Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 72, Issue 6, pp 2141–2151 | Cite as

Three criteria reliability analyses for groundwater recharge estimations

  • Nara Somaratne
  • Keith Smettem
  • Jacqueline Frizenschaf
Original Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

There is a broad variety of methods to estimate groundwater recharge, but tools to assess the reliability of particular methods are not available. This paper introduces three distinct criteria to assess the reliability of recharge: applicability of the method used, availability of reliable data, and spatial coverage. Weightings of each criterion are assigned using key attributes present to total attributes required under each criterion. A reliability assessment was applied to two point-recharge and two diffuse-recharge dominated groundwater basins in South Australia. We show that the use of groundwater age based on chlorofluorocarbon and the conventional chloride mass balance method gives unreliable estimates of recharge in karstic aquifers, primarily due to inappropriate assumptions concerning the nature of recharge in these systems. Among the methods evaluated, watertable fluctuation, numerical groundwater modelling, Darcy flow calculation and the water budget method are applied to both point and diffuse recharge dominant groundwater basins. The reliability of these methods depends primarily on the quality of data and spatial coverage of the basin. Once the reliability level is known, water resources planners and managers assess the level of risk to aquifers, the environment, and the socio-economic development required for sustainable management of groundwater.

Keywords

Recharge Water resources planning Allocation Groundwater 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the editor, two anonymous reviewers, Dr. John Van Leeuwen, and Dr. Mushtaque Ahmed for their valuable comments, which helped to improve the original manuscript. We thank Brooke Swaffer for assistance with figures.

