Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, 77:794 | Cite as

Hydrochemical evolution of groundwater in a riparian zone affected by acid mine drainage (AMD), South China: the role of river–groundwater interactions and groundwater residence time

  • Jing Wen
  • Changyuan Tang
  • Yingjie Cao
  • Xing Li
  • Qian Chen
Original Article
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Investigations were undertaken in the riparian zone near Shangba village, an AMD area, in southern China to determine the effects that river–groundwater interactions and groundwater residence time have had on environmental quality and geochemical evolution of groundwater. Based on the Darcy’s law and ionic mass balances as well as the method of isotopic tracer, the results showed that there were active interactions between AMD-contaminated river water and groundwater in the riparian zone in the study area. River water was found to be the main source of groundwater recharge in the northwestern part of the study area, whereas groundwater was found to be discharging into the river in the southeastern part of the study area throughout the year. End-member mixing analysis quantified that the contributions of river water to groundwater decreased gradually from 35.9% to negligible levels along the flow path. The calculated mixing concentrations of major ions indicated that water–rock reactions were the most important influence on groundwater quality. The wide range of Ca2+ + Mg2+ and HCO3 ratios and the change of groundwater type from Ca2+–SO42− type to a chemical composition dominated by Ca2+–HCO3 type indicated a change of the major water–rock reaction process from the influence of H2SO4 (AMD) to that of CO2 (soil respiration) along a groundwater flow path. Furthermore, the kinetics interpretation of SO42− and HCO3 concentrations suggested that the overlapping time of their kinetics triggered the hydrochemical evolution and the change of major weathering agent. This process might take approximately 8 years and this kinetic time will be continued when a steady source of contamination enter the aquifer.

