Advertisement

Relationship between Na2SO4 concentration and thermal response of reconstituted stone in the laboratory and on site

  • Céline Thomachot-Schneider
  • Maxime Gommeaux
  • Norman Lelarge
  • Alexandra Conreux
  • Kamel Mouhoubi
  • Jean-Luc Bodnar
  • Patricia Vázquez
Thematic Issue
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Geomaterials used as construction raw materials and their environmental interactions

Abstract

The reconstituted stone used in the Orval Abbey is highly susceptible to salt weathering. It was produced from debris of natural stones (which were at that time in short supply) by craftsmen working in the Abbey and its composition is highly variable. The major salt involved in weathering is sodium sulfate (Na2SO4). This study focused on the thermal behavior of a reconstituted stone with various degrees of weathering observed on-site and it was studied by passive and active infrared thermography (IRT), and on the evolution of reconstituted-stone samples in a salt uptake experiment in the laboratory. On-site, the thermal responses of salt-weathered and unweathered zones were different. IRT allowed to detect unweathered though highly salt-laden zones, although correlations between thermal response and salt concentration are difficult to establish due to the influence of surface properties (color and roughness). In the laboratory, samples of the reconstituted stone were submitted to successive immersion-drying cycles in solutions of Na2SO4 with 7, 14 and 26 % concentration and characterized by weighing, surface colorimetry and active IRT. Results showed that the thermal response (increase in surface temperature due to flash excitation: T max) increased with salt concentration and with the number of cycles, as long as sample disintegration had not started. Then, it decreased and stabilized, whatever the salt concentration. Those results indicated that an increase in the thermal response of building materials (in active IRT) can be interpreted as an indicator of salt accumulation, possibly leading to damage. IRT proved to be an interesting non-destructive technique in this respect.

