Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, 76:154 | Cite as

Implementation and diffusion of innovative water infrastructures: obstacles, stakeholder networks and strategic opportunities for utilities

  • Jan Hendrik Trapp
  • Heide Kerber
  • Engelbert Schramm
Thematic Issue
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Water in Germany

Abstract

German municipalities and their water utilities are having to react to substantial ecological, economic and social changes that have been brought about by climate change, volatile energy prices and declining numbers of citizens. Innovative technologies and concepts for urban water and wastewater systems already exist, but so far they have only been implemented in pilot projects, mainly as the result of the institutional barriers they face. So how can urban water transformation be encouraged? Qualitative expert interviews, a literature analysis and a series of workshops involving representatives from utilities and stakeholders involved in urban planning were undertaken to identify the key obstacles and encourage action. The current challenges facing the implementation of innovative urban water systems include sector-focused planning approaches, path dependencies (such as technological and “mental” barriers), legal and institutional constraints, and complex structures of responsibilities. New institutional arrangements involving the key players (cooperation models) as well as new processes requiring a reallocation of labour could contribute to a smoother implementation. Innovative water systems present new strategic opportunities for water utilities. Two opportunities that are worthy of consideration in order to fully exploit the benefits of such systems are a strengthening of the water–energy link and an intensification of activities along the “water chain”. The findings in this paper reveal that the urban water infrastructure of the future promises new forms of cross-sectoral integration and co-management, and the coexistence of centralised and decentralised systems.

Keywords

Water infrastructure Urban water Innovation Governance structure Business model Germany 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The netWORKS 3 project “Intelligent integrated water management solutions in Frankfurt am Main and Hamburg” is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) as part of the funding measure “Smart and multifunctional infrastructural systems for sustainable water supply, sanitation and stormwater management” (INIS).

References

  1. Anda M, Mohamed RMSR, Mathew K, Dallas S, Ho GE (2010) Decentralized wastewater treatment and recycling in urban villages. Water Pract Technol 5(3):1. doi: 10.2166/wpt.2010.047
  2. ATT (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Trinkwassertalsperren e.V.), BDEW (Bundesverband der Energie- und Wasserwirtschaft e.V.), DBVW (Deutscher Bund der verbandlichen Wasserwirtschaft e.V.), DVGW (Deutscher Verein des Gas- und Wasserfaches e. V. – Technisch-wissen-schaftlicher Verein), DWA (Deutsche Vereinigung für Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser und Abfall e.V.), VKU (Verband kommunaler Unternehmen e.V.) (2015) Profile of the German Water Sector 2015. Bonn. https://www.bdew.de/internet.nsf/res/1EF08743E7477878C1257E1200438C17/$file/Branchenbild_Wasserwirtschaft_2015.pdf http://de.dwa.de/tl_files/_media/content/PDFs/Abteilung_AuG/WEB-Branchenbild-dt-wasserwirtschaft-2011.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2016
  3. Beveridge R, Kern K (2013) Energiewende in Germany: background, developments and future challenges. Renew Energy Law Pol Rev 1:3–12Google Scholar
  4. Beveridge R, Monsees J, Moss T (2012) The IRS Handbook. Analysing Institutional and Political Contexts of Water Resources Management Projects. http://www.irs-net.de/download/publikationen/WarmIn-en.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2016
  5. Bieger T, zu Knyphausen-Aufseß D, Krys C (eds) (2011) Innovative Geschäftsmodelle. Konzeptionelle Grundlagen, Gestaltungsfelder und unternehmerische Praxis. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  6. Blechschmidt A, Lanzendorf M, Wilde M (2015) Integrierte Stadtentwicklung und die Gestaltung nachhaltiger Mobilität—Zum Stand der Planungspraxis am Beispiel der Stadt Leipzig. Raumforsch Raumordn 73:423–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. BMWi (ed) (2015) Ein Strommarkt für die Energiewende. Ergebnispapier des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Energie (Weißbuch). http://www.bmwi.de/BMWi/Redaktion/PDF/Publikationen/weissbuch,property=pdf,bereich=bmwi2012,sprache=de,rwb=true.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2016
  8. Brown RR, Keath N, Wong THF (2009) Urban water management in cities: historical, current and future regimes. Water Sci Technol 59:847–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bundesregierung (2008) Deutsche Anpassungsstrategie an den Klimawandel vom Bundeskabinett am 17. Dezember 2008 beschlossen. http://www.bmub.bund.de/fileadmin/bmu-import/files/pdfs/allgemein/application/pdf/das_gesamt_bf.pdf. Accessed 19 Dec 2016
  10. Bürgow G, Kluge T, Million A, Schramm E, Winker M (2014) Das Memorandum “Klimagerechte Stadt”. Ein Aufruf an Politik, Wissenschaft und Akteure aus der Praxis. Planerin 6:45–47Google Scholar
  11. Buth M, Kahlenborn W et al (2015) Germany’s vulnerability to Climate Change. Climate Change 24/2015. UBA, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  12. Cave M (2009) Innovation in the water industry in England and Wales: Final Report. Defra, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. CGI/Trend:research (2013) Strategiewende zur Energiewende? Zukünftige Ausrichtung der Stadtwerke. https://www.de.cgi.com/studie/strategiewende-zur-energiewende. Accessed 5 Nov 2013
  14. Commerzbank (2009) Perspektiven von Stadtwerken. Studie vor dem Hintergrund der Interdependenz von Wettbewerb und Daseinsvorsorge im Fokus eines regulierten Marktumfeldes. Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  15. Daigger GT (2009) Sustainable urban water and resource management. Bridge Urb Sust 41:13–18Google Scholar
  16. Di Brenner K (2005) Dienstleister und Partner für die Wasserwirtschaft—Veolia Water arbeitet für Kommunen, Verbände und Industrie. Österr Wass Abfallw 57(7):a18–a19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dolata U (2009) Technological innovations and sectoral change. Transformative capacity, adaptability, patterns of change: an analytical framework. Res Policy 38:1066–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Domènech L (2011) Rethinking water management: from centralized to decentralized water supply and sanitation models. Documents d’anàlisi geogràfica 57:293–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dose N (2008) Governance als problemorientierte Steuerung. Steuerung angesichts alter Probleme und neuer Herausforderungen. In: Schuppert G, Zürn M (eds) Governance in einer sich wandelnden Welt. Pol Viertelj Schr Spec, vol 41, pp 77–95. doi: 10.1007/978-3-531-91066-6_25
  20. DStGB (2015) Starkregen und Hitzewellen: Die Stadt im Klimawandel fordert die kommunale Wasserwirtschaft heraus. Themen, Projekte und Lösungen aus der BMBF-Fördermaßnahme INIS. Dokumentation No. 133Google Scholar
  21. DWA (2008) Neuartige Sanitärsysteme, DWA-Themen KA 1. Hennef, Deutsche Vereinigung für Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser und Abfall e.VGoogle Scholar
  22. DWA (2010) Do we need New Alternative Sanitation Systems in Germany? In plain language. Hennef, Deutsche Vereinigung für Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser und Abfall e.VGoogle Scholar
  23. DWA (2013) Positionen zur Energie- und Wasserwirtschaft. Reihe DWA-Positionen, HennefGoogle Scholar
  24. DWA (2014) Neuartige Sanitärsysteme: Akteursbezogene Hinweise für die Projektentwicklung und -umsetzung. Korr Abw 61:781–785Google Scholar
