Abstract
Bench-scale soil washing experiments were conducted for simultaneous removal of heavy metals (Pb, Cu, Zn) and low-level petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants from soils. Various washing solutions including hydrochloric acid (HCl), nitric acid (HNO3), sulfuric acid (H2SO4), tartaric acid (C4H6O6) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (C10H16N2O8, EDTA) were used. The concentration of the washing solutions ranged from 0.1 to 3M with a liquid-to-solid ratio of 10. The soil washing results showed that hydrochloric acid (HCl) was the best washing solution at 3M for heavy metal removal. Other washing solutions also showed a significant removal of heavy metals, except for sulfuric acid (H2SO4). Sulfuric acid (H2SO4) exhibited the worst performance among all washing solutions used with respect to Pb removal. 1M HCl and HNO3 were sufficient for effective Pb and Cu removal, and all of the tested washing solutions at a concentration of 0.1M produced results compliant with the Korean warning standard for Zn removal. In the case of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), tartaric acid (C4H6O6) produced the highest removals at all concentration levels compared with other washing solutions. More specifically, TPH removal efficiencies exceeded 33 and 82 % at the lowest (0.1M) and highest (3M) tartaric acid (TA) concentrations, respectively. Overall, TA could be a viable washing solution for the removal of both heavy metals (Pb, Cu, Zn) and TPH from contaminated soils.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baek S-J, Park I-S, Lim H-S, Park J-W (2012) Risk assessment of the Yongsan rail yard by using the RBCA tools and RISK5 Tools. In: Proceedings of Korean Geo-Environmental Society Conference, 75–78
Ball DF (1964) Loss-on-ignition as an estimate of organic matter and organic carbon in non-calcareous soil. J Soil Sci 15:84–92
Choi HJ (2005) Cleanup of soil contaminated with combined pollutants by soil washing. Ph.D. Dissertation, Korea University, p 156
FitzPatrick EA (1983) Soils: their formation, classification and distribution. Longman Sci Tech, London, p 353
ICDD (2002) Powder Diffraction File.PDF-2 Database Release. In: International Centre for Diffraction Data, Pennsylvania, USA
Khodadoust AP, Reddy KR, Maturi K (2005) Effect of different extraction agents on metal and organic contaminant removal from a field soil. J Hazard Mater B117:15–24
Ko IW, Lee CH, Lee KP, Lee SW, Kim KW (2006) Remediation of soil contaminated with arsenic, zinc, and nickel by pilot-scale soil washing. Environ Prog 25(1):39–48
Madadian E, Gitipour S, Amiri L, Alimohammadi M, Saatloo J (2014) The application of soil washing for treatment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons contaminated soil: a case study in a petrochemical complex. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 33:107–113
Mann JM (1999) Full-scale and pilot-scale soil washing. J Hazard Mater 66:119–136
MDI (2005) Jade Version 7.1.Material’s Data Inc., California, USA
Ministry of Environment (MOE) (2010) The Korean Standard Test (KST) methods for soils. Korean Ministry of Environment, Gwachun, Kyunggi, p. 225 (in Korean)
Moon DH, Lee J-R, Wazne M, Park J-H (2012) Assessment of soil washing for Zn contaminated soils using various washing solutions. J Ind Eng Chem 18:822–825
Moutsatsou A, Gregou M, Matsas D, Protonotarios V (2006) Washing as a remediation technology applicable in soils heavily polluted by mining-metallurgical activities. Chemosphere 63:1632–1640
Mulligan CN, Yong RN, Gibbs BF (2001) Remediation technologies for metal-contaminated soils and groundwater: an evaluation. Eng Geol 60:193–207
Paterson IF, Chowdhry BZ, Leharne SA (1999) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon extraction from a coal tar-contaminated soil using aqueous solutions of non-ionic surfactants. Chemosphere 38(13):3095–3107
Reddy KR, Al-Hamdan AZ, Ala P (2011) Enhanced soil flushing for simultaneous removal of PAHs and heavy metals from industrial contaminated soil. J Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste 15(3):166–174
Upadhyay B, Keshav A (2012) Modeling of recovery of tartaric acid using various solvents. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Chemical, Ecology and Environmental Sciences (ICEES’2012), March 17–18, Bangkok, 173–176
USEPA (1986) Cation-exchange capacity of soils (Sodium acetate), Test method 9081, Washington DC
Zhang W, Tsang DCW, Lo IMC (2007) Removal of Pb and MDF from contaminated soils by EDTA-and SDS-enhanced washing. Chemosphere 66:2025–2034
Acknowledgments
This study is supported by the Republic of Korea Ministry of Environment as “Green Remediation Research Center for Organic–Inorganic Combined Contamination (The GAIA Project-2012000550001)”. This study was also supported by the Republic of Korea Ministry of Environment as the GAIA (Geo-Advanced Innovative Action) Project (No. 2015000550003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moon, D.H., Park, JW., Koutsospyros, A. et al. Assessment of soil washing for simultaneous removal of heavy metals and low-level petroleum hydrocarbons using various washing solutions. Environ Earth Sci 75, 884 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5690-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5690-6