References

  1. ADWG (2011) Australian drinking water guidelines 6. National water quality management strategy, vol 1, Commonwealth of Australia 2011Google Scholar
  2. Bakalowicz M (2005) Karst groundwater: a challenge for new resources. Hydrogeol J 13:148–160. doi: 10.1007/s10040-004-0402-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bleys C (1966) Hydrogeology and aquifer characteristics of the Carribie basin. Department of Mines, South Australia. Report Bk. No. 63/44Google Scholar
  4. Bowering OJ (1972) Southern Yoke peninsula groundwater study: assessment of Para Wurlie basin. Department of Mines, South Australia. Report Bk No. 72/14Google Scholar
  5. Brown KG, Harrington GA (2002) The dynamic behaviour of a stressed, semi-arid groundwater basin, South Australia. Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation. Report DWLBC 2003/08Google Scholar
  6. Commonwealth of Australia (2002) Groundwater quality protection. Discussion paper, Natural Resources Management Standing Committee, Commonwealth of AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  7. Cook PG, Plummer LN, Soloman DK, Bussenberg E, Han LF (2006) Effects and processes that can modify apparent CFC age. In: Use of chlorofluorocarbons in hydrology: a guide book, Chap 4, pp 31–56. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna Google Scholar
  8. Covello VT, Merkhofer MW (1993) Risk assessment methods—approaches for assessing health and environmental risks. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Crosbie RS, Binning P, Kalma JD (2005) A time series approach to inferring groundwater recharge using the watertable fluctuation method. Water Resour Res. 41, W01008. doi: 10.1029/2004WR003077
  10. Davis A, Cahill K, Munday T (2012) Aquifer characterisation in the Uley South basin, South Australia, using NMR: final report. CSIRO technical report EP-31-01-12-14Google Scholar
  11. Denis K (1989) Coffin Bay town water supply—Geological survey. Department of Mines and Energy. Rept. Bk. No. 89/9Google Scholar
  12. Deposit Insurance Corporation of Ontario (2011) Enterprise risk management: application guide. Deposit Insurance Corporation of OntarioGoogle Scholar
  13. Dong WH, Kang B, Du SH, Shi XF (2013) Estimation of shallow groundwater ages and circulation rates in the Henan Plain, China: CFC ages and deuterium excess methods. Geosci J. doi: 10.1007/s12303-013-0037-8
  14. Evans SL (1997) Estimating long-term recharge to thin, unconfined carbonate aquifers using conventional and environmental isotopes techniques: Eyre Peninsula, South Australia. Masters thesis, Flinders University of South Australia (unpublished)Google Scholar
  15. Green CH, Agnew JE, Fife IA (2003) Risk assessment for a radionuclide area. Nucl Med Commun 24:1017–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harbaugh AW, Banta ER, Hill MC, McDonald MG (2000) MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular groundwater model: user guide to modularization concepts and the groundwater flow process. U.S Geological Survey, open file report 00-92Google Scholar
  17. Harrington N, Zulfic D, Wohling D (2006) Uley basin groundwater modelling project, vol 1: Project overview and conceptual model development. DWLBC report 2006/01, Government of South AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  18. Healy RW, Cook PG (2002) Using groundwater levels to estimate recharge. Hydrogeol J 10:91–109. doi: 10.1007/s10040-001-0178-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hutton JT (1976) Chloride in rainwater in relation to distance from the ocean. Search 7:207–208Google Scholar
  20. Kaplan S (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal 1:11–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lanevin CD, Shoemaker B, Guo W (2000) SEAWAT-2000: a version of MODFLOW-2000 with the variable density flow process and the Integrated MT3DMS transport process. U.S Geological Survey Office of GroundwaterGoogle Scholar
  22. Lerch RN, Wicks CM, Moss PL (2005) Hydrologic characterization of two karst recharge areas in Boone County, Missouri. J Cave Karst Stud 67(3):158–173Google Scholar
  23. Lerner DN, Issar AS, Simmers I (1990) Groundwater recharge, a guide to understanding and estimating natural recharge. Report 8, International Association of Hydrogeologists, Kenilworth, 345 pp Google Scholar
  24. Lindhe A (2010) Risk assessment and decision support for managing drinking water systems. Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  25. Middlemis H, Merrick N, Ross J (2000) Murray–Darling Basin Commission groundwater flow modelling guideline. Project no. 125, Aquaterra Consulting Pty Ltd, Perth, 133 ppGoogle Scholar
  26. Mogharreban N (2006) Adoption of a cluster discovery technique to a decision support system. Interdiscip J Inf Knowl Manag 1:59–68Google Scholar
  27. Moon SK, Woo NC, Lee KS (2004) Statistical analysis of hydrograph and watertable fluctuation to estimate groundwater recharge. J Hydrol 292:198–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Office of the Fire Commissioner (2002) Hazard analysis and risk assessment. Office of the Fire Commissioner, BrandonGoogle Scholar
  29. Ordens CM, Werner AD, Post VEA, Hutson JL, Simmons CT, Irvine BM (2012) Groundwater recharge to a sedimentary aquifer in the topographically closed Uley South basin, South Australia. Hydrogeol J 20:61–72. doi: 10.007/s10040-011-0794-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pattle Delamore Partners Ltd (2001) Risk screening system for contaminated sites. Prepared for Sustainable management fund—New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  31. Plummer LN, Busenberg E, Cook PG (2006a) Principles of chlorofluorocarbon dating. In: Use of chlorofluorocarbons in hydrology: a guide book, Chap 3, pp 17–29. International Atomic Energy Agency, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  32. Plummer LN, Busenberg E, Han LF (2006b) Data interpretation in representative cases. In: Use of chlorofluorocarbons in hydrology: a guide book, Chap 8, pp 105–130. International Atomic Energy Agency, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  33. Plummer LN, Busenberg E, Han LF (2006c) CFCs in binary mixtures of young and old groundwater. In: Use of chlorofluorocarbons in hydrology: a guide book, Chap 5, pp 59–71. International Atomic Energy Agency, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  34. Punthakey JF, Prathapar SA, Somaratne NM (1992) Pumpman: optimizing pumping rates to control shallow watertables in the Wakool irrigation district. Technical report TS 92.088, NSW Department of Water ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  35. Scanlon BR, Healy RW, Cook PG (2002) Choosing appropriate techniques for quantifying groundwater recharge. Hydrogeol J 10:18–39. doi: 10.1007/s10040-001-0176-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sharma ML (1989) Groundwater recharge. AA Balkema, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  37. Sibenaler XP (1980) Southern Yoke Peninsula groundwater investigations, Para Wurlie basin. Report no. 2, Department of Mines and Energy, South Australia. Report Bk. No. 80/45Google Scholar
