Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, 76:632 | Cite as

A lumped conceptual approach for modeling hydrological processes: the case of Scopia catchment area, Central Greece

  • Nikos CharizopoulosEmail author
  • Aris Psilovikos
  • Eleni Zagana
Original Article
  • 133 Downloads

Abstract

In the catchment area of Scopia, Central Greece, a lumped applied approach of water balance was accomplished, by applying the Zygos model, which delineates an essential water balance forms. The model is in view of Thornthwaite model, in its modified version. It can be adjusted automatically, with the evolutionary annealing-simplex technique for nonlinear optimization, or manually and the input data are precipitation and the potential evapotranspiration. In the present study, both programmed and manual calibration occurred. Programmed calibration took place, utilizing a specimen of measured runoff values from October 2009 to March 2011. Despite the fact that the Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient (NSC) value was high (0.87), the simulated parameters of water balance had abnormal significance for Scopia catchment area. On the contrary, manual calibration uncovered that the actual evapotranspiration constitutes 64.6% (450.1 mm) of the precipitation. Runoff and percolation represent 20.6% (143.6 mm) and 14.8% (102.9 mm) of the precipitation, respectively. The NSC (0.70) and the validation criteria exhibit an ideal adjustment of simulated to measured runoff, while the hydrological parameters appeared to have a physical significance for the study site. Zygos model connects the emergence of springs with the development of the karstification in the carbonate rocks of the region and affirms the predominance of runoff versus percolation due to the hydrolithological structure of the Scopia catchment. This is related to the presence of episodic floods in the area. The yearly precipitation values were found with an error of 0.2% and are viewed as insignificant.

Keywords

Hydrognomon software Zygos model Manual calibration Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient Scopia catchment area 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors express their grateful acknowledgments to the research team ITIA of the National Technical University of Athens for providing access to software utilized in this study. Appreciations are also expressed to the Ministry of Rural Development and Food and the Ministry of Environment and Energy for providing the data used in this paper.

References

  1. Antonakos AK, Lamprakis NJ (2007) Development and testing of three hybrid methods for the assessment of aquifer vulnerability to nitrates, based on the drastic model, an example from NE Korinthia, Greece. J Hydrol 333:288–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnaud P, Fine JA, Lavabre J (2007) An hourly rainfall generation model applicable to all types of climate. Atmos Res 85(2):230–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aschonitis V, Baltas E, Antonopoulos V (2006) Hydrologic investigations of the basin of Eordaios River. In: Proceedings of the national conference water resources management and environmental protection, Xanthi, pp 23–30Google Scholar
  4. Brath A, Montanari A, Toth E (2002) Neural networks and non-parametric methods for improving real-time flood forecasting through conceptual hydrological models. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 6(4):627–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Charizopoulos N (2013) Investigation on mechanisms of quantitative and qualitative deterioration of water and soil recourses in Domokos catchment by natural and anthropogenic processes. Ph.D. dissertation, Agriculture University of AthensGoogle Scholar
  6. Charizopoulos N, Psilovikos A (2015) Geomorphological analysis of Scopia catchment (Central Greece), using DEM data and GIS. Fresen Environ Bull 24(11):3973–3983Google Scholar
  7. Charizopoulos N, Psilovikos A (2016) Hydrologic processes simulation using the conceptual model Zygos: the example of Xynias drained Lake catchment (central Greece). Environ Earth Sci 75:777. doi: 10.1007/s12665-016-5565-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dimitriou E, Zacharias I (2006) Quantifying the rainfall-water level fluctuation process in a geologically complex lake catchment. Environ Monit Assess 119:491–506. doi: 10.1007/s10661-005-9039-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Efstratiadis A (2001) Investigation of global optimum seeking methods in water resources problems. Master Thesis, National Technical University of Athens, AthensGoogle Scholar
  10. Efstratiadis A, Koutsoyiannis D (2002) An evolutionary annealing-simplex algorithm for global optimization of water resource systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on hydroinformatics, Cardiff, UK, pp 1423–1428Google Scholar
  11. Efstratiadis A, Koutsoyiannis D (2010) One decade of multi-objective calibration approaches in hydrological modelling: a review. Hydrolog Sci J 55:58–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Engeland K, Xu CY, Gottschalk L (2005) Assessing uncertainties in a conceptual water balance model using Bayesian methodology. Hydrolog Sci J 50(1):45–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Esri (2012) ArcGIS Desktop 10.0 Help. http://help.arcgis.com/en/arcgisdesktop/10.0/help/index.html#/. Accessed 28 Sept 2012
  14. Garcia M, Peters-Lidard CD, Goodrich D (2008) Spatial interpolation of precipitation in a dense gauge network for monsoon storm events in the southwestern United States. Water Resour Res. doi: 10.1029/2006WR005788 Google Scholar
  15. Georgakakos KP, Smith GF (1990) On improved hydrologic forecasting-results from a WMO real-time forecasting experiment. J Hydrol 114:17–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hughes DA (1995) Monthly rainfall-runoff models applied to arid and semi-arid catchments for water resources estimation purposes. Hydrolog Sci J 40(6):751–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ITIA (2009) Hydrognomon, hydrological time series processing software. ITIA research team, National Technical University of Athens. http://www.itia.ntua.gr/help/misc/hydrognomon/?set_language=el. Accessed 25 Nov 2009
  18. Jothiprakash V, Magar RB (2012) Multi-time-step ahead daily and hourly intermittent reservoir indynamics prediction by artificial intelligent techniques using lumped and distributed data. J Hydrol 450–451:293–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Karsili C (2013) Calculation of past and present water availability in the Mediterranean Region and future estimates according to the Thornthwaite water-balance Model. Master thesis, Lund University, LundGoogle Scholar
  20. Kling Η, Gupta Η (2009) On the development of regionalization relationships for lumped watershed models: the impact of ignoring sub-basin scale variability. J Hydrol 373:337–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kozanis S, Efstratiadis A (2006). Zygos: a basin processes simulation model. In: Proceedings of the 21st European conference for esri users, Athens, GreeceGoogle Scholar
  22. Kozanis S, Efstratiadis A, Christofides A (2010) Scientific documentation of the Hydrognomon software (version 4), Development of Database and software applications in a web platform for the National Databank for Hydrological and Meteorological Data. ITIA research team, National Technical University of Athens. http://www.itia.ntua.gr/getfile/928/1/documents/HydrognomonV4TheoryGR-v1.02.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2010
  23. Krause P, Boyle DP, Base F (2005) Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Adv Geosci 5:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mackay JD, Jackson CR, Wang L (2014) A lumped conceptual model to simulate groundwater level timeseries. Environ Modeling Softw 61:229–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moriasi DN et al (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. ASABE 50:885–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River dynamics forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ngongondo C, Xu CY, Tallaksen LM, Alemaw B (2015) Observed and simulated changes in the water balance components over Malawi, during 1971–2000. Quat Int 369:7–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Panagopoulos A et al (2015) Area-differentiated modeling of water balance in Pinios river Basin, central Greece. Global Nest J 17(2):221–235Google Scholar
  29. Rozos E, Efstratiadis A, Nalbantis I, Koutsoyiannis D (2004) Calibration of a semi-distributed model for conjunctive simulation of surface and groundwater dynamicss. Hydrolog Sci J 49(5):819–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Samaras D, Reif A, Theodoropoulos K (2014) Evaluation of radiation-based reference evapotranspiration models under different mediterranean climates in Central Greece. Water Resour Manag 28:207–225. doi: 10.1007/s11269-013-0480-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sentas A (2013) Stochasic Simulation Models in Surface Water Quality in River Nestos. Ph.D. dissertation, University of ThessalyGoogle Scholar
  32. Singh A (2012) Development and application of a watertable model for the assessment of waterlogging in irrigated semi-arid regions. Water Resour Manag 26:4435–4448. doi: 10.1007/s11269-012-0154-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tewolde MH, Smithers JC (2006) Flood routing in ungauged catchments using Muskingum methods. Water SA 32(3):376–388Google Scholar
  34. Thornthwaite CW (1948) An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geogr Rev 38(1):55–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thornthwaite CW, Mather JR (1955) The water balance. Publ Climatol Lab Climatol Dresel Inst Technol 8(8):1–104Google Scholar
  36. Tzouka A (2007) Interpretation of conceptual hydrologic model parameters with watershed characteristics. Exploration using the model Zygos. Thesis (M.Sc.), National Technical University of AthensGoogle Scholar
  37. Vandewiele GL, Win NL (1998) Monthly water balance for 55 basins in 10 countries. Hydrolog Sci J 43(5):687–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Voudouris K (2006) Groundwater balance and safe yield of the coastal aquifer system in NEastern Korinthia, Greece. Appl Geogr 26:291–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang QJ et al (2011) Monthly versus daily water balance models in simulating monthly runoff. J Hydrol 404:166–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wu Q, Liu S, Cai Y, Li X, Jiang Y (2017) Improvement of hydrological model calibration by selecting multiple parameter ranges. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 21:393–407. doi: 10.5194/hess-21-393-2017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Xu CY, Vandewiele GL (1995) Parsimonious monthly rainfall-runoff models for humid basins with different input requirements. Adv Water Resour 18:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Xu CY, Tunemar L, Chen YD, Singh VP (2006) Evaluation of seasonal and spatial variations of lumped water balance model sensitivity to precipitation data errors. J Hydrol 324:80–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zagana E (2000) Wasserhaushalt und Stofftransport im Aliakmonasgebiet (Nordwest-Griechenland). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg. http://file.scirp.org/pdf/JWARP_2014021414523386.pdf, http://www.ifarsala.gr/2016/05/23/theominia-ston-dimo-farsalon-dilosi-dimarchou-farsalon/, https://www.itia.ntua.gr/en/docinfo/873/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Mineralogy-GeologyAgricultural University of AthensAthensGreece
  2. 2.Department of Ichthyology and Aquatic EnvironmentUniversity of ThessalyVolosGreece
  3. 3.Laboratory of Hydrogeology, Department of GeologyUniversity of PatrasRio, PatrasGreece

Personalised recommendations