  25. EIP Water (European Innovation Partnership on Water) (2014) Barriers and bottlenecks for Innovation in the Water Sector, 1st Stage: Identification of non-technological barriers and definition of priority and intervention measures, Final Report. http://www.eip-water.eu/sites/default/files/DiagnosisBarriersBottlenecks-Final_0.pdf. Accessed 6 Jan 2016
  26. Flick U (2005) Qualitative Sozialforschung. Eine Einführung. Rowohlt, Reinbek bei HamburgGoogle Scholar
  27. Geels FW (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Pol 31:1257–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Haberkern B, Maier W, Schneider U (2008) Steigerung der Energieeffizienz auf kommunalen Kläranlagen. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/publikation/long/3347.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2016
  29. Hardy AI, Hård M (2013) Common cause: Public Health and Bacteriology in Germany, 1870–1895. East Central Europe 40:319–340. doi: 10.1163/18763308-04003002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Haus M (2010) Governance-Theorien und Governance-Probleme: Diesseits und jenseits des Steuerungsparadigmas. Pol Viertelj Schr 51:457–479. doi: 10.1007/s11615-010-0023-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hering JG, Waite TD, Luthy RG, Drewes JE, Sedlak DL (2013) A changing framework for urban water systems. Environ Sci Technol 47:10721–10726. doi: 10.1021/es4007096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hiessl H, Stemplewski J, Toussaint D, Hetschel M, Geisler S, Kersting M (2007) Abwasserentsorgung einer Streusiedlung mit MBR-Kleinkläranlagen im Rahmen eines Contracting-Modells. Korr Abw 54(12):1238–1245Google Scholar
  33. Hoffjan A, Müller NA, Di Frederico V, Liserra T (2014) Advice to water management practitioners on competition, efficiency and new business opportunities. https://riunet.upv.es/bitstream/handle/10251/46621/Advice_to_water_management_practitioners_on_ccompetitio__efficiency__and_new_business_opportunities%20%281%29.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed 11 Feb 2015
  34. Kerber H, Giese T, Schramm E (2015) Governing future water services: new institutional arrangements to improve the implementation of system innovations. In: IWA/TRUST proceedings. Cities of the Future Conference. Transitions to the Urban Water Services of Tomorrow (TRUST), 28–30 April 2015 in Mühlheim/Ruhr, pp 134–136Google Scholar
  35. Kiparski M, Sedlak DL, Thompson BH, Truffer B (2013) The innovation deficit in urban water: the need for an integrated perspective on institutions, organizations, and technology. Environ Eng Sci 30:395–408. doi: 10.1089/ees.2012.0427 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kluge T, Libbe J (2010) Transformationsmanagement für eine nachhaltige Wasserwirtschaft. Handreichung zur Realisierung neuartiger Infrastrukturlösungen im Bereich Wasser und Abwasser. Difu, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  37. Krozer Y, Hophmayer-Tokich S, van Meerendonk H, Tijsma S, Vos E (2010) Innovations in the water chain—experiences in the Netherlands. J Clean Prod 18:439–446. doi: 10.1016/j.clepro.2009.11.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lazarova V, Choo KH, Cornel P (eds) (2012) Water-energy interactions in water reuse. IWA Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Lazarova V, Asano T, Bahri A, Anderson J (eds) (2013) Milestones in water reuse: the best success stories. IWA Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Libbe J (2015) Transformation städtischer Infrastruktur—Perspektiven und Elemente eines kommunalen Transformationsmanagements am Beispiel Energie. Dissertation, Leipzig UniversityGoogle Scholar
  41. Litschel J, Schramm E (2011) Konzeption und Durchführung eines Stakeholder-Involvements in BiK-F. BiK-F Knowledge Flow Paper No 9. http://www.isoe.info/ftp/bik_f/kfp_nr-9.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2016
  42. Mayring P (2007) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken, BeltzCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mikat H (2009) Aquiferbewirtschaftung heute und morgen—Einflussfaktoren und Lösungsansätze. bbr 7/8: 38-43Google Scholar
  44. Miller WG (2006) Integrated concepts in water reuse: managing global water needs. Desalination 187:65–75. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mitchell RB (2003) Of course international institutions matter: but when and how? In: Breit H, Engels A, Moss T, Troja M (eds) How Institutions change. Perspectives on social learning in global and local environmental contexts. Leske + Budrich, Opladen, pp 35–52Google Scholar
  46. Monstadt J, Schmidt M, Wilts H (2012) Regionale Zusammenarbeit in der Ver-und Entsorgung des Rhein-Main-Gebiets. In: Monstadt J et al (eds) Die diskutierte Region: Probleme und Planungsansätze der Metropolregion Rhein-Main. Campus, Frankfurt am Main, pp 185–210Google Scholar
  47. Moss T (2011) Intermediaries and the governance of urban infrastructures in transition. In: Guy S, Marvin S, Medd W, Moss T (eds) Shaping urban infrastructures. intermediaries and the governance of socio-technical networks. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 17–35Google Scholar
  48. Müller K, Cornel P, Kluge T (2016) Integrated systemic approach. In: Liehr S, Kramm J, Jokisch A, Müller K (ed) Integrated water resources management in water-scarce regions: water harvesting, groundwater desalination and water reuse in namibia. IWA Publishing, London (in print)Google Scholar
