Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, 77:615 | Cite as

Effect of activated carbon on microbial-induced calcium carbonate precipitation of sand

  • Yang ZhaoEmail author
  • Cunbin Fan
  • Pinghui LiuEmail author
  • Houguo Fang
  • Zhiquan Huang
Original Article

Abstract

Microbial-induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) is a sustainable technique to transform or improve physical and mechanical properties of soils. This paper aims to study the effect of activated carbon (AC) on the property of bio-treated China Standard sand. Six sample groups were prepared considering various dosages of cementation solutions and bacterial suspensions. In each group, samples were prepared at six different AC ratios (0%, 0.2%, 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 3% by weight of sand). Bacterial retention ability, calcium carbonate mass, unconfined compression strength (UCS), and microstructures of bio-treated samples were examined and evaluated in the presence of AC. It was found that the improved yield of calcium carbonate crystals and increased UCS were correlated to the enhanced bacterial retention ability attributed to AC. In addition, the test results showed that the amount of cementation solution played an important role in the MICP process, but volume variation of the bacterial suspension had a little effect on the bio-treated samples.

Keywords

Bacterial fixation Bio-treated sand Soil reinforcement Calcium carbonate Sporosarcina pasteurii 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51409102, U1704243) and the Henan Science and Technology Project (No. 172102310190).

References

  1. Achal V, Mukherjee A, Reddy MS (2010) Microbial concrete: a way to enhance the durability of building structures. J Mater Civ Eng 23(6):730–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al Qabany A, Soga K (2013) Effect of chemical treatment used in MICP on engineering properties of cemented soils. Géotechnique 63(4):331–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al Qabany A, Soga K, Santamarina C (2012) Factors affecting efficiency of microbially induced calcite precipitation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 138(8):992–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amiri A, Bundur ZB (2018) Use of corn-steep liquor as an alternative carbon source for biomineralization in cement-based materials and its impact on performance. Constr Build Mater 165:655–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boehler M, Zwickenpflug B, Hollender J et al (2012) Removal of micropollutants in municipal wastewater treatment plants by powder-activated carbon. Water Sci Technol 66(10):2115–2121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Choi SG, Wu S, Chu J (2016a) Biocementation for sand using an eggshell as calcium source. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 142(10):1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Choi SG, Wang K, Chu J (2016b) Properties of biocemented, fiber reinforced sand. Constr Build Mater 120:623–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chu J, Stabnikov V Ivanov V (2012) Microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation on surface or in the bulk of soil. Geomicrobiol J 29(6):544–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cui MJ, Zheng JJ, Zhang RJ et al (2017) Influence of cementation level on the strength behaviour of bio-cemented sand. Acta Geotech 12:971–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dejong JT, Fritzges MB, Nüsslein K (2006) Microbially induced cementation to control sand response to undrained shear. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132(11):1381–1392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dejong JT, Mortensen BM, Martinez BC et al (2010) Bio-mediated soil improvement. Ecol Eng 36(2):197–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feng K, Montoya BM (2017) Quantifying level of microbial-induced cementation for cyclically loaded sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 143(6):1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fujita Y, Taylor JL, Wendt LM, Reed DW, Smith RW (2010) Evaluating the potential of native ureolytic microbes to remediate a 90 sr contaminated environment. Environ Sci Technol 44(19):7652–7658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guo HX, Cheng XH, Li M (2013) Experimental analysis of bio-stimulated sealing process in environmental geotechnical engineering. Sci China 56(7):732–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hale SE, Jensen J, Jakob L, Oleszczuk P et al (2013) Short-term effect of the soil amendments activated carbon, biochar, and ferric oxyhydroxide on bacteria and invertebrates. Environ Sci Technol 47(15):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harkes MP, Passen LAV, Booster JL, Whiffin VS et al (2010) Fixation and distribution of bacterial activity in sand to induce carbonate precipitation for ground reinforcement. Ecol Eng 36(2):112–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ismail MA, Joer HA, Sim WH, Randolf MF (2002) Effect of cement type on the shear behavior of cemented calcareous soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 128(6):520–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ivanov V, Chu J (2008) Applications of microorganisms to geotechnical engineering for bioclogging and biocementation of soil in situ. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 7:139–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ivanov V, Chu J, Stabnikov V, He J, Naeimi M (2010) Iron based bio-grout for soil improvement and land reclamation. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on sustainable construction materials and technologies. Elsevier, Ancona, pp 415–420Google Scholar
  20. Ivanov V, Chu J, Stabnikov V, Li B (2015) Strengthening of soft marine clay using bioencapsulation. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 33:320–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li M, Cheng X, Guo H et al (2013) Enhancement of the yield and strength of microbially-induced carbonate precipitation by optimum cultivation and grouting measures for civil engineering applications. J Pure Appl Microbiol 7:631–638Google Scholar
  22. Li M, Cheng XH, Guo HX, Yang Z (2015) Biomineralization of carbonate by terrabacter tumescens for heavy metal removal and biogrouting applications. J Environ Eng 142(9):1–5Google Scholar
  23. Li MD, Li L, Ogbonnaya U et al (2016) Influence of fiber addition on mechanical properties of MICP-treated sand. J Mater Civ Eng 28(4):1–10Google Scholar
  24. Li M, Fang C, Kawasaki S et al (2018) Fly ash incorporated with biocement to improve strength of expansive soil. Sci Rep 8(1):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lin H, Suleiman MT, Brown DG et al (2016) Mechanical behavior of sands treated by microbially induced carbonate precipitation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 142(2):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martinez BC, Dejong JT, Ginn TR (2014) Bio-geochemical reactive transport modeling of microbial induced calcite precipitation to predict the treatment of sand in one-dimensional flow. Comput Geotech 58(5):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Montoya BM, Dejong JT (2015) Stress-strain behavior of sands cemented by microbially induced calcite precipitation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 141(6):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Neupane D (2013) Applicability of enzymatic calcium carbonate precipitation as a soil-strengthening technique. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(12):2201–2211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ramachandran SK, Ramakrishnan V, Bang SS (2001) Remediation of concrete using microorganisms. ACI Mater J 98:3–9Google Scholar
  30. Rong H, Qian CX (2014) Cementation of loose sand particles based on bio-cement. J Wuhan Univ Technol 29(6):1208–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rowshanbakht K, Khamehchiyan M, Sajedi RH, Nikudel MR (2016) Effect of injected bacterial suspension volume and relative density on carbonate precipitation resulting from microbial treatment. Ecol Eng 89:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shashank BS, Sharma S, Sowmya S, Latha RA, Meenu PS, Singh DN (2016) State-of-the-art on geotechnical engineering perspective on bio-mediated processes. Environ Earth Sci 75(3): 270–286.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5071-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Soon NW, Lee LM, Tan CK et al (2013) Improvements in engineering properties of soils through microbial-induced calcite precipitation. Ksce J Civ Eng 17(4):718–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. van Paassen LA, Harkes MP, van Zweiten GA, van der Zon WH, van der Star WRL, van Loosdrecht MCM (2009) Scale up of bioGrout: a biological ground reinforcement method. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. IOS Press, Lansdale, pp 2328–2333Google Scholar
  35. van Paassen LA, Daza CM, Staal M et al (2010) Potential soil reinforcement by biological denitrification. Ecol Eng 36(2):168–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Whiffin VS, van Paassen LA, Marien P, Harkes (2007) Microbial carbonate precipitation as a soil improvement technique. Geomicrobiol J 24(5):417–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yang Z, Cheng XH (2013) A performance study of high-strength microbial mortar produced by low pressure grouting for the reinforcement of deteriorated masonry structures. Constr Build Mater 41:505–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yasuhara H, Neupane D, Hayashi K, Okamura M (2012) Experiments and predictions of physical properties of sand cemented by enzymatically-induced carbonate precipitation. Soils Found 52(3):539–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang Y, Guo HX, Cheng XH (2015) Role of calcium sources in the strength and microstructure of microbial mortar. Constr Build Mater 77:160–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Resources and EnvironmentNorth China University of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric PowerZhengzhouChina
  2. 2.School of Water Conservancy and Environmental EngineeringZheng Zhou UniversityZhengzhouChina
  3. 3.Yellow River Engineering Consulting Limited CompanyZhengzhouChina

Personalised recommendations