Advertisement

Flood hazard mapping in Jamaica using principal component analysis and logistic regression

  • Arpita Nandi
  • Arpita Mandal
  • Matthew Wilson
  • David Smith
Original Article

Abstract

Jamaica, the third largest island in the Caribbean, has been affected significantly by flooding and flood-related damage. Hence assessing the probability of flooding and susceptibility of a place to flood hazard has become a vital part of planning and development. In addition to heavy rainfall from tropical storms and Atlantic hurricanes, several terrestrial factors play significant roles in flooding, including local geology, geomorphology, hydrology and land-use. In this study, a GIS-based multi-criteria statistical methodology was developed to quantify hazard potential and to map flood characteristics. Fourteen factors potentially responsible for flooding were identified and used as initial input in a hybrid model that combined principal component analysis with logistic regression and frequency distribution analysis. Of these factors, seven explained 65 % of the variation in the data: elevation, slope angle, slope aspect, flow accumulation, a topographic wetness index, proximity to a stream network, and hydro-stratigraphic units. These were used to prepare the island’s first map of flood hazard potential. Hazard potential was classified from very low to very high, nearly one-fifth (19.4 %) of the island was included within high or very high flood hazard zones. Further analysis revealed that areas prone to flooding are often low-lying and flat, or have shallow north- or northwest-facing slopes, are in close proximity to the stream network, and are situated on underlying impermeable lithology. The multi-criteria hybrid approach developed could classify 86.8 % of flood events correctly and produced a satisfactory validation result based on the receiver operating characteristic curve. The statistical method can be easily repeated and refined upon the availability of additional or higher quality data such as a high resolution digital elevation model. Additionally, the approach used in this study can be adopted to evaluate flood hazard in countries with similar characteristics, landscapes and climatic conditions, such as other Caribbean or Pacific Small Island Developing States.

Keywords

Caribbean Flood hazard evaluation Statistical analysis Validation ArcGIS 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Water Resources Authority, Meteorological Service of Jamaica and the Office of Disaster Preparedness and Emergency Management, Jamaica for providing the spatial datasets and historical flood data. The authors also acknowledge the Climate Development Knowledge Network (CDKN) and Caribsave for funding the research project of which the present study is a component.

