Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 73, Issue 7, pp 3275–3284 | Cite as

Evaluation of the risk to groundwater after treating logs with cypermethrin

  • Dimitri Dousse
  • Luiz Felippe de Alencastro
  • Dominique Grandjean
  • Robert Jenni
  • François Zwahlen
Original Article

Abstract

In order to protect conifer logs against attacks from the striped ambrosia beetle (Trypodendron lineatum) during spring in Swiss forests, logs are treated with the insecticide cypermethrin. Rainfall can cause the insecticide to leach into the ground, potentially threatening the groundwater quality. Forest groundwater is widely used for drinking water, which means that any contaminants within it should be avoided. This study assesses the risk of groundwater contamination in field conditions. The two study areas are located on unconsolidated sediments (Censières, or CS) and on karstic rocks (Grand Bochat, or GB). An analytical method was developed to determine the concentration of cypermethrin and its degradation products 3-PBA and DCVA in water samples. Intensive rainfall was simulated in order to mimic a situation that threatens groundwater. The study’s results show that, when treated according to the manufacturer’s instructions, a certain amount of insecticide was leached during the first rainfall event (2.2 g or 4.4 % of the applied cypermethrin). This leaching threatens groundwater quality, but can be avoided by decreasing the pesticide amount applied while maintaining a satisfactory protection. The insecticide amount that reached the groundwater was very low and was related to simulated rainfall, not natural rainfall. In Censières, only one groundwater sample presented a cypermethrin concentration (4 μg/l). In Grand Bochat, after a simulated rainfall of 36 mm, 3.3 % of the insecticide (5 g) was leached and 0.05 % of the total applied insecticide amount (corresponding to 1.5 % of the leached insecticide) reached the groundwater under the epikarst layer.

Keywords

Cypermethrin Logs Insecticide treatment Groundwater contamination 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the “Service des parcs et domains” of the city of Lausanne and the “Service des forêts” of the city of Neuchâtel, which permitted and actively supported the realisation of the experiments on the studied areas Censières and Grand Bochat, and also lent materials and made employees available to assist. Thanks are also due to the Soil & Vegetation Laboratory of the University of Neuchâtel for the soil analysis. This research was funded by the Alpeau project, which is a part of the France-Switzerland Interreg programme of territorial cooperation.

References

  1. Adam O (2011) Bioindication de la qualité de l’eau pas les gammares: Concepts et applications. Presses universitaires de Franche-Comté, Université de Franche-Comté Google Scholar
  2. Angerer J, Ritter A (1997) Determination of pyrethroid metabolites in human urine using solid-phase extraction and gas chromatography-mass-spectrometry. J Chromatogr 695:217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baize D, Girard MC (2009) Référentiel pédologique 2008. Editions Quæ, VersaillesGoogle Scholar
  4. Calvet R (2005) Les pesticides dans les sols, Conséquences agronomiques et environnementales. France Agricole Editions, ParisGoogle Scholar
  5. Friberg-Jensen U, Wendt-Rasch L, Woin P, Christoffersen K (2003) Effects of the pyrethroid insecticide, cypermethrin, on a freshwater community studied under field conditions. I. Direct and indirect effects on abundance measures of organisms at different trophic levels. Aquat Toxicol 63:357–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Geibe CE, Danielsson R, van Hees PAW, Lundström Ulla S (2006) Comparison of soil solution chemistry sampled by centrifugation, two types of suction lysimeters and zero-tension lysimeters. Appl Geochem 21:2096–2111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. German Federal Environment Agency (2005) Internal pyrethroid exposure among the general population in Germany and reference values for pyrethroid metabolites in urine. Bundesgesundheitsbl–Gesundheitsforsch–Gesundheitsschutz 48:1187–1193Google Scholar
  8. Gobat JM, Aragno M, Matthey W (2003) Le sol vivant, Base de pédologie–Biologie des sols. Presse polytechnique et universitaire romande, LausanneGoogle Scholar
  9. Heudorf U, Angerer J (2001) Metabolites of pyrethroid insecticides in urine specimens: current exposure in an urban population in Germany. Environ Health Perspect 109:213–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hladik ML, Smalling KL, Kuivila KM (2009) Methods of analysis–Determination of pyrethroid insecticides in water and sediment using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 5–C2Google Scholar
  11. IUSS Working Group WRB (2006) World reference base for soil resources 2006. World Soil Resources Reports No.103. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  12. Landon MK, Delin GN, Komor SC, Regan CP (1999) Comparison of the stable-isotopic composition of soil water collected from suction lysimeters, wick samplers and cores in a sandy unsaturated zone. J Hydrol 224:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee S, Gan J, Kavashima J (2002) Recovery of synthetic pyrethroids in water samples during storage and extraction. J Agric Food Chem 50:7194–7198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leng G, Kühn KH, Idel H (1998) Biological monitoring of pyrethroids in blood and pyrethroid metabolites in urine: applications and limitations. Sci Total Environ 199:173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leng G, Ranft U, Sugiri K, Hadnagy W, Berger-Preiss E, Idel H (2003) Pyrethroids used indoors–biological monitoring of exposure to pyrethroids following an indoor pest control operation. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2006(2):85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu W, Gan JJ, Qin S (2005) Separation and aquatic toxicity of enantiomers of synthetic pyrethroid insecticides. Chirality 17:127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu TF, Sun C, Ta N, Hong J, Yang SG, Chen CX (2007) Effect of copper on the degradation of pesticides cypermethrin and cyhalothrin. J Environ Sci 19:1235–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Madec G (1999) Etude des écoulements dans l’épikarst. Approche géophysique, hydraulique et hydrochimique sur le site de Grand-Bochat. MSc thesis, Centre of Hydrogeology, NeuchâtelGoogle Scholar
  19. Neary DG, Ice GG, Jackson CR (2009) Linkages between forest soils and water quality and quantity. For Ecol Manage 258:2269–2281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Oudou HC, Hansen HC (2002) Sorption of lambda-cyhalothrin, cypermethrin, deltamethrin and fenvalerate to quartz, corundum, kaolinite and montmorillonite. Chemosphere 49:1285–1294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Perrin J (2003) A conceptual model of flow and transport in a karst aquifer based on spatial and temporal variations of natural tracers. Thesis, University of Neuchâtel, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  22. Pronk M, Goldscheider N, Zopfi J, Zwahlen F (2008) Percolation and particle transport in the unsaturated zone of a karst aquifer. Ground Water 47:361–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Raeppel C, Nief M, Fabritius M, Racault L, Appenzeller BM, Millet M (2011) Simultaneous analysis of pesticides from different chemical classes by using a derivatisation step and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1218:8123–8129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Savoy L (2007) Use of natural and artificial reactive tracers to investigate the transfer of solutes in karst systems. Thesis, University of Neuchâtel, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  25. Vijverberg HPM, van den Bercken J (1990) Neurotoxicological effects and the mode of action of pyrethroid insecticides. Crit Rev Toxicol 21:105–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. World Health Organization, IPCS (1989) Environmental Health Criteria 82. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  27. Xie WJ, Zhou JM, Wang HY, Chen XQ (2008) Effect of nitrogen on the degradation of cypermethrin and its metabolite 3-phenoxybenzoic acid in soil. Pedosphere 18:638–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zanella A et al (2011) European Humus Forms Reference Base, hal-00541496, version 2Google Scholar
  29. Zhou JL, Rowland SJ (1995) Influence of the nature of particulate organic matter on the sorption of cypermethrin: implications on KOC correlations. Environ Int 21:187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dimitri Dousse
    • 1
  • Luiz Felippe de Alencastro
    • 2
  • Dominique Grandjean
    • 2
  • Robert Jenni
    • 3
  • François Zwahlen
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Hydrogeology and Geothermics (CHYN)University of NeuchâtelNeuchâtelSwitzerland
  2. 2.Central Environmental Laboratory, School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental EngineeringEcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne EPFLLausanneSwitzerland
  3. 3.Bureau Nouvelle Forêt SàrlFribourgSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations