Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pressure transient technique to constrain CO2 plume boundaries

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Carbon dioxide (CO2) has been injected in the subsurface permeable formations as a means to cut atmospheric CO2 emissions and/or enhance oil recovery (EOR). It is important to constrain the boundaries of the CO2 plume in the target formation and/or other formations hosting the CO2 migrated from the target formation. Monitoring methods and technologies to assess the CO2 plume boundaries over time within a reservoir of interest are required. Previously introduced methods and technologies on pressure monitoring to detect the extent of the CO2 plume require at least two wells, i.e. pulser and observation wells. We introduce pressure transient technique requiring single well only. Single well pressure transient testing (drawdown/buildup/injection/falloff) is widely used to determine reservoir properties and wellbore conditions. Pressure diagnostic plots are used to identify different flow regimes and determine the reservoir/well characteristics. We propose a method to determine the plume extent for a constant rate pressure transient test at a single well outside the CO2 plume. Due to the significant contrast between mobility and storativity of the CO2 and native fluids (oil or brine), the CO2 boundary causes deviation in the pressure diagnostic response from that corresponding to previously identified heterogeneities. Using the superposition principle, we develop a relationship between the deviation time and the plume boundary. We demonstrate the applicability of the proposed method using numerically generated synthetic data corresponding to homogeneous, heterogeneous, and anisotropic cases to evaluate its potential and limitations. We discuss ways to identify and overcome the potential limitations for application of the method in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbaszadeh M, Hegeman PS (1990) Pressure-transient analysis for a slanted well in a reservoir with vertical pressure support. SPE Form Eval. https://doi.org/10.2118/19045-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal RG (1980) A new method to account for producing time effects when drawdown type curves are used to analyze pressure buildup and other test data. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Dallas

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdet D (2002) Well test analysis: the use of advanced interpretation models. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen CC, Chu W-C, Sadighi S (1996) Pressure-transient testing of gas reservoirs with edge-waterdrive. SPE Form Eval. https://doi.org/10.2118/28381-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CMG-GEM (2015) Computer modelling group CMG-GEM version 2015 user’s guide. Computer Modelling Group Ltd., Calgary

    Google Scholar 

  • Corey AT (1954) The interrelation between gas and oil relative permeabilities. Prod Mon 19:38–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Haghighat SA, Mohaghegh SD, Gholami V, Shahkarami A (2013) Pressure history matching for CO2 storage in saline aquifers: case study for Citronelle Dome. In: Carbon management technology conference, Alexandria

  • Hosseini SA, Alfi M (2016) Time-lapse application of pressure transient analysis for monitoring compressible fluid leakage. Greenh Gases Sci Technol 6:352–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu L (2017) Characterization of CO2 plumes in deep saline formations using fluid pressure tomography

  • Hu LW, Bayer P, Alt-Epping P, Tatomir A, Sauter M, Brauchler R (2015) Time-lapse pressure tomography for characterizing CO2 plume evolution in a deep saline aquifer. Int J Greenh Gas Control 39:91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu L, Bayer P, Brauchler R (2016) Detection of carbon dioxide leakage during injection in deep saline formations by pressure tomography. Water Resour Res

  • Hu L, Doetsch J, Brauchler R, Bayer P (2017) Characterizing CO2 plumes in deep saline formations: comparison and joint evaluation of time-lapse pressure and seismic tomography. Geophysics 82:ID1–ID18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CR, Greenkorn RA, Woods EG (1966) Pulse-testing: a new method for describing reservoir flow properties between wells. J Pet Trans

  • Koperna GJ (2013) Anthropogenic test simulation results joint Citronelle–Cranfield. In: SECARB technical meeting, Austin

  • Lee J, Rollins JB, Spivey JP (2003) Pressure transient testing. In: SPE textbook series, vol 9. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Dallas

  • Petrusak RL, Cyphers S, Bumgardner SB, Hills D, Pashin J, Esposito RA (2010) Saline reservoir storage in an active oil field: extracting maximum value from existing data for initial site characterization; Southeast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (SECARB) phase III. In: SPE paper 139700, SPE international conference on CO2 capture, storage, and utilization, New Orleans

  • Shakiba M, Hosseini SA (2016) Detection and characterization of CO2 leakage by multi-well pulse testing and diffusivity tomography maps. Int J Greenh Gas Control 54:15–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.08.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard D (1968) A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data. In: Proceedings of the 1968 23rd ACM national conference. ACM, New York, pp 517–524

  • Spivey JP, Lee WJ (2013) Applied well test interpretation. In: SPE textbook series. SPE, Dallas

  • Streltsova-Adams TD (1979) Pressure drawdown in a well with limited flow entry. J Pet Tech. https://doi.org/10.2118/7486-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun AY, Lu JM, Hovorka S (2015) A harmonic pulse testing method for leakage detection in deep subsurface storage formations. Water Resour Res 51:4263–4281. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014wr016567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun AY, Lu J, Freifeld BM, Hovorka SD, Islam A (2016) Using pulse testing for leakage detection in carbon storage reservoirs: a field demonstration. Int J Greenh Gas Control 46:215–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.01.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran NH, Zeidouni M (2017) CO2 plume characterization using pressure arrival time. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Dallas

  • van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidouni M, Hovorka SD, Shi K (2016) Tracer test to constrain CO2 residual trapping and plume evolution. Environ Earth Sci 75:1451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-6261-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidouni M, Tran NH, Munawar MD (2017) Interpretation of above-zone pressure influence time to characterize CO2 leakage. Greenh Gases Sci Technol 7(6):1050–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the funding from Louisiana State University, College of Engineering—Chevron Innovative Research Fund (CIRS) 2016. We also appreciate the funding from the U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) under Grant number DE-FE0029274. The authors are thankful to the two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful and constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Zeidouni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tran, N., Zeidouni, M. Pressure transient technique to constrain CO2 plume boundaries. Environ Earth Sci 77, 736 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7926-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7926-0

Keywords

Navigation