Assessment of soil carbon pool, carbon sequestration and soil CO2 flux in unreclaimed and reclaimed coal mine spoils

Original Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Surface coal mining inevitably deforests the land, reduces carbon (C) pool and generates different land covers. To re-establish the ecosystem C pool, post-mining lands are often afforested with fast-growing trees. A field study was conducted in the 5-year-old unreclaimed dump and reclaimed coal mine dump to assess the changes in soil CO2 flux and compared with the reference forest site. Changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen stocks were estimated in post-mining land. Soil CO2 flux was measured using close dynamic chamber method, and the influence of environmental variables on soil CO2 flux was determined. Woody biomass C and SOC stocks of the reference forest site were threefold higher than that of 5-year-old reclaimed site. The mean soil CO2 flux was highest in 5-year-old reclaimed dump (2.37 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1) and lowest in unreclaimed dump (0.21 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1). Soil CO2 flux was highly influenced by environmental variables, where soil temperature positively influenced the soil CO2 flux, while soil moisture, relative humidity and surface CO2 concentration negatively influenced the soil CO2 flux. Change in soil CO2 flux under different land cover depends on plant and soil characteristics and environmental variables. The study concluded that assessment of soil CO2 flux in post-mining land is important to estimate the potential of afforestation to combat increased emission of soil CO2 at regional and global scale.

Keywords

Surface coal mining Reclamation Soil CO2 flux Soil organic carbon Temperature 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first author is grateful to the Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad and Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), Government of India, to provide Ph.D. research fellowship. Bharat Coking Coal Limited (BCCL), India, is acknowledged for providing a site to perform field experiments. We are also grateful to the Editor and anonymous reviewers for their constructive and insightful comments during the revision process.