  38. Simmers I (ed) (1988) Estimation of natural groundwater recharge. Reidel, BostonGoogle Scholar
  39. Simmers I (ed) (1997) Recharge of phreatic aquifers in (semi-)arid areas. AA Balkema, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  40. Somaratne NM (1997) Wadi Safwaan groundwater model. Ministry of Water Resources, Sultanate of Oman (unpublished)Google Scholar
  41. Somaratne N (2005) Warooka and Point Turton water supply: resource assessment and sustainable management plan for Para Wurlie and Carribie basins. SA Water 2005/3, South Australian Water Corporation (unpublished)Google Scholar
  42. Somaratne N (2006) Streaky Bay groundwater model. SA Water unpublished groundwater modelGoogle Scholar
  43. Somaratne N (2013) Hydrogeology of the Uley South basin. SA Water 2013/1, South Australian Water Corporation (unpublished)Google Scholar
  44. Somaratne NM, Lawson L (2007) Nangwarry groundwater model. South Australian Water Corporation (unpublished)Google Scholar
  45. Somaratne NM, Punthakey JF, Carr RS, Watson KK (1994a) Simulation of catchment processes for the Berriquin irrigation district using the SHE Model. NSW Department of Water Resources, Technical Services DivisionGoogle Scholar
  46. Somaratne NM, Punthakey JF, Wooley D, Williams RM, Ross JB (1994b) Lower Gwydir Valley groundwater model. Technical report TS 94.031, NSW Department of Water ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  47. Somaratne N, Zulfic H, Swaffer B, Ashman G (2009) Coffin Bay lens A—resource assessment. Report no. SA Water 2009/1, South Australian Water Corporation (unpublished)Google Scholar
  48. Somaratne N, Zulfic H, Frizenschaf J, Lasslett S (2011) Review of status of groundwater in Para Wurlie and Carribie basins. South Australian Water Corporation (unpublished)Google Scholar
  49. Somaratne N, Zulfic H, Ashman G, Vial H, Swaffer B, Frizenschaf J (2013) Groundwater risk assessment model (GRAM): groundwater risk assessment model for wellfield protection. Water 5:1419–1439. doi: 10.3390/w5031419 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Steele K, Carmel Y, Cross J, Wilcox C (2008) Uses and misuses of multi-criteria analysis (MCDA) in environmental decision making. Australian Centre of Excellence for Risk Analysis. 05 Attachment, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  51. Taylor CJ, Greene EA (2008) Hydrogeologic characterization and methods used in the investigation of karst hydrology. In: Rosenberry DO, LaBaugh JW (eds) Field techniques for estimating water fluxes between surface water and groundwater, chap 3. Techniques and methods 4-D2. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
  52. The University of Melbourne (2004) Risk assessment 2D and 3D models. EHS manual, The University of Melbourne. www.cab.unimelb.edu.au/pdf/ra11.pdf. Accessed 13 Feb 2012
  53. Troldborg M (2010) Risk assessment models and uncertainty estimation of groundwater contamination from point sources. PhD thesis, DTU Environment, Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  54. Ward JD, Hutson J, Howe B, Fildes S, Werner AD, Ewenz C (2010) A modelling framework for the assessment of recharge processes and climate change. Report developed through the Eyre Peninsula Groundwater Allocation and Planning ProjectGoogle Scholar
  55. Watermark Numerical Computing (2004) PEST-model independent parameter estimation. User manual, 5th ednGoogle Scholar
  56. Weissmann GS, Zhang Y, LaBolle EM, Fogg GE (2002) Dispersion of groundwater age in an alluvial aquifer system. Water Resour Res 38:1198. doi: 10.1029/2001WR000907 Google Scholar
  57. Werner AD (2010) A groundwater flow model of Uley South basin. Flinders University of South Australia, South AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  58. White WB (2003) Conceptual model for karstic aquifers. Speleogenes Evol Karst Aquifers Virtual Sci J 1(1):P2. Available at http://www.speleogenesis.info. Accessed 13 Feb 2013
  59. WHO and FAO (2009) Risk characterization of microbiological hazards in food. Microbiological risk assessment series 17. World Health Organization and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsGoogle Scholar
  60. Wood WW (1999) Use and misuse of the chloride mass balance method in estimating groundwater recharge. Technical commentary. Groundwater 37(1): 2–3 Google Scholar
  61. Wood WW, Sanford WE (1995) Chemical and isotopic methods for quantifying groundwater recharge in a regional semi-arid environment. Ground Water 33(3):458–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wu JC, Zeng XK (2013) Review of the uncertainty analysis of groundwater numerical simulations. China Sci Bull 58:3044–3052. doi: 10.1007/s11434-013-5950-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zulfic D, Harrington N, Evans S (2007) Uley basin groundwater modelling project, vol 2: Groundwater flow model. DWLBC report 2007/04, Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation, South AustraliaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nara Somaratne
    • 1
  • Keith Smettem
    • 2
  • Jacqueline Frizenschaf
    • 1
  1. 1.South Australian Water CorporationAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Environmental Dynamics and Ecohydrology, School of Environmental Systems EngineeringUniversity of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations