Proposals for risk assessment of major cations in surface water and deep sediment: iso-cation curves, probabilities of occurrence and non-occurrence of cations

  • Fatih Külahcı
Original Article


Spatial analysis and stochastic risk analysis methodologies are proposed for the characterisation of major cations (Mg, Ca, K, Na and Zn) in deep sediments and surface waters of the Keban Reservoir, Turkey. Curves denoted as “iso-cation curves” were drawn using the spatial analysis of the major cations. Spatial diagrams and risk assessment allowed significant conclusions about the nature of the variations in cation concentration in the reservoir. Major cations are measured at 20 different locations within the reservoir, and their comparisons are presented through both spatial distribution and risk analysis models for each ion. Their collective behaviour was also analysed by comparing spatial diagrams of surface water and deep sediment concentrations. Finally, the iso-cation curves and achievement of the occurrence and/or non-occurrence cation probabilities in any research area can be generalised to other the environment sciences. This calculation can be extended easily to cover all pollutants at micro- and macroscales.


Risk assessment Risk analysis Cation Spatial analysis Lake 



This study is part of a research project supported by The Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) and The Council of Higher Education (YÖK), Turkey. The author would like to thank TÜBİTAK and YÖK for financial support and encouragement.


  1. Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Trussell RR (1989) Standart methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, USA, Part 7000-7500Google Scholar
  2. Evans M, Hastings N, Peacock B (2000) Statistical distributions, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Feller W (1967) An introduction to probability theory and its application, vol 1. Wiley, New York, p 509Google Scholar
  4. Golden Software (2009) Grapher version 8.0.278. Golden, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  5. Keban Dam Lake Limnological Study Report (1982) Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources, Operations and Maintenance Department, Ankara Google Scholar
  6. Kim H-S, Chung C-K, Kim H-K (2016) Geo-spatial data integration for subsurface stratification of dam site with outlier analyses. Environ Earth Sci 75:168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Krige DG (1951) A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Witwatersrand. J Chem Metall Min Soc S Afr 52:119–139Google Scholar
  8. Külahcı F (2011) A risk analysis model for radioactive wastes. J Hazard Mater 191:349–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Külahcı F, Şen Z (2009) Spatio-temporal modeling of 210Pb transportation in lake environments. J Hazard Mater 65:525–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Matheron G (1963) Principles of geostatistics. Econ Geol 58:1246–1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Merian E, Anke M, Ihnat M, Stoeppler M (2004a) Elements and their compounds in the environment, vol 1. Wiley, WeinheimCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Merian E, Anke M, Ihnat M, Stoeppler M (2004b) Elements and their compounds in the environment, vol 2. Wiley, WeinheimCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mor S, Ravindra K, Dahiya RP et al (2006) Leachate characterization and assessment of groundwater pollution near municipal solid waste landfill site. Environ Monit Assess 118:435–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Özmen H, Külahcı F, Çukurovalı A, Doğru M (2004) Concentrations of heavy metal and radioactivity in surface water and sediment of Hazar Lake (Elazığ, Turkey). Chemosphere 55:401–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. SAS (2007) UCLA: Academic Technology Services, Statistical Consulting Group.
  16. Şen Z (1976) Wet and dry periods of annual flow series. ASCE J Hydraul Div 102:1503–1514Google Scholar
  17. Şen Z (1991) Probabilistic modelling of crossing in small samples and application of runs to hydrology. J Hydrol 124:345–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Şen Z (1999) Simple risk calculations in dependent hydrological series. J Hydrol Sci 44:871–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Swaine DJ (2000) Why trace elements are important. Fuel Process Technol 65:21–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Viets FG (1962) Chemistry and availability of micronutrients in soil. J Agric Food Chem 10:174–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Xue Y, Meng X, Wasowsk J et al (2015) Spatial analysis of surface deformation distribution detected by persistent scatterer interferometry in Lanzhou Region, China. Environ Earth Sci 75:80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. You M, Huang Y, Lu J, Li C (2016) Fractionation characterizations and environmental implications of heavy metal in soil from coal mine in Huainan, China. Environ Earth Sci 75:78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Physics Department, Science FacultyFırat UniversityElazigTurkey

Personalised recommendations