Keywords

Salt weathering Reconstituted stone Na2SO4 Active infrared thermography 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was partly funded by the Hybriprotech grant as part of the INTERREG IV program and the starting grant TRANSELS financed by the University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne. The authors warmly thank Brother Xavier for permitting work and sample collection in the Orval Abbey, Xavier Drothière for his help in laboratory measurements and Arlette Thomachot for revising the English.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Angeli M, Bigas J-P, Benavente D et al (2007) Salt crystallization in pores: quantification and estimation of damage. Environ Geol 52:187–195. doi: 10.1007/s00254-006-0509-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angeli M, Benavente D, Bigas J-P et al (2008) Modification of the porous network by salt crystallization in experimentally weathered sedimentary stones. Mater Struct Constr 41:1091–1108. doi: 10.1617/s11527-007-9308-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anson-Cartwright T, Bourguignon E, Bromblet P, et al (2008) ICOMOS-ISCS : Illustrated glossary on stone deterioration patterns—Glossaire illustré sur les formes d’altération de la pierre, vol 15. ICOMOS Éd., Paris, 78 p. http://www.international.icomos.org/publications/monuments_and_sites/15/pdf/Monuments_and_Sites_15_ISCS_Glossary_Stone.pdf
  4. Avdelidis NP, Moropoulou A (2004) Applications of infrared thermography for the investigation of historic structures. J Cult Herit 5:119–127. doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2003.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avdelidis NP, Moropoulou A, Theoulakis P (2003) Detection of water deposits and movement in porous materials by infrared imaging. Infrared Phys Technol 44:183–190. doi: 10.1016/S1350-4495(02)00212-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck K, Al-Mukhtar M, Rozenbaum O, Rautureau M (2003) Characterization, water transfer properties and deterioration in tuffeau: building material in the Loire valley-France. Build Environ 38:1151–1162. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1323(03)00074-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bodnar JL, Candoré JC, Nicolas JL et al (2012) Stimulated infrared thermography applied to help restoring mural paintings. NDT E Int 49:40–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bodnar JL, Nicolas JL, Mouhoubi K et al (2013) Characterization of an inclusion of plastazote located in an academic fresco by photothermal thermography. Int J Thermophys 34:1633–1637. doi: 10.1007/s10765-012-1335-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cardell C, Benavente D, Rodríguez-Gordillo J (2008) Weathering of limestone building material by mixed sulfate solutions. Characterization of stone microstructure, reaction products and decay forms. Mater Charact 59:1371–1385. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2007.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Edis E, Flores-Colen I, de Brito J (2015) Quasi-quantitative infrared thermographic detection of moisture variation in facades with adhered ceramic cladding using principal component analysis. Build Environ 94:97–108. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.07.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Flatt RJ (2002) Salt damage in porous materials: how high supersaturations are generated. J Cryst Growth 242:435–454. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0248(02)01429-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Franzen C, Mirwald PW (2004) Moisture content of natural stone: static and dynamic equilibrium with atmospheric humidity. Environ Geol 46:391–401. doi: 10.1007/s00254-004-1040-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fujimaki T, Osawa Y, Oguchi CT, et al (2011) Salt weathering susceptibility of natural limestone and reconstituted stone used in the Orval Abbey, Belgium. SWBSS2011 Limassol, Cyprus, pp 19–22Google Scholar
  14. Gommeaux M, Thomachot-Schneider C, Fronteau G, et al (2014) Salt weathering processes of reconstituted stone used in the Orval Abbey (Belgium). SWBSS 2014 Brussels, pp 521–524Google Scholar
  15. Grinzato E, Vavilov V, Kauppinen T (1998) Quantitative infrared thermography in buildings. Energy Build 29:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grinzato E, Bressan C, Marinetti S et al (2002) Monitoring of the Scrovegni Chapel by IR thermography: Giotto at infrared. Infrared Phys Technol 43:165–169. doi: 10.1016/S1350-4495(02)00136-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grossi CM, Alonso FJ, Esbert RM, Rojo A (2007) Effect of laser cleaning on granite color. Color Res Appl 32:152–159. doi: 10.1002/col.20299 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hori M, Aoki T, Tanikawa T et al (2013) Modeling angular-dependent spectral emissivity of snow and ice in the thermal infrared atmospheric window. Appl Opt 52:7243–7255. doi: 10.1364/AO.52.007243 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Janvier-Badosa S, Beck K, Brunetaud X et al (2015) Gypsum and spalling decay mechanism of tuffeau limestone. Environ Earth Sci 74:2209–2221. doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-4212-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jeannette D (1997) Importance of the pore structures during the weathering process of stones in monuments. Soils and sediments. Springer, Berlin, pp 177–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lerma C, Mas Á, Gil E et al (2014) Pathology of building materials in historic buildings. Relationship between laboratory testing and infrared thermography. Mater Constr 64:e009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. López-Arce P, Fort R, Gómez-Heras M et al (2011) Preservation strategies for avoidance of salt crystallisation in El Paular Monastery cloister, Madrid, Spain. Environ Earth Sci 63:1487–1509. doi: 10.1007/s12665-010-0733-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mercuri F, Orazi N, Zammit U et al (2012) Thermographic analysis of cultural heritage: recent applications and perspectives. Thermogr Cult Herit 9:84–89Google Scholar
  24. Moropoulou A, Koui M, Avdelidis NP (2000) Infrared thermography as an NDT tool in the evaluation of materials and techniques for the protection of historic monuments. Insight Nondestr Test Cond Monit 42:379–383Google Scholar
  25. Přikryl R, Weishauptová Z, Novotná M et al (2011) Physical and mechanical properties of the repaired sandstone ashlars in the facing masonry of the Charles Bridge in Prague (Czech Republic) and an analytical study for the causes of its rapid decay. Environ Earth Sci 63:1623–1639. doi: 10.1007/s12665-010-0819-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schaffer RJ (1932) The weathering of natural building stones. Donhead, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Scherer GW (2006) Internal stress and cracking in stone and masonry. In: Konsta-Gdoutos MS (ed) Measuring, monitoring and modeling concrete properties. Springer, Netherlands, pp 633–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shahidzadeh-Bonn N, Desarnaud J, Bertrand F et al (2010) Damage in porous media due to salt crystallization. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.066110 Google Scholar
  29. Siegesmund S, Snethlage R (2014) Stone in architecture: Properties, durability, 5th edn. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sousa LMO, Gonçalves BMM (2013) Differences in the quality of polishing between sound and weathered granites. Environ Earth Sci 69:1347–1359. doi: 10.1007/s12665-012-2035-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thomachot-Schneider C, Gommeaux M, Fronteau G et al (2011) A comparison of the properties and salt weathering susceptibility of natural and reconstituted stones of the Orval Abbey (Belgium). Environ Earth Sci 63:1447–1461. doi: 10.1007/s12665-010-0743-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Thomachot-Schneider C, Vazquez P, Lelarge N, et al (2014) Thermal behaviour of building stones submitted to salt solutions. SWBSS 2014, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  33. Vázquez P, Thomachot-Schneider C, Mouhoubi K et al (2015) Infrared thermography monitoring of the NaCl crystallisation process. Infrared Phys Technol 71:198–207. doi: 10.1016/j.infrared.2015.03.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wiggenhauser H (2002) Active IR-applications in civil engineering. Infrared Phys Technol 43:233–238. doi: 10.1016/S1350-4495(02)00145-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Winkler EM (1966) Important agents of weathering for building and monumental stone. Eng Geol 1:381–400. doi: 10.1016/0013-7952(66)90003-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yu S, Oguchi CT (2009) Complex relationships between salt type and rock properties in a durability experiment of multiple salt–rock treatments. Earth Surf Process Landf 34:2096–2110. doi: 10.1002/esp.1904 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yu S, Oguchi CT (2010) Role of pore size distribution in salt uptake, damage, and predicting salt susceptibility of eight types of Japanese building stones. Eng Geol 115:226–236. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.05.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Céline Thomachot-Schneider
    • 1
  • Maxime Gommeaux
    • 1
  • Norman Lelarge
    • 1
  • Alexandra Conreux
    • 1
  • Kamel Mouhoubi
    • 2
  • Jean-Luc Bodnar
    • 2
  • Patricia Vázquez
    • 1
  1. 1.GEGENAA, EA 3795Université de Reims Champagne-ArdenneReimsFrance
  2. 2.CATHERM, GRESPI EA 4694Université de Reims Champagne-ArdenneReimsFrance

Personalised recommendations