Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, 77:112 | Cite as

Assessment of Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) feasibility at selected sites in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, UAE

  • S. Sathish
  • Mohamed M. MohamedEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) is considered as a strategy for the storage of water to ensure a sustainable water supply in the Abu Dhabi emirate. Earlier investigations have been conducted, and two sites were proposed for the installation of ASR in the surficial aquifer. Recently, the site located in the center of Abu Dhabi (sand dune area) was executed, and the second site is undergoing the pilot phase of the study. However, the performance and influence of the regional groundwater system may vary depending on regional hydrogeological characteristics, which have not been investigated. Hence, this study attempts to understand the feasibility of the proposed ASR sites in the surficial aquifer using a regional model developed by the finite-difference approach with an accuracy of 0.28 m mean residual difference. Additionally, six sites were selected on the basis of the literature and aquifer parameters and were investigated for their suitability for future ASR installation. Six cycles of injection and recovery at various rates were analyzed at each ASR site by using a transient calibrated model until the end of the year 2030. The area of influence is axisymmetrical in the sand dune area and non-symmetrical in the east and northeastern areas because of the steep topography and groundwater table gradient. At the sites that possess a non-symmetrical influence, the area of influence is always high upstream of the groundwater flow. Heterogeneity-induced variation in the fluctuation of the groundwater table is noted in all sites. Even with 100% recovery, the groundwater table did not reach the ambient groundwater table during the recovery period. This finding confirms the contribution of regional groundwater to the site during recovery. All sites selected for future ASR installation, except site 5, are capable of storing the volume needed to meet expected water demand. Site 2 is considered the most suitable site for ASR installation in the future. This study will facilitate the scientific communities and authorities in understanding the feasibility of ASR installation for sustainable water storage and supply in the Abu Dhabi emirate.

Keywords

Aquifer storage and recovery Artificial recharge Heterogeneity Arid region Numerical modeling Abu Dhabi Emirate 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to express their sincere appreciation to the National Water Center, UAE, and the United Arab Emirates University for the financial support of this project under fund Grant Numbers 31R008 and 31R093.

