Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 72, Issue 12, pp 4727–4744 | Cite as

Hydrologic effects of climate change in a sub-basin of the Western Bug River, Western Ukraine

Thematic Issue


Today, integrated water resources management (IWRM) is an important approach for sustainable management and protection of catchment areas. One of the core challenges for a successful IWRM program is the assessment of climate change impacts on the quantity and quality of water resources as well as related socioeconomic sectors. In this context, the climate impact on the hydrology of the catchment “Inflow Reservoir Dobrotvir” situated in Western Ukraine was investigated. The results of the regional climate model CCLM (COSMO—Climate Limited-area Modeling) were used to evaluate the climate conditions for two 30-year future periods in the framework of the future emissions scenarios A2 and B1 as laid out by the IPCC. Based on the projected climatic conditions, a hydrologic impact study was conducted using the Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). Signals of possible future climate and future water budgets were analyzed having the period 1961–1990 as a reference for current climatic conditions. Climatic and hydrologic indices were calculated to assess possible risks and opportunities for the water management sector. In a more generic manner, the implications of climatic changes for the sectors of agriculture, forestry, ecology, energy business and human health were examined with respective literature. Increasing temperatures, declining summer rainfalls and a decreasing climatic water balance were the primary simulated results for the period 2071–2100. These meteorological conditions lead to decreasing soil water content as well as decreasing runoff and groundwater recharge through nearly all seasons. Reduced water yields may affect the energy sector, water supply and water quality negatively. Water stress, especially in summer, might cause declining yields in agriculture and forestry. By contrast, rising temperatures will lead to an extended growing season, which represents an opportunity for higher agricultural and silvicultural yields. However, rising temperatures may also cause indirect effects such as higher risks of pest infestation and germs, which can have a negative impact on a variety of the evaluated socioeconomic sectors. In this work, the impact of possible future scenarios on climate and hydrology as well as resulting risks and opportunities have been identified to serve as a basis for further investigations.


Western Ukraine IWRM Climate change CCLM SWAT Hydrologic impact modeling 



This work was supported by funding from the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) in the framework of the project “IWAS—International Water Research Alliance Saxony” (Grant 02WM1028). The authors would like to thank the State Environment Agency Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany, for providing the software package InterMet for this work. We are also grateful to the three referees for their helpful comments.


