Corroborating stable isotopic data with pumping test data to investigate recharge and groundwater flow processes in a fractured rock aquifer, Rivirivi Catchment, Malawi

  • Dwight KambukuEmail author
  • Maki Tsujimura
  • Shigeyoshi Kagawa
  • Hassan Mdala
Original Article


Fractured rock aquifers continue to support millions of people in arid and semiarid regions. However, due to heterogeneous nature of their hydrogeology and comparative low yields, research in these formations is regarded expensive, and thus, very little is known about their dominant hydrological processes. In this study, we corroboratively used pumping test and stable isotopic data to understand groundwater recharge and flow processes in fractured hornblende-biotite-gneiss. It was established that rain is the main source of groundwater recharge. The groundwater system seems to retain the stable isotopic signatures of precipitation which has undergone evaporation before infiltration. Geochemical data also show that the groundwater system has not undergone pronounced geochemical evolution as evidenced by low total dissolved solids in both seasons. A combination of stable isotopic data and derivative plots of drawdown data helped identification of apparent recharge zones, no-flow boundaries and dominant flow types in the pumped wells with bilinear flow being the dominant type of flow in BP1 and BP2, while linear flow was dominant in BP3 and BP4. Geochemical, stable isotopic and hydraulic data further revealed hydraulic connection between two wells juxtaposed across Ntcheu Fault, indicating potential for groundwater flow across the fault and highlighting that the fault may be acting as a groundwater conduit across it. The established phenomena are important when considering groundwater development and sustainable management of the resource.


Fractured rock aquifer Groundwater recharge Groundwater flow Stable isotopes Pumping test Malawi 



The authors would like to sincerely thank Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) for providing support under MEXT Scholarship terms. We would also like to thank Department of Water Resources of the Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Water Development in Malawi for providing existing data and equipment support during field surveys.


  1. Ako A, Shimada J, Hosono T, Ichiyanagi K, Elambo Nkeng G, Eneke TEG, Njila RN (2012) Hydrogeochemical and isotopic characteristics of groundwater in Mbanga, Njombe and Penja (Banana Plain)—Cameroon. J Afr Earth Sci 75:25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alazard M, Boisson A, Marechal J, Perrin J, Dewandel B et al (2016) Investigation of recharge dynamics and flow paths in a fractured crystalline aquifer in semi-arid India using borehole logs: implications for managed aquifer recharge. Hydrogeol J 24(1):35–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altinors A, Onder H (2008) A double-porosity model for a fractured aquifer with non-Darcian flow in fractures. J Hydrol Sci 53(4):868–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Apaydin A (2010) Relation of tectonic structure to groundwater flow in the Beypazari region, NW Anatolia, Turkey. Hydrogeol J 18:1343–1356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bai M, Elsworth D, Roegiers J (1993) Multi-porosity/multi-permeability approach to the simulation of naturally fractured reservoirs. Water Resour Res 29(6):1621–1633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barenblatt GI, Zheltov YP, Kochina IN (1960) Basic concepts in the theory of seepage of homogeneous liquids in fissured rocks. In: Streltsova TD (ed) Well testing in heterogeneous formations. An Exxon monograph. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Bense VF, Gleeson T, Loveless SE, Bour O, Scibek J (2013) Fault zone hydrogeology. Earth Sci Rev 127:171–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berkowitz B (2002) Characterizing flow and transport in fractured geological media: a review. Adv Water Resour 25:861–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bourdet D, Gringarten AC (1980) Determination of fissure volume and block size in fractured reservoirs by type-curve analysis. Paper SPE 9293, 1980 SPE annual fall technical conference and exhibition, DallasGoogle Scholar
  10. Chavula GSM (2012) Groundwater availability and use in Malawi. In: Pavelic P, Giordano M, Keraita B, Ramesh V, Rao T (eds) Groundwater availability and use in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review of 15 countries. International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Colombo, pp 78–90Google Scholar
  11. Chilton PJ, Foster SSD (1995) Hydrogeological characteristics and water-supply potential of Basement Aquifers in Tropical Africa. Hydrogeol J 3(1):36–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark I, Fritz P (1997) Environmental isotopes in hydrogeology. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  13. Cook PG (2003) A guide to regional groundwater flow in fractured rock aquifers. CSIRO Land and Water, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  14. Craig H (1961) Isotopic variations in meteoric waters. Science 133:1702–1703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Delinom RM (2009) Structural geology controls on groundwater flow: Lembang fault case study. Hydrogeol J. Google Scholar
  16. Department of Climate Change and Meteorological Services (2016) Climate data for Malawi. Accessed 18 Oct 2016
  17. Dewandel B, Perrin J, Ahmed S, Aulong S, Krkal Z et al (2010) Development of a tool for managing groundwater resource in semi-arid hard rock regions: application to rural watershed in South India. Hydrol Process 24(19):2784–2797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dewandel B, Aunay B, Marechal J, Roques C et al (2014) Analytical solutions for analysing pumping tests in a sub-vertical and anistotropic fault zone draining shallow aquifers. J Hydrol 509:115–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dewandel B, Alazard M, Lachassagne P, Bailly-Conte V et al (2017) Respective roles of the weathering profile and tectonic fractures in the structure and functioning of crystalline thermo-mineral carbo-gaseous aquifers. J Hydrol 547:690–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Edmunds WM, Smedley P (2000) Residence time indicators in groundwater: the East Midlands Triassic sandstone aquifer. Appl Geochem 15:737–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bloomfield K, Garson MS (1965) The geology of kirk range—Lisungwe valley area. Bulletin No. 17. Geological Survey Department, ZombaGoogle Scholar
  22. Gleeson T, Novakowski K (2009) Identifying watershed-scale barriers to groundwater flow: lineaments in the Canadian Shield. GSA Bull 121(3–4):333–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guiheneuf N, Boisson A, Bour O, Dewandel B, Perrin J, Dausse A, Viossanges M, Chandra S, Ahmed S, Marechal JC (2014) Groundwater flows in weathered crystalline rocks; impact of piezometric variations and depth dependent fracture connectivity. J Hydrol 511:320–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. IAEA/WMO (2006) Global network of isotopes in precipitation. The GNIP database. Accessed 20 Oct 2015
  25. Kambuku D, Tsujimura M, Kagawa S (2018) Groundwater recharge and flow processes as revealed by stable isotopes and geochemistry in a catchment underlain by fractured and faulted Hornblende-biotite-gneiss, Rivirivi Catchment, Malawi. Afr J Environ Sci Technol 12:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Karay G (2013) Evaluating methods of pumping tests to analysing flow properties in fractured rocks. In: Second conference of junior researchers in civil engineering, Budapest, pp 235–242Google Scholar
  27. Kazemi H, Seth MS, Thomas GW (1969) The interpretation of interference tests in naturally fractured reservoirs with uniform fracture distribution. Soc Petrol Eng J 9:463–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kebede S, Travi Y, Asrat A, Alemayehu T, Ayenew T (2005) Groundwater recharge, circulation and geochemical evolution in the source region of Blue Nile River, Ethiopia. Appl Geochem 20(9):1658–1676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Knoema (2015) Malawi statistics. = 1002090-ntcheu. Accessed 26 Dec 2016
  30. Kruseman GP, de Ridder NA (1994) Analysis and evaluation of pumping test data, 2nd edn. International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement Publication 47, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  31. Lachassgne P, Wyns R, Dewandel B (2011) The fracture permeability of hard rock aquifers is due neither to tectonics, nor to unloading, but to weathering processes. Terra Nova 23(3):145–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lapworth DJ, MacDonald AM, Tijani MN, Darling WG, Goody DC, Bonsor HC, Araguas- Araguas LJ (2013) Residence times of shallow groundwater in West Africa: implications for hydrogeology and resilience to future changes in climate. Hydrogeol J 21:673–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Water Development (MoAIWD) (2015) National water resources master plan. CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd., LilongweGoogle Scholar
  34. Moench AF (1984) Double porosity models for a fissured groundwater reservoir with fracture skin. Water Resour Res 20(7):831–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Monjerezi M, Vogt RD, Aagaard P, Gebru AG, Saka JDK (2011) Using 87Sr/86Sr, δ 18O and δ 2H isotopes along with major chemical composition to assess groundwater salinization in lower Shire valley, Malawi. Appl Geochem 26:2201–2214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Negrel P, Pauwels H, Dewandel B, Gandolfi JM, Mascré C, Ahmed S (2011) Understanding groundwater systems and their functioning through the study of stable water isotopes in a hard-rock aquifer (Maheshwaram watershed, India). J Hydrol 397:55–70. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oxtobee JPA, Novakowski KS (2003) Groundwater-surface water interaction in a fractured rock aquifer. Groundwater 41(5):667–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pavelic P, Giordano M, Keraita B, Ramesh V, Rao T (eds) (2012) Groundwater availability and use in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review of 15 countries. International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Colombo, p 274Google Scholar
  39. Praamsma WT (2016) Rock outcrops in the Canadian Shield: an investigation of contaminant transport from surface sources in the fractured rock aquifers. Ph.D. thesis, ProQuest number: 10155252. Queen’s University Kingston, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  40. Praamsma T, Novakowski K, Kyser K, Hall K (2009) Using stable isotopes and hydraulic head data to investigate groundwater recharge and discharge in a fractured rock aquifer. J Hydrol 366:35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roques C, Bour O, Aquilina L, Dewandel B, Leray S, Schroetter JM et al (2014) Hydrological behavior of a deep sub-vertical fault in crystalline basement and relationships with surrounding reservoirs. J Hydrol 509:42–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sarma D, Xu Y (2014) An approach to sustainable rural water supply in semi-arid Africa with a case study from Namibia. Hydrogeol J 22:1681–1692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stehfest H (1970) Algorithm 368—numerical inversion of laplace transform. Commun ASM 13(1):47–49Google Scholar
  44. Sukhija BS, Reddy DV, Nagabhushanam P, Bhattacharya SK, Jani RA, Kumar D (2006) Characterisation of recharge processes and groundwater flow mechanisms in weathered-fractured granites of Hyderabad (India) using isotopes. Hydrogeol J 14:663–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tiedeman CR, Hsieh PA (2001) Assessing an open-well aquifer test in fractured crystalline rock. Groundwater 39(1):68–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tsujimura M, Abe Y, Tanaka T, Shimada J, Higuchi S, Yamanaka T, Davaa G, Oyunbaatar D (2007) Stable isotopes and geochemical characteristics of groundwater in Kherlen River basin, a semi-arid region in eastern Mongolia. J Hydrol 333:47–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Van Tonder GJ, Botha JF, Chiang WH, Kunstmann H, Xu Y (2001) Estimation of the sustainable yields of boreholes in fractured rock formations. J Hydrol 241:70–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van Tonder GJ, Bardenhagen I, Riemann K, van Bosch J, Dzanga P, Xu Y (2002) Manual on pumping test analysis in fractured rock aquifer. WRC report no. 1116/1/02 (ISBN no. 186845 861X)Google Scholar
  49. Verbovsek T, Kanduc T (2016) Isotope geochemistry of groundwater from fractured dolomite aquifers in Central Slovenia. Aquat Geochem 22:131–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Verweji HJM, Barker JA (1999) Well hydraulics and yield analysis. In: Lloyd JW (ed) Water resources of hard rock aquifers in arid and semi-arid zones. UNESCO Publication 58, ParisGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang L, Li G, Dong Y, Han D, Zhang J (2015) Using hydrochemical and isotopic data to determine sources of recharge and groundwater evolution in an arid region: a case study in the upper-middle reaches of the Shule River Basin, northwestern China. Environ Earth Sci 73:1901–1915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Warren JE, Root PJ (1963) The behavior of naturally fractured reservoirs. Soc Petrol Eng J 3:245–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Warshaw RD (1965) The geology of Ntcheu-Balaka area. Bulletin no. 19. Geological Survey Department, ZombaGoogle Scholar
  54. Williams AJ, Crossey LJ, Karlstrom KE, Newell D, Person M, Woolsey E (2013) Hydrogeochemistry of the Middle Rio Grande aquifer system—fluid mixing and salinization of the Rio Grande due to fault inputs. Chem Geol 351:281–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Xiao L, Xu Y (2014) Diagnostic analysis of pumping tests using derivative of dlgs/dlgt with case study. Groundwater 52:208–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yuan R, Song X, Zhang Y, Han D, Wang S, Tang C (2011) Using major ions and stable isotopes to characterize recharge regime of fault-influenced aquifer in Beiyishui River Watershed, North China Plain. J Hydrol 405:512–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhang Y, Li F, Zhao G, Li J, Zhu O (2014) An attempt to evaluate the recharge source and extent using hydrogeochemistry and stable isotopes in North Henan Plain, China. Environ Monit Assess 186:5185–5197. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of TsukubaTsukubaJapan
  2. 2.Society of Researchers for International DevelopmentTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Geological Surveys DepartmentMwanzaMalawi

Personalised recommendations