Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 73, Issue 3, pp 1151–1160 | Cite as

Geoelectrical investigation of seawater intrusion in the coastal urban area of Çanakkale, NW Turkey

  • M. Ali Kaya
  • Gülçin Özürlan
  • Çağlayan Balkaya
Original Article


Seawater intrusion (SI) constitutes one of the major concerns most commonly encountered in coastal areas. The city of Çanakkale, which is situated in the northwestern part of Turkey and built on an alluvial coastal plain, has the second longest coastline in the country. Thus, SI poses a serious threat to shallow freshwater resources in the plain. Direct current resistivity method is the most widely used geoelectrical method for determining low-resistivity zones that usually correspond to the presence of SI. A total of 78 vertical electrical sounding (VES) measurements covering the entire coastal urban area were conducted in 2004 for groundwater exploration. In the present study, 61 soundings displaying an alignment along 13 lines in the direction of E–W were re-interpreted using a two-dimensional (2D) inversion technique based on a smoothness-constrained least squares method to delineate the extend of SI landward. The produced geoelectrical cross-sections successfully revealed an undulating seawater–freshwater interface. The reliability of the estimated solutions was demonstrated by a sensitivity analysis performed by calculating model resolution matrix. The results obtained via 2D inversion of VES data were also correlated well with those obtained from hydrogeological and borehole information within the study area. Consequently, the results of this study indicated that SI characterized by low resistivity (<5 Ωm) is mainly observed in the southern part of the Sarıçay stream which passes through the city center and flows into the Çanakkale Strait (Dardanelles). Moreover, seawater input extends several hundred meters landward.


2D inversion Coastal urban area Çanakkale Seawater intrusion Electrical resistivity VES 



We thank Savaş Gürçay (MSc), Dr. Alper Demirci and Dr. Yunus Levent Ekinci for their efforts and contributions to the field study. We also thank Dr. Ozan Deniz for kindly providing us his works. We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their helpful and constructive comments which greatly improved the paper. Generic Mapping Tools (GMT) (Wessel and Smith 1995) was used to generate location maps.


  1. Aktimur HT, Uysal S, Tamgaç ÖF, Aktimur S, Sarıaslan M, Emre Ö, Yıldırım N, Potoğlu S (1993) Land use potential in the province Çanakkale. General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration Institute of Turkey (MTA) Report, Ankara, p 159 (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  2. Alumbaugh DL, Newman GA (2000) Image appraisal for 2-D and 3-D electromagnetic inversion. Geophysics 65:1455–1467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ASTM (2011) Standard guide for selecting surface geophysical methods. Designation: D6429–99, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  4. Balkaya Ç, Kaya MA, Göktürkler G (2009) Delineation of shallow resistivity structure in the city of Burdur, SW Turkey by vertical electrical sounding measurements. Environ Geol 57:571–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balkaya Ç, Göktürkler G, Erhan Z, Ekinci YL (2012) Exploration for a cave by magnetic and electrical resistivity surveys: Ayvacık Sinkhole example, Bozdağ, İzmir (western Turkey). Geophysics 77:135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bauer P, Supper R, Zimmermann S, Kinzelbach W (2006) Geoelectrical imaging of groundwater salinization in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. J Appl Geophys 60:126–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berthold S, Bentley LR, Hayashi M (2004) Integrated hydrogeological and geophysical study of depression-focused groundwater recharge in the Canadian prairies. Water Resour Res 40:W06505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choudhury K, Saha DK, Chakraborty P (2001) Geophysical study for saline water intrusion in a coastal alluvial terrain. J Appl Geophys 46:189–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clément R, Descloitres M, Günther B, Oxarango L, Morra C, Laurent J-P, Gourc J-P (2010) Improvement of electrical resistivity tomography for leachate injection monitoring. Waste Manag 30:452–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Demirci A (2007) Seismic microzoning of Çanakale City. MSc Thesis (in Turkish), Center Graduate School of Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart UniversityGoogle Scholar
  11. Demirci A, Ekinci YL, Kaya MA (2013) Electrical resistivity survey for delineation of the seawater intrusion in the Çanakkale Plain, NW Turkey. European Geosciences Union General Assembly, Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vienna, 7–12 April, v. 15, p 9246Google Scholar
  12. Deniz O (2005) Investigation of groundwater quality in residential area in Çanakkale. MSc Thesis (in Turkish), Center Graduate School of Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart UniversityGoogle Scholar
  13. Deniz O, Baba A (2006) Evaluation of the lithological characteristics in view of the groundwater of the Çanakkale plain. In: Proceedings of the symposium on recent applications in engineering geology, 25–27 May, Denizli, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  14. Ekinci YL, Demirci A (2008) A damped least-squares inversion program for the interpretation of Schlumberger sounding curves. J Appl Sci 8:4070–4078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. El-Qady G, Sakamato C, Ushijima K (1999) 2-D inversion of VES data in Saqqara archaeological area, Egypt. Earth Planets Space 51:1091–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gürçay S (2004) Groundwater assessment around the Çanakkale City. MSc Thesis (in Turkish), Center Graduate School of Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart UniversityGoogle Scholar
  17. Gürçay S, Kaya MA (2006) Investigation of seawater intrusion in Çanakkale city surrounding by means of resistivity method. In: Symposium on recent applications in engineering geology, 25 May 2006, Denizli, Turkey (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  18. Khalil MA, Santos FAM (2013) 2D and 3D resistivity inversion of Schlumberger vertical electrical sounding in Wadi El Natrun, Egypt: a case study. J Appl Geophys 89:116–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Martínez J, Benavente J, García-Aróstegui JL, Hidalgo MC, Rey J (2009) Contribution of electrical resistivity tomography to the study of detrital aquifers affected by seawater intrusion–extrusion effects: the river Vélez delta (Vélez-Málaga, southern Spain). Eng Geol 108:161–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Menke W (1984) Geophysical data analysis: discrete inverse theory. Academic Press Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Moret GJM, Knoll MD, Barrash W, Clement WP (2006) Investigating the stratigraphy of an alluvial aquifer using crosswell seismic traveltime tomography. Geophysics 71:B63–B73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nowroozi AA, Horrocks SB, Henderson P (1999) Saltwater intrusion into the freshwater aquifer in the eastern shore of Virginia: a reconnaissance electrical resistivity survey. J Appl Geophys 42:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Özürlan G, Candansayar ME, Şahin MH (2006) Deep resistivity structure of the Dikili-Bergama region, west Anatolia, revealed by two-dimensional inversion of vertical electrical sounding data. Geophys Prospect 54:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Uchida T, Murakami Y (1990) Development of a fortran code for the two-dimensional schlumberger inversion. Geological Survey of Japan Open-File Report, no. 150Google Scholar
  25. Werner AD, Bakker M, Post VEA, Vandenbohede A, Lu C, Ataie-Ashtiani B, Simmons CT, Barry DA (2013) Seawater intrusion processes, investigation and management: recent advances and future challenges. Adv Water Resour 51:3–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wessel P, Smith WHF (1995) New version of the generic mapping tools released. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 76:329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wilson SR, Ingham M, McConchie JA (2006) The applicability of earth resistivity methods for saline interface definition. J Hydrol 316:301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zarroca M, Bach J, Linares R, Pellicer XM (2011) Electrical methods (VES and ERT) for identifying, mapping and monitoring different saline domains in a coastal plain region (Alt Empordà, Northern Spain). J Hydrol 409:407–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Ali Kaya
    • 1
  • Gülçin Özürlan
    • 2
  • Çağlayan Balkaya
    • 3
  1. 1.Şıhlar MahallesiTaşkent/KonyaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Geophysical EngineeringIstanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Geophysical EngineeringSüleyman Demirel UniversityIspartaTurkey

Personalised recommendations