References

  1. Abdul-Wahab S, Bakheit C, Al-Alawi S (2005) Principal component and multiple regression analysis in modelling of ground-level ozone and factors affecting its concentrations. Environ Model Softw 20(10):1263–1271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altman D (1991) Categorizing continuous covariates (letter to the editor). Br J Cancer 64:975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altman D, Lausen B, Sauerbrei W, Schumacher M (1994) Dangers of using ‘optimal’ cutpoints in the evaluation of prognostic factors. J Nat Cancer Inst 86:829–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bates PD, Wilson MD, Horritt MS, Mason D, Holden N, Currie C (2006) Reach scale floodplain inundation dynamics observed using airborne Synthetic Aperture Radar imagery: data analysis and modelling. J Hydrol 328:306–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bathrellos GD, Kalivas DP, Skilodimou HD (2009) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping models applied to natural and urban planning in Trikala Central Greece. Estud Geol Madr 65(1):49–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bathrellos GD, Gaki-Papanastassiou K, Skilodimou HD, Papanastassiou D, Chousianitis KG (2012) Potential suitability for urban planning and industry development by using natural hazard maps and geological—geomorphological parameters. Environ Earth Sci 66(2):537–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bathrellos GD, Gaki-Papanastassiou K, Skilodimou HD, Skianis GA, Chousianitis KG (2013) Assessment of rural community and agricultural development using geomorphological-geological factors and GIS in the Trikala prefecture (Central Greece). Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27(2):573–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beven K, Kirby M (1979) A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol Sci B 24:43–69Google Scholar
  9. Burgess C, Taylor M, Stephenson T, Mandal A (2013) Extreme precipitation for Jamaica: 1895–2100. International Conference on Flood Resilience: experiences in Asia and Europe. Exeter, United Kingdom: University of ExeterGoogle Scholar
  10. Burgess C, Taylor M, Stephenson T, Mandal A, Powell L (2015) A macro scale flood risk for Jamaica with impact of climate variability. Nat Haz 48(1):231–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carby B (2011) Mid-term review of the hyogo framework for action in the caribbean. In: Hutchinson G, Harris D (eds) University of the west indies, in PIOJ, 2012a. A Growth-Inducement Strategy for Jamaica. Planning Institute of Jamaica. Kingston, JamaicaGoogle Scholar
  12. Chang H, Franczyk J, Kim C (2009) What is responsible for increasing flood risks? The case of Gangwon Province, Korea. Nat Haz 48(3):339–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chubey M, Hathout S (2004) Integration of RADARSAT and GIS modeling for estimating Red River flood risk. GeoJour 59:237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chung C, Fabbri A (2003) Validation of spatial prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Nat Haz 30:451–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Collymore J (2007) Disaster management in the Caribbean: perspectives on institutional capacity reform and development. Environ Haz 10(1):6–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Collymore J (2011) Disaster management in the Caribbean: perspectives on institutional capacity reform and development. Environ Haz 10(1):6–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. CRIES (Comprehensive Resources Inventory and Evaluation Systems) (1985) Jamaica Resource Assessment, Comprehensive Resource Inventory and Evaluation System Project, Michigan State University, U.S. Department of Agriculture/Soil Conservation Service, Ohio State University, U.S.A. p 230Google Scholar
  18. Dai F, Lee C, Li J, Xu Z (2001) Assessment of landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Environ Geol 40:381–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dixon B (2005) Applicability of neuro-fuzzy techniques in predicting ground-water vulnerability: a GIS-based sensitivity analysis. J Hydrol 309:37–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ECLAC (2001) Jamaica: assessment of the damage caused by flood rains and landslides in association with hurricane Michelle, October 2001. Implications for economic, social and environmental development. p 46Google Scholar
