Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 73, Issue 12, pp 8287–8297 | Cite as

Spatial autocorrelation of soil CO2 fluxes on reclaimed mine land

  • Moagabo Mathiba
  • Kwame Awuah-Offei
Original Article

Abstract

Recent evidence has shown that CO2 emissions from reclaimed mine soil with acid mine drainage and carbonate material is an emerging geohazard. Surface CO2 flux measurements can be a cheap and effective way to delineate such hazards and avoid residential and commercial real-estate development on high-risk zones. Very little work has been done to ascertain whether or not such fluxes are spatially correlated, which has significant implications on the choice of statistical methods for analysis. The objective of this study was to understand the extent to which CO2 fluxes on a reclaimed mine spoil, with CO2 from carbonate neutralization of acidic drainage, are spatially autocorrelated. CO2 fluxes from three reclaimed surface coal mine sites were measured and used in statistical analysis to test the research hypothesis. The results show that the spatial variability of fluxes is not always random but can show significant (p < 0.0001) spatial autocorrelation. This result implies that classical statistical analysis of CO2 fluxes from reclaimed mine land may lead to wrong inferences, since such analysis ignores the spatial correlation. It appears spatial autocorrelation in CO2 fluxes may be related to spatial autocorrelation in soil temperatures, suggesting a common underlying phenomenon. Significant contribution of CO2 from exothermic acid mine drainage to soil CO2 flux is suggested as a possible explanation.

Keywords

CO2 fluxes Spatial dependence Autocorrelation Acid mine drainage Carbonate neutralization Mine reclamation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge: OSMRE’s Applied Science program’s project #S09AC15437 and the Government of Botswana for financial support, Dr. Bret A. Robinson for his assistance in accessing the Hudson site and sharing ideas, Alfred J. Baldassare for his input and assistance in providing access to the Godin site, Mr. Bismark Osei for his assistance in this work. The authors are also grateful for the reviewers’ comments, which greatly improved the discussion and, hence, the scientific merit of the work.

References

  1. Anselin L (1995) Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geogr Anal 27(2):93–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Awuah-Offei K, Baldassare FJ (2011) CO2 flux field delineation for construction on reclaimed mine land. Office of Surface Mining (OSM) Cooperative Agreement #S09AC15437, Final report. http://www.techtransfer.osmre.gov/NTTMainSite/appliedscience/2009/Projects/MSTAwuah-OffeiCO2Flux2009FR.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2013
  3. Awuah-Offei K, Mathiba M, Baldassare A (2009) Quantifying variation of CO2 flux on reclaimed mine spoils to prevent accumulation in homes. In: Proceedings of the 31st annual national association of abandoned mine land programs conference, September 27–30, 2009; Rogers, Arkansas, CD-ROMGoogle Scholar
  4. Awuah-Offei K, Mathiba M, Baldassare AJ (2010) Soil CO2 flux monitoring protocol for AMD-caused CO2. In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual national association of abandoned mine land programs conference, September 19–22, 2010; Scranton, PA, CD-ROMGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergfeld D, Goff F, Janik CJ (2001) Elevated carbon dioxide flux at the Dixie Valley geothermal field, Nevada: relations between surface phenomena and the geothermal reservoir. Chem Geol 117:43–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiodini G, Cioni R, Guidi M, Marini L (1998) Soil CO2 flux measurements in volcanic and geothermal areas. Appl Geochem 13(5):543–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiodini G, Caliro S, Cardellini C, Avino R, Granieri D, Schmidt A (2008) Carbon isotopic composition of soil CO2 efflux, a powerful method to discriminate different sources feeding soil CO2 degassing in volcanic-hydrothermal areas. Earth Planet Sci Lett 274:372–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cravotta III CA, Dugas DL, Brady KBC, Kovalchuk TE (1994a) Effects of selective handling of pyritic, acid-forming materials on the chemistry of pore gas and ground water at a reclaimed surface coal mine, Clarion County, PA, USA. In: Proceedings of the international land reclamation and mine drainage conference and the 3rd international conference on the abatement of acidic drainage, Pittsburgh, PA, 365–374Google Scholar
  9. Cravotta III CA, Brady KBC, Gustafson-Minnich LC, Dimatteo MR, (1994b) Geochemical and geohydrological characteristics of bedrock and spoil from two methods of mining at a reclaimed surface coal mine, Clarion County, PA, USA. In: Proceedings of the international land reclamation and mine drainage conference and the third international conference on the abatement of acidic drainage, Pittsburg, PA, April 24–29Google Scholar
  10. Davidson EA, Belk E, Boone R (1998) Soil water content and temperature as independent or confounded factors controlling soil respiration in a temperate mixed hardwood forest. Glob Change Biol 4:217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davidson A, Verchot LV, Cattânio JH, Ackerman IL, Carvalho JEM (2000) Effects of soil water content on soil respiration in forests and cattle pastures of Eastern Amazonia. Biogeochem 48:53–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dawson B, Phillip M, O’Kane M (2009) Sullivan Mine fatalities incident: site setting, acid rock drainage management, land reclamation and investigation into the fatalities. Presented at the securing the future and 8th ICARD, June 22–26, 2009, Skelleftea, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  13. Ehler WC (2002) Dangerous atmosphere created by strip mine spoil. In: Proceedings of the 24th national association of abandoned mine lands programs, Park City, Utah, 1–16Google Scholar
  14. Fang C, Moncrieff JB (2001) The dependence of soil CO2 Efflux on Temperature. Soil Biol Biochem 33:155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fang C, Moncrieff JB, Gholz HL, Clark KL (1998) Soil CO2 efflux and its spatial variation in a Florida slash pine plantation. Plant Soil 205(2):135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fortin M-J, Drapeau P, Legendre P (1989) Spatial autocorrelation and sampling design in plant ecology. Vegetatio 83(1–2):209–222. doi: 10.1007/BF00031693 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harrison JM, Rao CY, Benaise LG (2004) Health hazard evaluation report #2004-0075-2944. West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP), Fairmont, WV. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/hhe/reports. Accessed 29 Aug 2013
  18. Hockley D, Walter Kuit W, Phillip M (2009) Sullivan Mine fatalities: key conclusions and implications for other sites. Presented in the securing the future and 8th international conference on acid rock drainage (ICARD), June 22–26, 2009, Skelleftea, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  19. Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM (1989) An introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Jacinthe PA, Lal R (2006) Spatial variability of soil properties and trace gas fluxes in reclaimed mine land in southeastern Ohio. Geoderma 136:598–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kämpf H, Bräuer K, Schumann J, Hahne K, Strauch G (2013) CO2 discharge in an active, non-volcanic continental rift area (Czech Republic): characterisation (δ13C, 3He/4He) and quantification of diffuse and vent CO2 emissions. Chem Geol 339:71–83. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.08.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lahmira B, Lefebvre R (2007) Modeling the influence of heterogeneity and anisotropy on physical processes in ARD-producing waste rock piles. OttawaGeo 2007 http://www.polymtl.ca/enviro-geremi/pdf/articles/CGS2007090.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2013
  23. Lahmira B, Lefebvre R, Hockley D, Phillip M (2009) Sullivan Mine fatalities incident: numerical modeling of gas transport and reversal in gas flow directions. Presented in the securing the future and 8th international conference on acid rock drainage (ICARD), June 22–26, 2009, Skelleftea, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  24. Laughrey CD, Baldassare FJ (2003) Some applications of isotope geochemistry for determining sources of stray carbon dioxide gas. Environ Geosci 10(3):107–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lefebvre R, Hockley D, Smolensky J, Gélinas P (2001) Multiphase transfer processes in waste rock piles producing acid mine drainage 1: conceptual model and system characterization. J Contam Hydrol 52:137–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lewicki JL, Fischer ML, Hilley GE (2008) Six-week time series of eddy covariance CO2 flux at Mammoth Mountain, California: performance evaluation and role of meteorological forcing. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 171:178–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mathiba M (2013) Spatial variation of AMD related CO2 emissions on reclaimed mine spoil. Dissertation, Missouri University of Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  28. Mathiba MJK, Awuah-Offei K (2010) Investigating the effect of a mitigating trench on CO2 fluxes on a reclaimed coal mine spoil, In: SME Annual Meeting Preprints, Society of Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, Tucson, AZ, February 28–March 3, 2010, Preprint 10-068, CD-ROMGoogle Scholar
  29. MODNR (n.d.) Missouri DNR AML projects completed as of Jan. 1, 2012, http://www.dnr.mo.gov/env/lrp/reclamation/aml/amlcompproj.htm. Accessed 29 Aug 2013
  30. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration–National Climatic Data Center (1971–2000) Online Data, http://mrcc.isws.illinois.edu/prod_serv/prodserv.htm. Accessed 29 Aug 2013
  31. Parkin TB, Venterea RT (2003) Chamber-based trace gas flux measurement protocol, USDA-ARS GRACEnet Project Protocols http://www.ars.usda.gov/SP2UserFiles/Program/212/Chapter%203.%20GRACEnet%20Trace%20Gas%20Sampling%20Protocols.pdf. Accessed 29 Aug 2013
  32. Pihlatie M, Pumpanen J, Rinne J, Ilvesniemi H, Simojoki A, Hari P, Vesela T (2007) Gas concentration driven fluxes of nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide in boreal forest soil. Tellus 59B:458–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ramsey PW, Rillig MC, Feris KP, Moore JN, Gannon JE (2005) Mine waste contamination limits on soil respiration rates: a case study using quantile regression. Soil Biol Biochem 37:1177–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Robinson BA (2010) Occurrence and attempted mitigation of carbon dioxide in a home constructed on reclaimed coal-mine spoil, Pike County, Indiana. US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5157Google Scholar
  35. Rustad LE, Huntington TG, Boone RD (2000) Controls on soil respiration: implications for climate change. Biogeochem 48:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schabenberger O, Gotway CA (2005) Statistical methods for spatial data analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  37. Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/. Accessed 30 Aug 2013
  38. Tackle ES, Massman WJ, Brandle JR, Schmidt RA, Zhou X, Litvina IV, Garcia R, Doyle G, Rice CW (2004) Influence of high-frequency ambient pressure pumping on carbon dioxide efflux from soil. Agric For Meteorol 124:193–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wright EL, Black CR, Turner BL, Sjögersten S (2013) Environmental controls of temporal and spatial variability in CO2 and CH4 fluxes in a neotropical peatland. Glob Change Biol 19:3775–3789. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12330 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of BotswanaGaboroneBotswana
  2. 2.Missouri University of Science and TechnologyRollaUSA

Personalised recommendations