Assessment of the European Standard for the determination of resistance of marble to thermal and moisture cycles: recommendations for improvements

  • Rossana BellopedeEmail author
  • Eleonora Castelletto
  • Bjorn Schouenborg
  • Paola Marini
Thematic Issue
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Geomaterials used as construction raw materials and their environmental interactions


The bowing phenomenon is so relevant that two projects, EU funded, from 1999 studied it and a European Standard to assess the resistance to thermal and moisture cycles (influencing bowing) has been recently adopted. In particular, according EN 16306: 2013, measurements of bowing and flexural strength should be performed before and at the end of the ageing cycles. Additional non-destructive tests are recommended, but are not compulsory for the standard. Moreover, Annex A of EN 16306 contains guidance on the limit values for the selection of marble types suitable for outdoor uses, especially façade applications. Eleven varieties of marble have been tested by means of this laboratory ageing test. Non-destructive tests such as the measurements of ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), adjacent grains analysis, open porosity, and water absorption have been executed together with the conventional flexural strength test. The results obtained from image analysis on thin sections indicate that the AGA index may not always be correlated with the other tests: amount of bowing, loss of flexural strength, or loss of UPV. Some consideration of the decrease in mechanical resistance and the bowing in relation to the variety of marble tested and the limit values indicated in Annex A of EN 16306 can be noted. It is known that bowing and rapid strength loss occur in some varieties of marble when used as exterior cladding and other exterior applications. Additional conclusions have been drawn: bowing and flexural strength correlate well and can be used to assess the suitability of the marble to be employed in outdoors.


Permanent bowing Flexural strength Fabric Non-destructive tests Dolomitic and calcitic marble 


  1. Åkesson U, Lindqvist JE, Schouenborg B, Grelk B (2006) Relationship between microstructure and bowing properties of calcite marble claddings. Bull Eng Geol Environ 65(1):73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Åkesson U, Lindqvist JE, Schouenborg B (2010) AGA: the method to demonstrate the relationship between microstructure and bowing properties of calcite marble claddings. In: Global stone congress 2010, Alicante, Spain, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  3. Andriani GF, Germinario L (2014) Thermal decay of carbonate dimension stones: fabric, physical and mechanical change. Environ Earth Sci 72:2523–2539. doi: 10.1007/s12665-014-3160-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barsotelli M et al (1998) Microfabric and alteration in Carrara marble: a preliminary study. Sci Technol Cult Herit 7(2):115–126Google Scholar
  5. Bednarik M, Moshammer B, Heinrich M, Holzer R, Laho M, Rabeder J, Uhlir C, Unterwurzacher M (2014) Engineering geological properties of Leitha limestone from historical quarries in Burgenland and Styria. Austria Eng Geol 176:66–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bellopede R, Manfredotti L (2006) Ultrasonic sound test on stone: comparison of indirect and direct methods under various test conditions. In: Fort R, Alvarez de Buergo M, Gomez-Heras M, Vazquez-Calvo C (eds) Heritage weathering and conservation, vol 2. Taylor & Francis/Balkema, London, pp 539–546Google Scholar
  7. Bellopede R, Luodes NM, Marini P, Manfredotti L (2006) The ultrasonic measurements: an instrument for the factory production control of marble slabs. In: Proceedings of the fifteenth international symposium mining planning and equipment selection. Torino, 20–22 Sept 2006, Galliate: Fiordo s.r.l. (ed). ISBN/ISSN: ISBN 88 9014424 0, pp 537–542Google Scholar
  8. Bellopede R, Castelletto E, Marini P, Zichella L (2014) Long term natural ageing of marble: evaluation and analysis. In: Tugrul A, Yavuz Y (eds) V global stone congress. 22–25 Oct 2014, Antalya 1, pp 34–34Google Scholar
  9. Cantisani E et al (2000) Relationship between microstructure and physical properties of white Apuan marbles: inferences on weathering durability. Period Mineral 69(3):257–268Google Scholar
  10. Castelletto E (2014) Studio dell’avanzamento della porosità in marmi degradati. Master’s thesis. Politecnico di Torino. p 115Google Scholar
  11. EN 13755 (2008) Natural stone test methods: determination of water absorption at atmospheric pressure. CEN Committee, Brussels, p 8Google Scholar
  12. EN 16306 (2013) Natural stone test methods: determination of resistance of marble to thermal and moisture cycles. CEN Committee, Brussels, p 18Google Scholar
  13. EN 1936 (2006) Natural stone test methods: determination of real density and apparent density, and of total and open porosity, CEN Committee, Brussels, p 12Google Scholar
  14. Grelk B, Christiansen C, Schouenborg B, Malaga K (2007) Durability of Marble Cladding: a comprehensive literature review. J ASTM Int 4(4):1–19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Malaga-Starzec K, Lindqvist JE, Schouenborg B (2002) Experimental study on the variation in porosity of marble as function of temperature, In: Siegesmund S, Weiss T, Vollbrecht A (eds) Natural stone: weathering phenomena, conservation strategies and case studies. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 205, pp 81–88Google Scholar
  16. Manfredotti M, Marini P (2006) The “contact sponge”: study of the applicability of a new and simple methodology. In: Fort R, Álvarez de Buergo M (eds) Book of abstracts of heritage, weathering and conservation 2006, eighth thematic network on cultural and historic heritage scientific meeting, Madrid, 21–24 June 2006, p 103Google Scholar
  17. Molina Ballesteros E, Cantano Martín M, García Talegón J (2010) Role of porosity in rock weathering processes: a theoretical approach. Cadernos Lab. Xeolóxico de Laxe Coruña 35:147–162Google Scholar
  18. Molli G, Conti P, Giorgetti G, Meccheri M, Oesterling M (2000) Microfabric study on the deformational and thermal history of the Alpi Apuane marbles (Carrara Marbles). J Struct Geol 22:1809–1825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rasolofosaon PNJ, Siegesmund S, Weiss T (2000) The relationship between deterioration, fabric, velocity and porosity constraint. In: Fassina V (ed) Proceedings of the 9th international congress deteriorioration and conservation of stone. Elsevier, Venice, pp 215–223Google Scholar
  20. Schouenborg B, Grelk B, Malaga K (2007) Testing and assessment of marble and limestone, TEAM: important results from a large European research project on cladding panels. J ASTM Int 4(5):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shushakova V, Fuller ER Jr, Siegesmund S (2011) Influence of shape fabric and crystal texture on marble degradation phenomena: simulations. Environ Earth Sci 63:1587–1601. doi: 10.1007/s12665-010-0744-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Siegesmund S, Ruedrich J, Koch A (2008) Marble bowing: comparative studies of three different public building facades. Environ Geol J 56(3–4):473–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. UNI 11432 (2011) Cultural heritage: natural and artificial stone—determination of the water absorption by contact spongeGoogle Scholar
  24. Vandevoorde D, Pamplona M, Schalm O, Vanhellemont Y, Cnudde V, Verhaeven EC (2009) Contact sponge method: performance of a promising tool for measuring the initial water absorption. J Cult Herit 10(1):41–47, ISSN 1296-2074.  10.1016/j.culher.2008.10.002
  25. Weiss T, Siegesmund S, Fuller E (2002) Thermal stresses and microcracking in calcite and dolomite marbles quantified by finite element modelling. In: Siegesmund S, Weiss T, Vollbrecht A (eds) natural stone, weathering phenomena, conservation strategies and case studies. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 205, pp 89–102Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rossana Bellopede
    • 1
    Email author
  • Eleonora Castelletto
    • 1
  • Bjorn Schouenborg
    • 2
  • Paola Marini
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environment, Land and Infrastructure EngineeringPolitecnico di TorinoTurinItaly
  2. 2.Swedish Cement and Concrete Research Institute CBIBoråsSweden

Personalised recommendations