Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 73, Issue 8, pp 4135–4142 | Cite as

Soil radon (222Rn) monitoring in a forest site in Fukushima, Japan

  • Ryoko FujiyoshiEmail author
  • Misato Ohno
  • Kazumasa Okamoto
  • Kikuo Umegaki
Original Article

Abstract

Soil radon (222Rn) has been monitored since August 2013 at three different soil depths on a campus forest of Fukushima University in Japan, where a large amount of fallout nuclides were released by the accident of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in March 2011. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate 222Rn activity level, variability and factors controlling 222Rn concentration in soil air using data obtained from August to December 2013. Time series of 222Rn activity concentration showed depth-dependent variability with an equilibrium value (222Rneq) during this observation period; 7.5, 14 and 23 kBq m−3 at 0.3, 0.6 and 1.0 m in depth, respectively. Two typhoons passing over the site had a great influence on soil radon level, which was practically used for evaluating effective diffusion coefficient of 222Rn. Transport mechanism of 222Rn in soil air was considered to be diffusion-controlled with data sets on changing 222Rn concentration with time in selected cases that showed decreasing (or increasing) 222Rn concentration with time at every depth. Important factors affecting soil 222Rn variability are meteorological parameters, low-pressure front passing over the site, and subsequent precipitation. Time lags of decreasing 222Rn concentration at different depths after rain indicate a certain relationship of 222Rn level with moving water (and water vapor) in soil. The findings obtained in this study are important to evaluate the fate of fallout nuclides (radiocesium) in contaminated forest sites using soil radon as a tracer of moving soil air.

Keywords

222Rn Soil air Monitoring Gas transportation Typhoon Fukushima 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Prof. Akira Watanabe of the Fukushima University for helping with everything necessary for them to start and continue monitoring on their campus. They greatly acknowledge Mr. Toshihiko Hatano and Mr. Masato Yamakawa of North One Co. Ltd. for preparing a special instrument of micro-barometric pressure measurement in the field. They give special thanks to Dr. Claude Bertrand at Algade (France) for his useful comments and suggestions in radon field monitoring. They appreciate Prof. Emeritus Ivan Kobal of Jozef Stefan Institute in Slovenia who checked the manuscript thoroughly including English grammar. This work has been supported financially by Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) on a research theme “Multidisciplinary investigation on radiocesium fate and transport for safety assessment for interim storage and disposal of heterogeneous waste” (Tamotsu KOZAKI, Hokkaido University) from 2012 to 2014.

References

  1. Bittelli M, Ventura F, Campbell GS, Snyder RL, Gallegati F, Pisa PR (2008) Coupling of heat, watervapor, and liquid water fluxes to compute evaporation in bare soils. J Hydrol 362:191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dörr H, Münnich KO (1990) 222Rn flux and soil air concentration profiles in West-Germany. Soil 222Rn as tracer for gas transport in the unsaturated soil zone. Tellus 42B:20–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dörr H, Kromer B, Levin L, Munnich KO, Volpp HJ (1983) CO2 and radon 222 as tracers for atmospheric transport. J Geophys Res Ocean 88:1309–1313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fujiyoshi R, Sawamura T (2004) Mesoscale variability of vertical profiles of environmental radionuclides (40K, 226Ra, 210Pb and 137Cs) in temperate forest soils in Germany. Sci Total Environ 320:177–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fujiyoshi R, Kinoshita M, Sawamura S (2005) Variation of 222Rn activity concentrations in soil gas at a site in Sapporo, Japan. Environ Geochem Health 27:539–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fujiyoshi R, Sakamoto K, Imanishi T, Sumiyoshi S, Sawamura S, Vaupotič J, Kobal I (2006) Meteorological parameters contributing to variability in 222Rn activity concentrations in soil gas at a site in Sapporo, Japan. Sci Total Environ 370:224–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fujiyoshi R, Haraki Y, Sumiyoshi T, Amano H, Kobal I, Vaupotič J (2010) Tracing the sources of gaseous components (222Rn, CO2 and its carbon isotopes) in soil air under a cool-temperate deciduous stand in Sapporo. Jpn Environ Geochem Health 32(1):73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fujiyoshi R, Yamaguchi T, Okamoto K, Sumiyoshi T, Kobal I, Vaupotič J (2011) Tracing depositional consequences of environmental radionuclides (137Cs and 210Pb) in Slovenian forest soils. Cent Eur J Geosci 3(3):291–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fujiyoshi R, Okabayashi M, Sakuta Y, Okamoto K, Sumiyoshi T, Kobal I, Vaupotič J (2013) Soil radon in winter months under snowpack in Hokkaido, Japan. Environ Earth Sci 70:1159–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fukushima University. http://www.fukushima-u.ac.jp/guidance/top/fukudai-housyasen.html/ (in Japanese) Accessed 12 Jan 2014
  11. Hao LC, Nitta M, Fujiyoshi R, Sumiyoshi T, Tao CV (2013) Radiocesium fallout in surface soil of Tomakomai Experimental forest in Hokkaido due to the Fukushima Nuclear Accident. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1428–1436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hashimoto S, Ugawa S, Nanko K, Shichi K (2012) The total amounts of radioactively contaminated materials in forests in Fukushima, Japan. Sci Rep 2:416–420. doi: 10.1038/srep00416 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kurosawa T, Tsutsumi T, Kikuchi S (2010) Fukushima Daigaku Chiiki Souzou 22(1):103–128 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  14. Nazaroff WW (1992) Radon transport from soil to the air. Rev Geophys 30(2):137–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Neznal M, Neznal M (2005) Permeability as an important parameter for radon risk classification of foundation soils. Ann Geophys 48(1):175–180Google Scholar
  16. Perrier F, Girault F (2013) Harmonic response of soil radon-222 flux and concentration induced by barometric oscillations. Geophy J Int 195:945–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Prefecture Fukushima (1982) Fundamental Land Classification Survey (1:50,000). Fukushima Prefecture, Japan (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  18. Richon P, Sabroux JC, Halbwachs M, Vandemeulebrouck J, Poussielgue N (2003) Radon anomaly in the soil of Taal volcano, the Philippines: a likely precursor of the M 7.1 Mindoro earthquake (1994). Geophys Res Lett 30(9):1481–1484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sakoda A, Ishimori Y, Yamaoka K (2011) A comprehensive review of radon emanation measurements for mineral rock, soil, mill, tailing and fly ash. Appl Radiat Isot 69:1422–1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Science Council of Japan (2012) Recommendations toward making a new step forward in radiation measures-taking actions based on fact-based scientific research. Committee on Supporting Reconstruction after the Great East Japan Earthquake, Science Council of JapanGoogle Scholar
  21. Vaupotič J, Gregorič A, Kobal I, Žvab P, Kozak K, Mazur J, Kochowska E, Grządziel D (2010) Radon concentration in soil gas and radon exhalation rate at the Ravne Fault in NW Slovenia. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:895–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wells T, Fityus S, Smith DW (2007) Use of in situ air flow measurements to study permeability in cracked clay soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133(12):1577–1586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yakovleva VS (2005) A theoretical method for estimating the characteristics of radon transport in homogeneous soil. Ann Geophys 48(1):195–198Google Scholar
  24. Zahorowski W, Chambers SD, Henderson-Sellers A (2004) A ground based radon-222 observations and their application to atmospheric studies. J Environ Radioactiv 76:3–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryoko Fujiyoshi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Misato Ohno
    • 1
  • Kazumasa Okamoto
    • 1
  • Kikuo Umegaki
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of EngineeringHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan

Personalised recommendations