  49. Nickel D, Schönfelder W, Medearis D, Dolowitz DP, Keeley M, Shuster W (2014) German experience in managing stormwater with green infrastructure. J Environ Plan Manag 57:403–423. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2012.748652 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nolde E (2000) Greywater reuse systems for toilet flushing in multi-storey buildings: over ten years experience in Berlin. Urban Water 1:275–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nolde E (2013) Water and energy recycling in a residential passive house. SB13 Graz, Sustainable: 1353-1360. http://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB_DC27882.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2016
  52. OECD (2015) Principles on water governance. http://www.oecd.org/gov/regional-policy/OECD-Principles-on-Water-Governance-brochure.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2016
  53. Oldenburg M, Rohde R, Wuttke M, Kuck W (2015) Handbuch Unterdruckentwässerung—Ein Leitfaden für die Installation in Gebäuden. Hamburg Wasser, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  54. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Otterpohl R, Albold A, Oldenburg M (1999) Source control in urban sanitation and waste management: ten systems with reuse of resources. Water Sci Technol 39:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Parsons D, Cabrera E, Jeffrey P (2012) Carbon sensitive urban water futures. https://riunet.upv.es/bitstream/handle/10251/35723/Report_on_carbon_sensitive_urban_water_futures.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 26 Jan 2016
  57. Partzsch L (2007) Nachhaltige innovative Wasserwirtschaft—deutsche Governance-Struktur im internationalen Vergleich. Ifo Schnelld 60:16–26Google Scholar
  58. Rogers P, Hall AW (2003) Effective water governance. TEC background papers No 7. http://www.gwp.org/Global/ToolBox/Publications/Background%20papers/07%20Effective%20Water%20Governance%20%282003%29%20English.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2016
  59. Roy AH, Wenger SJ, Fletcher TD, Walsh CJ, Ladson AR, Shuster WD, Thurston HW, Brown RR (2008) Impediments and solutions to sustainable, watershed-scale urban stormwater management: lessons from Australia and the United States. Environ Manag 42:344–359. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9119-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rygaard M, Binning PJ, Albrechtsen HJ (2011) Increasing urban water self-sufficiency: new era, new challenges. J Environ Manag 92(1):185–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Saleth RM, Dinar A (2005) Water institutional reforms: theory and practice. Water Pol 7:1–19Google Scholar
  62. Schott D (2014) Europäische Urbanisierung (1000–2000): Eine umwelthistorische Einführung. Wien, Köln, WeimarGoogle Scholar
  63. Schramm E (2008) Energierückgewinnung aus Abwasser—Technologien für die Zukunft. ISOE-Diskussionspapiere 30. Frankfurt am Main. http://www.isoe.de/publikationen/publikation-detail/?tx_refman_pi1[refman]=507%24tx_refman_pi1[controller]=Refman%24tx_refman_pi1[action]=detail%24cHash=a74934b29cfd8c57d84d4d9290e3febd
  64. Schramm E, Giese T, Kluge T, Kuck W, Völker C (2016) Verändertes Kooperationsmanagement für neuartige Sanitärsysteme in Umsetzung und Betrieb. Folgerungen aus dem Beispiel Jenfelder Au in Hamburg. gwf Wasser Abw 157(2):148–155Google Scholar
  65. Science for Environment Policy (2015) Innovation in the European water sector. Future Brief 10. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/research/newsalert/pdf/innovation_european_water_sector_FB10_en.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2016
  66. Sehring J (2009) Path dependencies and institutional bricolage in post-soviet water governance. Water Altern 2:61–81Google Scholar
  67. Skambraks AK, Augustin K, Meinzinger F, Hartmann M (2014) Hamburg`s lead on water and energy: implementing resource-oriented sanitation using the Hamburg Water Cycle. Water 21(4):15–18Google Scholar
  68. smm Managementberatung, Kompetenzzentrum öffentliche Wirtschaft und Daseinsvorsorge, Universität Leipzig (2010) Strategien von Stadtwerken—Status quo und Perspektiven. https://www.uni-leipzig.de/fiwi/Kompetenzzentrum/pdf/smm.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2016
  69. Speight VL (2015) Innovation in the water industry: barriers and opportunities for US and UK utilities. WIREs Water 2:301–313. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tauchmann H, Hafkesbrink J, Nisipeanu P et al (2006) Innovationen für eine nachhaltige Wasserwirtschaft: Einflussfaktoren und Handlungsbedarf. Physica, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  71. Thomas D, Ford R (2005) The crisis of innovation in water and wastewater. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  72. Trapp JH (2015) Innovative de- and semi-centralized water infrastructures—opportunities for water supply and wastewater companies. In: Institut für Siedlungswasserwirtschaft, Technische Universität Braunschweig (ed) Conference proceedings 5th international symposium “RE-Water Braunschweig” (2–3 Nov 2015), Braunschweig, pp 22–34Google Scholar
  73. Weigert B (2014) Vom Klärwerk zum Kraftwerk. gwf Wasser Abw 11:1164 Google Scholar
  74. Williamson OE (1996) The mechanisms of governance. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Hendrik Trapp
    • 1
  • Heide Kerber
    • 2
  • Engelbert Schramm
    • 2
  1. 1.German Institute of Urban AffairsBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Social-Ecological ResearchFrankfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations