A new hydro-mechanical model for bentonite resaturation applied to the SEALEX experiments

  • K. E. Thatcher
  • A. E. Bond
  • P. Robinson
  • C. McDermott
  • A. P. Fraser Harris
  • S. Norris
Thematic Issue
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. DECOVALEX 2015


Bentonite barriers perform safety critical functions in many radioactive waste disposal concepts, but it is challenging to accurately predict bentonite resaturation behaviour in repository settings. Coupled models of the hydro-mechanical response of bentonite are used to demonstrate understanding of bentonite behaviour in experiments and to predict the response of bentonite in a repository environment. Following trials of a range of numerical approaches, a new model is presented, referred to as the Internal Limit Model, which makes use of key observations on limiting stresses supported in bentonite samples in experimental data. This model is based on the Modified Cam Clay model, and uses the observation that for a given dry density of bentonite, there is a limiting stress that the sample can support, be that stress due to swelling, compaction or suction, to explicitly couple the hydraulic and mechanical models. The model is applied to experimental data from the SEALEX experiments, involving a 70/30 by mass mixture of MX80 bentonite and sand. The model is able to reproduce the experimental data using a single set of parameters for all the experiments considered. This builds confidence that the model will be useful in the future for predictive modelling given appropriate data to characterise the bentonite material being used.


Bentonite Coupled modelling Resaturation 



This work was conducted within the international DECOVALEX Project (, with funding from Radioactive Waste Management Limited (RWM) (, a wholly–owned subsidiary of the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority.

Supplementary material

12665_2016_5741_MOESM1_ESM.docx (52 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 51 kb)


  1. Alonso E, Gens A, Josa A (1990) A constitutive model for partially saturated soils. Géotechnique 40(3):405–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alonso EE, Vaunat J, Gens A (1999) Modelling the mechanical behaviour of expansive clays. Eng Geol 54:173–183. doi: 10.1016/S0013-7952(99)00079-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnichon J-D, Dick P, Bauer C (2011) The SEALEX in situ experiments: performance tests of repository seals. In: Zhou Y, Qian Q (eds) Harmonising rock engineering and the environment. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 1391–1394. ISBN 978-0-415-80444-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benbow SJ, Rivett MO, Chittenden N, Herbert AW, Watson S, Williams SJ, Norris S (2014) Potential migration of buoyant LNAPL from Intermediate Level Waste (ILW) emplaced in a geological disposal facility (GDF) for UK radioactive waste. J Contam Hydrol 167:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bond A, Millard A, Nakama S, Zhang C, Garitte B (2013) Approaches for representing hydromechanical coupling between large engineered voids and argillaceous porous media at ventilation experiment, Mont Terri. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 5(2):85–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bond A, Thatcher K, Chittenden N, McDermott C, Fraser-Harris A (2014) RWM coupled processes project: first annual report for RWM participation in DECOVALEX-2015 tasks A and C1. AMEC report to RWM 18040-TR-002 v2.0Google Scholar
  7. Bond A, Thatcher K, Chittenden N, McDermott C, Fraser-Harris A (2015a) RWM coupled processes project: second annual report for RWM participation in DECOVALEX-2015 tasks A and C1. AMEC report to RWM 18040-TR-003 v3.0Google Scholar
  8. Bond A, Thatcher K, Chittenden N, McDermott C, Fraser-Harris A (2015b) RWM coupled processes project: third annual report for RWM participation in DECOVALEX-2015 tasks A and C1. AMEC foster wheeler report to RWM 18040-TR-004 v2.0Google Scholar
  9. Bond A, Thatcher K, Chittenden N, McDermott C, Fraser-Harris A, Wilson J (2015c) Final report of the coupled processes project: outcomes from DECOVALEX-2015. AMEC foster wheeler report to RWM 18040-TR-005 v1.0Google Scholar
  10. Dueck A (2004) Hydro-mechanical properties of a water unsaturated sodium bentonite. Ph.D thesis, Lund UniversityGoogle Scholar
  11. Howell P, Kozyreff G and Ockenden J (2009) Applied Solid Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Jacinto AC, Villar M, Ledesma A (2012) Influence of water density on the water retention curve of expansive clays. Géotechnique 62(8):657–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kristensson O, Börgesson L (2015) Canister retrieval test: final report. SKB technical report TR-14-19Google Scholar
  14. Maul P (2013) QPAC: Quintessa’s general-purpose modelling software. Quintessa report QRS-QPAC-11.
  15. Mayor JC, García-Siñeriz JL, Alonso E, Alheid HJ, Blümbling P (2005) Final report of the engineered barrier emplacement experiment in opalinus clay (FIS5 - 1999 – 00121 EURATOM)Google Scholar
  16. Nagra (2013) Main outcomes and review of the FEBEX In Situ Test (GTS) and Mock-Up after 15 years of operation. Arbeitsbericht NAB 13–96Google Scholar
  17. Navarro V, Asensio L, Alonso J, Yustres Á, Pintado X (2014) Multiphysics implementation of advanced soil mechanics models. Comput Geotech 60:20–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Roscoe KH, Burland JB (1968) On the generalised stress-strain behaviour of ‘wet clay’. In: Heyman J, Leckie FA (eds) Engineering plasticity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 535–609Google Scholar
  19. Roscoe KH, Schofield AN (1963) Mechanical behaviour of an idealised ‘wet clay’. In: Proceedings of 2nd European conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Wiesbaden, vol 1, pp 47–54Google Scholar
  20. Rutqvist J, Ijiri Y, Yamamoto H (2011) Implementation of the Barcelona Basic Model into TOUGH–FLAC for simulations of the geomechanical behaviour of unsaturated soils. Comput Geosci 37:751–762. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2010.10.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rutqvist J, Zheng L, Chen F, Liu H-H, Birkholzer (2014) Modelling of coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical processes with links to geochemistry associated with bentonite-backfilled repository tunnels in clay formations. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:167–186. doi: 10.1007/s00603-013-0375-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sellin P, Leupin OX (2013) The use of clay as an engineered barrier in radioactive-waste management—a review. Clays Clay Miner 61:477–498. doi: 10.1346/CCMN.2013.0610601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Thatcher KE, Bond AE, Norris S (2016) Engineered damage zone sealing during a water injection test at the Tournemire URL. Environ Earth Sci. doi: 10.1007/s12665-016-5739-6 Google Scholar
  24. Wang Q, Tang AM, Cui Y-J, Delage P, Gatmiri B (2012) Experimental study of the swelling behaviour of bentonite/claystone mixture. Eng Geol 124:59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang Q, Cui Y-J, Tang AM, Barnichon J-D, Saba S, Ye W-M (2013a) Hydraulic conductivity and microstructure changes of compacted bentonite/sand mixture during hydration. Eng Geol 164:67–76. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.06.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang Q, Tang AM, Cui Y-J, Barnichon J-D, Ye W-M (2013b) Investigation of the hydro-mechanical behaviour of compacted bentonite/sand mixture based on the BExM. Comput Geotech 54:46–52. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2010.10.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang Q, Tang AM, Cui Y-J, Delage P, Barnichon J-D, Ye W-M (2013c) The effects of technological voids on the hydro-mechanical behaviour of compacted bentonite-sand mixture. Soils Found 53:232–245. doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2013.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang Q, Tang AM, Cui Y-J, Barnichon J-D, Ye W-M (2013d) A comparative study on the hydro-mechanical behaviour of compacted bentonite/sand plug based on laboratory and field infiltration tests. Eng Geol 162:79–87. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.05.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. E. Thatcher
    • 1
  • A. E. Bond
    • 1
  • P. Robinson
    • 1
  • C. McDermott
    • 2
  • A. P. Fraser Harris
    • 2
  • S. Norris
    • 3
  1. 1.Quintessa LtdWarringtonUK
  2. 2.University of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  3. 3.Radioactive Waste Management LimitedDidcotUK

Personalised recommendations