An approach for simulating the THMC process in single novaculite fracture using EPCA
- 257 Downloads
An approach for simulating thermal, hydraulic, mechanical and chemical (THMC) coupled processes in single rock fractures has been developed under the framework of a self-developed numerical method, i.e., an elasto-plastic cellular automaton. The balance equations of multi-physics problems to describe the THMC process in single rock fracture are solved by using cellular automaton technique on space scale and finite difference method on time scale, respectively. Using the concept of cellular automaton, a single rock fracture surface is discretized into a system composed of cell elements. Different apertures, i.e., 0 for contact and nonzero for void, are assigned to each cell element based on the fracture surface topography. The fluid flow, stress-dependent chemical reaction and solute transport are simulated by using a cellular automaton updating rule, in which only local cell balance equation is considered. The contribution of cell elements in contact to cell’s transmissivity and convection can be ignored conveniently. The Lagrangian method is used to simulate the particle transport. Special treatment for particle transport to outer boundaries and internal boundaries is adopted. As a result, the local behaviors, such as the formation of local contact, dead ends in the fracture and the local aperture change, are conveniently updated dynamically. The approach is used to simulate the coupled THMC process in a single novaculite fracture. The behaviors of pressure dissolution caused by effective stress, free-face dissolution/precipitation, thermal-dependent fluid flow and ion transport are well reproduced by using the developed approach, subject to parameter calibration. The robustness of the general approach to such complex problems is demonstrated by comparing with experimental data.
KeywordsCoupled THMC process Elasto-plastic cellular automaton Fracture aperture Chemical dissolution Solute transport Tortuous flow
The authors appreciate and thank the Funding Organisations for their financial and technical support of the DECOVALEX project work described in this paper. This work was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 51322906 and 41272349 and Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS under Grant No. 2011240. The statements made in the paper are, however, solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Funding Organisation(s).
- Bond A (2016) Task C1 final report, KTH report. ISBN 978-91-7595-829-3(06), ISSN 1650-86-10Google Scholar
- Lanru J, Xiating F (2004) Numerical modeling for coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical and chemical processes (THMC) of geological media—international and Chinese experiences. Chinese J Rock Mech Eng 22(10):1704–1715Google Scholar
- Min K-B, Rutqvist J, Tsang C-F, Jing L (2004) Stress-dependent permeability of fractured rock masses: a numerical study. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(7):1191–1210Google Scholar
- Pruess K (2004) The TOUGH codes—a family of simulation tools for multiphase flow and transport processes in permeable media. Vadose Zone J 3(3):738–746Google Scholar
- Talman S, Perkins E, Gunter W (2000) Users manual for GAMSPATH a reaction path-mass transfer program DRAFT. Geochemical Applications and Modelling Software Ltd, p 39Google Scholar
- Watanabe N, Bilke L, Fischer T, Kalbacher T, Nagel T, Naumov D, Rink K, Shao H, Wang W, Kolditz O (2014) OpenGeoSys: an open-source initiative for numerical simulation of thermo-hydro-mechanical/chemical (THM/C) processes in porous media. AGU fall meeting abstractsGoogle Scholar
- Xu T, Sonnenthal E, Spycher N, Pruess K (2006) TOUGHREACT—a simulation program for non-isothermal multiphase reactive geochemical transport in variably saturated geologic media: applications to geothermal injectivity and CO 2 geological sequestration. Comput Geosci 32(2):145–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yasuhara H, Elsworth D, Polak A (2004) Evolution of permeability in a natural fracture: significant role of pressure solution. J Geophys Res Solid Earth (1978–2012) 109(B3):1–11Google Scholar