References

  1. Almulla A, Hamad A, Gadalla M (2005) Aquifer storage and recovery (ASR): a strategic cost effective facility to balance water production and demand for Sharjah. Desalination 174(2):193–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson MP, Woessner WW (1992) Applied groundwater modelling: Simulation of flow and advective transport. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  3. Awange JL, Forootan E, Kuhn M, Kusche J, Heck B (2014) Water storage changes and climatic variability within the Nile Basin between 2002 and 2011. Adv Water Res 73:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baalousha HM (2016) Development of a groundwater flow model for the highly parameterized Qatar aquifers. Model Earth Syst Environ 2:67.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0124-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradbury KR, Krohelski JT (1999) A regional groundwater model as a tool for evaluation the impacts of urbanization. Geol Soc Am Abstr Progr 31(7):A-156Google Scholar
  6. Brook M (2009) Water resources of Abu Dhabi emirate, UAE. Water Resources Department, Environment Agency Abu DhabiGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown CJ, Weiss R, Verrastro R, Schubert S (2005) Development of an aquifer, storage and recovery (ASR) site selection suitability index in support of the comprehensive everglades restoration project. J Environ Hydrol 13:20Google Scholar
  8. de Graaf IEM, van Beek RLPH, Gleeson T, Moosdorf N, Schmitz O, Sutanudjaja EH, Bierkens MFP (2017) A global-scale two-layer transient groundwater model: development and application to groundwater depletion. Adv Water Res 102:53–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. EAD (2012) Advancing sustainable groundwater management in Abu Dhabi. Environment Agency Abu Dhabi, UAEGoogle Scholar
  10. Elmahdy S, Mohamed M (2012) Topographic attributes control groundwater flow and groundwater salinity of Al Ain, UAE: a prediction method using remote sensing and GIS. J Environ Earth Sci 2(8):1–13Google Scholar
  11. Elmahdy S, Mohamed M (2014) Relationship between geological structures and groundwater flow and groundwater salinity in Al Ain, UAE; mapping and analysis by means of remote sensing and GIS. Arabian J Geosci 7:1249–1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elmahdy S, Mohamed M (2015a) Automatic detection of near surface geological and hydrological features and investigating their influence on groundwater accumulation and salinity in southwest Egypt using remote sensing and GIS. Geocarto Int 30(2):132–144Google Scholar
  13. Elmahdy S, Mohamed M (2015b) Probabilistic frequency ratio model for groundwater potential mapping in Al Jaww plain, UAE. Arabian J Geosci 8(4):2405–2416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Esmail OJ, Kimbler OK (1967) Investigation of the technical feasibility of storing freshwater in saline aquifers. Water Resour Res 3:683–695.  https://doi.org/10.1029/WR003i003p00683 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fath H, Sadik A, Mezher T (2013) Present and future trend in the production and energy consumption of desalinated water in GCC countries. Int J Therm Environ Eng 5(2):155–165Google Scholar
  16. Ginkel MV, Tombe BD, Olsthoorn T (2016) Small-scale ASR between flow barriers in a saline aquifer. Groundwater.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12427 Google Scholar
  17. GTZ (2005b) Combined artificial recharge and utilization of the groundwater resource in the Greater Liwa Area. Pilot Project Final Technical ReportGoogle Scholar
  18. Halcrow SW, Partners (1969) Report on the water resources of the Trucial States. Engineering report for the Trucial States Council. Water Resources Survey, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Dubai, UAEGoogle Scholar
  19. Hassan D (1998) Salvage barge to be scuttled: Gulf News, February 12, 1998, p 3Google Scholar
  20. IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007—impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, Vander Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  21. Khan IA (1980) Determining impact of irrigation on groundwater. J Irrig Drainage Eng 106(IR4):331–344Google Scholar
  22. Khezri S (2010) Evaluation of the aquifer storage and recovery pilot project in Liwa Area, Emirate of Abu Dhabi, UAE. M.Sc. Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, December 2010Google Scholar
  23. Leite BT (2000) Preliminary evaluation of aquifer storage and recovery in the recife metropolitan region, Pernambuco, Brazil. In: Ist joint world congress on groundwater, Ceara, Brazil (in Portuguese) Google Scholar
  24. Lopez O, Stenchikov G, Missimer M (2014) Water management during climate change using aquifer storage and recovery of stormwater in a dune field in western Saudi Arabia. Environ Res Lett 9(7):075008.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/7/075008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lowry CS (2004) Assessment of aquifer storage recovery: defining hydraulic controls on recovery efficiency at three representative sites in Wisconsin. M.S. thesis, Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, p 104Google Scholar
  26. Lowry CS, Anderson MP (2006) An assessment of aquifer storage recovery using ground water flow models. Groundwater 44(5):661–667.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2006.00237.x Google Scholar
  27. Lu C, Du P, Chen Y, Luo J (2011) Recovery efficiency of aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) with mass transferlimitation. Water Resour Res 47:W08529.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010605 Google Scholar
  28. Malek C (2015) Groundwater at danger level in UAE, The National, UAE. Dt. February 21, 2015Google Scholar
  29. Maliva RG, Missimer TM (2008) ASR, useful storage, and the myth of residual pressure. Groundwater 46:171.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2007.00369.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maliva RG, Missimer TM (2010) Aquifer storage and recovery and the development of sustainable water supplies. IDA J 2(2):74–80Google Scholar
  31. Maliva RG, Missimer TM (2012) Arid lands water evaluation and management. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin/Heidelberg, GermanyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McDonald MG, Harbaugh AW (1984) A modular three-dimensional finite-difference groundwater flow model. U.S. Geol.Survey/U.S. Department of the Interior, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  33. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries (1993) Hydrology, Department of Soil and Water, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, United Arab Emirates, p 294Google Scholar
  34. Missimer TM (2004) Future use of the Floridan Aquifer System: the concept of aquifer zoning. In: Proc of the Florida Section, AWWA, St. Cloud, FLGoogle Scholar
