Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Review of European energy policies regarding the recent “carbon capture, utilization and storage” technologies scenario and the role of coal seams

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

European energy policy has made an effort in the last years in developing a coherent strategy towards the definition of a set of goals, involving the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and, at the same time, increasing renewable energy use. This paper presents the different options of carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) technologies regarding the legislative initiatives implemented in the new European energy policy. This new European energy strategy was established taking into consideration not only energy demand but also social and environmental requirements. Taking that into account, the different strategies adopted by the European energy council are discussed and an overview of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies—a mitigation strategy able to reduce greenhouse gas emissions—and the CO2 potential utilization were also addressed. Conventional and unconventional CO2 geological storage/sequestration reservoirs are analysed, taking into consideration the different properties of both types of reservoirs. Finally, it is possible to conclude that coal seams must play a major role in CCS/CCUS technologies, since coal is considered as an efficient technological solution to CO2 geological storage/sequestration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ansolabehere S, Beer J, Deutch J, Ellerman AD, Friedmann SJ, Herzog H, Jacoby HD, Joskow PL, McRae G, Lester R, Moniz EJ, Steinfeld E, Katzer J (2007) The future of coal: options for a carbon-constrained world. An interdisciplinary MIT study, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. http://web.mit.edu/coal/The_Future_of_Coal.pdf. Accessed 26 June 2012

  • Barros N, Oliveira GM, Lemos de Sousa MJ (2012) Environmental impact assessment of carbon capture and sequestration: general overview. In: IAIA12 Conference Proceedings: Energy Future: The Role of Impact Assessment (32nd Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment), 27 May-1 June 2012, Porto—Portugal (www.iaia.org), pp 6

  • CSLF (2011) Carbon sequestration leadership forum, CCS focus: carbon capture and storage. What is carbon utilization? pp 7. November 2011. http://www.cslforum.org/publications/documents/cslf_infocus_whatiscarbon_utilization.pdf. Accessed 4 January 2013

  • Dinis MAD (2010) The study of the gas diffusion process in coals using Langmuir isotherms. PhDDissertation, Universityof Fernando Pessoa, Porto, Portugal, pp 388. (Portuguese) http://hdl.handle.net/10284/1492. Accessed 11 December 2014

  • Dinis MAP, Rodrigues CF (2010) Lemos de Sousa MJ (2010) Gas Storage versus gas circulation in north atlantic and gondwana coal types. Int J Energ Clean Env 11(1–4):35–40. doi:10.1615/InterJEnerCleanEnv.001661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EASAC (2013a) Capturing carbon to tackle climate change, A non-technical summary of Carbon capture and storage in Europe, a report by the European Academies Science Advisory Council (EASAC), 16 pp. EASAC – European Academies Science Advisory Council. May 2013. http://www.easac.eu/fileadmin/PDF_s/reports_statements/Easac_13_CCS-LaySummary_Web.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2013

  • EASAC (2013b) Carbon capture and storage in Europe, EASAC—European Academies Science Advisory Council. German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina, Halle (Saale). (EASAC policy report 20). Lemos de Sousa MJ (Working Group membership and co-author of the book). Contribution of Rodrigues CFA. May 2013. 86 pp. http://www.easac.eu/fileadmin/Reports/Easac_13_CCS_Web_Complete.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2013

  • European Commission (2003) Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61. Official Journal of the European Union, No: L, 275(25.10). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2003:275:0032:0032:EN:PDF. Accessed 10 December 2012

  • European Commission (2004) Directive 2004/101/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 amending Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community, in respect of the Kyoto Protocol’s project mechanisms. Respect of the Kyoto Protocol’s Project Mechanisms, Official Journal of the European Union, No: L, 338(13.11). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:338:0018:0018:EN:PDF. Accessed 10 December 2012

  • European Commission (2007a) Limiting global climate change to 2 °C: the way ahead for 2020 and beyond. COM (2007), 2, 8–9. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2007:0002:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed 10 December 2012

  • European Commission (2007b) Towards a European strategic energy technology plan. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2007:0723:fin:en:pdf. Accessed 10 December 2012

  • European Commission (2009) Directive 2009/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the geological storage of carbon dioxide. European Commission, Brussels. (Text with EEA relevance). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:140:0114:0135:EN:PDF. Accessed 10 December 2012

  • European Commission (2010) Energy 2020: A strategy for competitive, sustainable and secure energy. COM (2010), 639. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0639:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed 10 December 2012

  • European Commission (2011a) COM 539 final. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, On security of energy supply and international cooperation-“The EU Energy Policy: Engaging with Partners beyond Our Borders”. (Brussels: 07/09/2011). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0539:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed 10 December 2012

  • European Commission (2011b) Energy Roadmap 2050. Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/energy2020/roadmap/doc/com_2011_8852_en.pdf. Accessed 10 December 2012

  • European Commission (2011c) Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on energy efficiency and repealing directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC. COM (2011), 370. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0370:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed 10 December 2012

  • European Commission (2011d) Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure and repealing Decision No 1364/2006/EC. COM (2011), 658. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0658:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed 10 December 2012

  • European Commission (2011e) Smart grids: from innovation to deployment. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions.COM (2011), 202. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0202:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed 10 December 2012

  • European Commission (2014) A policy framework for climate and energy in the period from 2020 to 2030. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM (2014), 15. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2014:0015:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed 19 May 2014

