK, Keller GV, Frischknecht FC (2016) Two-dimensional electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and time-domain-induced polarization (TDIP) study in hard rock for groundwater investigation: a case study at Choutuppal, Telangana, India. Arab J Geosci 9:355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Limaye SD (2005) GROUNDWATER—Vol. II—groundwater development in hard rocks. encyclopedia of life support systems (EOLSS). http://www.eolss.net/Sample-chapters/C07/E2-09-05-05.pdf
  35. Loke MH (1997) Electrical imaging surveys for environmental and engineering studies. Unpublished report 1–8Google Scholar
  36. Loke MH (1999) Electrical imaging surveys for environmental and engineering studies a practical guide to 2-D and 3-D surveys 63Google Scholar
  37. Loke MH, Barker RD (1996) Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudo sections using a quasi-Newton method. Geophys Prospect 44:131–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Martínez-Moreno FJ, Pedrera A, Ruano P, Galindo-Zaldívar J, Martos-Rosillo S, González-Castillo L, Sánchez-Úbeda JP, Marín-Lechado C (2014) Combined microgravity, electrical resistivity tomography and induced polarization to detect deeply buried caves: Algaidilla cave (Southern Spain). Eng Geol 162:67–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Martínez-Pagán P, Gómez-Ortiz D, Martín-Crespo T, Manteca JI, Rosique M (2013) The electrical resistivity tomography method in the detection of shallow mining cavities. A case study on the Victoria Cave, Cartagena (SE Spain). Eng Geol 156:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Metwaly M, AlFouzan F (2013) Application of 2-D geoelectrical resistivity tomography for subsurface cavity detection in the eastern part of Saudi. Arab Geosci Front 4:469–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mohammed SF (2011) Geophysical characteristics of WadiHanifah water system, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Arab J Geosci 4:1051–1066.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-0090104-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mondal NC, Rao VA, Singh VS, Sarwade DV (2008) Integrated approach for identification of potential groundwater zones in Seethanagaram, Mandal of Vizianagaram district, Andhra Pradesh, India. J Earth Syst Sci 117(2):133–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mondal NC, Singh V, Ahmed S (2013) Delineating shallow saline groundwater zones from Southern India using geophysical indicators. Environ Monit Asses 185(6):4869–4886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Olutoyin AF, Moshood NT, Abel OT, Oluwatola IA (2014) Delineation of groundwater potential zones in the crystalline basement terrain of SW-Nigeria: an integrated GIS and remote sensing approach. Appl Water Sci 4:19–38Google Scholar
  45. Pal SK, Vaish J, Kumar S, Bharti AK (2016) Coalfire mapping of East Basuria Colliery, Jharia coal field using Vertical Derivative Technique of Magnetic data. J Earth Syst Sci 125(1):165–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pánek T, Margielewski W, Táborik P, Urban J, Hradecký J, Szura C (2010) Gravitationally induced caves and other discontinuities detected by 2D electrical resistivity tomography: case studies from the Polish Flysch Carpathians. Geomorphol 123:165–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pazdirek O, Blaha V (1996).Examples of resistivity imaging using ME-100 resistivity field acquisition system. In: EAGE 58th conference and technical exhibition extended abstracts, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  48. Raji WO, Adeoye TO (2016) Geophysical mapping of contaminant leachate around a reclaimed open dumpsite. J King Saud Univ Sci 29:348–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rao PJ, Rao BS, Rao MJ, Harikrishna P (2003) Geo-electrical data analysis to demarcate groundwater pockets and recharge zones in Champavathi River Basin, Vizianagaram District, Andhra Pradesh. J Ind Geophys Union 7:105–113Google Scholar
  50. Sajeena S, Hakkim A, Kurien VMEK (2014) Identification of groundwater prospective zones using geoelectrical and electromagnetic surveys. Int J Eng Invent 3(6):17–21Google Scholar
  51. Sasaki Y (1992) Resolution of resistivity tomography inferred from numerical simulation. Geophys Prospect 40:453–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sauck WA (2000) A model for the resistivity structure of LNAPL plumes and their environs in sandy sediments. J Appl Geophys 44:151–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Singh KKK (2013b) Delineation of waterlogged area in inaccessible underground workings at Hingir Rampur Colliery using 2D resistivity imaging: a case study. Bull Eng Geol Environ 72(1):115–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Singh KKK, Singh KB, Lokhande RD, Prakash A (2004) Multielectrode Resistivity imaging technique for the study of coal seam. J Sci Indus Res 63:927–930Google Scholar
  55. Singh KKK, Singh AK, Singh KB, Sinha A (2006) 2D resistivity imaging survey for siting water-supply tube wells in metamorphic terrains: a case study of CMRI campus, Dhanbad, India. The leading edge, December 2006Google Scholar
  56. Singh KKK, Singh PK, Roy MP (2016) Resistivity imaging technique to investigate the subsurface strata conditions due to blasting in underground coal mines in India. Near Surf Geophys 14(1):47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sivaramakrishnan J, Asokan A, Sooryanarayana KR, Hegde SS, Benjamin J (2015) Occurrence of ground water in hard rock under distinct geological setup. Aquat Proced 4:706–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Srinivasamoorthy K, Chidambaram S, Vasanthavigar M, Anandhan P, Sarma VS (2015) Geophysical investigations for groundwater in a hard rock terrain, Salem district, Tamil Nadu, India. Bull Eng Geol Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0488-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Srivastava VK, Giri DN, Bharadwaj P (2012) Study and mapping of ground water prospect using remote sensing, GIS and geoelectrical resistivity techniques—a case study of Dhanbad district, Jharkhand, India. J Ind Geophys Union 16(2):55–63Google Scholar
  60. Stummer P, Maurer H, Green A (2004) Experimental design: electrical resistivity data sets that provide optimum subsurface information. Geophysics 69:120–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Surinaidu L, Gurunadha Rao VVS, TammaRao G, Mahesh J, Padalu G, Sarma VS, Rajendra Prasad P, MallikarjunaRao S, Manga Raja Rao B (2012) An integrated approach to investigate saline water intrusion and to identify the salinity sources in the Central Godavari delta, Andhra Pradesh, India. Arab J Geosci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0634-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. TammaRao G, GurunadhaRao VVS, Sarma VS, Ratnakar D, Surinaidu L, Mahesh J, Ramesh G (2011a) Hydrogeochemical parameters for assessment of groundwater quality in a river subbasin. Int J Environ Sci Tech.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-012-0024-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. TammaRao G, GurunadhaRao VVS, SrinivasaRao Y, Ramesh G (2011b) Study of hydro-geochemical processes of the groundwater in Ghatprabha river sub-basin, Bagalkot District, Karnataka, India. Arab J Geosci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0535-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. TammaRao G, GurunadhaRao VVS, SrinivasaRao Y, Ramesh G (2012) Application of numerical modelling for groundwater flow and contaminant transport analysis in the basaltic terrain, Bagalkot, India. Arab J Geosci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-011-046-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Telford WM, Geldart LP, Sheriff RE, Keys DA (1976) Applied geophysics (2nd edition). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 700Google Scholar
  66. Vaish J, Pal SK (2013) Interpretation of magnetic anomaly data over East Basuria region using an enhanced local wavenumber (ELW) technique. 10th Biennial International Conference and Exposition on Petroleum Geophysics, Kochi, 23–25 November, P110Google Scholar
  67. Vaish J, Pal SK (2015a) Subsurface coal fire mapping of East Basuria Colliery, Jharkhand. J Geol Soc India 86(4):438–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vaish J, Pal SK (2015b) Geological mapping of Jharia Coalfield, India using GRACE EGM2008 gravity data: a vertical derivative approach. Geocarto Int 30(4):388–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vaish J, Pal SK (2016) Subsurface Coal fire mapping of Patherdih Colliery a part of Jharia coal field, India. J Geol Soc India Spec Publ 4:80–85.  https://doi.org/10.17491/cgsi/2016/95899 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ward S (1989) Resistivity and induced polarization methods: in investigations in geophysics. Geotechnical and environmental geophysics, vol I, Ward S (ed.), SEG, Tulsa, pp 47–189Google Scholar
  71. Yadav GS, Singh SK (2007) Integrated resistivity surveys for delineation of fractures for groundwater exploration in hard rock areas. J Appl Geophys 62:301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhou B, Greenhalgh SA (2000) Cross-hole resistivity tomography using different electrode configurations. Geophys Prospect 48(5):887–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. K. K. Singh
    • 1
    Email author
  • Abhay Kumar Bharti
    • 1
  • S. K. Pal
    • 2
  • Amar Prakash
    • 1
  • Saurabh
    • 2
  • Rajwardhan Kumar
    • 2
  • P. K. Singh
    • 1
  1. 1.CSIR-Central Institute of Mining and Fuel ResearchDhanbadIndia
  2. 2.Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines)DhanbadIndia

Personalised recommendations