Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, 77:793 | Cite as

Synthesis and characterisation of a multifunctional oil-based drilling fluid additive

  • Wu-Juan Sun
  • Guo-Qing Tian
  • Hang-Juan Huang
  • Guo-Min Lu
  • Cong-Yu Ke
  • Jun-Feng Hui
  • Xun-Li Zhang
Original Article
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

An oil-based drilling fluid additive H-DEA (or humic acid-cocamide diethanolamine) was synthesised using humic acid and cocamide diethanolamine as raw materials. The rheological behaviors of H-DEA showed that the synthesised product has the good properties in both decreasing the filtrate loss and improving rheology property of oil-based drilling fluids compared with other commercially available additives. Under the optimal additive amount of 3%, both API filtrate loss and yield point changed remarkably from 5.40 to 0.41 mL and 9.0 to 25.6 Pa, respectively. Furthermore, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) showed that H-DEA has good thermal stability in a wide temperature range up to 170 °C. Infrared spectroscopy (IR) and rheological analysis revealed that the possible mechanism of the multifunctional effects may be attributed to the existing of high density of strong polar groups, hydrogen bonds, electrostatic forces, and intermolecular association on H-DEA molecular structure. The results of the study showed that the synthesised H-DEA can be potentially used as a multifunctional oil-based drilling fluid additive in oil-drilling excavation.

Keywords

Oil-based drilling fluid additives Humic acid Cocamide diethanolamine Filtrate loss Yield point Rheology property 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21676215), Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (2018JM2046), Scientific Research Program of Shaanxi Provincial Education Department (17JK0601), and Xi’an Science and Technology Project [2017081CG/RC044 (XASY001)].