References

  1. Acosta M, Pavelka M, Montagnani L, Kutsch W, Lindroth A, Juszczak R, Janous D (2013) Soil surface CO2 flux measurements in Norway spruce forests: comparison between four different sites across Europe-from boreal to alpine forest. Geoderma 192:295–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahirwal J, Maiti SK (2016) Assessment of soil properties of different land uses generated due to surface coal mining activities in tropical Sal (Shorea robusta) forest, India. CATENA 140:155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahirwal J, Maiti SK (2017) Assessment of carbon sequestration potential of revegetated coal mine overburden dumps: a chronosequence study from dry tropical climate. J Environ Manag 201:369–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahirwal J, Maiti SK, Singh AK (2017) Changes in ecosystem carbon pool and soil CO2 flux following post-mine reclamation in dry tropical environment, India. Sci Total Environ 583:153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Akala VA, Lal R (2001) Soil organic carbon pools and sequestration rates in reclaimed minesoils in Ohio. J Environ Qual 30:2098–2104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amichev BY, Burger JA, Rodrigue JA (2008) Carbon sequestration by forests and soils on mined land in the Midwestern and Appalachian coalfields of the US. For Ecol Manag 256:1949–1959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bond-Lamberty B, Thomson A (2010) Temperature-associated increases in the global soil respiration record. Nature 464:579–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bray R, Kurtz LT (1966) Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorus in soil. Soil Sci 59:39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown S, Gillespie A, Lugo AE (1989) Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data. For Sci 35:881–902Google Scholar
  10. Bujalsky L, Kaneda S, Dvorščík P, Frouz J (2014) In situ soil respiration at reclaimed and unreclaimed post-mining sites: responses to temperature and reclamation treatment. Ecol Eng 68:53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chaudhuri S, McDonald LM, Pena-Yewtukhiw EM, Skousen J, Roy M (2013) Chemically stabilized soil organic carbon fractions in a reclaimed minesoil chronosequence: implications for soil carbon sequestration. Environ Earth Sci 70:1689–1698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chave J, Andalo C, Brown S, Cairns MA, Chambers JQ, Eamus D, Fölster H, Fromard F, Higuchi N, Kira T, Lescure JP (2005) Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia 145:87–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chave J, Réjou-Méchain M, Búrquez A, Chidumayo E, Colgan MS, Delitti WB, Duque A, Eid T, Fearnside PM, Goodman RC, Henry M (2014) Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees. Glob Change Biol 20:3177–3190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Das R, Maiti SK (2016) Importance of carbon fractionation for the estimation of carbon sequestration in reclaimed coalmine soils—a case study from Jharia coalfields, Jharkhand, India. Ecol Eng 90:135–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davidson EA, Janssens IA (2006) Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature 440:165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Food and agriculture organization (FAO) (2005) Global forest resources assessment 2005. Global assessment of growing stock, biomass and carbon stock. www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1757e/i1757e.pdf. Accessed 12 July 2017
  17. Frouz J, Elhottova D, Pižl V, Tajovský K, Šourková M, Picek T, Malý S (2007) The effect of litter quality and soil faunal composition on organic matter dynamics in post-mining soil: a laboratory study. Appl Soil Ecol 37:72–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frouz J, Cienciala E, Pizl V, Kalcic J (2009) Carbon storage in post-mining forest soil, the role of tree biomass and soil bioturbation. Biogeochemistry 94:111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. https://www.CO2.earth. Accessed 24 Jan 2017
  20. Huang Y, Tian F, Wang Y, Wang M, Hu Z (2015) Effect of coal mining on vegetation disturbance and associated carbon loss. Environ Earth Sci 73:2329–2342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Instruction Manual–LICOR (2007) Automated soil CO2 flux system. LI-8100 Lincoln, NE 68504, USAGoogle Scholar
  22. IPCC (2006) IPCC Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, NGGIP Publications, IGES, JapanGoogle Scholar
  23. IPCC, Penman J, Gytarsky M, Hiraishi T, Krug T, Kruger D, Pipatti R, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K, Wagner F (2003) Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestryGoogle Scholar
  24. Jackson ML (1973) Soil chemical analysis. PHI Pvt. Ltd, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  25. Kishwan J, Pandey R, Dadhwal VK (2009) India’s forest and tree cover: contribution as a carbon sink. Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education, DehradunGoogle Scholar
  26. Kutsch WL, Bahn M, Heinemeyer A (2009) Soil carbon dynamics: an integrated methodology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Kuzyakov Y, Domanski G (2000) Carbon input by plants into the soil. Review. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 163:421–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuzyakov Y, Gavrichkova O (2010) Time lag between photosynthesis and carbon dioxide flux from soil: a review of mechanisms and controls. Glob Change Biol 16:3386–3406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration in India. Clim Change 65:277–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lal R (2008) Carbon sequestration. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363:815–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Linder S, Troeng E (1981) The seasonal variation in stem and coarse root respiration of a 20-year-old Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). In: Tranquillini W (ed) Dickenwachstum der Bäume, vol 142. Mitt. Forstl. Bundesversuchsanst, Wien, pp 125–140Google Scholar
  32. Lodhiyal LS, Singh RP, Singh SP (1995) Structure and function of an age series of poplar plantations in central Himalaya: i dry matter dynamics. Ann Bot 76:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maiti SK (2012) Ecorestoration of the coalmine degraded lands. Springer, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  34. Mathiba M, Awuah-Offei K (2015) Spatial autocorrelation of soil CO2 fluxes on reclaimed mine land. Environ Earth Sci 73:8287–8297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mathiba M, Awuah-Offei K, Baldassare FJ (2015) Influence of elevation, soil temperature and soil moisture content on reclaimed mine land soil CO2 fluxes. Environ Earth Sci 73:6131–6143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. MOC (2017) Annual report 2016–2017. Ministry of Coal, Government of India. https://coal.nic.in/sites/upload_files/coal/files/coalupload/chap1AnnualReport1617en.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2017