  • Gentzis T (2000) Subsurface sequestration of carbon dioxide—an overview from an Alberta (Canada) perspective. Int J Coal Geol 43:287–305. doi:10.1016/S0166-5162(99)00064-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2011) Carbon capture and storage. Legal and regulatory review, 2nd Ed., pp 108. IEA-International Energy Agency. http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/ccs_legal.pdf. Accessed 4 January 2013

  • ISO 11760 (2005) Classification of coals. International Organization for Standardization—ISO, Geneva, pp 9

  • Lemos de Sousa MJ, Rodrigues CF (2008) “CO2 abatement: state of art” CIAGEB—global change, energy, environment and bioengineering RDID&D Unit, Fernando Pessoa University, Porto, Portugal, personal communication. (Personal communication)

  • Lemos de Sousa MJ, Oliveira G, Rodrigues C, Dinis A, Tato Diogo M, Barros N (ed) (2009) Workshop on “energy, greenhouse gases and environment”, Porto, 6–8 October 2008. Proceedings, Presentations and Posters. Universidade Fernando Pessoa, Porto. CD-ROM

  • McCoy S (2014) Carbon capture and storage: legal and regulatory review. International Energy Agency. http://www.iea.org/publications/insights/insightpublications/CCSReview_4thEd_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 2 August 2013

  • Metz B, Davidson O, de Coninck H, Loos M, Meyer L (Eds.) (2005a) ‘Carbon dioxide capture and storage’. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 431. http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/_reports_carbon_dioxide.htm. Accessed 21 August 2013

  • Metz B, Davidson O, de Coninck H, LoosM, Meyer L (2005b). IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Intergovernmental panel on climate change, Geneva (Switzerland). Working Group III. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/special-reports/srccs/srccs_wholereport.pdf. Accessed 2 August 2013

  • Pashin JC, Carroll RE, Groshong Jr RH, Raymond DE, McIntyre M, Payton JW (2004) Geologic screening criteria for sequestration of CO2 in coal—quantifying potential of the black warrior coal-bed methane fairway, Alabama: final technical report, US Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Contract DE-FC26-00NT40927, Geological Survey of Alabama, Department of Geological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa. p 254. http://www.ogb.state.al.us/CO2/CO2page/40927R03.pdf. Accessed 9 June 2013

  • Rodrigues CF (2002) The application of isotherm studies to evaluate the coalfield methane potential of the waterberg coalfield, South Africa. PhD Dissertation, Faculty of Sciences of Oporto University, Porto, Portugal, pp 298

  • Rodrigues CF, Lemos de Sousa MJ (2002) The measurement of coal porosity with different gases. Int J Coal Geol 48(3–4):245–251. doi:10.1016/S0166-5162(01)00061-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues CF, Lemos de Sousa MJ (2006) Coal gas adsorption/desorption isotherms versus diffusion process. In: ALAGO Congress on Organic Geochemistry: Extended Abstracts of ALAGO Congress on Organic Geochemistry, 4–10 November 2006, Salvador, p 196

  • Rodrigues CF, Lemos de Sousa MJ (2008) ‘Coalbed methane recovery versus CO2 geological storage in coals: focus in recent developments and future perspectives’, 2nd Petrobras International Seminar on CO2 capture and geological storage, 9–12 September 2008, Salvador, Brasil

  • Rodrigues C, Laiginhas C, Fernandes M, Lemos de Sousa MJ (2003) The Role of coal “cleat system” in coalbed methane prospecting/exploring: a new approach. In: American Association of Petroleum Geologists, International Conference & Exhibition, Barcelona, September 2003, crossroads of geology, energy and cultures, official programme, InstitutCartogràfic de Catalunya, DPTOP, p A80

  • Rodrigues CF, Dinis MAP, Lemos de Sousa MJ (2008) Gas content derivative data versus diffusion coefficient. In: 60th ICCP (International Committee for Coal and Organic Petrology) and 25th TSOP (The Society for Organic Petrology): Program abstracts of the International Conference on coal and organic petrology ICCP-TSOP Join Meeting, 21–27 September 2008, Oviedo, Spain, p 63

  • Rodrigues CF, Dinis MAP, Lemos de Sousa MJ (2011). Coal as an unconventional reservoir for a CO2 safe geological sequestration solution. In: Proceedings of the Global Conference on Global Warming 2011, 11–14 July 2011, Lisbon, p 11

  • Rodrigues C, Dinis MA, Lemos de Sousa MJ (2013) Unconventional coal reservoir for CO2 safe geological sequestration. Int J Glob Warm 5(1):46–66. doi:10.1504/IJGW.2013.051481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues CF, Laiginhas C, Fernandes M, Lemos de Sousa M, Dinis MAP (2014) The coal cleat system: a new approach to its study. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 6(3):208–218. doi:10.1016/j.jrmge.2014.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahay VK, Van Dyke SK (2010) Tight gas sandstone: is it truly an unconventional reservoir? Can Soc Pet Geol Res 8:31–33

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

M. J. Lemos de Sousa is indebted to the Academy of Sciences of Lisbon for his appointment as the Portuguese representative in the European Academies Science Advisory Council—EASAC working group responsible for the report entitled “Carbon capture and storage in Europe” (2013). The authors are grateful to Fundação Fernando Pessoa/Fernando Pessoa University for supporting this investigation in the scope of the UFP Energy, Environment and Health Research Unit (FP-ENAS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Alzira Pimenta Dinis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodrigues, C.F.A., Dinis, M.A.P. & Lemos de Sousa, M.J. Review of European energy policies regarding the recent “carbon capture, utilization and storage” technologies scenario and the role of coal seams. Environ Earth Sci 74, 2553–2561 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4275-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4275-0

Keywords

Navigation