  21. Fekete A (2009) Validation of a social vulnerability index in context to river-floods in Germany. Nat Haz Earth Syst Sci 9:393–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ghalkhani H, Golian S, Saghafian B, Farokhnia A, Shamseldin A (2013) Application of surrogate artificial intelligent models for real-time flood routing. Water Environ J 27:535–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grabs T, Seibert J, Bishop K, Laudon H (2009) Modeling spatial patterns of saturated areas: a comparison of the topographic wetness index and a dynamic distributed model. J Hydro 373:15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guha-Sapir D, Below R, Hoyois PH (2010) EM-DAT: international disaster database. Université Catholique de Louvain, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  25. Hilsenbeck S, Clark G (1996) Practical p-value adjustment for optimally selected cutpoints. Stat Med 15:103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New York, p 383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hsu K, Gupta HV, Gao X, Sorooshian S, Imam B (2002) Self-organizing linear output map (SOLO): an artificial neural network suitable for hydrologic modeling and analysis. Water Res Res 38(1):17–38Google Scholar
  28. Hu T, Lam K, Ng S (2001) River flow time series prediction with a range dependent neural network. Hydro Sci J 46(5):729–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hunter NM, Bates PD, Horritt MS, Wilson MD (2007) Simple spatially-distributed models for predicting flood inundation: a review. Geomorph 90(3–4):208–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Imric C, Durucan S, Korre A (2000) River flow prediction using artificial neural networks: generalisation beyond the calibration range. Hydrol 233:138–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jourde H, Lafare A, Mazzilli N, Belaud G, Neppel L, Dörfliger N, Cernesson F (2014) Flash flood mitigation as a positive consequence of anthropogenic forcing on the groundwater resource in a karst catchment. Environ Earth Sci 71(2):573–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Keating A, Campbell K, Mechler R, Michel‐Kerjan E, Mochizuki J, Kunreuther H, Bayer J, Hanger S, McCallum I, See L, Williges K, Atreya A, Botzen W, Collier B, Czajkowski J, Hochrainer S, Egan C (2014) Operationalizing resilience against natural disaster risk: opportunities, barriers and a way forward, Zurich Flood Resilience AllianceGoogle Scholar
  33. Kendall M (1957) A course in multivariate analysis. Griffin, London, p 185 Google Scholar
  34. Kia MB, Pirasteh S, Pradhan B, Mahmud AR, Sulaiman WNA, Moradi A (2012) An artificial neural network model for flood simulation using GIS: Johor River Basin, Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci 67:251–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kim G, Barros A (2001) Quantitative flood forecasting using multisensor data and neural networks. J Hydrol 246(1–4):45–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kleinbaum DG, Klein M (2002) Modeling strategy for assessing interaction and confounding. In: Kleinbaum DG, Klein M (eds) Logistic regression: a self-learning text. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Knebl M, Yang Z, Hutchison K, Maidment D (2005) Regional scale flood modeling using NEXRAD rainfall, GIS and HEC-HMS/RAS: a case study for the San Antonio river basin summer 2002 storm event. J Environ Manage 75:325–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lam K, Tau T, Lam MCK (2010) A Material supplier selection model for property developers using fuzzy principal component analysis. Auto Const 19:608–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Langhammer J (2010) Analysis of the relationship between the stream regulations and the geomorphologic effects of floods. Nat Haz 54(1):121–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lee S (2005) Application of logistic regression model and its validation for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and remote sensing data. Int J Rem Sens 26(7):477–1491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lee S, Sambath T (2006) Landslide susceptibility mapping in the Damrei Romel area, Cambodia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Environ Geol 50:847–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lee S, Song KY, Kim Y, Park I (2012) Regional groundwater productivity potential mapping using a geographic information system (GIS) based artificial neural network model. Hydrogeol J 20(8):1511–1527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Liu Y, De Smedt F (2005) Flood modeling for complex terrain using GIS and remote sensed information. Water Res Manage 19(5):605–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lulseged A, Hiromitsu Y, Norimitsu U (2004) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based weighted linear combination—the case in Tsugawa area of Agano River, Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Landslides 1:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mahyat S, Tehrany, Moung-Jin L, Pradhan B, Mustafa NJ, Lee S (2014) Flood susceptibility mapping using integrated bivariate and multivariate statistical models. Environ Earth Sci 72(10):4001–4015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mandal A, Maharaj A (2013) Flooding in Jamaica with assessment of riverine inundation of Port Maria, St Mary. Bull de la Soc Geol de Fr 184(1–2):165–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Merwade V, Cook A, Coonrod J (2008) GIS techniques for creating