Hunza river watershed landslide and related features inventory mapping

  • M. Farooq Ahmed
  • J. David Rogers
  • Muhammad Zubair Abu Bakar
Original Article


This study summarizes the continuation of a series of regional landslide inventories undertaken in Northern Pakistan. Mass wasting appears to be the dominant process shaping the morphology of the main river channel in the Hunza River watershed. The project included assembling an inventory of historic mass wasting features in the basin, especially, those along the Hunza River. A hillshade topographic map was created by stitching ASTER Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) with 30 m resolution topographic sheets of 40 m resolution, using ArcGIS. The methodology utilizes anomalous topographic expression (i.e., parallel and converging drainage patterns, divergent contours, crenulated contours, and isolated knobs) to identify landslide features. The screening process includes examination of topographic anomalies and inconsistencies, which are typical of landslides and related mass wasting features. The mapped landslide features included a number of historic landslides in the area. Historic landslide damming of the Hunza River has occurred at Attabad, Boultar Glacier, Gannish-Chiss, and Ganesh-Saukien. The outbreak floods associated with the overtopping of these recent landslide dams often leave anomalous geomorphic signatures, which were identified in the terrain analysis, and helped validate the interpretations made as part of this study. Such products serve as guide maps for more detailed analyses of specific sites, as might be under consideration for structures, highways, tunnels, dams, powerhouses, or utility corridors.