  35. Missimer TM, Maliva RG (2010) Efficiency improvement of co-located electric power and seawater desalination plants using aquifer storage and recovery technology. In: Proceedings of Singapore water week 2010: sustainable cities: clean and affordable water, June 28–July 2, 2010, Singapore, p 7Google Scholar
  36. Missimer TM, Sinha S, Ghaffour N (2012) Strategic aquifer storage and recovery of desalinated water to achieve water security in the GCC/MENA region. Int J Environ Sustain 1(3):87–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mohamed M (2014) An integrated water resources management strategy for Al-Ain City, United Arab Emirates. Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences 364:273–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mohamed M, Hatfield K (2005) Modeling microbial-mediated reduction in batch reactors. Chemosphere 59(8):1207–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mohamed M, Almualla A (2010a) Water demand forecasting in Umm Al-Quwain (UAE) using the IWRMAIN specify forecasting model. Water Res Manag 24:4093–4120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mohamed M, Almualla A (2010b) Water demand forecasting in Umm Al-Quwain using the constant rate model. Desalination 259:161–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mohamed M, Saleh N, and Sherif M (2010a) Modeling In-Situ benzene bioremediation in the contaminated liwa aquifer (UAE) using the slow-release oxygen source technique. Environ Earth Sci 61(7):1385–1399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mohamed M, Saleh N, Sherif M (2010b) Sensitivity of natural attenuation to variations in kinetic and transport parameters. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 84:443–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Molz FJ, Bell LC (1977) Head gradient control in aquifers used for fluid storage. Water Resour Res 13(4):795–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Moulder EA (1970) Freshwater bubbles: a possibility for using saline aquifers to store water. Water Resour Res 6(5):1528–1531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mukhopadhyay A, Szekely F, Senay Y (1994) Artificial groundwater recharge experiments in carbonate and clastic aquifers of Kuwait. Water Resour Bull 30(6):1091–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. MWR (1999) Ministry of Water Resources, Sultanate of Oman, Water Attachment position paperGoogle Scholar
  47. NAS—National Academy of Science, (2002) Regional issues in aquifer storage and recovery for everglades restoration. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, pp 5–10Google Scholar
  48. Pavelic P, Nicholson BC, Dillon PJ, Barry KE (2005) Fate of disinfection by products in groundwater during aquifer storage and recovery with reclaimed water. J Contam Hydrol 77(1–2):119–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. PIK (2007) Development of functional irrigation types for improved global cropmodelling. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK). PIK Report No. 104. Potsdam, March 2007Google Scholar
  50. Pyne RDG (2002) Aquifer storage and recovery wells: the path ahead. Florida Water Resour J 55(2):19–27Google Scholar
  51. Rahman MA, Oberdorfer P, Jin Y, Pervin M, Holzbecher E (2012) Impact assessment of hydrologic and operational factors on the efficiency of managed aquifer recharge scheme. In: The 8th comsol conference, MilanGoogle Scholar
  52. Saif O (2012) The future outlook of desalination in the Gulf: challenges and opportunities faced by Qatar and the UAEGoogle Scholar
  53. Saif O, Mezher T, Arfat HA (2014) Water security in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries: challenges and opportunities. J Environ Stud Sci 4(4):329–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sathish S, Elango L (2015) Numerical simulation and prediction of groundwater flow in a coastal aquifer of Southern India. J Water Res Prot 7:1483–1494.  https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2015.717122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sathish S, Elango L (2016) An integrated study on the characterization of freshwater lens in a coastal aquifer of Southern India. Arab J Geosci 9:643.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2656-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. SCAD (2011) Water Statistics. Statistic Centre-Abu Dhabi. https://www.scad.ae/Release%20Documents/EBOOK%20English%20SYB%202011.pdf. Accessed 14 Mar 2016
  57. SCAD (2014) Water statistics. Statistical Centre-Abu Dhabi. Accessed 14 Mar 2016Google Scholar
  58. SCAD (2015) Water Statistics. Statistic Centre-Abu Dhabi. https://scad.ae/Release%20Documents/ADStats_GP_Publication_Annual_Annual_2016_v5.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2018
  59. Schlumberger Water Services (2011) Strategic aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) project for the western region of the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, Liwa pilot ASR system final report: Schlumberger Water Services, Abu Dhabi, United Arab EmiratesGoogle Scholar
  60. Stanford WE, Wood WW (2001) Hydrology of the coastal sabkhas of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Hydrogeol J 9(4):358–366.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s100400100137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. TRANSCO (2013) Seven years water planning statement (2012–2020), June 2013Google Scholar
  62. USACE (2011) Final groundwater model calibration report aquifer storage and recovery reigonal modeling studyGoogle Scholar
  63. USGS (1996) Groundwater resources of Abu Dhabi emirateGoogle Scholar
  64. USGS (1998) Simulation of aquifer storage recovery of excess desalinated seawater, Al Ain Area, Abu Dhabi emirateGoogle Scholar
  65. WHO (2011) Safe drinking water from desalination. Guidance on risk assessment and risk management procedures to ensure the safety of desalinated drinking-water. Edited by World Health Organization. Ref.: WHO/HSE/WSH/11.03, pp 1–34Google Scholar
  66. Willmann M, Carrera J, Sanchez-Vila X, Vazquez-Sune E (2007) On the meaning of the transmissivity values obtained from recovery tests. Hydrogeol J 15(5):833–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zhou Y, Li W (2011) A review of regional groundwater flow modeling. Geosci Front 2(2):205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zuurbier KG, Bakker M, Zaadnoordijk WJ, Stuyfzand P (2013) Identification of potential sites for aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) in coastal areas using ASR performance estimation methods. Hydrogeol J 21(6):1373–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Water CenterUnited Arab Emirates UniversityAl-AinUnited Arab Emirates
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of EngineeringUnited Arab Emirates UniversityAl-AinUnited Arab Emirates

Personalised recommendations