Environmental Earth Sciences

, 75:239 | Cite as

Delineating hazardous CO2 fluxes from acid mine drainage

Original Article

Abstract

Incidents of hazardous accumulations of CO2 in homes built on or near reclaimed mine land, in the last decade, have been shown to be linked to neutralization reactions between acidic mine drainage and carbonate material. Recent research has shown that CO2 fluxes on reclaimed mine land with this hazard are, sometimes, spatially autocorrelated (i.e., the spatial variability is not random). This result implies geostatistics can be used to delineate hazardous areas where fluxes are likely to exceed established thresholds. This study applies sequential Gaussian simulation to delineate this emerging hazard on a site in southwestern Indiana, USA. Due to lack of regulatory threshold limits for CO2 flux at the current time, the authors conduct a sensitivity analysis of the threshold limit using the 75th, 90th and 95th percentiles of the measured fluxes for the first day of monitoring. These limits are used to produce hazard maps, which are validated with the known hazard at the site. This work further shows the potential of surface CO2 flux monitoring as a cheap and effective strategy to monitor and delineate such hazards to avoid residential and commercial real estate development in high risk zones.

Keywords

CO2 fluxes Hazard delineation Acid mine drainage Mine reclamation Sequential Gaussian simulation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge: Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement’s Applied Science program’s project #S09AC15437 and the Government of Botswana for financial support; Dr. Bret A. Robinson for his assistance in accessing the study site; Alfred J. Baldassare for his input; and Bismark Osei for his assistance in this work.

The authors are also grateful for the review comments in response to our original submission. The comments have improved the quality of the manuscript.

References

  1. Bergfeld D, Goff F, Janik CJ (2001) Elevated carbon dioxide flux at the dixie valley geothermal field, Nevada: relations between surface phenomena and the geothermal reservoir. Chem Geol 117:43–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chiodini G, Caliro S, Cardellini C, Avino R, Granieri D, Schmidt A (2008) Carbon isotopic composition of soil CO2 efflux, a powerful method to discriminate different sources feeding soil CO2 degassing in volcanic-hydrothermal areas. Earth Planetary Sci Lett 274:372–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Davidson EA, Belk E, Boone R (1998) Soil water content and temperature as independent or confounded factors controlling soil respiration in a temperate mixed hardwood forest. Glob Chang Biol 4:217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davidson EA, Verchot LV, Cattânio JH, Ackerman IL, Carvalho JEM (2000) Effects of soil water content on soil respiration in forests and cattle pastures of Eastern Amazonia. Biogeochemistry 48:53–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ehler WC (2002) Dangerous atmosphere created by strip mine spoil. The Proceedings of the 24th National Association of Abandoned Mine Lands Programs. Park City, Utah, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  6. Farrar CD et al. (1998) Magmatic Carbon Dioxide Emissions at Mammoth Mountain, California. US Geological Survey. Water-Resources Investigations Report, pp 98–4217Google Scholar
  7. Farrar CD et al (1995) Forest-killing diffuse CO2 emission at Mammoth Mountain as a sign of magmatic unrest. Nature 376:675–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gerlach TM, Doukas MP, McGee KA, Kessler R (1998) Three-year decline of magmatic CO2 emissions from soils of a Mammoth Mountain tree kill: Horseshoe Lake, CA, 1995–1997. Geophys Res Lett 25:1947–1950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacinthe PA, Lal R (2006) Spatial variability of soil properties and trace gas fluxes in reclaimed mine land in Southeastern Ohio. Geoderma 136:598–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lahmira B, Lefebvre R, Hockley D, Phillip M (2009). Sullivan Mine fatalities incident: Numerical modeling of gas transport and reversal in gas flow directions. Presented in the securing the future and 8th International Conference on Acid Rock Drainage (ICARD), June 2–26, 2009, Skelleftea, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  11. Laughrey Christopher D, Baldassare Fred J (2003) Some applications of isotope geochemistry for determining sources of stray carbon dioxide gas. Environ Geosci 10(3):107–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lewicki JL, Fischer ML, Hilley GE (2008) Six-week time series of Eddy Covariance CO2 Flux at Mammoth Mountain, California: performance evaluation and role of meteorological forcing. J Volcanol Geoth Res 171:178–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lin YP (2008) Simulating Spatial distributions, variability and uncertainty of soil arsenic by geostatistical simulations in geographical information systems. The Open Environ J 2:26–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mathiba M (2013) Spatial variation of AMD related CO2 emissions on reclaimed mine spoil. Dissertation. Missouri University of Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  15. Mathiba M, Awuah-Offei K (2015) Spatial autocorrelation of soil CO2 fluxes on reclaimed mine land. Environ Earth Sci 73(12):8287–8297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mathiba M, Awuah-Offei K, Baldassare FJ (2015) Influence of elevation, soil temperature and soil moisture content on reclaimed mine land soil CO2 fluxes. Environ Earth Sci 73(10):6131–6143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). (2009) Web Soil Survey. Retrieved June 6, 2011, from USDA NRCS Website: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx
  18. Parkin T, Mosier A, Smith J, Venterea R, Johnson J, Reicosky D et al. (2003) Chamber-based trace gas flux measurement protocol. USDA-ARSGoogle Scholar
  19. Pihlatie M, Pumpanen J, Rinne J, Ilvesniemi H, Simojoki A, Hari P, Vesela T (2007) Gas concentration driven fluxes of nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide in boreal forest soil. Tellus 59B(3):458–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Robinson BA (2010) Occurrence and attempted mitigation of carbon dioxide in a home constructed on reclaimed coal-mine spoil, Pike County, Indiana. US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010-5157, p 21Google Scholar
  21. Schabenberger O, Gotway CA (2005) Statistical methods for spatial data anlaysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  22. Sun Y, Ding N, Cai F, Meng F (2008) Spatial analysis of heavy metals in surface soils based on geostatistics. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol 7145, pp 714514Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Missouri University of Science and TechnologyRollaUSA
  2. 2.School of River and Ocean EngineeringChongqing Jiaotong UniversityChongqingChina
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of BotswanaGaboroneBotswana

Personalised recommendations