Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 74, Issue 6, pp 5233–5244 | Cite as

Shallow and deep geothermal energy potential in low heat flow/cold climate environment: northern Québec, Canada, case study

  • Jacek A. MajorowiczEmail author
  • Vasile Minea
Original Article

Abstract

Northern Québec, a large and cold climate territory located north of the 49th parallel, has low average heat flow density (40 ± 9 mW/m2) typical of the Canadian Shield. The lack of the thermal blanket otherwise provided by sediments in the platform of southern Québec results in deep drilling requirements for potential mining heat (80 °C at some 5 km). Drilling doublet or triplet well systems at such depths into low-enthalpy granitic rocks would be expensive; however, in some cases of heat flow higher by one standard deviation of the mean and fracked permeability allowing flow rates >30 kg/s may make this heat useable in the future. Other options in providing heat are more likely to be applied earlier. These would include shallow geothermal energy use with heat pumps in granites by placement of artificial heat exchanges by directional loop drilling. These systems may have promise in Northern Québec due to its very cold climate and extremely high energy cost based on diesel oil heating for remote communities and mining areas. Findings show that recent industrial age climatic warming increased the mean underground temperatures in the upper circa couple hundred meters. This has resulted in temperature gains and energy ground storage.

Keywords

Geothermal energy Northern Canada Quebec Climate change Temperature-to-depth Heat flow density 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Renewable Energy Department at Hydro-Québec Research Institute for funding and encouraging this work. We would like to thank Dr. James W. LaMoreaux, Editor-in-Chief for his help with final version of the edits and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

References

  1. Beckers KF, Lukawski MZ, Reber TJ, Anderson BJ, Moore MC, Tester JW (2013) Introducing GEOPHIRES v1. 0: Software package for estimating levelized cost of electricity and/or heat from enhanced geothermal systems. In: Proceedings, Thirty-Eighth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 11Google Scholar
  2. Blackwell DD, Richards M (2004) Geothermal map of North America, Scale 1:6,500,000, AAPGGoogle Scholar
  3. Chapman DS, Furlong KP (1992) Thermal state of the continental lower crust. In: Continental lower crust. Fountain DM, Arculus R Kay KW (eds) Elsevier, pp 179–199Google Scholar
  4. Chouinard C, Fortier R, Mareschal JC (2007) Recent climate variations in the subarctic inferred from three borehole temperature profiles in northern Quebec Canada. Earth Planet Sci Lett 263(3–4):355–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chouinard C, Mareschal JC (2009) Ground surface temperature history in southern Canada: temperatures at the base of the Laurentide ice sheet and during the Holocene. Earth Planet Sci Lett 277:280–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Environment Canada (1995) The state of Canada’s climate: monitoring variability and change. State of the Environment Report 95–1, Minister of Supply and Services Canada, p 52Google Scholar
  7. Gosnold W, Majorowicz J, Klenner R, Hauk S (2011) Implications of post-glacial warming for northern hemisphere heat flow. GRC Trans 35:795–800Google Scholar
  8. Hydro Québec (2009) History of wind power at Hydro-Québec. http://www.hydroquebec.com/learning/eolienne/historique-eolienhydro-quebec.html
  9. Jaupart C, Mareschal JC (2011) Heat generation and transport in the Earth. Cambridge, p 464Google Scholar
  10. Jessop AM (1990) Terrestrial heat flow in Canada. In: Slemmons DB, Engdahl ER, Zoback MD, Blackwell DD (eds.), Neotectonics of North America: geological society of America decade map vol 1, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  11. Jessop AM (1990) Thermal geophysics. Elsevier, p 306Google Scholar
  12. Judge AS, Smith SL, Majorowicz J (1994) The current distribution and thermal stability of natural gas hydrates in the Canadian polar regions. In: Proceedings of the Fourth (1994) International Offshore and Engineering Conference Osaka, Japan, April 10–15, 1994 Copyright© 1994 by The International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers ISBN 1-880653-10-9 (Set); ISBN 1-880653-11-7 (vol I)Google Scholar
  13. Lachenbruch AH, Marshall BV (1986) Changing climate: geothermal evidence from permafrost in Alaska. Science 234:689–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lévy F, Jaupart C, Mareschal JC, Bienfait G, Limare A (2010) Low heat flux and large variations of lithospheric thickness in the Canadian Shield. J Geophys Res 115:B06404. doi: 10.1029/2009JB006470 Google Scholar
  15. Lukawski MZ, Anderson BJ, Augustine C, Capuano LE Jr, Beckers KF, Livesay B, Tester JW (2014) Cost analysis of oil, gas, and geothermal well drilling. J Petrol Sci Eng 118:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Majorowicz JA, Skinner WR, Šafanda J (2005) Ground surface warming history in Northern Canada inferred from inversions of temperature logs and comparison with other proxy climate reconstruction. Pure appl Geophys 162:109–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Majorowicz J, Minea V (2012) Geothermal energy potential in the St. Lawrence River area Québec. Geothermics 43:25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Majorowicz JA, Grasby SE (2013) Geothermal energy for northern Canada: is it economical? Nat Resour Res. doi: 10.1007/s11053-013-9199-3 Google Scholar
  19. Majorowicz J, Moore M (2014) The feasibility and potential of geothermal heat in the deep Alberta foreland basin-Canada for CO2 savings. Renew Energy 66:541–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mareschal JC, Jaupart C (2013). Radiogenic heat production, thermal regime and evolution of continental crust. Tectonophysics. ISSN 0040-1951.  10.1016/j.tecto.2012.12.001
  21. Minea V, Majorowicz JA (2011) Assessment of enhanced geothermal systems potential in Québec, Canada. AAPG/SPE/SEG Hedberg Research ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  22. Moore MC (2006) Energy-sector fundamentals: economic analysis, projections, and supply curves. In: Tester JW, Meissner HP, Anderson BJ, Batchelor AS,Blackwell DD, DiPippo R et al. (eds.) The future of geothermal energy: the impact of enhanced geothermal systems on the United States in the 21st century. MIT Press, Cambridge. (http://web.mit.edu/mitei/research/studies/documents/geothermal-nergy/geothermal-energy-1-3.pdf).MRNFQ (Ministère des ressources naturelles et de la faune du Québec). BHT data base, 2009
  23. NSIDC (2015) Digital Database of permafrost thickness in Canada. http://nsidc.org/
  24. Smith SL, Burgess MM (1998) Mapping the response of permafrost in Canada to climate warming. Curr Res Geol Survey Can 1998-E:163–171Google Scholar
  25. Smith SL, Burgess MM (1999) Mapping the sensitivity of Canadian permafrost to climate warming. Interactions between the cryosphere, climate and greenhouse gases. Proceedings of IUGG 99 Symposium HS2, Birmingham, July 1999 IAHS Publication 256:71–80Google Scholar
  26. Taylor A, Judge A (1979) Permafrost studies in northern Québec. Geograph Phys Quat 33(3–4):245–251. URI:http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1000361ar. doi: 10.7202/1000361ar MIT Press. (http://web.mit.edu/mitei/research/studies/documents/geothermal-energy/geothermal-energy-1-3.pdf
  27. Tester JW, Meissner HP, Anderson BJ, Batchelor AS, Blackwell DD, DiPippo R et al. (2006) The future of geothermal energy: the impact of enhanced geothermal systems on the United States in the 21st century, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Wilhelm H (1994) Analytical solution of a basic geothermal equation. Geophys J Int 119:684–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northern Geothermal ConsultingEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.Hydro-Québec Research Institute, Laboratoire des technologies de l’énergie (LTE)ShawiniganCanada

Personalised recommendations