  37. Mukhopadhyay S, Maiti SK (2014) Soil CO2 flux in grassland, afforested land and reclaimed coalmine overburden dumps: a case study. Land Degrad Dev 25:216–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mukhopadhyay S, Masto RE (2016) Carbon storage in coal mine spoil by Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. Geoderma 284:204–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mukhopadhyay S, Masto RE, Yadav A, George J, Ram LC, Shukla SP (2016) Soil quality index for evaluation of reclaimed coal mine spoil. Sci Total Environ 542:540–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Paz CP, Goosem M, Bird M, Preece N, Goosem S, Fensham R, Laurance S (2016) Soil types influence predictions of soil carbon stock recovery in tropical secondary forests. For Ecol Manag 376:74–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pietrzykowski M, Chodak M (2014) Near infrared spectroscopy—a tool for chemical properties and organic matter assessment of afforested mine soils. Ecol Eng 62:115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pietrzykowski M, Krzaklewski W (2010) Potential for carbon sequestration in reclaimed mine soil on reforested surface mining areas in Poland. Nat Sci 2:1015–1021Google Scholar
  43. Pietrzykowski M, Socha J (2011) An estimation of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) ecosystem productivity on reclaimed post-mining sites in Poland (central Europe) using of allometric equations. Ecol Eng 37:381–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Piper CS (1966) Soil and plant analysis. Maver Publisher, BombayGoogle Scholar
  45. Qu JF, Hou YL, Ge MY, Wang K, Liu S, Zhang SL, Li G, Chen F (2017) Carbon dynamics of reclaimed coal mine soil under agricultural use: a chronosequence study in the dongtan mining area, Shandong Province, China. Sustainability 9:629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reeder JD (1998) Transformations of nitrogen-15-labelled fertilizer nitrogen and carbon mineralisation in incubated coal mine spoils and disturbed soil. J Environ Qual 17:291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rey A (2015) Mind the gap: non-biological processes contributing to soil CO2 efflux. Glob Change Biol 21:1752–1761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rivas-Pérez IM, Fernández-Sanjurjo MJ, Núñez-Delgado A, Monterroso C, Macías F, Álvarez-Rodríguez E (2016) Evolution of chemical characteristics of technosols in an afforested coal mine dump over a 20-year period. Land Degrad Dev 27(6):1640–1649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rumpel C, Kögel-Knabner I, Knicker H, Hüttl RF (2000) Composition and distribution of organic matter in physical fractions of a rehabilitated mine soil rich in lignite-derived carbon. Geoderma 98:177–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Scharlemann JP, Tanner EV, Hiederer R, Kapos V (2014) Global soil carbon: understanding and managing the largest terrestrial carbon pool. Carbon Manag 5:81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shrestha RK, Lal R, Jacinthe PA (2009) Enhancing carbon and nitrogen sequestration in reclaimed soils through organic amendments and chiseling. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:1004–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shrestha RK, Lal R, Rimal B (2013) Soil carbon fluxes and balances and soil properties of organically amended no-till corn production systems. Geoderma 197:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Singh AN, Zeng DH, Chen FS (2006) Effect of young woody plantations on carbon and nutrient accretion rates in a redeveloping soil on coalmine spoil in a dry tropical environment, India. Land Degrad Dev 17:13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Socha J, Wezyk P (2007) Allometric equations for estimating the foliage biomass of Scots pine. Eur J For Res 126:263–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Song X, Yuan H, Kimberley MO, Jiang H, Zhou G, Wang H (2013) Soil CO2 flux dynamics in the two main plantation forest types in subtropical China. Sci Total Environ 444:363–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sreenivas K, Dadhwal VK, Kumar S, Harsha GS, Mitran T, Sujatha G, Suresh GJR, Fyzee MA, Ravisankar T (2016) Digital mapping of soil organic and inorganic carbon status in India. Geoderma 269:160–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Subbiah BV, Asija GL (1956) A rapid procedure for the determination of available nitrogen in soils. Curr Sci 25:259–260Google Scholar
  58. Tripathi N, Singh RS, Nathanail CP (2014) Mine spoil acts as a sink of carbon dioxide in Indian dry tropical environment. Sci Total Environ 468:1162–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tripathi N, Singh RS, Hills CD (2016) Soil carbon development in rejuvenated Indian coal mine spoil. Ecol Eng 90:482–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ussiri DA, Lal R (2008) Method for determining coal carbon in the reclaimed minesoils contaminated with coal. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:231–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ussiri DA, Jacinthe PA, Lal R (2014) Methods for determination of coal carbon in reclaimed minesoils: a review. Geoderma 214:155–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vargas R, Baldocchi DD, Allen MF, Bahn M, Black TA, Collins SL, Yuste JC, Hirano T, Jassal RS, Pumpanen J, Tang J (2010) Looking deeper into the soil: biophysical controls and seasonal lags of soil CO2 production and efflux. Ecol Appl 20:1569–1582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vesper DJ, Moore JE, Adams JP (2016) Inorganic carbon dynamics and CO2 flux associated with coal-mine drainage sites in Blythedale PA and Lambert WV, USA. Environ Earth Sci 75:340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vinduskova O, Frouz J (2013) Soil carbon accumulation after open-cast coal and oil shale mining in Northern Hemisphere: a quantitative review. Environ Earth Sci 69:1685–1698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vindušková O, Sebag D, Cailleau G, Brus J, Frouz J (2015) Methodological comparison for quantitative analysis of fossil and recently derived carbon in mine soils with high content of aliphatic kerogen. Organic Geochem 89:14–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Waschkies C, Hüttl RF (1999) Microbial degradation of geogenic organic C and N in mine spoils. Plant Soil 213:221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wei S, Zhang X, McLaughlin NB, Liang A, Jia S, Chen X, Chen X (2014) Effect of soil temperature and soil moisture on CO2 flux from eroded landscape positions on black soil in Northeast China. Soil Tillage Res 144:119–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Xu M, Shang H (2016) Contribution of soil respiration to the global carbon equation. J Plant Physiol 203:16–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yuan Y, Zhao Z, Zhang P, Chen L, Hu T, Niu S, Bai Z (2017) Soil organic carbon and nitrogen pools in reclaimed mine soils under forest and cropland ecosystems in the Loess Plateau, China. Ecol Eng 102:137–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Center of Mining EnvironmentIndian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines)DhanbadIndia

Personalised recommendations