Keywords

AMD River–groundwater interactions Groundwater residence time The geochemical evolution 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Special thanks go to Lei Gao, Rui Li, Zewen Pan, Jiafu Zhao, Pengcheng Zhang and Chenglei Xie for technical support and guidance. We thank Dan Yao for article language help. Shangba villagers are also acknowledged for providing assistance during the sampling campaigns. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation NSFC (no. 41471020), Science Research Programs of Guangzhou (no. 201510010300), and Youth Science Fund Project (no. 41501512).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Amalfitano S, Del Bon A, Zoppini A, Ghergo S, Fazi S, Parrone D, Casella P, Stano F, Preziosi E (2014) Groundwater geochemistry and microbial community structure in the aquifer transition from volcanic to alluvial areas. Water Res 65:384–394.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brakensiek DL, Rawls WJ, Stephenson GR (1986) A note on determining soil properties for soils containing rock fragments. J Range Manag Arch 50(3):408–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brodie R, Sundaram B, Tottenham R, Hostetler S, Ransley T (2007) An overview of tools for assessing groundwater-surface water connectivity. Bureau of Rural Sciences, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  4. Caraballo MA, Macías F, Nieto JM, Ayora C (2016) Long term fluctuations of groundwater mine pollution in a sulfide mining district with dry Mediterranean climate: implications for water resources management and remediation. Sci Total Environ 539:427–435.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen A, Lin C, Lu W, Wu Y, Ma Y, Li J, Zhu L (2007) Well water contaminated by acidic mine water from the Dabaoshan Mine, South China: chemistry and toxicity. Chemosphere 70(2):248–255.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.06.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chowdary VM, Rao NH, Sarma PBS (2005) Decision support framework for assessment of non-point-source pollution of groundwater in large irrigation projects. Agric Water Manag 75(3):194–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2004.12.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gimeno MJALGJ (ed) (2008) Water–rock interaction modelling and uncertainties of mixing modelling. Swedish Nuclear Fuel & Waste Management Co, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  8. Goienaga N, Carrero JA, Zuazagoitia D, Baceta JI, Murelaga X, Fernández LA, Madariaga JM (2015) Recrystallization and stability of Zn and Pb minerals on their migration to groundwater in soils affected by acid mine drainage under CO2 rich atmospheric waters. Chemosphere 119:727–733.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.07.081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gómez JB, Gimeno MJ, Auqué LF, Acero P (2014) Characterisation and modelling of mixing processes in groundwaters of a potential geological repository for nuclear wastes in crystalline rocks of Sweden. Sci Total Environ 468–469:791–803.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. González E, Felipe-Lucia MR, Bourgeois B, Boz B, Nilsson C, Palmer G, Sher AA (2017) Integrative conservation of riparian zones. Biol Conserv 211:20–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gribovszki Z, Kalicz P, Szilágyi J, Kucsara M (2008) Riparian zone evapotranspiration estimation from diurnal groundwater level fluctuations. J Hydrol 349(1–2):6–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.10.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Han DM, Song XF, Currell MJ, Yang JL, Xiao GQ (2014) Chemical and isotopic constraints on evolution of groundwater salinization in the coastal plain aquifer of Laizhou Bay, China. J Hydrol 508:12–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.10.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Han D, Cao G, McCallum J, Song X (2015) Residence times of groundwater and nitrate transport in coastal aquifer systems: Daweijia area, northeastern China. Sci Total Environ 538:539–554.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang G, Sun J, Zhang Y, Chen Z, Liu F (2013) Impact of anthropogenic and natural processes on the evolution of groundwater chemistry in a rapidly urbanized coastal area, South China. Sci Total Environ 463–464:209–221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Iepure S, Meffe R, Carreño F, Rasines RL, de Bustamante I (2014) Geochemical, geological and hydrological influence on ostracod assemblages distribution in the hyporheic zone of two Mediterranean rivers in central Spain. Int Rev Hydrobiol 99(6):435–449.  https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.201301727 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jiang Y, Wu Y, Groves C, Yuan D, Kambesis P (2009) Natural and anthropogenic factors affecting the groundwater quality in the Nandong karst underground river system in Yunan, China. J Contam Hydrol 109(1–4):49–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2009.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Katz BG (2004) Sources of nitrate contamination and age of water in large karstic springs of Florida. Environ Geol 46(6–7):689–706.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-004-1061-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lin CY, Abdullah MH, Praveena SM, Yahaya AHB, Musta B (2012) Delineation of temporal variability and governing factors influencing the spatial variability of shallow groundwater chemistry in a tropical sedimentary island. J Hydrol 432–433:26–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu F, Song X, Yang L, Han D, Zhang Y, Ma Y, Bu H (2015) The role of anthropogenic and natural factors in shaping the geochemical evolution of groundwater in the Subei Lake basin, Ordos energy base, Northwestern China. Sci Total Environ 538:327–340.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mander Ü, Tournebize J (2015) Riparian buffer zones: functions and dimensioning. In: 2010 4th international conference on bioinformatics and biomedical engineering (iCBBE), pp 20151–20154Google Scholar
  21. Meyer LD, Johnson CB, Foster GR (1972) Stone and woodchip mulches forerosion control on construction sites. Soil Water Conserv 27:246–269Google Scholar
  22. Molson J, Aubertin M, Bussière B (2012) Reactive transport modelling of acid mine drainage within discretely fractured porous media: plume evolution from a surface source zone. Environ Model Softw 38:259–270.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.06.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Qiao X, Li G, Li M, Zhou J, Du J, Du C, Sun Z (2011) Influence of coal mining on regional karst groundwater system: a case study in West Mountain area of Taiyuan City, northern China. Environ Earth Sci 64(6):1525–1535.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0586-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rahman MM, Worch E (2005) Nonequilibrium sorption of phenols onto geosorbents: the impact of pH on intraparticle mass transfer. Chemosphere 61(10):1419–1426.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.04.085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schilling KE, Jacobson PJ, Wolter CF (2018) Using riparian zone scaling to optimize buffer placement and effectiveness. Landsc Ecol 33(1):141–156.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0589-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Szilágyi J, Gribovszki Z, Kalicz P, Kucsara M (2008) On diurnal riparian zone groundwater-level and streamflow fluctuations. J Hydrol 349(1–2):1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vengosh A, De Lange GJ, Starinsky A (1998) Boron isotope and geochemical evidence for the origin of Urania and Bannock brines at the eastern Mediterranean: effect of water-rock interactions. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 62:3221–3228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00236-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vidal-Abarca Gutiérrez MR, Suárez Alonso ML (2013) Which are, what is their status and what can we expect from ecosystem services provided by Spanish rivers and riparian areas? Biodivers Conserv 22(11):2469–2503.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0532-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vidon PGF, Hill AR (2004) Landscape controls on the hydrology of stream riparian zones. J Hydrol 292(1–4):210–228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Woessner WW (2000) Stream and fluvial plain ground water interactions:rescaling hydrogeologic thought. Groundwater 38(3):423–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Worch E (2004) Modelling the solute transport under nonequilibrium conditions on the basis of mass transfer equations. J Contam Hydrol 68(1–2):97–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7722(03)00091-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yesilnacar MI, Kadiragagil Z (2013) Effects of acid mine drainage on groundwater quality: a case study from an open-pit copper mine in eastern Turkey. Bull Eng Geol Environ 72(3–4):485–493.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0512-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhao H, Xia B, Qin J, Zhang J (2012) Hydrogeochemical and mineralogical characteristics related to heavy metal attenuation in a stream polluted by acid mine drainage: a case study in Dabaoshan Mine, China. J Environ Sci China 24(6):979–989.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(11)60868-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jing Wen
    • 1
  • Changyuan Tang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yingjie Cao
    • 1
  • Xing Li
    • 1
  • Qian Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Environmental Science and EngineeringSun Yat-Sen UniversityGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of Geography and PlanningSun Yat-Sen UniversityGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations