Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, 77:758 | Cite as

Application of a unified linear yield criterion in plane strain to study the strength theory effect in geotechnical engineering

  • Changguang Zhang
  • Mingming Cai
  • Junhai Zhao
  • Lizhou WuEmail author
Original Article
  • 144 Downloads

Abstract

The plane strain condition is a common, but polyaxial stress state for geotechnical structure designs, in which the selection of an appropriate yield or failure criterion is crucial to reasonably account for the intermediate principal stress. Under plane strain condition, a unified linear yield criterion for seven commonly used geotechnical yield criteria is presented in conjunction with the inductive method. These seven yield criteria considered in this study are the Mohr–Coulomb, Tresca, Drucker–Prager, Mogi–Coulomb, Extended Matsuoka–Nakai, Extended Lade–Duncan criteria, and the Unified Strength Theory. The generalized analytical solutions for earth pressure of retaining walls, critical load of strip foundations as well as stress and displacement of circular tunnels are derived on the basis of the proposed unified yield criterion, and their respective theoretical significance is analyzed. Thereafter, the critical load of strip foundations obtained herein is compared with two numerical results from the literature. Furthermore, the effect of strength theory on result differences of the three typical geotechnical problems by simply selecting constants, which conform to different yield criteria, is explored through a parametric study. It is found that the proposed unified yield criterion is convenient for investigating analytical solutions of the aforementioned geotechnical structures. The strength theory effect due to adopting different yield criteria is considerably significant, which cannot be ignored. Additionally, recommendations are provided on how to make use of these seven yield criteria for an optimum design.

Keywords

Unified linear yield criterion Plane strain Effect of strength theory Intermediate principal stress Generalized analytical solution 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 41202191 and 51878056), the Opening Fund of State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection (SKLGP2017K025), the Special Fund for Basic Scientific Research of Central Colleges (310828173402), and the China Scholarship Council (CSC 201706565020) is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would like to thank four anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions in improving the original manuscript.

References

  1. Al-Ajmi AM, Zimmerman RW (2005) Relation between the Mogi and the Coulomb failure criteria. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 42(3):431–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bishop AW (1966) The strength of soils as engineering materials. Géotechnique 16(2):89–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carranza-Torres C, Zhao J (2009) Analytical and numerical study of the effect of water pressure on the mechanical response of cylindrical lined tunnels in elastic and elasto-plastic porous media. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46(3):531–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen WF (1975) Limit analysis and soil plasticity. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen QN, Zhang YX, Zhou XP (2005) Formula of Rankine passive earth pressure in triaxial state of stress. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 24(5):880–882 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  6. Cheng C, Wan M, Wu XD, Cai ZY, Zhao R, Meng B (2017) Effect of yield criteria on the formability prediction of dual-phase steel sheets. Int J Mech Sci 133:28–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Colmenares LB, Zoback MD (2002) A statistical evaluation of intact rock failure criteria constrained by polyaxial test data for five different rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39(6):695–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Drucker DC, Prager W (1952) Soil mechanics and plastic analysis or limit design. Q Appl Math 10(2):157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duan K, Kwok CY, Ma XD (2017) DEM simulations of sandstone under true triaxial compressive tests. Acta Geotech 12(3):495–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fan W, Lin YL, Qin YH (2003) Formula for critical load of foundation based on the unified strength theory. J Chang’an Univ (Earth Sci Ed) 25(3):48–51 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  11. Gao DZ (1998) Soil mechanics and foundation engineering. China Architecture and Building Press, Beijing (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  12. GB50007-2011 (2012) Code for design of building foundation. The National Standards Compilation Group of People’s Republic of China. China Architecture and Building Press, Beijing (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  13. Grammatikopoulou A, Zdravkovic L, Potts DM (2007) The effect of the yield and plastic potential deviatoric surfaces on the failure height of an embankment. Géotechnique 57(10):795–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haimson BC (2011) Consistent trends in the true triaxial strength and deformability of cores extracted from ICDP deep scientific holes on three continents. Tectonophysics 503(1–2):45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoek E, Brown ET (1997) Practical estimates of rock mass strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(8):1165–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoyos LR, Pérez-Ruiz DD, Puppala AJ (2012) Refined true triaxial apparatus for testing unsaturated soils under suction-controlled stress paths. Int J Geomech 12(3):281–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Humpheson C, Naylor DJ (1975) The importance of the form of the failure criterion. University of Wales, CardiffGoogle Scholar
  18. Jiang H (2017) Three-dimensional failure criteria for rocks based on the Hoek-Brown criterion and a general lode dependence. Int J Geomech 17(8):04017023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jiang Q, Zhu JM, Yao YP (2005) Application of Lade-Duncan failure criterion to calculation of bearing capacity of foundations. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 24(18):3262–3265 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  20. Kumruzzaman M, Yin JH (2002) Influence of the intermediate principal stress on the stress-strain-strength behaviour of a completely decomposed granite soil. Géotechnique 62(3):275–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lade PV (2006) Assessment of test data for selection of 3-D failure criterion for sand. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 30(4):307–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lade PV, Duncan JM (1973) Cubical triaxial tests on cohesionless soil. J Soil Mech Found Div 99(SM10):793–812Google Scholar
  23. Lade PV, Kim MK (1988) Single hardening constitutive model for frictional materials II. Yield criterion and plastic work contours. Comput Geotech 6(1):13–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lade PV, Kim MK (1995) Single hardening constitutive model for soil, rock and concrete. Int J Solids Struct 32(14):1963–1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lagioia R, Panteghini A (2014) The influence of the plastic potential on plane strain failure. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 38(8):844–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lagioia R, Panteghini A (2017) Accounting for specific failure criteria in the slip-line method for plane strain problems. Geotech Lett 7(2):184–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee YK, Ghosh J (1996) The significance of J 3 to the prediction of shear bands. Int J Plast 12(9):1179–1197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li L, Aubertin M (2009) An elastoplastic evaluation of the stress state around cylindrical openings based on a closed multiaxial yield surface. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 33(2):193–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li JC, Ma GW, Yu MH (2008) Penetration analysis for geo-material based on unified strength criterion. Int J Impact Eng 35(10):1154–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Luo T, Yao YP, Matsuoka H (2001) Soil strength equation in plane strain based on SMP. Rock Soil Mech 21(4):390–393 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  31. Ma XD, Haimson BC (2016) Failure characteristics of two porous sandstones subjected to true triaxial stresses. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 121(9):6477–6498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ma ZY, Liao HJ (2012) Study of twin shear unified elastoplastic finite difference method. Chin J Comput Mech 29(1):43–48 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  33. Ma ZY, Liao HJ, Dang FN (2014) Influence of intermediate principal stress on the bearing capacity of strip and circular footings. J Eng Mech 140(7):04014041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Makhnenko R, Labuz J (2014) Plane strain testing with passive restraint. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47(6):2021–2029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Matsuoka H, Hoshikawa T, Ueno K (1990) A general failure criterion and stress-strain relation for granular materials to metals. Soils Found 30(2):119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Matsuoka H, Sun DA, Kogane A, Fukuzawa N, Ichihara W (2002) Stress-strain behaviour of unsaturated soil in true triaxial tests. Can Geotech J 39(3):608–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mogi K (2007) Experimental rock mechanics. Taylor & Francis/Balkema, LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nanda S, Patra NR (2015) Determination of soil properties for plane strain condition from the triaxial tests results. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 39(9):1014–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pan XD, Brown ET (1996) Influence of axial stress and dilatancy on rock tunnel stability. J Geotech Eng 122(2):139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Park PH, Kim YJ (2006) Analytical solution for a circular opening in an elastic-brittle-plastic rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43(4):616–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Potts DM, Gens A (1984) The effect of the plastic potential in boundary value problems involving plane strain deformation. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 8(3):259–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Priest S (2012) Three-dimensional failure criteria based on the Hoek-Brown criterion. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45(6):989–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rahimi R, Nygaard R (2015) Comparison of rock failure criteria in predicting borehole shear failure. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 79:29–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Satake M (1976) Stress-deformation and strength characteristics of soil under three difference principal stresses (discussion). Proc Jpn Soc Civ Eng 246:137–138 (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  45. Shalev E, Lyakhovsky V (2018) The role of the intermediate principal stress on the direction of damage zone during hydraulic stimulation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 107:86–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shang JL, Duan K, Gui YL, Handley K, Zhao ZY (2017) Numerical investigation of the direct tensile behaviour of laminated and transversely isotropic rocks containing incipient bedding planes with different strengths. Comput Geotech.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.11.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shang JL, Gui YL, Zhao ZY (2018a) Broad-spectrum fracture toughness of an anisotropic sandstone under mixed-mode loading. Theor Appl Fract Mech 96:556–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shang JL, Zhao ZY, Ma SQ (2018b) On the shear failure of incipient rock discontinuities under CNL and CNS boundary conditions: insights from DEM modelling. Eng Geol 234:153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Singh AK, Rao KS, Ayothirman R (2017) Effect of intermediate principal stress on cylindrical tunnel in an elasto-plastic rock mass. Procedia Eng 173:1056–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wanatowski D, Chu J (2007) Drained behaviour of Changi sand in triaxial and plane-strain compression. Geomech Geoeng 2(1):29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang YL (1994) The effect of a nonlinear Mohr-Coulomb criterion on borehole stresses and damage-zone estimate. Can Geotech J 31(1):104–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang Q, Lade PV (2001) Shear banding in true triaxial test and its effect on failure in sand. J Eng Mech 127(8):754–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wu CZ, Yang LD, Li QS (2013) Perfect elastic-brittle-plastic solution of axisymmetric circular openings in rock mass on extended SMP criterion. Eng Mech 30(8):223–228 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  54. Wu LZ, Zhou Y, Sun P, Shi JS, Liu GG, Bai LY (2017) Laboratory characterization of rainfall-induced loess slope failure. Catena 150:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wu SC, Zhang SH, Zhang G (2018) Three-dimensional strength estimation of intact rocks using a modified Hoek-Brown criterion based on a new deviatoric function. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 107:181–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Xu SQ, Yu MH (2006) The effect of the intermediate principal stress on the ground response of circular openings in rock mass. Rock Mech Rock Eng 39(2):169–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yang XQ, Wu ZC, Yang ZK (2010) Research on active soil pressure on retaining wall under general stress states. China J Highw Transp 23(2):25–29 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  58. Yao YP, Hu J, Zhou AN, Luo T, Wang ND (2015) Unified strength criterion for soils, gravels, rocks, and concretes. Acta Geotech 10(6):749–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yi X, Valkó PP, Russell JE (2005) Effect of rock strength criterion on the predicted onset of sand production. Int J Geomech 5(1):66–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yu MH (1998) Two-shear theory and its application. Science, Beijing (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  61. Yu MH (2002) Advance in strength theories of materials under the complex stress state in the 20th Century. Appl Mech Rev 55(3):169–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yu MH (2004) Unified strength theory and its applications. Springer, Berlin HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yu MH, Zan YW, Zhao J, Yoshimine M (2002) A unified strength criterion for rock material. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39(8):975–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yumlu M, Ozbay MU (1995) A study of the behaviour of brittle rocks under plane strain and triaxial loading conditions. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 32(7):725–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhang LL, Cao P, Radha KC (2010a) Evaluation of rock strength criteria for wellbore stability analysis. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47(8):1304–1316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhang CG, Wang JF, Zhao JH (2010b) Unified solutions for stresses and displacements around circular tunnels using the Unified Strength Theory. Sci China Tech Sci 53(6):1694–1699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zhang CG, Zhao JH, Zhang QH, Hu XD (2012) A new closed-form solution for circular openings modeled by the Unified Strength Theory and radius-dependent Young’s modulus. Comput Geotech 42:118–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zhang CG, Chen XD, Fan W, Zhao JH (2015) A new unified failure criterion for unsaturated soils. Environ Earth Sci 74(4):3345–3356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zheng YR, Xiang YZ, Gao H (2016) The Mohr stress circle theory and strength criterion of friction materials of rock and soil. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 35(6):1081–1089 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  70. Zhou SH (1994) A program to model the initial shape and extent of borehole breakout. Comput Geosci 20(7–8):1143–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zhou XP, Yang HQ, Zhang YX, Yu MH (2009) The effect of the intermediate principal stress on the ultimate bearing capacity of a foundation on rock masses. Comput Geotech 36(5):861–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhu JM, Wu ZX, Zhang HT, Yao YP (2012) Study of residual stress of rock based on Lade-Duncan and SMP strength criteria. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 31(8):1715–1720 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  73. Zienkiewicz OC, Pande GN (1977) Finite elements in geomechanics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  74. Zou JF, Xia ZQ (2017) Closed-form solution for cavity expansion in strain-softening and undrained soil mass based on the unified strength failure criterion. Int J Geomech 17(9):04017046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zou JF, Xia ZQ, Xu Y (2017) Nonlinear visco-elasto-plastic solution of surrounding rock considering seepage force and 3-D Hoek-Brown failure criterion. Int J Geotech Eng 11(3):302–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Changguang Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mingming Cai
    • 1
  • Junhai Zhao
    • 1
  • Lizhou Wu
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.School of Civil EngineeringChang’an UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment ProtectionChengdu University of TechnologyChengduChina

Personalised recommendations