Hunza River Landslide Inventory mapping Lithology Hillshade maps 


  1. Ahmed MF, Rogers JD (2012) Landslide Mapping and Identification of old Landslide dams along the Indus River in Pakistan, using GIS Techniques. AEG 55th Annual Meeting, Salt Lake City, Utah 55:44Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed MF, Rogers JD (2014) Creating reliable, first-approximation landslide inventory maps, using ASTER DEM data and geomorphic indicators, an example from the upper Indus River in northern Pakistan. Environ Eng Geosci 20(1):67–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed MF, Rogers JD (2015) Regional level landslide inventory maps of the Shyok River watershed, Northern Pakistan. Bull Eng Geol Environ. doi: 10.1007/s10064-015-0773-2 Google Scholar
  4. Ahmed MF, Rogers JD, Ismail EH (2014) A regional level preliminary landslide hazard study of upper Indus River basin. Eur J Remote Sens 47:343–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Angeli MG, Gasparetto P, Menotyti RM, Pasuto A, Silvano S, Soldati M (1996) Rock avalanche, Art. 8.2. In: Dikau R, Brunsden D, Schrott L, Ibsen M-L (eds) Landslide recognition, identification, movement and causes. Wiley, New York, pp 190–201Google Scholar
  6. Becher J (1859) Letter addressed to RH Davis Esq. Secreretary to the Government of the Punjab and its dependencies (on the Indus flood). J Asiat Soc Bengal 28:219–228Google Scholar
  7. Brabb EE (1991) The World landslide problem. Episodes 14(1):52–61Google Scholar
  8. Cardinali M, Guzzetti F, Brabb EE (1990) Preliminary map showing landslide deposits and related features in New Mexico. US Geological Survey Open File Report 90/293, 4 sheets, scale 1:500,000Google Scholar
  9. Crosta GB (2001) Failure and flow development of a complex slide: the 1993 Sesa landslide. Eng Geol 59:173–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crozier MJ (1973) Techniques for morphometric analysis of landslips. Zeitschrift fur Geomorphologie 17(1):78–101Google Scholar
  11. Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides, investigation and mitigation, special report 247. Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C, pp 36–75Google Scholar
  12. Doyle BC, Rogers JD (2005) Seismically-induced lateral spread features in the western New Madrid seismic zone. Environ Eng Geosci 11(3):251–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gardner JS, Hewitt K (1991) A surge of the Bultar Glacier, Karakoram range, Pakistan: a possible landslide trigger. J Glaciol 32(112):27–29Google Scholar
  14. Geological Map of Pakistan (1993) Geological Survey of Pakistan Graphic Publishers, Karachi. Scale 1:1,000,000Google Scholar
  15. Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M, Galli M (2006) Estimating the quality of landslide susceptibility models. Geomorphology 81:166–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hansen A (1984) Landslide hazard analysis. In: Brunsden D, Prior DB (eds) Slope instability. Wiley, New York, pp 523–602Google Scholar
  17. Hewitt K (1982) Natural dams and outburst floods of the Karakoram Himalaya. In: Glen J (ed) Hydrological aspects of Alpine and high mountain areas., 138International Hydrological Association Publication, UK, pp 259–269Google Scholar
  18. Hewitt K (1998) Catastrophic landslides and their effects on the Upper Indus streams, Karakoram Himalaya, northern Pakistan. Geomorphology 26:47–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hewitt K (2002) Styles of rock-avalanche depositional complexes conditioned by very rugged terrain, Karakoram Himalaya Pakistan in Evans, SG, and Degraff, JV, eds, Catastrophic Landslides: Effects, occurrence, and mechanisms. Boulder, Colorado, Geological Society of America, Reviews in Engineering Geology 15: 345–377Google Scholar
  20. Hewitt K, Gosse J, Clague JJ (2011) Rock avalanches and the pace of late Quaternary development of river valleys in the Karakoram Himalaya. Geol Soc Am Bull 123(9/10):1836–1850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hutchinson JN (1968) Mass Movement. In: Fairbridge RW (ed) The Encyclopedia of Geomorphology. Reinhold Book Corp, New York, pp 688–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ibsen ML, Brunsden D, Bromhead E, Collison A (1996) Flow Slide, Art. 8.3. In: Dikau R, Brunsden D, Schrott L, Ibsen M-L (eds) Landslide recognition, identification, movement and causes. Wiley, New York, pp 202–211Google Scholar
  23. Kazmi AH, Jan MQ (1997) Geology and tectonics of Pakistan. Graphic Publishers, Karachi, p 554. ISBN 9698375007Google Scholar
  24. Keefer DL, Johnson AM (1983) Earth flows—morphology, mobilization, and movement. US Geol Surv Prof Pap 1264:56Google Scholar
  25. Korup O, Montgomery DR, Hewitt K (2010) Glacier and landslide feedbacks to topographic relief in the Himalayan syntaxes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(12):5317–5322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee KL, Duncan JM (1975) Landslide of April 25, 1974 on the Mantaro River, Peru: National Academy of Sciences. National Research Council, Washington, DC, p 72Google Scholar
  27. McCalpin J (1984) Preliminary age classification of landslides for inventory mapping: Proceedings 21st Annual Engineering Geology and Soils Engineering Symposium. University Press, Moscow, pp 99–111Google Scholar
  28. Miller WJ (1931) The landslides at Point Fermin, California. Sci Mon 32:464–469Google Scholar
  29. Owen L (1991) Mass movement deposits in the Karakoram Mountains: their sedimentary characteristics, recognition and role in Karakoram landform evolution. Zeitschrift fur Geomorphologie N.F 35:401–424Google Scholar
  30. Reneau SL (1988) Depositional and Erosional History of Hollows: application to Landslide Location and Frequency, Long-Term Erosion Rates, and Effects of Climatic change. Ph.D Dissertation in Geology, University of California Berkeley, p 328Google Scholar
  31. Rodine JM (1974) Analysis of mobilization of debris flows. Ph.D Dissertation, Scholl of Earth Sciences Stanford University, p 137Google Scholar
  32. Rogers JD (1980) Factors Affecting Hillslope Profile: Current Topics in Geomorphology, U. C. Berkeley, unpublished manuscript. U. C. Water Resources Center Archives Riverside CA, p 67Google Scholar
  33. Rogers JD (1994) Report Accompanying Map of Landslides and Other Surficial Deposits of the City of Orinda, CA. Consultant’s report for the City of Orinda Public Works Department, p 141Google Scholar
  34. Rogers JD (1998) Topographic expression of deep-seated bedrock landslide complexes. Notes accompanying evaluation and mitigation of seismic hazards. University of California Extension, Los Angeles, p 13Google Scholar
  35. Selby MJ (1993) Hillslope materials and processes, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  36. Sharpe CFS (1938) Landslides and related phenomina: Columbia University Press, New York, p 137Google Scholar
  37. Shehzad F, Mahmood SA, Gloaguen R (2009) Drainage network and seismological analysis of active tectonics in Nanga Parbat Haramosh Massif, Pakistan. IGARSS 1:9–12Google Scholar
  38. Shroder JF (1998) Slope failure and denudation in the western Himalaya. Geomorphology 26:81–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shroder JF, Bishop MP (1998) Mass movement in the Himalaya: New insights and research directions. Geomorphology 26:13–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Todd H (1930) Gilgit and Hunza river floods: correspondence. Himal J 2:173–175Google Scholar
  41. Varnes DJ (1958) Landslide types and processes. In: Eckel EB (ed) Landslides and engineering practice highway research board special report29. NAS‐NRC Publication544, Washington, D.C, pp 20–47Google Scholar
  42. Varnes DJ (1978) Slope movement types and processes. In: Schuster RL, Krizek RJ (eds) Landslides: analysis and control, National Research Council, Washington, DC, Transportation Research Board, National Academy Press, Special Report 176, 11–33Google Scholar
  43. Watkins CM, Rogers JD, and Warme JE (2007) Reconstruction of composite landslides in flat-lying sedimentary strata using graphical methods. In: Schaefer VR, Schuster RL, Turner AK (eds) First North American Landslide Conference, Conference Presentations, Association of Environmental and Engineering Geologists Special Publication 23, 488–501Google Scholar
  44. Zaruba Q, Mencl V (1982) Landslides and their control, 2nd edn. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co, Amsterdam, p 324Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Farooq Ahmed
    • 1
  • J. David Rogers
    • 2
  • Muhammad Zubair Abu Bakar
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Geosciences and Geological and Petroleum EngineeringMissouri University of Science & Technology (On leave from University of Engineering and Technology Lahore, Pakistan)RollaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Geosciences and Geological and Petroleum EngineeringMissouri University of Science & TechnologyRollaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Geological EngineeringUniversity of Engineering and TechnologyLahorePakistan

Personalised recommendations