References

  1. Abdo J, Al-Shabibi A, Al-Sharji H (2015) Effects of tribological properties of water-based drilling fluids on buckling and lock-up length of coiled tubing in drilling operations. Tribol Int 82:493–503.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2014.01.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aftab A, Ismail AR, Ibupoto ZH, Akeiber H, Malghani MGK (2017) Nanoparticles based drilling muds a solution to drill elevated temperature wells: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 76:1301–1313.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amanullah M, Ramasamy J, Al-Arfaj MK, Aramco S (2016) Application of an indigenous eco-friendly raw material as filtrate loss additive. J Petrol Sci Eng 139:191–197.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.12.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergaya F, Lagaly G (2013) Developments in clay science, (Second ed.), Handbook of Clay Science, vol. 5, Elsevier LtdGoogle Scholar
  5. Bose CC, Alshatti B, Swartz L, Gupta A, Barati R (2014) Dual application of polyelectrolyte complex nanoparticles as enzyme breaker carriers and filtrate loss additives for fracturing fluids. In: SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference–Canada, Society of Petroleum EngineersGoogle Scholar
  6. Cadix A, Wilson J, Barthet C, Phan C, Poix C, Dupuis P, Harrisson S (2015) Diblock copolymers: a new class of filtrate loss control additive for oilfield cementing. In: SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Society of Petroleum EngineersGoogle Scholar
  7. de Figueiredo JMR, Araujo JP, Silva IA, Cartaxo JM, Neves GA, Ferreira HC (2014) Purified smectite clays organofilized with ionic surfactant for use in oil-based drilling fluids. Brazilian Ceramic Conference 57 798–799:21–26.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.798-799.21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dino D, Thompson J, Geurtsen R (2011) Thermally stable compositions and use thereof in drilling fluids. US Patent 7:906,461Google Scholar
  9. Fan JT, Zhu H, Li R, Chen NJ (2015) Montmorillonite modified by cationic and nonionic surfactants as high-performance fluid-loss-control additive in oil-Based drilling fluids. J Disper Sci Technol 36(4):569–576.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01932691.2014.917052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fink JK (2012) filtrate loss Additives. Petroleum engineer’s guide to oil field chemicals and fluids:61–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-383844-5.00002-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ghanbari S, Kazemzadeh E, Soleymani M, Naderifar A (2016) A facile method for synthesis and dispersion of silica nanoparticles in water-based drilling fluid. Colloid Polym Sci 294(2):381–388.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-015-3794-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Growcock F, Harvey T (2005) Drilling fluids processing handbook. Elsevier Inc 57:155–203Google Scholar
  13. Guo LP, Wang L (2013) Study on the flow behavior of underbalanced circulative micro-foam drilling fluid. Adv Mater Res 706–708:1585–1588.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.706-708.1585 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Han B, Lu GL, Cao H, Zhang L (2017) Fractal features of the microstructure of the drilling fluid used into the hydrate-bearing sediments under the shearing action. Environ Earth Sci (2017) 76:468.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6798-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hermoso J, Martinez-Boza F, Gallegos C (2014) Influence of viscosity modifier nature and concentration on the viscous flow behaviour of oil-based drilling fluids at high pressure. Appl Clay Sci 87:14–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2013.10.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ibrahim MNM, Ahmed-Haras MR, Sipaut CS, Aboul-Enein HY, Mohamed AA (2010) Preparation and characterization of a newly water soluble lignin graft copolymer from oil palm lignocellulosic waste. Carbohyd Polym 80(4):1102–1110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.01.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jain R, Mahto V (2015) Evaluation of polyacrylamide/clay composite as a potential drilling fluid additive in inhibitive water based drilling fluid system. J Pet Sci Eng 133:612–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kelly J (1983) Drilling-fluids selection, performance, and quality-control. J Petrol Technol 35(5):889–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khodja M, Khodja-Saber M, Canselier JP, Khodja-Saber M, Cohaut N, Bergaya F (2010) Drilling fluid technology: performances and environmental considerations. INTECH Open Access PublisherGoogle Scholar
  20. Li JC, Yang P, Guan J, Sun YD, Kuang XB, Chen SS (2014) A new type of whole oil-based drilling fluid. Pet Explor Dev 41(4):538–544.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(14)60064-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ma C, Yang YP, Li L (2012) Study on drilling fluid technology of eliminating bit balling by changing wettability. Adv Mater Res 542–543:1083–1086.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.542-543.1083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ma C, Li L, Wang G, Yuan X (2014) Synthesis and characterization of substituted-ammonium humic acid filtrate loss additive for oil-based drilling fluids. Adv Mater Res 1004–1005:623–626.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1004-1005.623 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meng L, Gong S, He Y (2004) Organic spectral analysis. Wuhan University Press, Wuhan (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  24. Mueller D (1992) Performance characteristics of vinylsulfonate-based cement fluid-loss additives. In: SPE Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting, Society of Petroleum EngineersGoogle Scholar
  25. Shivhare S, Kuru E (2014) A study of the pore-blocking ability and formation damage characteristics of oil-based colloidal gas aphron drilling fluids. J Petrol Sci Eng 122:257–265.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2014.07.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vryzas Z, Kelessidis VC (2017) Nano-based drilling fluids: a review. Energies 10(4):540.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en10040540 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang L (2015) Preparation and application of viscosifier for environmentally friendly oil-based drilling fluid. Chem Technol Fuels Oils 51(5):539–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang PQ, Yu ZX, Yin D, Liang HJ, Yang KB (2011) A multi-function agent used in drilling fluid and completion fluid MFA-1. Advanced Materials Structures 335–336:491–497.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.335-336.491 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Watson RB, Viste P, Lauritzen R (2012) The influence of filtrate loss additives in high-temperature reservoirs. In: SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Society of Petroleum EngineersGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang QZ, Sun XW, Li CC, Zhang Y, Liu NN (2013) Synthesis and performance test of filtrate loss additive H-QA. Oil Drilling Production Technology 35(1):40–44Google Scholar
  31. Zhou H, Deville JP, Davis CL (2015) Novel high density brine-based drill-In fluids significantly increased temperature limit for HP/HT applications. In: SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum EngineersGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhuang GZ, Wu H, Zhang HX, Zhang ZP, Zhang XM, Liao LB (2017) Rheological properties of organo-palygorskite in oil-based drilling fluids aged at different temperatures. Appl Clay Sci 137:50–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhuang GZ, Zhang ZP, Yang H, Tan JJ (2018) Structures and rheological properties of organo-sepiolite in oil-based drilling fluids. Appl Clay Sci 154:43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wu-Juan Sun
    • 1
  • Guo-Qing Tian
    • 2
  • Hang-Juan Huang
    • 2
  • Guo-Min Lu
    • 1
  • Cong-Yu Ke
    • 1
  • Jun-Feng Hui
    • 3
  • Xun-Li Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringXi’an Shiyou UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.The 6th Gas Production PlantPetroChina Changqing Oilfield CompanyXi’anPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.School of Chemical EngineeringNorthwest UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations