Liquefaction severity mapping based on SPT data: a case study in Canakkale city (NW Turkey)

  • M. Celal TunusluogluEmail author
  • Oznur Karaca
Original Article


Soil liquefaction is one of the major causes of damage to buildings and structures during earthquakes. Very shallow groundwater table in Quaternary alluvial deposits and the seismic properties of a region can cause a significant damage to buildings and infrastructure dependent on liquefaction. Canakkale city is located in the first-degree seismic hazard zone according to the earthquake zone map of Turkey. A large part of the Canakkale settlement area is located on unconsolidated alluvium recently deposited by the Saricay River. In this survey, the liquefaction potential of the Canakkale settlement area was investigated based on the liquefaction severity index and liquefaction potential index for two possible earthquake scenarios with a moment magnitude (Mw) and peak ground acceleration (amax) of 7.5 and 319 gal and 7.0 and 222 gal, respectively. In addition, these two methods were analysed using the peak ground acceleration (amax = 141 gal) value measured at the Canakkale station during the 2014 Aegean Sea earthquake. Based on the results of the analyses, liquefaction susceptibility maps of Canakkale city were produced for different amax values. The study involved three stages: field work, laboratory testing, and generation of the liquefaction severity maps. Geotechnical boreholes at 151 locations were drilled and Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) performed. Thereafter, natural moisture content, unit weight, grain-size distribution, and Atterberg limits were determined by means of laboratory testing. Finally, Quaternary alluvial deposits in the study area were divided into five classes representing very low-to-very high liquefaction for three amax values.


Liquefaction Canakkale Liquefaction severity index Liquefaction potential index Standard penetration test 



The authors would like to express their gratitude to the municipality of Çanakkale for information and the logs of geotechnical boreholes. The authors also thank Saziye Ozge Dinc Gogus for valuable contributions during site investigations.


  1. AFAD (Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency) (2014) Earthquake Reports. Accessed 15 Jan 2018
  2. AFAD (Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency).
  3. Akin M, Ozvan A, Akin MK, Topal T (2013) Evaluation of liquefaction in Karasu River floodplain after the October 23, 2011, Van (Turkey) earthquake. Nat Hazards 69:1551–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) (2004) Annual book of ASTM. standards-soil and rock, building stones, Section-4, Vol 04.08, p 1369Google Scholar
  5. Atabey E, Ilgar A, Sakıtaş A (2004) Middle-Upper Miocene stratigraphy of Çanakkale, Çanakkale, NW Turkey. Bull Min Res Exp 128:79–97 (in Turkish) Google Scholar
  6. Basaran-Uysal A, Sezen F, Ozden S, Karaca O (2014) Classification of residential areas according to physical vulnerability to natural hazards: a case study of Çanakkale, Turkey. Disasters 38(1):202–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buyuksarac A, Tunusluoglu MC, Bekler T, Yalciner CC, Karaca O, Ekinci YL, Alper D, Dinc SO (2013) Geological and geotechnical investigation project report of Canakkale settlement area prepared for Canakkale Municipality, p 234 (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  8. Cetin KO, Seed RB, Der Kiureghian A, Tokimatsu K, Harder LF, Kayen RE, Moss RES (2004) Standard penetration test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 130(12):1314–1340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chu BL, Hsu SC, Chang YM (2004) Ground behavior and liquefaction analyses in central Taiwan-Wufeng. Eng Geol 71:119–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deniz O (2005) Groundwater quality investigation of Canakkale settlement area. Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, MSc Thesis, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, p 100 (in Turkish) Google Scholar
  11. Dixit J, Dewaikar DM, Jangid RS (2012) Assessment of liquefaction potential index for Mumbai city. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:2759–2768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duman ES, İkizler SB, Angin Z (2015) Evaluation of soil liquefaction potential index based on SPT data in the Erzincan, Eastern Turkey. Arab J Geosci 8:5269–5283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. General Directorate of Disaster Affairs (1996) The seismic zoning map of TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  14. General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration (MTA) (2012) Active fault map of TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  15. Gurbuz C, Aktar M, Eyidogan H, Cisternas A, Haessler H, Barka A, Ergin M, Turkelli N, Polat O, Ucer SB, Kuleli S, Baris S, Kaypak B, Bekler T, Zor E, Bicmen F, Yoruk A (2000) The seismotectonics of the Marmara region (Turkey): results from a microseismic experiment. Tectonophysics 316:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hasancebi N, Ulusay R (2006) Evaluation of site amplification and site period using different methods for an earthquake-prone settlement in Western Turkey. Eng Geol 87:85–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2004) Semi empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on soil dynamics and earthquake engineering and 3rd international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering I, pp 32–56Google Scholar
  18. Iwasaki T, Tokida K, Tatsuoka F, Watanabe S, Yasuda S, Sato H (1982) Microzonation for soil liquefaction potential using simplified methods. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Microzonation, Seattle 3, pp 1319–1330Google Scholar
  19. Juang CH, Yuan H, Lee DH, Lin PS (2003) A simplified CPT-based method for evaluating liquefaction potential of soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 129(1):66–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kang GC, Chung JW, Rogers JD (2014) Re-calibrating the thresholds for the classification of liquefaction potential index based on the 2004 Niigata-ken Chuetsu earthquake. Eng Geol 169:30–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. KOERI (Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute) (2014) The Aegean Sea Earthquake on 24 May 2014 (Press Release)Google Scholar
  22. Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, p 653Google Scholar
  23. Lee DH, Ku CS, Yuan H (2004) A study of the liquefaction risk potential at Yuanlin, Taiwan. Eng Geol 71:97–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liao SSC, Whitman RV (1986) Overburden correction factors for SPT in sand. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 112(3):373–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Okay AI, Kaslılar-Ozcan A, Imren C, Boztepe-Guney A, Demirbag E, Kuscu E I (2000) Active faults and evolving strike-slip basins in the Marmara Sea, northwest Turkey: a multichannel seismic reflection study. Tectonophysics 321:189–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rahman MZ, Siddiqua S, Kamal ASMM. (2014) Liquefaction hazard mapping by liquefaction potential index for Dhaka City. Bangladesh Eng Geol 188:137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rockwell T, Barka A, Dawson T, Akyuz S, Thorup K (2001) Paleoseismology of the Gazikoy-Saros segment of the North Anatolia fault, northwestern Turkey: comparison of the historical and paleoseismic records, implications of regional seismic hazard, and models of earthquake recurrence. J Seismol 5:433–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 107(SM9):1249–1274Google Scholar
  29. Seed HB, Idriss IM (1982) Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, p 134Google Scholar
  30. Seed HB, Tokimatsu K, Harder LF, Chung RM (1985) Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations. J Geotech Eng 111(12):1425–1445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Seed RB, Cetin KO, Moss RES, Kammerer AM, Wu J, Pestana JM, Riemer MF, Sancio RB, Bray JD, Kayen RE, Faris A (2003) Recent advances in soil liquefaction engineering: a unified and consistent framework. EERC Report No. 2003-06Google Scholar
  32. Senturk K, Karakose C (1987) Geology of Canakkale Strait and surrounding. General Directorate of Mineral Research and Explorations. Archive of Geological Survey Department, unpublished technical report, 371, p 207 (in Turkish) Google Scholar
  33. Sharma B, Hazarika PJ (2013) Assessment of liquefaction potential of Guwahati City: a case study. Geotech Geol Eng 31:1437–1452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Siyako M (2006) Thracian Basin Tertiary rock units. Stratigraphy Committee Lithostratigraphic Units Series-2, pp 43–83 (in Turkish) Google Scholar
  35. Sonmez H (2003) Modification to the liquefaction potential index and liquefaction susceptibility mapping for a liquefaction-prone area (Inegol-Turkey). Environ Geol 44(7):862–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sonmez H, Gokceoglu C (2005) A liquefaction severity index suggested for engineering practice. Environ Geol 48:81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sonmez B, Ulusay R (2008) Liquefaction potential at Izmit Bay: comparison of predicted and observed soil liquefaction during the Kocaeli earthquake. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sonmez B, Ulusay R, Sonmez H (2008) A study on the identification of liquefaction-induced failures on ground surface based on the data from the 1999 Kocaeli and Chi-Chi earthquakes. Eng Geol 97:112–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tosun H, Ulusay R (1997) Engineering geological characterization and evaluation of liquefaction susceptibility of foundation soils at a dam site, southwest Turkey. Environ Eng Geosci 3(3):389–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tosun H, Seyrek E, Orhan A, Savaş H, Türköz M (2011) Soil liquefaction potential in Eskişehir, NW Turkey. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:1071–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tunusluoglu MC (2014) Assessment of the instability mechanism of spillway with reference to an earthfill dam in the northwest Turkey. Arab J Geosci 7:407–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ulamis K, Kilic R (2008) Liquefaction potential of Quaternary alluvium in Bolu settlement area, Turkey. Environ Geol 55:1029–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ulusay R, Kuru T (2004) 1998 Adana-Ceyhan (Turkey) earthquake and a preliminary microzonation based on liquefaction potential for Ceyhan town. Nat Hazards 32:59–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ulusay R, Aydan O, Kumsar H, Sonmez H (2000) Engineering geological characteristics of the 1998 Adana-Ceyhan earthquake, with particular emphasis on liquefaction phenomena and the role of soil behaviour. Bull Eng Geol Environ 59:99–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ulusay R, Tuncay E, Sonmez H, Gokceoglu C (2004) An attenuation relationship based on Turkish strong motion data and iso-acceleration map of Turkey. Eng Geol 74:265–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ulusay R, Tuncay E, Hasancebi N (2007) Liquefaction assessments by field-based methodologies: foundation soils at a dam site in Northeast Turkey. Bull Eng Geol Environ 66:361–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vipin KS, Sitharam TG, Anbazhagan P (2010) Probabilistic evaluation of seismic soil liquefaction potential base on SPT data. Nat Hazards 53:547–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Well DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84(4):974–1002Google Scholar
  49. Yalcin A, Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H (2008) Liquefaction severity map for Aksaray city center (Central Anatolia, Turkey). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 8:641–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yaltırak C, Işler EB, Aksu AE, Hiscott AE RN (2012) Evolution of the Bababurnu Basin and shelf of the Biga Peninsula: Western extension of the middle strand of the North Anatolian Fault Zone, Northeast Aegean Sea, Turkey. J Asian Earth Sci 57:103–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yildirim A, Akdur O, Ozcelik H (2015) Injuries and emergency department visits without building destruction after Gökçeada earthquake in Çanakkale, Turkey. Notfall Rettungsmed 18:377–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yilmaz I, Bagci A (2006) Soil liquefaction susceptibility and hazard mapping in the residential area of Kütahya (Turkey). Environ Geol 49:708–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yilmaz I, Yavuzer D (2005) Liquefaction potential and susceptibility mapping in the city of Yalova, Turkey. Environ Geol 47:175–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Youd TL, Idriss IM, Andrus RD, Arango I, Castro G, Christian JT, Dobry R, Finn WDL, Harder LF, Hynes ME, Ishihara K, Koester JP, Liao SSC, Marcuson WF III, Martin GR, Mitchell JK, Moriwaki Y, Power MS, Robertson PK, Seed RB, Stokoe IIKH. (2001) Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127:817–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geological EngineeringCanakkale Onsekiz Mart UniversityCanakkaleTurkey

Personalised recommendations