river terrain models for hydrodynamic modeling and flood inundation mapping. J Environ Mod Soft 23:1300–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mukerji A, Chatterjee C, Raghuwanshi N (2009) Flood forecasting using ANN, neuro-fuzzy, and neuro-GA Models. J Hydrol Eng 14(6):647–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nandi A, Shakoor A (2010) A GIS-based landslide susceptibility evaluation using bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses. Eng Geol 110:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nefeslioglu H, Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H (2008) An assessment on the use of logistic regression and artificial neural networks with different sampling strategies for the preparation of landslide susceptibility maps. Eng Geol 97:171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Noori R, Karbassi AR, Moghaddamnia A, Han D, Zokaei-Ashtiani MH, Farokhnia A, Ghafari Gousheh M (2011) Assessment of input variables determination on the SVM model performance using PCA, Gamma test and forward selection techniques for monthly stream flow prediction. J Hydrol 401:177–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Papadopoulou-Vrynioti K, Bathrellos GD, Skilodimou HD, Kaviris G, Makropoulos K (2013) Karst collapse susceptibility mapping using seismic hazard in a rapid urban growing area. Eng Geol 158:77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. PIOJ (Planning Institute of Jamaica) (2002) Jamaica: Macro-socio-economic Assessment of the Damage done by Flood Rains and Landslides May 2002. Kingston, Jamaica: PIOJ. http://pioj.gov.jm/Portals/0/Sustainable_Development/May%202002%20Flood%20Rains.pdf. Accessed 8 Feb 2015
  54. PIOJ (Planning Institute of Jamaica) (2004) Jamaica Macro-socio-economic and Environmental Assessment of the Damage done by Hurricane Ivan Sept 10–12, 2004. Kingston, Jamaica: PIOJ. http://pioj.gov.jm/Portals/0/Sustainable_Development/Hurricane%20Ivan.pdf. Accessed 8 Feb 2015
  55. PIOJ (Planning Institute of Jamaica) (2005a) Assessment of the Socio-economic and Environmental Impact of Hurricanes Dennis and Emily on Jamaica. Kingston, Jamaica: PIOJ. http://pioj.gov.jm/Portals/0/Sustainable_Development/Dennis%20Emily%20Report.pdf. Accessed 8 Feb 2015
  56. PIOJ (Planning Institute of Jamaica) (2005b) Assessment of the Socio-economic and Environmental Impact of Hurricane Wilma on Jamaica. Kingston, Jamaica: PIOJ. http://pioj.gov.jm/Portals/0/Sustainable_Development/Hurricane%20Wilma.pdf. Accessed 8 Feb 2015
  57. PIOJ (Planning Institute of Jamaica) (2007) Assessment of The Socio-economic and Environmental Impact of Hurricane Dean on Jamaica. Kingston, Jamaica: PIOJ. http://pioj.gov.jm/Portals/0/Sustainable_Development/Hurricane%20Dean.pdf. Accessed 8 Feb 2015
  58. PIOJ (Planning Institute of Jamaica) (2008) Assessment of the Socio-economic and Environmental Impact of Tropical Storm Gustav on Jamaica. Kingston, Jamaica: PIOJ. http://pioj.gov.jm/Portals/0/Sustainable_Development/Tropical%20Storm%20Gustav.pdf. Accessed 8 Feb 2015
  59. PIOJ (Planning Institute of Jamaica) (2009) Vision 2030 Jamaica—National Development Plan. Kingston, Jamaica: PIOJ. http://www.vision2030.gov.jm/. Accessed 8 Feb 2015
  60. PIOJ (Planning Institute of Jamaica) (2010) Jamaica Macro Socio-economic and Environmental Assessment of the Damage and Loss Caused by Tropical Depression No. 16/Tropical Storm Nicole. Kingston, Jamaica: PIOJ. http://pioj.gov.jm/Portals/0/Sustainable_Development/Tropical%20Storm%20Nicole_Impact%20Assessment_Final.pdf. Accessed 8 Feb 2015
  61. PIOJ (Planning Institute of Jamaica) (2012) Jamaica Macro Socio-economic and Environmental Assessment of the Damage and Loss caused by Hurricane Sandy. Kingston, Jamaica: PIOJ. http://pioj.gov.jm/ResearchandData/tabid/82/Default.aspx. Accessed 8 Feb 2015
  62. Porporato A, Ridolfi L (1997) Nonlinear analysis of river flow time sequences. Water Res Res 33:1353–1367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pradhan B (2010) Flood susceptible mapping and risk area delineation using logistic regression, GIS and remote sensing. J Spat Hydrol 9:1–18Google Scholar
  64. Quinn P, Beven K, Lamb R (1995) The ln(a/tanβ) index : how to calculate it a n d how to use it within the topmodel framework. Hydrol Proc 9:161–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rajurkar M, Kothyari U, Chaube U (2004) Modeling of the daily rainfall runoff relationship with artificial neural network. J Hydrol 285:96–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Remondo J, González A, Díaz de Terán JR (2003) Validation of landslide susceptibility maps; examples and applications from a case study in Northern Spain. Nat Hazards 30:437–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Roohollah N, Khakpour A, Omidvar B, Farokhnia A (2010) Comparison of ANN and principal component analysis-multivariate linear regression models for predicting the river flow based on developed discrepancy ratio statistic. Expert Sys Appl 37:5856–5862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rozos D, Bathrellos GD, Skilodimou HD (2011) Comparison of the implementation of rock engineering system (RES) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) methods, based on landslide susceptibility maps, compiled in GIS environment. A case study from the Eastern Achaia County of Peloponnesus, Greece. Environ. Earth Sci 63(1):49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Saleh S, Al-Hatrushi S (2009) Torrential Flood Hazards Assessment, Management, and Mitigation, in Wadi Uday, Muscat Area, Sultanate of Oman, a GIS & RS approach Egypt. J Rem Sens Space Sci 12:71–86Google Scholar
  70. Sanyal J, Lu XX (2004) Application of remote sensing in flood management with special reference to monsoon Asia: a review. Nat Hazards 33:283–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schoof J, Pryor S (2001) Downscaling temperature and precipitation: a comparison of regression-based methods and artificial neural networks. Int J Clim 21:773–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sivakumar B (2001) Rainfall dynamics at different temporal scales: a chaotic perspective. Hydrol Earth Sys Sci 5(4):645–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sivakumar B, Berndtsson R, Olsson J, Jinno K (2001) Evidence of chaos in the rainfall-runoff process. Hydrol Sci 46(1):131–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Skilodimou H, Livaditis G, Bathrellos G, Verikiou-Papaspiridakou E (2003) Investigating the flooding events of the urban regions of Glyfada and Voula, Attica, Greece: a contribution to Urban Geomorphology. Geogr Ann A 85(2):197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sørensen R, Seibert J (2007) Effects of DEM resolution on the calculation of topographical indices: TWI and its components. J Hydrol 347(1–2):79–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sousa S, Martins F, Alvim-Ferraz M, Pereira M (2007) Multiple linear regression and artificial neural networks based on principal components to predict ozone concentrations. Environ Mod Softw 22:97–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Taylor MA, Mandal A, Burgess C, Stephenson T (2014) Flooding and climate change: sectorial impacts and adaptation strategies for the caribbean region, Chap 10. In: Dave D, Chadee, Joan M, Sutherland, John B, Agard (eds) Flooding in Jamaica: causes and controls. Nova Science Pub Inc, New York, pp 163–187Google Scholar
  78. Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebur MN (2014) Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS. J Hydrol 512:332–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Townsend PA, Walsh S (1998) Modeling floodplain inundation using an integrated GIS with Radar and optical remote sensing. Geomorph 21:295–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tsai F, Li X (2008) Inverse groundwater modeling for hydraulic conductivity estimation using Bayesian model averaging and variance window. Water Res Res 44:W09434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. UNISDR (United Nations Office of Disaster Risk Reduction) (2011) Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  82. Verstraeten G, Poesen J (2001) Modelling the long term sediment trap efficiency of small ponds. Hydrol Proc 15:2797–2819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wang S, Xiao F (2004) AHU sensor fault diagnosis using principal component analysis method. Energy Build 36(2):147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Yesilnacar E, Topal T (2005) Landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale study, Hendek region (Turkey). Eng Geol 79(3–4):251–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Youssef AM, Pradhan B, Hassan AM (2011) Flash flood risk estimation along the St. Katherine road, southern Sinai, Egypt using GIS based morphometry and satellite imagery. Environ. Earth Sci 62(3):611–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zhu D, Ren Q, Xuan Y, Chen Y, Cluckie ID (2013) An effective depression filling algorithm for DEM-based 2-D surfaceflow modelling Guangzhou, China. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:495–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zwenzner H, Voigt S (2009) Improved estimation of flood parameters by combining space based SAR data with very high resolution digital elevation data. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13:67–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arpita Nandi
    • 1
  • Arpita Mandal
    • 2
  • Matthew Wilson
    • 3
  • David Smith
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of GeosciencesEast Tennessee State UniversityTennesseeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Geography and GeologyUniversity of the West IndiesMonaJamaica
  3. 3.Department of GeographyUniversity of the West IndiesSt. AugustineTrinidad and Tobago
  4. 4.Disaster Risk Reduction Center, Institute of Sustainable DevelopmentUniversity of the West IndiesMonaJamaica

Personalised recommendations