  1. Alcamo J, Flörke M, Marker M (2007) Future long-term changes in global water resources driven by socio-economic and climatic change. Hydrol Sci J 52:247–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ångström A (1924) Solar and terrestrial radiation—report to the international commission for solar research on actinometric investigations of solar and atmospheric radiation. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc 50(210):121–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnell NW (1999) The effect of climate change on hydrological regimes in Europe: a continental perspective. Global Environ Chang 9:5–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnell N, Tomkins E, Adger N and Delaney K (2005) Vulnerability to abrupt climate change in Europe. ESRC/Tyndall Centre Technical Report No 20, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia, NorwichGoogle Scholar
  5. ATV-DVWK Deutsche Vereinigung für Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser und Abfall e.V. (Hrsg.) (2002) Verdunstung in Bezug zu Landnutzung, Bewuchs und Boden. ATV-DVWK-M 504, DWA, BonnGoogle Scholar
  6. Barfus K, Bernhofer C, Bernhofer C (2014) Assessment of GCM performances in the IWAS regions Arabic Peninsula, Brazil, and Ukraine and indications of regional climate change. Environ Earth Sci. doi: 10.1007/s12665-014-3147-3 Google Scholar
  7. Bates BC, Kundzewicz ZW, Wu S, Palutikof JP, Eds. (2008) Climate change and water. Technical paper of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, IPCC Secretariat, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernhofer C, Goldberg V, Franke J, Häntzschel J, Harmansa S, Pluntke T, Geidel K, Surke M, Prasse H, Freydank E, Hänsel S, Mellentin U, Küchler W (2008) Sachsen im Klimawandel—Eine Analyse. Sächsisches Staatsministerium für Umwelt und Landwirtschaft (Ed.), Eigenverlag, DresdenGoogle Scholar
  9. Buksha IF (2010) Ukraine: study of climate change impact on forest ecosystems, and the development of adaptation strategies in forestry. forests and climate change working paper 8, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, pp 157–179. http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/k9589e/k9589e16.pdf. Accessed 26 June 2013
  10. ECA&D Project team (2012) Algorithm theoretical basis document (ATBD), European climate assessment and dataset (ECA&D) project document, version 10.5, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute KNMIGoogle Scholar
  11. Ertel A-M, Lupo A, Scheifhacken N, Bodnarchuk T, Manturova O, Berendonk T, Petzoldt T (2011) Heavy load and high potential. Anthropogenic pressures and their impacts on the water quality along a lowland river (Western Bug, Ukraine). Environ Earth Sci 65(5):1459–1473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Giorgi F, Bi X, Pal J (2004) Mean interannual and trends in a regional climate change experiment over Europe. II: climate change scenarios (2071-2100). Clim The Physical Science Dyn 23:839–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gitay H, Suarez A, Watson RT, Dokken DJ (eds) (2002) Climate change and biodiversity. IPCC Technical Paper V, IPCC, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  14. IPCC (2013) Summary for policymakers. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate Change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. IPCC (2007a) Summary for policymakers. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change (2007) impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. IPCC (2007b) In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Tignor KBM, Miller HL (eds) Climate Change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Kalbus E, Kalbacher T, Kolditz O, Krüger E, Seegert J, Teutsch G, Borchardt D, Krebs P (2011) IWAS-integrated water resources management under different hydrological, climatic and socioeconomic conditions. Environ Earth Sci 65(5):1363–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klein Tank AMG, Zwiers FW, Zhang X (2009) Guidelines on Analysis of extremes in a changing climate in support of informed decisions for adaption. Climate data and monitoring WCDMP-No. 72, WMO-TD No. 1500Google Scholar
  19. KLIWA (2008) Arbeitskreis KLIWA (2008): KLIWA-Projekt A1.2.4 “Langzeitverhalten der Sonnenscheindauer und Globalstrahlung für hydrologische Auswertungen”. KLIWA Berichte. Heft 12. Bayrisches Landesamt für WasserwirtschaftGoogle Scholar
  20. Lehner B, Czisch G, Vassolo S (2005) The impact of global change on the hydropower potential of Europe: a model-based analysis. Energy Policy 33:839–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lehner B, Döll P, Alcamo J, Henrichs H, Kaspar F (2006) Estimating the impact of global change on flood and drought risks in Europe: a continental, integrated analysis. Clim Chang 75:273–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Manderscheid R, Pacholski A, Weigel H-J (2009) Effect of free air carbon dioxide enrichment combined with two nitrogen levels on growth, yield and yield quality of sugar beet: evidence for a sink limitation of beet growth under elevated CO2. Eur J Agron 32:228–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Matzarakis A (2007) Assessment method for climate and tourism based on daily data. In: Matzarakis A, de Freitas CR, Scott D (eds) Developments in Tourism Climatology, pp 52–58Google Scholar
  24. Moriasi D, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner R, Harmel R, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50:885–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nakičenovič N, Swart R (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios. a special report of working group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Neitsch SL, Arnold J G, Kiniry JR, Williams JR, King KW (2002) Soil water assessment tool, theoretical documentation—Version 2000. Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station, Texas. TWRI Report TR-191Google Scholar
  27. Olesen JE, Bindi M (2002) Consequences of climate change for European agricultural productivity, land use and policy. Eur J Agron 16:239–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pavlik D, Söhl D, Pluntke T, Mykhnovych A, Bernhofer C (2011) Dynamic downscaling of global climate projections for Eastern Europe with a horizontal resolution of 7 km. Environ Earth Sci 65(5):1475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pavlik D, Söhl D, Pluntke T, Bernhofer C (2014) Climate change in the western Bug river basin and the impact on future hydroclimatic conditions. Environ Earth Sci. doi: 10.1007/s12665-014-3068-1 Google Scholar
  30. Peterson TC, Easterling DR, Karl TR, Groisman P, Nicholls N, Plummer N, Torok S, Auer I, Boehm R, Gullett D, Vincent L, Heino R, Tuomenvirta H, Mestre O, Szentimrey T, Salinger J, Forland E, Hansen-Bauer I, Alexandersson H, Jones P, Parker D (1998) Homogeneity adjustments of in situ atmospheric climate data: a review. Int J Climatol 18:1493–1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Piani C, Haerter JO, Coppola E (2010a) Statistical bias correction for daily precipitation in regional climate models over Europe. Theor Appl Climatol 99:187–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Piani C, Weedon GP, Best M, Gomes SM, Viterbo P, Haerter JO (2010b) Statistical bias correction of global simulated daily precipitation and temperature for the application of hydrological models. J Hydrol 395(3):199–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pluntke T, Pavlik D, Bernhofer C (2014) Reducing uncertainty in hydrological modeling in a data sparse region. Environ Earth Sci (this issue)Google Scholar
  34. Räisänen J, Hansson U, Ullerstig A, Döscher R, Graham LP, Jones C, Meier M, Samuelsson P, Willén U (2004) European climate in the late 21st century: regional simulations with two driving global models and two forcing scenarios. Clim Dyn 22:13–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rockel B, Will A, Hense A (2008) The regional climate model COSMO-CLM (CCLM). Meteorol Z 17:347–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Roeckner E, Bäuml G, Bonaventura L, Brokopf R, Esch M, Giorgetta M, Hagemann S, Kornblueh L, Schlese U, Schulzweida U, Kirchner I, Manzini E, Rhodin A, Tompkins A (2003) The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM5, Report No. 349. Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  37. Root TL, Price JT, Hall KR, Schneider SH, Rosenzweig C, Pounds JA (2003) Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421:57–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schanze J, Trümper J, Burmeister C, Pavlik D, Kruhlov I (2011) A methodology for dealing with regional change in integrated water resources management. Environ Earth Sci 65(5):1405–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schönwiese C-D (2013) Praktische Statistik für Meteorologen und Geowissenschaftler. Gebrüder Bornträger. 5. Auflage. Stuttgart. BookGoogle Scholar
  40. Themeßl MJ, Gobiet A, Leuprecht A (2010) Empirical-statistical downscaling and error correction of daily precipitation from regional climate models. Int J Climatol 31:1530–1544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Trnka M, Zalud Z, Eitzinger J, Dubrovsky M (2005) Global solar radiation in Central European lowlands estimated by various empirical formulae. Agric For Meteorol 131:54–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. WHO (2004) Extreme weather and climate events and public health responses. Report on a WHO meeting, Bratislava, Slovakia, Feb. 2004, World Health Organisation, WHO regional office for Europe, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  43. Yilmaz KK, Gupta HV, Wagener T (2008) A process-based diagnostic approach to model evaluation: Application to the NWS distributed hydrologic model. Water Resour Res 44:9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zebisch M, Grothmann T, Schröter D, Hasse C, Fritsch U, Cramer W (2005) Klimawandel in Deutschland: Vulnerabilität und Anpassungsstrategien klimasensitiver Systeme. UBA, Climate Change 08/05. http://www.umweltdaten.de/publikationen/fpdf-l/2947.pdf. Accessed 26 June 2013

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Fischer
    • 1
  • T. Pluntke
    • 1
  • D. Pavlik
    • 1
  • C. Bernhofer
    • 1
  1. 1.Chair of Meteorology, Institute of Hydrology and MeteorologyTechnical University of DresdenTharandtGermany

Personalised recommendations